Oral nutritional supplements in a randomised trial are more effective than dietary advice at improving quality of life in malnourished care home residents

Summary Background & aims Few trials have explored the effect of nutrition support on quality of life (QoL). This study examined the effects of oral nutritional supplements (ONS) vs dietary advice on QoL in malnourished care home residents. Methods 104 malnourished, care home residents (medium +...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland) Scotland), 2017-02, Vol.36 (1), p.134-142
Hauptverfasser: Parsons, Emma L, Stratton, Rebecca J, Cawood, Abbie L, Smith, Trevor R, Elia, Marinos
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 142
container_issue 1
container_start_page 134
container_title Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland)
container_volume 36
creator Parsons, Emma L
Stratton, Rebecca J
Cawood, Abbie L
Smith, Trevor R
Elia, Marinos
description Summary Background & aims Few trials have explored the effect of nutrition support on quality of life (QoL). This study examined the effects of oral nutritional supplements (ONS) vs dietary advice on QoL in malnourished care home residents. Methods 104 malnourished, care home residents (medium + high risk), identified using the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (‘MUST’), (mean age 88.5 ± 7.9y) were randomised to receive either oral nutritional supplements (ONS) (n = 53) or dietary advice (n = 51) for 12 weeks. Dietary intake was measured using 24 h dietary recall, and QoL assessed using EuroQol (EQ-5D), including time trade off (TTO) (range −0.59 to 1) and visual analogue scale (VAS) (score 0 to 100) for self-perceived health. Results QoL (adjusted for baseline QOL, malnutrition risk, type of care received (nursing or residential)) was significantly higher in the ONS than the dietary advice group (intention to treat analysis at week 12; n = 104 ). EQ-5D TTO scores (mean ± SE) were 0.50 ± 0.04 vs 0.36 ± 0.05 ( P  = 0.005), VAS rescaled scores were 0.54 + 0.03 vs 0.046 + 0.03 (P = 0.006) and VAS scores were 61.3 ± 4.5 vs 54.6 ± 6.3 ( P  = 0.533) for ONS vs dietary advice respectively. Total energy, protein and the majority of micronutrient intakes were significantly greater in the ONS group, with energy intake being 423 kcal greater in the ONS than the dietary advice group at week 12. Conclusions This study in malnourished care home residents indicates that ONS can improve QoL and nutritional intake more effectively than dietary advice alone. Clinical Trial Registry This trial was registered with clinicaltrials.gov on 10th August 2007. Clinical trials identifier is NCT00515125 http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00515125?term=nutrition+support&rank=60.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.clnu.2016.01.002
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1826659061</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0261561416000030</els_id><sourcerecordid>1826659061</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-3b536485fb275f0abc34b9491a17231f465949b4c73409ada337445870cf96c93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9ksuO1DAQRS0EYpqBH2CBvGST4FecREJIaMRLGmkWwNpynArtxrF77KSl_hW-lop6YMGCjR_SrWPfukXIS85qzrh-c6hdiGst8FwzXjMmHpEdb6SoeN_Jx2THhOZVo7m6Is9KOTDGGtl2T8mV0J1qe9XuyK-7bAON65L94lPEc1mPxwAzxKVQH6ml2cYxzb7ASFGFCpuBzgkXmCZwiz8BXfY20tHDYvOZ2vHkHVC7UD8fczr5-IPerzb45UzTRIOfYCPPNsS0Zl_2SHYbdJ9moBmKH7fXn5Mnkw0FXjzs1-T7xw_fbj5Xt3efvty8v62c4nyp5NBIrbpmGkTbTMwOTqqhVz23vBWST0o3eBuUa6VivR2tlK1STdcyN_Xa9fKavL5w8a_3K5TFoFkHIdgIaS2Gd0Ijg2mOUnGRupxKyTCZY_YzejacmS0TczBbJmbLxDBuMBMsevXAX4cZxr8lf0JAwduLANDlyUM2xXmIDkafsb9mTP7__Hf_lLvgo3c2_IQzlAP2GHNFH6YIw8zXbSq2oeAaB4JJJn8DOlm0ow</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1826659061</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Oral nutritional supplements in a randomised trial are more effective than dietary advice at improving quality of life in malnourished care home residents</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Parsons, Emma L ; Stratton, Rebecca J ; Cawood, Abbie L ; Smith, Trevor R ; Elia, Marinos</creator><creatorcontrib>Parsons, Emma L ; Stratton, Rebecca J ; Cawood, Abbie L ; Smith, Trevor R ; Elia, Marinos</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Background &amp; aims Few trials have explored the effect of nutrition support on quality of life (QoL). This