Reasons for Electronic Nicotine Delivery System use and smoking abstinence at 6 months: a descriptive study of callers to employer and health plan-sponsored quitlines

ObjectiveDescribe cigarette smoking abstinence among employer and health plan-sponsored quitline registrants who were not using Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS), were using ENDS to quit smoking or were using ENDS for other reasons at the time of quitline registration.MethodsWe examined 60...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Tobacco control 2017-03, Vol.26 (2), p.126-134
Hauptverfasser: Vickerman, K A, Schauer, G L, Malarcher, A M, Zhang, L, Mowery, P, Nash, C M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 134
container_issue 2
container_start_page 126
container_title Tobacco control
container_volume 26
creator Vickerman, K A
Schauer, G L
Malarcher, A M
Zhang, L
Mowery, P
Nash, C M
description ObjectiveDescribe cigarette smoking abstinence among employer and health plan-sponsored quitline registrants who were not using Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS), were using ENDS to quit smoking or were using ENDS for other reasons at the time of quitline registration.MethodsWe examined 6029 quitline callers aged ≥18 years who smoked cigarettes at registration, and completed ≥1 counselling calls, baseline ENDS use questions and a 6-month follow-up survey (response rate: 52.4%). 30-day point prevalence smoking quit rates (PPQRs) were assessed at 6-month follow-up (ENDS-only users were considered quit). Data were weighted for non-response bias. Logistic regression analyses controlled for participant characteristics and programme engagement.ResultsAt registration, 13.8% of respondents used ENDS (7.9% to quit smoking, 5.9% for other reasons). 30-day PPQRs were: 55.1% for callers using ENDS to quit, 43.1% for callers using ENDS for other reasons, and 50.8% for callers not using ENDS at registration. Callers using ENDS for other reasons were less likely to quit than other groups (adjusted ORs=0.65–0.77); quit rates did not significantly differ between non-ENDS users and those using ENDS to quit. Among callers using ENDS to quit at baseline, 40% used ENDS regularly at follow-up.ConclusionsENDS users not using ENDS to quit smoking were less successful at quitting at 6-month follow-up compared with callers using ENDS to quit smoking and callers who did not use ENDS at programme registration. Incorporating reasons for ENDS use may be important for future studies examining the role of ENDS in tobacco cessation.
doi_str_mv 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052734
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1826668062</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>44652342</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>44652342</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b415t-523bd56b6cd9f6fe31284e6c90feb228b8ba54726553fd3e768ba26372d202da3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkctu1TAQhiMEoofCI4As2LAJ-J6c7qq2XKQKJC7ryHYmnBycOPU4SNl1w7vwXDwJPqRUgh2rkWa--efX_EXxlNEXjAn9MgVrnAsujCkGX3LKVEkVr4S8U2yY1HUpBKvvFhu61bKUSouj4gHinlImKsXuF0e8ohWrBNsUPz6AwTAi6UIkFx5clhx7R971LqR-BHIOvv8GcSEfF0wwkBmBmLElOISv_fiFGIsHbnS5nYj-ef19yL52eEIMaQFd7KeUBQimuV1I6Igz3kNEkgKBYfJhgfhbcAfGpx2ZvBlLnLKlEKElV3OffNbHh8W9zniERzf1uPj86uLT2Zvy8v3rt2enl6WVTKVScWFbpa127bbTHQjGawnabWkHlvPa1tYoWXGtlOhaAZXODa5FxVtOeWvEcfF81Z1iuJoBUzP06MBnWxBmbFjNtdY11Tyjz_5B92GOY3aXqUoIUVesztTJSrkYECN0zRT7wcSlYbQ55Nn8nWdzyLNZ88zLT25OzHaA9nb1T4AZeLwCe0wh3s6l1PkT8uBRrXM77P_n8C-zDcA4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1873338718</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reasons for Electronic Nicotine Delivery System use and smoking abstinence at 6 months: a descriptive study of callers to employer and health plan-sponsored quitlines</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Vickerman, K A ; Schauer, G L ; Malarcher, A M ; Zhang, L ; Mowery, P ; Nash, C M</creator><creatorcontrib>Vickerman, K A ; Schauer, G L ; Malarcher, A M ; Zhang, L ; Mowery, P ; Nash, C M</creatorcontrib><description>ObjectiveDescribe cigarette smoking abstinence among employer and health plan-sponsored quitline registrants who were not using Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS), were using ENDS to quit smoking or were using ENDS for other reasons at the time of quitline registration.MethodsWe examined 6029 quitline callers aged ≥18 years who smoked cigarettes at registration, and completed ≥1 counselling calls, baseline ENDS use questions and a 6-month follow-up survey (response rate: 52.4%). 