Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and MRI–Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy for Index Tumor Detection: Correlation with Radical Prostatectomy Specimen
Abstract Background Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and MRI fusion targeted biopsy (FTB) detect significant prostate cancer (sPCa) more accurately than conventional biopsies alone. Objective To evaluate the detection accuracy of mpMRI and FTB on radical prostatectomy (RP) specimen...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European urology 2016-11, Vol.70 (5), p.846-853 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 853 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 846 |
container_title | European urology |
container_volume | 70 |
creator | Radtke, Jan P Schwab, Constantin Wolf, Maya B Freitag, Martin T Alt, Celine D Kesch, Claudia Popeneciu, Ionel V Huettenbrink, Clemens Gasch, Claudia Klein, Tilman Bonekamp, David Duensing, Stefan Roth, Wilfried Schueler, Svenja Stock, Christian Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter Roethke, Matthias Hohenfellner, Markus Hadaschik, Boris A |
description | Abstract Background Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and MRI fusion targeted biopsy (FTB) detect significant prostate cancer (sPCa) more accurately than conventional biopsies alone. Objective To evaluate the detection accuracy of mpMRI and FTB on radical prostatectomy (RP) specimen. Design, setting and participants From a cohort of 755 men who underwent transperineal MRI and transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsy under general anesthesia between 2012 and 2014, we retrospectively analyzed 120 consecutive patients who had subsequent RP. All received saturation biopsy (SB) in addition to FTB of lesions with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score ≥2. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis The index lesion was defined as the lesion with extraprostatic extension, the highest Gleason score (GS), or the largest tumor volume (TV) if GS were the same, in order of priority. GS 3 + 3 and TV ≥1.3 ml or GS ≥3 + 4 and TV ≥0.55 ml were considered sPCa. We assessed the detection accuracy by mpMRI and different biopsy approaches and analyzed lesion agreement between mpMRI and RP specimen. Results and limitations Overall, 120 index and 71 nonindex lesions were detected. Overall, 107 (89%) index and 51 (72%) nonindex lesions harbored sPCa. MpMRI detected 110 of 120 (92%) index lesions, FTB (two cores per lesion) alone diagnosed 96 of 120 (80%) index lesions, and SB alone diagnosed 110 of 120 (92%) index lesions. Combined SB and FTB detected 115 of 120 (96%) index foci. FTB performed significantly less accurately compared with mpMRI ( p = 0.02) and the combination for index lesion detection ( p = 0.002). Combined FTB and SB detected 97% of all sPCa lesions and was superior to mpMRI (85%), FTB (79%), and SB (88%) alone ( p < 0.001 each). Spearman's rank correlation coefficient for index lesion agreement between mpMRI and RP was 0.87 ( p < 0.001). Limitations included the retrospective design, multiple operators, and nonblinding of radiologists. Conclusions MpMRI identified 92% of index lesions compared with RP histopathology. The combination of FTB and SB was superior to both approaches alone, reliably detecting 97% of sPCa lesions. Patient summary Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging detects the index lesion accurately in 9 of 10 patients; however, the combined biopsy approach, while missing less significant cancer, comes at the cost of detecting more insignificant cancer. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.12.052 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1826657842</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0302283816000105</els_id><sourcerecordid>1826657842</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-b1865814f092c06ed36b26ae50cf0e9df2c685331fa47c883d6bfcd38a8f046b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUsuO0zAUtRCIKQN_gJCXwyLBj8RxWSBBYaDSVKBOZ205zk1xSexgJ0B3_AN_wWfxJTjqwIINKx_L59x7fc5F6DElOSVUPDvkMIUp-JwRWuaU5aRkd9CCyopnVSnIXbQgnLCMSS7P0IMYD4QQXi75fXTGhKSEF2KBfm6mbrSDDrqHMViDN3rvYExgC9E77Qzgda_31u3xxWa7foq1a3ACv77_2AXtYgAz6g7fdGPQ0U_p8XKK1jv8yvohHnHrA167Br7h3dQn_BrGpEiE53jlQ4BOzxf81Y4f8VY31qRiH4KPo555vj_i6wGM7cE9RPda3UV4dHueo5vLN7vVu-zq_dv16uVVZgpajVlNpSglLVqyZIYIaLiomdBQEtMSWDYtM0KWnNNWF5WRkjeibk3DpZYtKUTNz9HFqe4Q_OcJ4qh6Gw10nXbgp6ioZEKUlSxYohYnqkkTJytaNQTb63BUlKg5JXVQp5TUnJKiTKWUkuzJbYep7qH5K_oTSyK8OBEg_fOLhaCisZCyaOzst2q8_V-HfwuYzrrZ3E9whHjwU3DJQ0VVTAJ1PW_KvChUpCWhpOS_AbUYvnM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1826657842</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and MRI–Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy for Index Tumor Detection: Correlation with Radical Prostatectomy Specimen</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Radtke, Jan