Oral nutritional supplements in a randomised trial are more effective than dietary advice at improving quality of life in malnourished care home residents
Summary Background & aims Few trials have explored the effect of nutrition support on quality of life (QoL). This study examined the effects of oral nutritional supplements (ONS) vs dietary advice on QoL in malnourished care home residents. Methods 104 malnourished, care home residents (medium +...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland) Scotland), 2017-02, Vol.36 (1), p.134-142 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 142 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 134 |
container_title | Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland) |
container_volume | 36 |
creator | Parsons, Emma L Stratton, Rebecca J Cawood, Abbie L Smith, Trevor R Elia, Marinos |
description | Summary Background & aims Few trials have explored the effect of nutrition support on quality of life (QoL). This study examined the effects of oral nutritional supplements (ONS) vs dietary advice on QoL in malnourished care home residents. Methods 104 malnourished, care home residents (medium + high risk), identified using the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (‘MUST’), (mean age 88.5 ± 7.9y) were randomised to receive either oral nutritional supplements (ONS) (n = 53) or dietary advice (n = 51) for 12 weeks. Dietary intake was measured using 24 h dietary recall, and QoL assessed using EuroQol (EQ-5D), including time trade off (TTO) (range −0.59 to 1) and visual analogue scale (VAS) (score 0 to 100) for self-perceived health. Results QoL (adjusted for baseline QOL, malnutrition risk, type of care received (nursing or residential)) was significantly higher in the ONS than the dietary advice group (intention to treat analysis at week 12; n = 104 ). EQ-5D TTO scores (mean ± SE) were 0.50 ± 0.04 vs 0.36 ± 0.05 ( P = 0.005), VAS rescaled scores were 0.54 + 0.03 vs 0.046 + 0.03 (P = 0.006) and VAS scores were 61.3 ± 4.5 vs 54.6 ± 6.3 ( P = 0.533) for ONS vs dietary advice respectively. Total energy, protein and the majority of micronutrient intakes were significantly greater in the ONS group, with energy intake being 423 kcal greater in the ONS than the dietary advice group at week 12. Conclusions This study in malnourished care home residents indicates that ONS can improve QoL and nutritional intake more effectively than dietary advice alone. Clinical Trial Registry This trial was registered with clinicaltrials.gov on 10th August 2007. Clinical trials identifier is NCT00515125 http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00515125?term=nutrition+support&rank=60. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.clnu.2016.01.002 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1826659061</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0261561416000030</els_id><sourcerecordid>1826659061</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-3b536485fb275f0abc34b9491a17231f465949b4c73409ada337445870cf96c93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9ksuO1DAQRS0EYpqBH2CBvGST4FecREJIaMRLGmkWwNpynArtxrF77KSl_hW-lop6YMGCjR_SrWPfukXIS85qzrh-c6hdiGst8FwzXjMmHpEdb6SoeN_Jx2THhOZVo7m6Is9KOTDGGtl2T8mV0J1qe9XuyK-7bAON65L94lPEc1mPxwAzxKVQH6ml2cYxzb7ASFGFCpuBzgkXmCZwiz8BXfY20tHDYvOZ2vHkHVC7UD8fczr5-IPerzb45UzTRIOfYCPPNsS0Zl_2SHYbdJ9moBmKH7fXn5Mnkw0FXjzs1-T7xw_fbj5Xt3efvty8v62c4nyp5NBIrbpmGkTbTMwOTqqhVz23vBWST0o3eBuUa6VivR2tlK1STdcyN_Xa9fKavL5w8a_3K5TFoFkHIdgIaS2Gd0Ijg2mOUnGRupxKyTCZY_YzejacmS0TczBbJmbLxDBuMBMsevXAX4cZxr8lf0JAwduLANDlyUM2xXmIDkafsb9mTP7__Hf_lLvgo3c2_IQzlAP2GHNFH6YIw8zXbSq2oeAaB4JJJn8DOlm0ow</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1826659061</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Oral nutritional supplements in a randomised trial are more effective than dietary advice at improving quality of life in malnourished care home residents</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Parsons, Emma L ; Stratton, Rebecca J ; Cawood, Abbie L ; Smith, Trevor R ; Elia, Marinos</creator><creatorcontrib>Parsons, Emma L ; Stratton, Rebecca J ; Cawood, Abbie L ; Smith, Trevor R ; Elia, Marinos</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Background & aims Few trials have explored the effect of nutrition support on quality of life (QoL). This study examined the effects of oral nutritional