study examined the effects of oral nutritional supplements (ONS) vs dietary advice on QoL in malnourished care home residents. Methods 104 malnourished, care home residents (medium + high risk), identified using the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (‘MUST’), (mean age 88.5 ± 7.9y) were randomised to receive either oral nutritional supplements (ONS) (n = 53) or dietary advice (n = 51) for 12 weeks. Dietary intake was measured using 24 h dietary recall, and QoL assessed using EuroQol (EQ-5D), including time trade off (TTO) (range −0.59 to 1) and visual analogue scale (VAS) (score 0 to 100) for self-perceived health. Results QoL (adjusted for baseline QOL, malnutrition risk, type of care received (nursing or residential)) was significantly higher in the ONS than the dietary advice group (intention to treat analysis at week 12; n = 104 ). EQ-5D TTO scores (mean ± SE) were 0.50 ± 0.04 vs 0.36 ± 0.05 ( P  = 0.005), VAS rescaled scores were 0.54 + 0.03 vs 0.046 + 0.03 (P = 0.006) and VAS scores were 61.3 ± 4.5 vs 54.6 ± 6.3 ( P  = 0.533) for ONS vs dietary advice respectively. Total energy, protein and the majority of micronutrient intakes were significantly greater in the ONS group, with energy intake being 423 kcal greater in the ONS than the dietary advice group at week 12. Conclusions This study in malnourished care home residents indicates that ONS can improve QoL and nutritional intake more effectively than dietary advice alone. Clinical Trial Registry This trial was registered with clinicaltrials.gov on 10th August 2007. Clinical trials identifier is NCT00515125 http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00515125?term=nutrition+support&amp;rank=60.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0261-5614</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-1983</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2016.01.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26847947</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Administration, Oral ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Body Mass Index ; Care home ; Counseling ; Diet ; Dietary Proteins - administration &amp; dosage ; Dietary Supplements ; Elderly ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Gastroenterology and Hepatology ; Humans ; Male ; Malnutrition ; Malnutrition - drug therapy ; Mental Recall ; Micronutrients - administration &amp; dosage ; Nutrition Assessment ; Nutritional Status ; Quality of Life ; Risk Factors ; Supplement ; Weight Loss</subject><ispartof>Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland), 2017-02, Vol.36 (1), p.134-142</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism</rights><rights>2016 Elsevier Ltd and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-3b536485fb275f0abc34b9491a17231f465949b4c73409ada337445870cf96c93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-3b536485fb275f0abc34b9491a17231f465949b4c73409ada337445870cf96c93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2016.01.002$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26847947$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Parsons, Emma L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stratton, Rebecca J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cawood, Abbie L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Trevor R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elia, Marinos</creatorcontrib><title>Oral nutritional supplements in a randomised trial are more effective than dietary advice at improving quality of life in malnourished care home residents</title><title>Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland)</title><addtitle>Clin Nutr</addtitle><description>Summary Background &amp; aims Few trials have explored the effect of nutrition support on quality of life (QoL). This study examined the effects of oral nutritional supplements (ONS) vs dietary advice on QoL in malnourished care home residents. Methods 104 malnourished, care home residents (medium + high risk), identified using the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (‘MUST’), (mean age 88.5 ± 7.9y) were randomised to receive either oral nutritional supplements (ONS) (n = 53) or dietary advice (n = 51) for 12 weeks. Dietary intake was measured using 24 h dietary recall, and QoL assessed using EuroQol (EQ-5D), including time trade off (TTO) (range −0.59 to 1) and visual analogue