Second vs. First generation drug eluting stents in multiple vessel disease and left main stenosis: Two‐year follow‐up of the observational, prospective, controlled, and multicenter ERACI IV registry
Objective To compare second generation drug eluting stents (2DES) with first generation (1DES) for the treatment of patients (pts) with multiple coronary vessel disease (MVD). Background Although 2DES improved safety and efficacy compared to 1DES, MVD remains a challenge for percutaneous coronary in...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions 2017-01, Vol.89 (1), p.37-46 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objective
To compare second generation drug eluting stents (2DES) with first generation (1DES) for the treatment of patients (pts) with multiple coronary vessel disease (MVD).
Background
Although 2DES improved safety and efficacy compared to 1DES, MVD remains a challenge for percutaneous coronary interventions.
Methods
ERACI IV was a prospective, observational, and controlled study in pts with MVD including left main and treated with 2DES (Firebird 2, Microport). We included 225 pts in 15 sites from Argentina. Primary endpoint was the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACCE) defined as death, myocardial infarction (MI), cerebrovascular accident (CVA) and unplanned revascularization; and to compare with 225 pts from ERACI III study (1DES). PCI strategy was planned to treat lesions ≥70% in vessels ≥ 2.00 mm, introducing a modified Syntax score (SS) where severe lesions in vessels |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1522-1946 1522-726X |
DOI: | 10.1002/ccd.26468 |