Favorable outcome of children and adolescents undergoing lung transplantation at a European adult center in the new era
Summary Lung transplantation (LTx) is an accepted therapy in children with end‐stage lung diseases. Pediatric‐specific experience is considered important in pediatric LTx. We present our institutional experience and its outcome since the year 2000, asking whether different treatment strategies produ...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Pediatric pulmonology 2016-11, Vol.51 (11), p.1222-1228 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1228 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 1222 |
container_title | Pediatric pulmonology |
container_volume | 51 |
creator | Schmid, Florian A. Inci, Ilhan Bürgi, Urs Hillinger, Sven Schneiter, Didier Opitz, Isabelle Huber, Lars C. Isenring, Bruno D. Jungraithmayr, Wolfgang Schuurmans, Macé M. Weder, Walter Benden, Christian |
description | Summary
Lung transplantation (LTx) is an accepted therapy in children with end‐stage lung diseases. Pediatric‐specific experience is considered important in pediatric LTx. We present our institutional experience and its outcome since the year 2000, asking whether different treatment strategies produce comparable outcomes in pediatric lung transplant recipients at our predominantly adult center. This is a retrospective analysis of children and adolescents aged ≤20 years, undergoing LTx between January 2001 and December 2013. Minimum follow‐up was 12 months. Primary endpoints were re‐transplantation or death. We performed 33 lung transplant procedures in 29 patients. Survival 1 month post‐operatively was 96.6%, at 3 months 93.1% and at 12 months 82.8%, respectively. At the end of our follow up, 72.4% of our pediatric cohort was still alive — median post‐transplant survival was 59 months (range 0–159). 72.4% of the children were transplanted with support of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), size‐reduced donor grafts were used in 69.0%. The differences between post‐transplant survival of the “non‐ECMO‐group” versus the “ECMO‐group” (137 vs. 28 months, P=0.7) and “full size” versus “size‐reduced bilateral transplants” (61 vs. 28 months, P = 0.7) were not significant, though. There were no anastomotic complications, also not in size‐reduced lungs. Our results are well comparable to the international data and show excellent short‐ and mid‐term outcomes. We advocate ECMO‐bridge to be considered as a valuable treatment option to prolong time on the waiting list in highly selected patients, as well as size reduction and lobar transplants as a strong strategy to increase the donor pool and reduce donor‐recipient size‐mismatches. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2016;51:1222–1228. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ppul.23383 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1826646632</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1826646632</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4263-5605ac83bd2028f9fb73127bc4f62c9c9f9cd800a5b9e580574cef6e414b7b063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU1v1DAQhi1ERZeFCz8AWeLCJcUfsR0f0dIW0KqtEFUlLpbjOG2K1079wdJ_j7dbeuhlZqx53tF4XgDeYXSEESKf5rm4I0JpR1-ABUZSNqiV_CVYdIKxhnecHoLXKd0iVHsSvwKHhAtBKRELsD3Rf0LUvbMwlGzCpuYRmpvJDdF6qP0A9RCcTcb6nGDxg43XYfLX0JUactQ-zU77rPMUKp-hhsclhtnq-hqKy3CntBFOHuYbC73dQhv1G3Awapfs28e8BJcnxz9XX5v1-em31ed1Y1rCacM4Ytp0tB8IIt0ox15QTERv2pETI40cpRk6hDTrpWUdYqI1duS2xW0vesTpEnzcz51juCs2ZbWZ6l9cXdmGkhTuCOct55RU9MMz9DaU6Ot2O0oyxHA92hK8f6RKv7GDmuO00fFe_T9pBfAe2E7O3j_1MVI7s9TOLPVglrq4uFw_VFXT7DVTyvbvk0bH34oLKpi6OjtVZPXj-5X88ksh-g_bFJdC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1829505173</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Favorable outcome of children and adolescents undergoing lung transplantation at a European adult center in the new era</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Schmid, Florian A. ; Inci, Ilhan ; Bürgi, Urs ; Hillinger, Sven ; Schneiter, Didier ; Opitz, Isabelle ; Huber, Lars C. ; Isenring, Bruno D. ; Jungraithmayr, Wolfgang ; Schuurmans, Macé M. ; Weder, Walter ; Benden, Christian</creator><creatorcontrib>Schmid, Florian A. ; Inci, Ilhan ; Bürgi, Urs ; Hillinger, Sven ; Schneiter, Didier ; Opitz, Isabelle ; Huber, Lars C. ; Isenring, Bruno D. ; Jungraithmayr, Wolfgang ; Schuurmans, Macé M. ; Weder, Walter ; Benden, Christian</creatorcontrib><description>Summary