scale (VAS) (score 0 to 100) for self-perceived health. Results QoL (adjusted for baseline QOL, malnutrition risk, type of care received (nursing or residential)) was significantly higher in the ONS than the dietary advice group (intention to treat analysis at week 12; n = 104 ). EQ-5D TTO scores (mean ± SE) were 0.50 ± 0.04 vs 0.36 ± 0.05 ( P  = 0.005), VAS rescaled scores were 0.54 + 0.03 vs 0.046 + 0.03 (P = 0.006) and VAS scores were 61.3 ± 4.5 vs 54.6 ± 6.3 ( P  = 0.533) for ONS vs dietary advice respectively. Total energy, protein and the majority of micronutrient intakes were significantly greater in the ONS group, with energy intake being 423 kcal greater in the ONS than the dietary advice group at week 12. Conclusions This study in malnourished care home residents indicates that ONS can improve QoL and nutritional intake more effectively than dietary advice alone. Clinical Trial Registry This trial was registered with clinicaltrials.gov on 10th August 2007. Clinical trials identifier is NCT00515125 http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00515125?term=nutrition+support&amp;rank=60.</description><subject>Administration, Oral</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Body Mass Index</subject><subject>Care home</subject><subject>Counseling</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Dietary Proteins - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Dietary Supplements</subject><subject>Elderly</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Gastroenterology and Hepatology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Malnutrition</subject><subject>Malnutrition - drug therapy</subject><subject>Mental Recall</subject><subject>Micronutrients - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Nutrition Assessment</subject><subject>Nutritional Status</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Supplement</subject><subject>Weight Loss</subject><issn>0261-5614</issn><issn>1532-1983</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9ksuO1DAQRS0EYpqBH2CBvGST4FecREJIaMRLGmkWwNpynArtxrF77KSl_hW-lop6YMGCjR_SrWPfukXIS85qzrh-c6hdiGst8FwzXjMmHpEdb6SoeN_Jx2THhOZVo7m6Is9KOTDGGtl2T8mV0J1qe9XuyK-7bAON65L94lPEc1mPxwAzxKVQH6ml2cYxzb7ASFGFCpuBzgkXmCZwiz8BXfY20tHDYvOZ2vHkHVC7UD8fczr5-IPerzb45UzTRIOfYCPPNsS0Zl_2SHYbdJ9moBmKH7fXn5Mnkw0FXjzs1-T7xw_fbj5Xt3efvty8v62c4nyp5NBIrbpmGkTbTMwOTqqhVz23vBWST0o3eBuUa6VivR2tlK1STdcyN_Xa9fKavL5w8a_3K5TFoFkHIdgIaS2Gd0Ijg2mOUnGRupxKyTCZY_YzejacmS0TczBbJmbLxDBuMBMsevXAX4cZxr8lf0JAwduLANDlyUM2xXmIDkafsb9mTP7__Hf_lLvgo3c2_IQzlAP2GHNFH6YIw8zXbSq2oeAaB4JJJn8DOlm0ow</recordid><startdate>20170201</startdate><enddate>20170201</enddate><creator>Parsons, Emma L</creator><creator>Stratton, Rebecca J</creator><creator>Cawood, Abbie L</creator><creator>Smith, Trevor R</creator><creator>Elia, Marinos</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170201</creationdate><title>Oral nutritional supplements in a randomised trial are more effective than dietary advice at improving quality of life in malnourished care home residents</title><author>Parsons, Emma L ; Stratton, Rebecca J ; Cawood, Abbie L ; Smith, Trevor R ; Elia, Marinos</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-3b536485fb275f0abc34b9491a17231f465949b4c73409ada337445870cf96c93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Administration, Oral</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Body Mass Index</topic><topic>Care home</topic><topic>Counseling</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Dietary Proteins - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Dietary Supplements</topic><topic>Elderly</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Gastroenterology and Hepatology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Malnutrition</topic><topic>Malnutrition - drug therapy</topic><topic>Mental Recall</topic><topic>Micronutrients - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Nutrition Assessment</topic><topic>Nutritional Status</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Supplement</topic><topic>Weight Loss</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Parsons, Emma L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stratton, Rebecca J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cawood, Abbie L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Trevor R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elia, Marinos</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Parsons, Emma