30-day point prevalence smoking quit rates (PPQRs) were assessed at 6-month follow-up (ENDS-only users were considered quit). Data were weighted for non-response bias. Logistic regression analyses controlled for participant characteristics and programme engagement.ResultsAt registration, 13.8% of respondents used ENDS (7.9% to quit smoking, 5.9% for other reasons). 30-day PPQRs were: 55.1% for callers using ENDS to quit, 43.1% for callers using ENDS for other reasons, and 50.8% for callers not using ENDS at registration. Callers using ENDS for other reasons were less likely to quit than other groups (adjusted ORs=0.65–0.77); quit rates did not significantly differ between non-ENDS users and those using ENDS to quit. Among callers using ENDS to quit at baseline, 40% used ENDS regularly at follow-up.ConclusionsENDS users not using ENDS to quit smoking were less successful at quitting at 6-month follow-up compared with callers using ENDS to quit smoking and callers who did not use ENDS at programme registration. Incorporating reasons for ENDS use may be important for future studies examining the role of ENDS in tobacco cessation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0964-4563</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-3318</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052734</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27071731</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BMJ Publishing Group</publisher><subject>Abstinence ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Cardiovascular disease ; Cigarettes ; Clinical trials ; Cohort analysis ; Counseling ; Cross-sectional studies ; Electronic cigarettes ; Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Health Benefit Plans, Employee ; Hotlines ; Humans ; Logistic Models ; Male ; Manufacturing ; Medicaid ; Middle Aged ; Nicotine ; Public health ; Registration ; Smoking ; Smoking - epidemiology ; Smoking cessation ; Smoking Cessation - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Tobacco ; Transdermal medication ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Tobacco control, 2017-03, Vol.26 (2), p.126-134</ispartof><rights>Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing</rights><rights>2017 BMJ Publishing Group</rights><rights>Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.</rights><rights>Copyright: 2016 Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b415t-523bd56b6cd9f6fe31284e6c90feb228b8ba54726553fd3e768ba26372d202da3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b415t-523bd56b6cd9f6fe31284e6c90feb228b8ba54726553fd3e768ba26372d202da3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4450-912X ; 0000-0001-9418-168X ; 0000-0002-3719-8087 ; 0000-0003-3642-5265</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44652342$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/44652342$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27903,27904,57995,58228</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27071731$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vickerman, K A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schauer, G L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malarcher, A M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mowery, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nash, C M</creatorcontrib><title>Reasons for Electronic Nicotine Delivery System use and smoking abstinence at 6 months: a descriptive study of callers to employer and health plan-sponsored quitlines</title><title>Tobacco control</title><addtitle>Tob Control</addtitle><description>ObjectiveDescribe cigarette smoking abstinence among employer and health plan-sponsored quitline registrants who were not using Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS), were using ENDS to quit smoking or were using ENDS for other reasons at the time of quitline registration.MethodsWe examined 6029 quitline callers aged ≥18 years who smoked cigarettes at registration, and completed ≥1 counselling calls, baseline ENDS use questions and a 6-month follow-up survey (response rate: 52.4%). 30-day point prevalence smoking quit rates (PPQRs) were assessed at 6-month follow-up (ENDS-only users were considered quit). Data were weighted for non-response bias. Logistic regression analyses controlled for participant characteristics and programme engagement.ResultsAt registration, 13.8% of respondents used ENDS (7.9% to quit smoking, 5.9% for other reasons). 