Lung transplantation (LTx) is an accepted therapy in children with end‐stage lung diseases. Pediatric‐specific experience is considered important in pediatric LTx. We present our institutional experience and its outcome since the year 2000, asking whether different treatment strategies produce comparable outcomes in pediatric lung transplant recipients at our predominantly adult center. This is a retrospective analysis of children and adolescents aged ≤20 years, undergoing LTx between January 2001 and December 2013. Minimum follow‐up was 12 months. Primary endpoints were re‐transplantation or death. We performed 33 lung transplant procedures in 29 patients. Survival 1 month post‐operatively was 96.6%, at 3 months 93.1% and at 12 months 82.8%, respectively. At the end of our follow up, 72.4% of our pediatric cohort was still alive — median post‐transplant survival was 59 months (range 0–159). 72.4% of the children were transplanted with support of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), size‐reduced donor grafts were used in 69.0%. The differences between post‐transplant survival of the “non‐ECMO‐group” versus the “ECMO‐group” (137 vs. 28 months, P=0.7) and “full size” versus “size‐reduced bilateral transplants” (61 vs. 28 months, P = 0.7) were not significant, though. There were no anastomotic complications, also not in size‐reduced lungs. Our results are well comparable to the international data and show excellent short‐ and mid‐term outcomes. We advocate ECMO‐bridge to be considered as a valuable treatment option to prolong time on the waiting list in highly selected patients, as well as size reduction and lobar transplants as a strong strategy to increase the donor pool and reduce donor‐recipient size‐mismatches. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2016;51:1222–1228. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 8755-6863</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-0496</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ppul.23383</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26773327</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Child ; children ; Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ; Female ; Humans ; Lung Diseases - surgery ; Lung Transplantation ; Male ; pediatric ; Pediatrics ; Respiratory therapy ; Retrospective Studies ; Tissue Donors ; Transplants & implants ; Treatment Outcome ; Waiting Lists ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Pediatric pulmonology, 2016-11, Vol.51 (11), p.1222-1228</ispartof><rights>2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4263-5605ac83bd2028f9fb73127bc4f62c9c9f9cd800a5b9e580574cef6e414b7b063</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fppul.23383$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fppul.23383$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26773327$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schmid, Florian A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inci, Ilhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bürgi, Urs</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hillinger, Sven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneiter, Didier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Opitz, Isabelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huber, Lars C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Isenring, Bruno D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jungraithmayr, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schuurmans, Macé M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weder, Walter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benden, Christian</creatorcontrib><title>Favorable outcome of children and adolescents undergoing lung transplantation at a European adult center in the new era</title><title>Pediatric pulmonology</title><addtitle>Pediatr Pulmonol</addtitle><description>Summary