supplements (ONS) vs dietary advice on QoL in malnourished care home residents. Methods 104 malnourished, care home residents (medium + high risk), identified using the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (‘MUST’), (mean age 88.5 ± 7.9y) were randomised to receive either oral nutritional supplements (ONS) (n = 53) or dietary advice (n = 51) for 12 weeks. Dietary intake was measured using 24 h dietary recall, and QoL assessed using EuroQol (EQ-5D), including time trade off (TTO) (range −0.59 to 1) and visual analogue scale (VAS) (score 0 to 100) for self-perceived health. Results QoL (adjusted for baseline QOL, malnutrition risk, type of care received (nursing or residential)) was significantly higher in the ONS than the dietary advice group (intention to treat analysis at week 12; n = 104 ). EQ-5D TTO scores (mean ± SE) were 0.50 ± 0.04 vs 0.36 ± 0.05 ( P = 0.005), VAS rescaled scores were 0.54 + 0.03 vs 0.046 + 0.03 (P = 0.006) and VAS scores were 61.3 ± 4.5 vs 54.6 ± 6.3 ( P = 0.533) for ONS vs dietary advice respectively. Total energy, protein and the majority of micronutrient intakes were significantly greater in the ONS group, with energy intake being 423 kcal greater in the ONS than the dietary advice group at week 12. Conclusions This study in malnourished care home residents indicates that ONS can improve QoL and nutritional intake more effectively than dietary advice alone. Clinical Trial Registry This trial was registered with clinicaltrials.gov on 10th August 2007. Clinical trials identifier is NCT00515125 http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00515125?term=nutrition+support&rank=60.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0261-5614</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-1983</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2016.01.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26847947</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Administration, Oral ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Body Mass Index ; Care home ; Counseling ; Diet ; Dietary Proteins - administration & dosage ; Dietary Supplements ; Elderly ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Gastroenterology and Hepatology ; Humans ; Male ; Malnutrition ; Malnutrition - drug therapy ; Mental Recall ; Micronutrients - administration & dosage ; Nutrition Assessment ; Nutritional Status ; Quality of Life ; Risk Factors ; Supplement ; Weight Loss</subject><ispartof>Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland), 2017-02, Vol.36 (1), p.134-142</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism</rights><rights>2016 Elsevier Ltd and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-3b536485fb275f0abc34b9491a17231f465949b4c73409ada337445870cf96c93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-3b536485fb275f0abc34b9491a17231f465949b4c73409ada337445870cf96c93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2016.01.002$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26847947$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Parsons, Emma L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stratton, Rebecca J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cawood, Abbie L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Trevor R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elia, Marinos</creatorcontrib><title>Oral nutritional supplements in a randomised trial are more effective than dietary advice at improving quality of life in malnourished care home residents</title><title>Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland)</title><addtitle>Clin Nutr</addtitle><description>Summary Background & aims Few trials have explored the effect of nutrition support on quality of life (QoL). This study examined the effects of oral nutritional supplements (ONS) vs dietary advice on QoL in malnourished care home residents. Methods 104 malnourished, care home residents (medium + high risk), identified using the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (‘MUST’), (mean age 88.5 ± 7.9y) were randomised to receive either oral nutritional supplements (ONS) (n = 53) or dietary advice (n = 51) for 12 weeks. Dietary intake was measured using 24 h dietary recall, and QoL assessed using EuroQol (EQ-5D), including time trade off (TTO) (range −0.59 to 1) and visual analogue scale (VAS) (score 0 to 100) for