P ; Schwab, Constantin ; Wolf, Maya B ; Freitag, Martin T ; Alt, Celine D ; Kesch, Claudia ; Popeneciu, Ionel V ; Huettenbrink, Clemens ; Gasch, Claudia ; Klein, Tilman ; Bonekamp, David ; Duensing, Stefan ; Roth, Wilfried ; Schueler, Svenja ; Stock, Christian ; Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter ; Roethke, Matthias ; Hohenfellner, Markus ; Hadaschik, Boris A</creator><creatorcontrib>Radtke, Jan P ; Schwab, Constantin ; Wolf, Maya B ; Freitag, Martin T ; Alt, Celine D ; Kesch, Claudia ; Popeneciu, Ionel V ; Huettenbrink, Clemens ; Gasch, Claudia ; Klein, Tilman ; Bonekamp, David ; Duensing, Stefan ; Roth, Wilfried ; Schueler, Svenja ; Stock, Christian ; Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter ; Roethke, Matthias ; Hohenfellner, Markus ; Hadaschik, Boris A</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and MRI fusion targeted biopsy (FTB) detect significant prostate cancer (sPCa) more accurately than conventional biopsies alone. Objective To evaluate the detection accuracy of mpMRI and FTB on radical prostatectomy (RP) specimen. Design, setting and participants From a cohort of 755 men who underwent transperineal MRI and transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsy under general anesthesia between 2012 and 2014, we retrospectively analyzed 120 consecutive patients who had subsequent RP. All received saturation biopsy (SB) in addition to FTB of lesions with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score ≥2. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis The index lesion was defined as the lesion with extraprostatic extension, the highest Gleason score (GS), or the largest tumor volume (TV) if GS were the same, in order of priority. GS 3 + 3 and TV ≥1.3 ml or GS ≥3 + 4 and TV ≥0.55 ml were considered sPCa. We assessed the detection accuracy by mpMRI and different biopsy approaches and analyzed lesion agreement between mpMRI and RP specimen. Results and limitations Overall, 120 index and 71 nonindex lesions were detected. Overall, 107 (89%) index and 51 (72%) nonindex lesions harbored sPCa. MpMRI detected 110 of 120 (92%) index lesions, FTB (two cores per lesion) alone diagnosed 96 of 120 (80%) index lesions, and SB alone diagnosed 110 of 120 (92%) index lesions. Combined SB and FTB detected 115 of 120 (96%) index foci. FTB performed significantly less accurately compared with mpMRI ( p = 0.02) and the combination for index lesion detection ( p = 0.002). Combined FTB and SB detected 97% of all sPCa lesions and was superior to mpMRI (85%), FTB (79%), and SB (88%) alone ( p < 0.001 each). Spearman's rank correlation coefficient for index lesion agreement between mpMRI and RP was 0.87 ( p < 0.001). Limitations included the retrospective design, multiple operators, and nonblinding of radiologists. Conclusions MpMRI identified 92% of index lesions compared with RP histopathology. The combination of FTB and SB was superior to both approaches alone, reliably detecting 97% of sPCa lesions. Patient summary Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging detects the index lesion accurately in 9 of 10 patients; however, the combined biopsy approach, while missing less significant cancer, comes at the cost of detecting more insignificant cancer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0302-2838</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7560</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.12.052</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26810346</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Aged ; Anesthesia, General - methods ; Biopsy ; Cancer volume ; Dimensional Measurement Accuracy ; Germany ; Humans ; Image fusion ; Image-Guided Biopsy - methods ; Index tumor ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Grading ; Neoplasm Staging ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Predictive values ; Prostate - diagnostic imaging ; Prostate - pathology ; Prostate - surgery ; Prostate cancer ; Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology ; Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery ; Radical prostatectomy ; Retrospective Studies ; Tumor Burden ; Ultrasonography, Interventional - methods ; Ultrasound ; Urology</subject><ispartof>European urology, 2016-11, Vol.70 (5), p.846-853</ispartof><rights>European Association of Urology</rights><rights>2016 European Association of Urology</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-b1865814f092c06ed36b26ae50cf0e9df2c685331fa47c883d6bfcd38a8f046b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-b1865814f092c06ed36b26ae50cf0e9df2c685331fa47c883d6bfcd38a8f046b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.12.052$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26810346$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Radtke, Jan P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwab, Constantin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolf, Maya