Lung transplantation (LTx) is an accepted therapy in children with end‐stage lung diseases. Pediatric‐specific experience is considered important in pediatric LTx. We present our institutional experience and its outcome since the year 2000, asking whether different treatment strategies produce comparable outcomes in pediatric lung transplant recipients at our predominantly adult center. This is a retrospective analysis of children and adolescents aged ≤20 years, undergoing LTx between January 2001 and December 2013. Minimum follow‐up was 12 months. Primary endpoints were re‐transplantation or death. We performed 33 lung transplant procedures in 29 patients. Survival 1 month post‐operatively was 96.6%, at 3 months 93.1% and at 12 months 82.8%, respectively. At the end of our follow up, 72.4% of our pediatric cohort was still alive — median post‐transplant survival was 59 months (range 0–159). 72.4% of the children were transplanted with support of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), size‐reduced donor grafts were used in 69.0%. The differences between post‐transplant survival of the “non‐ECMO‐group” versus the “ECMO‐group” (137 vs. 28 months, P=0.7) and “full size” versus “size‐reduced bilateral transplants” (61 vs. 28 months, P = 0.7) were not significant, though. There were no anastomotic complications, also not in size‐reduced lungs. Our results are well comparable to the international data and show excellent short‐ and mid‐term outcomes. We advocate ECMO‐bridge to be considered as a valuable treatment option to prolong time on the waiting list in highly selected patients, as well as size reduction and lobar transplants as a strong strategy to increase the donor pool and reduce donor‐recipient size‐mismatches. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2016;51:1222–1228. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>children</subject><subject>Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lung Diseases - surgery</subject><subject>Lung Transplantation</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>pediatric</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Respiratory therapy</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Tissue Donors</subject><subject>Transplants & implants</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Waiting Lists</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>8755-6863</issn><issn>1099-0496</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU1v1DAQhi1ERZeFCz8AWeLCJcUfsR0f0dIW0KqtEFUlLpbjOG2K1079wdJ_j7dbeuhlZqx53tF4XgDeYXSEESKf5rm4I0JpR1-ABUZSNqiV_CVYdIKxhnecHoLXKd0iVHsSvwKHhAtBKRELsD3Rf0LUvbMwlGzCpuYRmpvJDdF6qP0A9RCcTcb6nGDxg43XYfLX0JUactQ-zU77rPMUKp-hhsclhtnq-hqKy3CntBFOHuYbC73dQhv1G3Awapfs28e8BJcnxz9XX5v1-em31ed1Y1rCacM4Ytp0tB8IIt0ox15QTERv2pETI40cpRk6hDTrpWUdYqI1duS2xW0vesTpEnzcz51juCs2ZbWZ6l9cXdmGkhTuCOct55RU9MMz9DaU6Ot2O0oyxHA92hK8f6RKv7GDmuO00fFe_T9pBfAe2E7O3j_1MVI7s9TOLPVglrq4uFw_VFXT7DVTyvbvk0bH34oLKpi6OjtVZPXj-5X88ksh-g_bFJdC</recordid><startdate>201611</startdate><enddate>201611</enddate><creator>Schmid, Florian A.</creator><creator>Inci, Ilhan</creator><creator>Bürgi, Urs</creator><creator>Hillinger, Sven</creator><creator>Schneiter, Didier</creator><creator>Opitz, Isabelle</creator><creator>Huber, Lars C.</creator><creator>Isenring, Bruno D.</creator><creator>Jungraithmayr, Wolfgang</creator><creator>Schuurmans, Macé M.</creator><creator>Weder, Walter</creator><creator>Benden, Christian</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201611</creationdate><title>Favorable outcome of children and adolescents undergoing lung transplantation at a European adult center in the new era</title><author>Schmid, Florian A. ; Inci, Ilhan ; Bürgi, Urs ; Hillinger, Sven ; Schneiter, Didier ; Opitz, Isabelle ; Huber, Lars C. ; Isenring, Bruno D. ; Jungraithmayr, Wolfgang ; Schuurmans, Macé M. ; Weder, Walter ; Benden, Christian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4263-5605ac83bd2028f9fb73127bc4f62c9c9f9cd800a5b9e580574cef6e414b7b063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>children</topic><topic>Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lung Diseases - surgery</topic><topic>Lung Transplantation</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>pediatric</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Respiratory therapy</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Tissue Donors</topic><topic>Transplants & implants</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Waiting Lists</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schmid, Florian A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inci, Ilhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bürgi, Urs</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hillinger, Sven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneiter, Didier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Opitz, Isabelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huber, Lars C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Isenring, Bruno D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jungraithmayr, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schuurmans, Macé M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weder, Walter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benden, Christian</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pediatric pulmonology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schmid, Florian A.