self-perceived health. Results QoL (adjusted for baseline QOL, malnutrition risk, type of care received (nursing or residential)) was significantly higher in the ONS than the dietary advice group (intention to treat analysis at week 12; n = 104 ). EQ-5D TTO scores (mean ± SE) were 0.50 ± 0.04 vs 0.36 ± 0.05 ( P = 0.005), VAS rescaled scores were 0.54 + 0.03 vs 0.046 + 0.03 (P = 0.006) and VAS scores were 61.3 ± 4.5 vs 54.6 ± 6.3 ( P = 0.533) for ONS vs dietary advice respectively. Total energy, protein and the majority of micronutrient intakes were significantly greater in the ONS group, with energy intake being 423 kcal greater in the ONS than the dietary advice group at week 12. Conclusions This study in malnourished care home residents indicates that ONS can improve QoL and nutritional intake more effectively than dietary advice alone. Clinical Trial Registry This trial was registered with clinicaltrials.gov on 10th August 2007. Clinical trials identifier is NCT00515125 http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00515125?term=nutrition+support&rank=60.</description><subject>Administration, Oral</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Body Mass Index</subject><subject>Care home</subject><subject>Counseling</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Dietary Proteins - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Dietary Supplements</subject><subject>Elderly</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Gastroenterology and Hepatology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Malnutrition</subject><subject>Malnutrition - drug therapy</subject><subject>Mental Recall</subject><subject>Micronutrients - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Nutrition Assessment</subject><subject>Nutritional Status</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Supplement</subject><subject>Weight Loss</subject><issn>0261-5614</issn><issn>1532-1983</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9ksuO1DAQRS0EYpqBH2CBvGST4FecREJIaMRLGmkWwNpynArtxrF77KSl_hW-lop6YMGCjR_SrWPfukXIS85qzrh-c6hdiGst8FwzXjMmHpEdb6SoeN_Jx2THhOZVo7m6Is9KOTDGGtl2T8mV0J1qe9XuyK-7bAON65L94lPEc1mPxwAzxKVQH6ml2cYxzb7ASFGFCpuBzgkXmCZwiz8BXfY20tHDYvOZ2vHkHVC7UD8fczr5-IPerzb45UzTRIOfYCPPNsS0Zl_2SHYbdJ9moBmKH7fXn5Mnkw0FXjzs1-T7xw_fbj5Xt3efvty8v62c4nyp5NBIrbpmGkTbTMwOTqqhVz23vBWST0o3eBuUa6VivR2tlK1STdcyN_Xa9fKavL5w8a_3K5TFoFkHIdgIaS2Gd0Ijg2mOUnGRupxKyTCZY_YzejacmS0TczBbJmbLxDBuMBMsevXAX4cZxr8lf0JAwduLANDlyUM2xXmIDkafsb9mTP7__Hf_lLvgo3c2_IQzlAP2GHNFH6YIw8zXbSq2oeAaB4JJJn8DOlm0ow</recordid><startdate>20170201</startdate><enddate>20170201</enddate><creator>Parsons, Emma L</creator><creator>Stratton, Rebecca J</creator><creator>Cawood, Abbie L</creator><creator>Smith, Trevor R</creator><creator>Elia, Marinos</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170201</creationdate><title>Oral nutritional supplements in a randomised trial are more effective than dietary advice at improving quality of life in malnourished care home residents</title><author>Parsons, Emma L ; Stratton, Rebecca J ; Cawood, Abbie L ; Smith, Trevor R ; Elia, Marinos</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-3b536485fb275f0abc34b9491a17231f465949b4c73409ada337445870cf96c93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Administration, Oral</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Body Mass Index</topic><topic>Care home</topic><topic>Counseling</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Dietary Proteins - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Dietary Supplements</topic><topic>Elderly</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Gastroenterology and Hepatology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Malnutrition</topic><topic>Malnutrition - drug therapy</topic><topic>Mental Recall</topic><topic>Micronutrients - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Nutrition Assessment</topic><topic>Nutritional Status</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Supplement</topic><topic>Weight Loss</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Parsons, Emma L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stratton, Rebecca J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cawood, Abbie L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Trevor R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elia, Marinos</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Parsons, Emma