30-day PPQRs were: 55.1% for callers using ENDS to quit, 43.1% for callers using ENDS for other reasons, and 50.8% for callers not using ENDS at registration. Callers using ENDS for other reasons were less likely to quit than other groups (adjusted ORs=0.65–0.77); quit rates did not significantly differ between non-ENDS users and those using ENDS to quit. Among callers using ENDS to quit at baseline, 40% used ENDS regularly at follow-up.ConclusionsENDS users not using ENDS to quit smoking were less successful at quitting at 6-month follow-up compared with callers using ENDS to quit smoking and callers who did not use ENDS at programme registration. Incorporating reasons for ENDS use may be important for future studies examining the role of ENDS in tobacco cessation.</description><subject>Abstinence</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Cardiovascular disease</subject><subject>Cigarettes</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Cohort analysis</subject><subject>Counseling</subject><subject>Cross-sectional studies</subject><subject>Electronic cigarettes</subject><subject>Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Health Benefit Plans, Employee</subject><subject>Hotlines</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Logistic Models</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Manufacturing</subject><subject>Medicaid</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nicotine</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Registration</subject><subject>Smoking</subject><subject>Smoking - epidemiology</subject><subject>Smoking cessation</subject><subject>Smoking Cessation - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Tobacco</subject><subject>Transdermal medication</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0964-4563</issn><issn>1468-3318</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkctu1TAQhiMEoofCI4As2LAJ-J6c7qq2XKQKJC7ryHYmnBycOPU4SNl1w7vwXDwJPqRUgh2rkWa--efX_EXxlNEXjAn9MgVrnAsujCkGX3LKVEkVr4S8U2yY1HUpBKvvFhu61bKUSouj4gHinlImKsXuF0e8ohWrBNsUPz6AwTAi6UIkFx5clhx7R971LqR-BHIOvv8GcSEfF0wwkBmBmLElOISv_fiFGIsHbnS5nYj-ef19yL52eEIMaQFd7KeUBQimuV1I6Igz3kNEkgKBYfJhgfhbcAfGpx2ZvBlLnLKlEKElV3OffNbHh8W9zniERzf1uPj86uLT2Zvy8v3rt2enl6WVTKVScWFbpa127bbTHQjGawnabWkHlvPa1tYoWXGtlOhaAZXODa5FxVtOeWvEcfF81Z1iuJoBUzP06MBnWxBmbFjNtdY11Tyjz_5B92GOY3aXqUoIUVesztTJSrkYECN0zRT7wcSlYbQ55Nn8nWdzyLNZ88zLT25OzHaA9nb1T4AZeLwCe0wh3s6l1PkT8uBRrXM77P_n8C-zDcA4</recordid><startdate>201703</startdate><enddate>201703</enddate><creator>Vickerman, K A</creator><creator>Schauer, G L</creator><creator>Malarcher, A M</creator><creator>Zhang, L</creator><creator>Mowery, P</creator><creator>Nash, C M</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>883</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0F</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4450-912X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9418-168X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3719-8087</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3642-5265</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201703</creationdate><title>Reasons for Electronic Nicotine Delivery System use and smoking abstinence at 6 months: a descriptive study of callers to employer and health plan-sponsored quitlines</title><author>Vickerman, K A ; Schauer, G L ; Malarcher, A M ; Zhang, L ; Mowery, P ; Nash, C M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b415t-523bd56b6cd9f6fe31284e6c90feb228b8ba54726553fd3e768ba26372d202da3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Abstinence</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Cardiovascular disease</topic><topic>Cigarettes</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Cohort analysis</topic><topic>Counseling</topic><topic>Cross-sectional studies</topic><topic>Electronic cigarettes</topic><topic>Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Health Benefit Plans, Employee</topic><topic>Hotlines</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Logistic Models</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Manufacturing</topic><topic>Medicaid</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nicotine</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Registration</topic><topic>Smoking</topic><topic>Smoking - epidemiology</topic><topic>Smoking cessation</topic><topic>Smoking Cessation - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Tobacco</topic><topic>Transdermal medication</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vickerman, K A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schauer, G L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malarcher, A M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mowery, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nash, C M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade &amp; Industry (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade &amp; Industry</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Tobacco control</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vickerman, K A</au><au>Schauer, G L</au><au>Malarcher, A M</au><au>Zhang, L</au><au>Mowery, P</au><au>Nash, C M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reasons for Electronic Nicotine Delivery System use and smoking abstinence at 6 months: a descriptive study of callers to employer and health plan-sponsored quitlines</atitle><jtitle>Tobacco control</jtitle><addtitle>Tob Control</addtitle><date>2017-03</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>126</spage><epage>134</epage><pages>126-134</pages><issn>0964-4563</issn><eissn>1468-3318</eissn><abstract>ObjectiveDescribe cigarette smoking abstinence among employer and health plan-sponsored quitline registrants who were not using Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS), were using ENDS to quit smoking or were using ENDS for other reasons at the time of quitline registration.MethodsWe examined 6029 quitline callers aged ≥18 years who smoked cigarettes at registration, and completed ≥1 counselling calls, baseline ENDS use questions and a 6-month follow-up survey (response rate: 52.4%). 30-day point prevalence smoking quit rates (PPQRs) were assessed at 6-month follow-up (ENDS-only users were considered quit). Data were weighted for non-response bias. Logistic regression analyses controlled for participant characteristics and programme engagement.ResultsAt registration, 13.8% of respondents used ENDS (7.9% to quit smoking, 5.9% for other reasons). 30-day PPQRs were: 55.1% for callers using ENDS to quit, 43.1% for callers using ENDS for other reasons, and 50.8% for callers not using ENDS at registration. Callers using ENDS for other reasons were less likely to quit than other groups (adjusted ORs=0.65–0.77); quit rates did not significantly differ between non-ENDS users and those using ENDS to quit. Among callers using ENDS to quit at baseline, 40% used ENDS regularly at follow-up.ConclusionsENDS users not using ENDS to quit smoking were less successful at quitting at 6-month follow-up compared with callers using ENDS to quit smoking and callers who did not use ENDS at programme registration. Incorporating reasons for ENDS use may be important for future studies examining the role of ENDS in tobacco cessation.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group</pub><pmid>27071731</pmid><doi>10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052734</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4450-912X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9418-168X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3719-8087</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3642-5265</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0964-4563
ispartof Tobacco control, 2017-03, Vol.26 (2), p.126-134
issn 0964-4563
1468-3318
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1826668062
source Jstor Complete Legacy; MEDLINE
subjects Abstinence
Adolescent
Adult
Cardiovascular disease
Cigarettes
Clinical trials
Cohort analysis
Counseling
Cross-sectional studies
Electronic cigarettes
Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems - statistics & numerical data
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Health Benefit Plans, Employee
Hotlines
Humans
Logistic Models
Male
Manufacturing
Medicaid
Middle Aged
Nicotine
Public health
Registration
Smoking
Smoking - epidemiology
Smoking cessation
Smoking Cessation - statistics & numerical data
Surveys and Questionnaires
Tobacco
Transdermal medication
Young Adult
title Reasons for Electronic Nicotine Delivery System use and smoking abstinence at 6 months: a descriptive study of callers to employer and health plan-sponsored quitlines
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T23%3A36%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reasons%20for%20Electronic%20Nicotine%20Delivery%20System%20use%20and%20smoking%20abstinence%20at%206%E2%80%85months:%20a%20descriptive%20study%20of%20callers%20to%20employer%20and%20health%20plan-sponsored%20quitlines&rft.jtitle=Tobacco%20control&rft.au=Vickerman,%20K%20A&rft.date=2017-03&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=126&rft.epage=134&rft.pages=126-134&rft.issn=0964-4563&rft.eissn=1468-3318&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052734&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E44652342%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1873338718&rft_id=info:pmid/27071731&rft_jstor_id=44652342&rfr_iscdi=true