</au><au>Inci, Ilhan</au><au>Bürgi, Urs</au><au>Hillinger, Sven</au><au>Schneiter, Didier</au><au>Opitz, Isabelle</au><au>Huber, Lars C.</au><au>Isenring, Bruno D.</au><au>Jungraithmayr, Wolfgang</au><au>Schuurmans, Macé M.</au><au>Weder, Walter</au><au>Benden, Christian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Favorable outcome of children and adolescents undergoing lung transplantation at a European adult center in the new era</atitle><jtitle>Pediatric pulmonology</jtitle><addtitle>Pediatr Pulmonol</addtitle><date>2016-11</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1222</spage><epage>1228</epage><pages>1222-1228</pages><issn>8755-6863</issn><eissn>1099-0496</eissn><abstract>Summary
Lung transplantation (LTx) is an accepted therapy in children with end‐stage lung diseases. Pediatric‐specific experience is considered important in pediatric LTx. We present our institutional experience and its outcome since the year 2000, asking whether different treatment strategies produce comparable outcomes in pediatric lung transplant recipients at our predominantly adult center. This is a retrospective analysis of children and adolescents aged ≤20 years, undergoing LTx between January 2001 and December 2013. Minimum follow‐up was 12 months. Primary endpoints were re‐transplantation or death. We performed 33 lung transplant procedures in 29 patients. Survival 1 month post‐operatively was 96.6%, at 3 months 93.1% and at 12 months 82.8%, respectively. At the end of our follow up, 72.4% of our pediatric cohort was still alive — median post‐transplant survival was 59 months (range 0–159). 72.4% of the children were transplanted with support of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), size‐reduced donor grafts were used in 69.0%. The differences between post‐transplant survival of the “non‐ECMO‐group” versus the “ECMO‐group” (137 vs. 28 months, P=0.7) and “full size” versus “size‐reduced bilateral transplants” (61 vs. 28 months, P = 0.7) were not significant, though. There were no anastomotic complications, also not in size‐reduced lungs. Our results are well comparable to the international data and show excellent short‐ and mid‐term outcomes. We advocate ECMO‐bridge to be considered as a valuable treatment option to prolong time on the waiting list in highly selected patients, as well as size reduction and lobar transplants as a strong strategy to increase the donor pool and reduce donor‐recipient size‐mismatches. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2016;51:1222–1228. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>26773327</pmid><doi>10.1002/ppul.23383</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 8755-6863 |
ispartof | Pediatric pulmonology, 2016-11, Vol.51 (11), p.1222-1228 |
issn | 8755-6863 1099-0496 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1826646632 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Adolescent Child children Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Female Humans Lung Diseases - surgery Lung Transplantation Male pediatric Pediatrics Respiratory therapy Retrospective Studies Tissue Donors Transplants & implants Treatment Outcome Waiting Lists Young Adult |
title | Favorable outcome of children and adolescents undergoing lung transplantation at a European adult center in the new era |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T21%3A58%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Favorable%20outcome%20of%20children%20and%20adolescents%20undergoing%20lung%20transplantation%20at%20a%20European%20adult%20center%20in%20the%20new%20era&rft.jtitle=Pediatric%20pulmonology&rft.au=Schmid,%20Florian%20A.&rft.date=2016-11&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1222&rft.epage=1228&rft.pages=1222-1228&rft.issn=8755-6863&rft.eissn=1099-0496&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ppul.23383&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1826646632%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1829505173&rft_id=info:pmid/26773327&rfr_iscdi=true |