L</au><au>Stratton, Rebecca J</au><au>Cawood, Abbie L</au><au>Smith, Trevor R</au><au>Elia, Marinos</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Oral nutritional supplements in a randomised trial are more effective than dietary advice at improving quality of life in malnourished care home residents</atitle><jtitle>Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland)</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Nutr</addtitle><date>2017-02-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>134</spage><epage>142</epage><pages>134-142</pages><issn>0261-5614</issn><eissn>1532-1983</eissn><abstract>Summary Background &amp; aims Few trials have explored the effect of nutrition support on quality of life (QoL). This study examined the effects of oral nutritional supplements (ONS) vs dietary advice on QoL in malnourished care home residents. Methods 104 malnourished, care home residents (medium + high risk), identified using the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (‘MUST’), (mean age 88.5 ± 7.9y) were randomised to receive either oral nutritional supplements (ONS) (n = 53) or dietary advice (n = 51) for 12 weeks. Dietary intake was measured using 24 h dietary recall, and QoL assessed using EuroQol (EQ-5D), including time trade off (TTO) (range −0.59 to 1) and visual analogue scale (VAS) (score 0 to 100) for self-perceived health. Results QoL (adjusted for baseline QOL, malnutrition risk, type of care received (nursing or residential)) was significantly higher in the ONS than the dietary advice group (intention to treat analysis at week 12; n = 104 ). EQ-5D TTO scores (mean ± SE) were 0.50 ± 0.04 vs 0.36 ± 0.05 ( P  = 0.005), VAS rescaled scores were 0.54 + 0.03 vs 0.046 + 0.03 (P = 0.006) and VAS scores were 61.3 ± 4.5 vs 54.6 ± 6.3 ( P  = 0.533) for ONS vs dietary advice respectively. Total energy, protein and the majority of micronutrient intakes were significantly greater in the ONS group, with energy intake being 423 kcal greater in the ONS than the dietary advice group at week 12. Conclusions This study in malnourished care home residents indicates that ONS can improve QoL and nutritional intake more effectively than dietary advice alone. Clinical Trial Registry This trial was registered with clinicaltrials.gov on 10th August 2007. Clinical trials identifier is NCT00515125 http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00515125?term=nutrition+support&amp;rank=60.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>26847947</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.clnu.2016.01.002</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0261-5614
ispartof Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland), 2017-02, Vol.36 (1), p.134-142
issn 0261-5614
1532-1983
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1826659061
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Administration, Oral
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Body Mass Index
Care home
Counseling
Diet
Dietary Proteins - administration & dosage
Dietary Supplements
Elderly
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Humans
Male
Malnutrition
Malnutrition - drug therapy
Mental Recall
Micronutrients - administration & dosage
Nutrition Assessment
Nutritional Status
Quality of Life
Risk Factors
Supplement
Weight Loss
title Oral nutritional supplements in a randomised trial are more effective than dietary advice at improving quality of life in malnourished care home residents
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T04%3A56%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Oral%20nutritional%20supplements%20in%20a%20randomised%20trial%20are%20more%20effective%20than%20dietary%20advice%20at%20improving%20quality%20of%20life%20in%20malnourished%20care%20home%20residents&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20nutrition%20(Edinburgh,%20Scotland)&rft.au=Parsons,%20Emma%20L&rft.date=2017-02-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=134&rft.epage=142&rft.pages=134-142&rft.issn=0261-5614&rft.eissn=1532-1983&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.clnu.2016.01.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1826659061%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1826659061&rft_id=info:pmid/26847947&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0261561416000030&rfr_iscdi=true