L</au><au>Stratton, Rebecca J</au><au>Cawood, Abbie L</au><au>Smith, Trevor R</au><au>Elia, Marinos</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Oral nutritional supplements in a randomised trial are more effective than dietary advice at improving quality of life in malnourished care home residents</atitle><jtitle>Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland)</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Nutr</addtitle><date>2017-02-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>134</spage><epage>142</epage><pages>134-142</pages><issn>0261-5614</issn><eissn>1532-1983</eissn><abstract>Summary Background & aims Few trials have explored the effect of nutrition support on quality of life (QoL). This study examined the effects of oral nutritional supplements (ONS) vs dietary advice on QoL in malnourished care home residents. Methods 104 malnourished, care home residents (medium + high risk), identified using the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (‘MUST’), (mean age 88.5 ± 7.9y) were randomised to receive either oral nutritional supplements (ONS) (n = 53) or dietary advice (n = 51) for 12 weeks. Dietary intake was measured using 24 h dietary recall, and QoL assessed using EuroQol (EQ-5D), including time trade off (TTO) (range −0.59 to 1) and visual analogue scale (VAS) (score 0 to 100) for self-perceived health. Results QoL (adjusted for baseline QOL, malnutrition risk, type of care received (nursing or residential)) was significantly higher in the ONS than the dietary advice group (intention to treat analysis at week 12; n = 104 ). EQ-5D TTO scores (mean ± SE) were 0.50 ± 0.04 vs 0.36 ± 0.05 ( P = 0.005), VAS rescaled scores were 0.54 + 0.03 vs 0.046 + 0.03 (P = 0.006) and VAS scores were 61.3 ± 4.5 vs 54.6 ± 6.3 ( P = 0.533) for ONS vs dietary advice respectively. Total energy, protein and the majority of micronutrient intakes were significantly greater in the ONS group, with energy intake being 423 kcal greater in the ONS than the dietary advice group at week 12. Conclusions This study in malnourished care home residents indicates that ONS can improve QoL and nutritional intake more effectively than dietary advice alone. Clinical Trial Registry This trial was registered with clinicaltrials.gov on 10th August 2007. Clinical trials identifier is NCT00515125 http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00515125?term=nutrition+support&rank=60.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>26847947</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.clnu.2016.01.002</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0261-5614 |
ispartof | Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland), 2017-02, Vol.36 (1), p.134-142 |
issn | 0261-5614 1532-1983 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1826659061 |
source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Administration, Oral Aged Aged, 80 and over Body Mass Index Care home Counseling Diet Dietary Proteins - administration & dosage Dietary Supplements Elderly Female Follow-Up Studies Gastroenterology and Hepatology Humans Male Malnutrition Malnutrition - drug therapy Mental Recall Micronutrients - administration & dosage Nutrition Assessment Nutritional Status Quality of Life Risk Factors Supplement Weight Loss |
title | Oral nutritional supplements in a randomised trial are more effective than dietary advice at improving quality of life in malnourished care home residents |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T04%3A56%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Oral%20nutritional%20supplements%20in%20a%20randomised%20trial%20are%20more%20effective%20than%20dietary%20advice%20at%20improving%20quality%20of%20life%20in%20malnourished%20care%20home%20residents&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20nutrition%20(Edinburgh,%20Scotland)&rft.au=Parsons,%20Emma%20L&rft.date=2017-02-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=134&rft.epage=142&rft.pages=134-142&rft.issn=0261-5614&rft.eissn=1532-1983&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.clnu.2016.01.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1826659061%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1826659061&rft_id=info:pmid/26847947&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0261561416000030&rfr_iscdi=true |