B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freitag, Martin T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alt, Celine D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kesch, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Popeneciu, Ionel V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huettenbrink, Clemens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gasch, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klein, Tilman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonekamp, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duensing, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roth, Wilfried</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schueler, Svenja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stock, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roethke, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hohenfellner, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hadaschik, Boris A</creatorcontrib><title>Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and MRI–Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy for Index Tumor Detection: Correlation with Radical Prostatectomy Specimen</title><title>European urology</title><addtitle>Eur Urol</addtitle><description>Abstract Background Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and MRI fusion targeted biopsy (FTB) detect significant prostate cancer (sPCa) more accurately than conventional biopsies alone. Objective To evaluate the detection accuracy of mpMRI and FTB on radical prostatectomy (RP) specimen. Design, setting and participants From a cohort of 755 men who underwent transperineal MRI and transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsy under general anesthesia between 2012 and 2014, we retrospectively analyzed 120 consecutive patients who had subsequent RP. All received saturation biopsy (SB) in addition to FTB of lesions with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score ≥2. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis The index lesion was defined as the lesion with extraprostatic extension, the highest Gleason score (GS), or the largest tumor volume (TV) if GS were the same, in order of priority. GS 3 + 3 and TV ≥1.3 ml or GS ≥3 + 4 and TV ≥0.55 ml were considered sPCa. We assessed the detection accuracy by mpMRI and different biopsy approaches and analyzed lesion agreement between mpMRI and RP specimen. Results and limitations Overall, 120 index and 71 nonindex lesions were detected. Overall, 107 (89%) index and 51 (72%) nonindex lesions harbored sPCa. MpMRI detected 110 of 120 (92%) index lesions, FTB (two cores per lesion) alone diagnosed 96 of 120 (80%) index lesions, and SB alone diagnosed 110 of 120 (92%) index lesions. Combined SB and FTB detected 115 of 120 (96%) index foci. FTB performed significantly less accurately compared with mpMRI ( p = 0.02) and the combination for index lesion detection ( p = 0.002). Combined FTB and SB detected 97% of all sPCa lesions and was superior to mpMRI (85%), FTB (79%), and SB (88%) alone ( p < 0.001 each). Spearman's rank correlation coefficient for index lesion agreement between mpMRI and RP was 0.87 ( p < 0.001). Limitations included the retrospective design, multiple operators, and nonblinding of radiologists. Conclusions MpMRI identified 92% of index lesions compared with RP histopathology. The combination of FTB and SB was superior to both approaches alone, reliably detecting 97% of sPCa lesions. Patient summary Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging detects the index lesion accurately in 9 of 10 patients; however, the combined biopsy approach, while missing less significant cancer, comes at the cost of detecting more insignificant cancer.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Anesthesia, General - methods</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Cancer volume</subject><subject>Dimensional Measurement Accuracy</subject><subject>Germany</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image fusion</subject><subject>Image-Guided Biopsy - methods</subject><subject>Index tumor</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Grading</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Predictive values</subject><subject>Prostate - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Prostate - pathology</subject><subject>Prostate - surgery</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Radical prostatectomy</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Tumor Burden</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Interventional - methods</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><subject>Urology</subject><issn>0302-2838</issn><issn>1873-7560</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUsuO0zAUtRCIKQN_gJCXwyLBj8RxWSBBYaDSVKBOZ205zk1xSexgJ0B3_AN_wWfxJTjqwIINKx_L59x7fc5F6DElOSVUPDvkMIUp-JwRWuaU5aRkd9CCyopnVSnIXbQgnLCMSS7P0IMYD4QQXi75fXTGhKSEF2KBfm6mbrSDDrqHMViDN3rvYExgC9E77Qzgda_31u3xxWa7foq1a3ACv77_2AXtYgAz6g7fdGPQ0U_p8XKK1jv8yvohHnHrA167Br7h3dQn_BrGpEiE53jlQ4BOzxf81Y4f8VY31qRiH4KPo555vj_i6wGM7cE9RPda3UV4dHueo5vLN7vVu-zq_dv16uVVZgpajVlNpSglLVqyZIYIaLiomdBQEtMSWDYtM0KWnNNWF5WRkjeibk3DpZYtKUTNz9HFqe4Q_OcJ4qh6Gw10nXbgp6ioZEKUlSxYohYnqkkTJytaNQTb63BUlKg5JXVQp5TUnJKiTKWUkuzJbYep7qH5K_oTSyK8OBEg_fOLhaCisZCyaOzst2q8_V-HfwuYzrrZ3E9whHjwU3DJQ0VVTAJ1PW_KvChUpCWhpOS_AbUYvnM</recordid><startdate>20161101</startdate><enddate>20161101</enddate><creator>Radtke, Jan P</creator><creator>Schwab, Constantin</creator><creator>Wolf, Maya B</creator><creator>Freitag, Martin T</creator><creator>Alt, Celine D</creator><creator>Kesch, Claudia</creator><creator>Popeneciu, Ionel V</creator><creator>Huettenbrink, Clemens</creator><creator>Gasch, Claudia</creator><creator>Klein, Tilman</creator><creator>Bonekamp, David</creator><creator>Duensing, Stefan</creator><creator>Roth, Wilfried</creator><creator>Schueler, Svenja</creator><creator>Stock, Christian</creator><creator>Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter</creator><creator>Roethke, Matthias</creator><creator>Hohenfellner, Markus</creator><creator>Hadaschik, Boris A</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161101</creationdate><title>Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and MRI–Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy for Index Tumor Detection: Correlation with Radical Prostatectomy Specimen</title><author>Radtke, Jan P ; Schwab, Constantin ; Wolf, Maya B ; Freitag, Martin T ; Alt, Celine D ; Kesch, Claudia ; Popeneciu, Ionel V ; Huettenbrink, Clemens ; Gasch, Claudia ; Klein, Tilman ; Bonekamp, David ; Duensing, Stefan ; Roth, Wilfried ; Schueler, Svenja ; Stock, Christian ; Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter ; Roethke, Matthias ; Hohenfellner, Markus ; Hadaschik, Boris A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c417t-b1865814f092c06ed36b26ae50cf0e9df2c685331fa47c883d6bfcd38a8f046b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Anesthesia, General - methods</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Cancer volume</topic><topic>Dimensional Measurement Accuracy</topic><topic>Germany</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image fusion</topic><topic>Image-Guided Biopsy - methods</topic><topic>Index tumor</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Grading</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Predictive values</topic><topic>Prostate - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Prostate - pathology</topic><topic>Prostate - surgery</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Radical prostatectomy</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Tumor Burden</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Interventional - methods</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><topic>Urology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Radtke, Jan P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwab, Constantin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolf, Maya B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freitag, Martin T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alt, Celine D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kesch, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Popeneciu, Ionel V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huettenbrink, Clemens</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gasch, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klein, Tilman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonekamp, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duensing, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roth, Wilfried</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schueler, Svenja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stock, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roethke, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hohenfellner, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hadaschik, Boris A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European urology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Radtke, Jan P</au><au>Schwab, Constantin</au><au>Wolf, Maya B</au><au>Freitag, Martin T</au><au>Alt, Celine D</au><au>Kesch, Claudia</au><au>Popeneciu, Ionel V</au><au>Huettenbrink, Clemens</au><au>Gasch, Claudia</au><au>Klein, Tilman</au><au>Bonekamp, David</au><au>Duensing, Stefan</au><au>Roth, Wilfried</au><au>Schueler, Svenja</au><au>Stock, Christian</au><au>Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter</au><au>Roethke, Matthias</au><au>Hohenfellner, Markus</au><au>Hadaschik, Boris A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and MRI–Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy for Index Tumor Detection: Correlation with Radical Prostatectomy Specimen</atitle><jtitle>European urology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur Urol</addtitle><date>2016-11-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>70</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>846</spage><epage>853</epage><pages>846-853</pages><issn>0302-2838</issn><eissn>1873-7560</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and MRI fusion targeted biopsy (FTB) detect significant prostate cancer (sPCa) more accurately than conventional biopsies alone. Objective To evaluate the detection accuracy of mpMRI and FTB on radical prostatectomy (RP) specimen. Design, setting and participants From a cohort of 755 men who underwent transperineal MRI and transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsy under general anesthesia between 2012 and 2014, we retrospectively analyzed 120 consecutive patients who had subsequent RP. All received saturation biopsy (SB) in addition to FTB of lesions with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score ≥2. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis The index lesion was defined as the lesion with extraprostatic extension, the highest Gleason score (GS), or the largest tumor volume (TV) if GS were the same, in order of priority. GS 3 + 3 and TV ≥1.3 ml or GS ≥3 + 4 and TV ≥0.55 ml were considered sPCa. We assessed the detection accuracy by mpMRI and different biopsy approaches and analyzed lesion agreement between mpMRI and RP specimen. Results and limitations Overall, 120 index and 71 nonindex lesions were detected. Overall, 107 (89%) index and 51 (72%) nonindex lesions harbored sPCa. MpMRI detected 110 of 120 (92%) index lesions, FTB (two cores per lesion) alone diagnosed 96 of 120 (80%) index lesions, and SB alone diagnosed 110 of 120 (92%) index lesions. Combined SB and FTB detected 115 of 120 (96%) index foci. FTB performed significantly less accurately compared with mpMRI ( p = 0.02) and the combination for index lesion detection ( p = 0.002). Combined FTB and SB detected 97% of all sPCa lesions and was superior to mpMRI (85%), FTB (79%), and SB (88%) alone ( p < 0.001 each). Spearman's rank correlation coefficient for index lesion agreement between mpMRI and RP was 0.87 ( p < 0.001). Limitations included the retrospective design, multiple operators, and nonblinding of radiologists. Conclusions MpMRI identified 92% of index lesions compared with RP histopathology. The combination of FTB and SB was superior to both approaches alone, reliably detecting 97% of sPCa lesions. Patient summary Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging detects the index lesion accurately in 9 of 10 patients; however, the combined biopsy approach, while missing less significant cancer, comes at the cost of detecting more insignificant cancer.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>26810346</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.eururo.2015.12.052</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0302-2838 |
ispartof | European urology, 2016-11, Vol.70 (5), p.846-853 |
issn | 0302-2838 1873-7560 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1826657842 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Aged Anesthesia, General - methods Biopsy Cancer volume Dimensional Measurement Accuracy Germany Humans Image fusion Image-Guided Biopsy - methods Index tumor Magnetic resonance imaging Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods Male Middle Aged Neoplasm Grading Neoplasm Staging Predictive Value of Tests Predictive values Prostate - diagnostic imaging Prostate - pathology Prostate - surgery Prostate cancer Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnosis Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery Radical prostatectomy Retrospective Studies Tumor Burden Ultrasonography, Interventional - methods Ultrasound Urology |
title | Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and MRI–Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy for Index Tumor Detection: Correlation with Radical Prostatectomy Specimen |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T21%3A51%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multiparametric%20Magnetic%20Resonance%20Imaging%20(MRI)%20and%20MRI%E2%80%93Transrectal%20Ultrasound%20Fusion%20Biopsy%20for%20Index%20Tumor%20Detection:%20Correlation%20with%20Radical%20Prostatectomy%20Specimen&rft.jtitle=European%20urology&rft.au=Radtke,%20Jan%20P&rft.date=2016-11-01&rft.volume=70&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=846&rft.epage=853&rft.pages=846-853&rft.issn=0302-2838&rft.eissn=1873-7560&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.12.052&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1826657842%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1826657842&rft_id=info:pmid/26810346&rft_els_id=S0302283816000105&rfr_iscdi=true |