Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: Is it beneficial in the over 80s?

Introduction Advanced age is often associated with higher incidence of co-morbidities, advanced cancer and post-operative complications. The aim of this study was to compare the differences in pre-operative, co-morbidities, cancer stage and surgical outcome measures between patients over the age of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Scottish medical journal 2016-08, Vol.61 (3), p.132-135
Hauptverfasser: Tabbakh, Y, Ihedioha, U, Panteleimonitis, S, Gevech, Z, Evans, J, Kang, P
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 135
container_issue 3
container_start_page 132
container_title Scottish medical journal
container_volume 61
creator Tabbakh, Y
Ihedioha, U
Panteleimonitis, S
Gevech, Z
Evans, J
Kang, P
description Introduction Advanced age is often associated with higher incidence of co-morbidities, advanced cancer and post-operative complications. The aim of this study was to compare the differences in pre-operative, co-morbidities, cancer stage and surgical outcome measures between patients over the age of 80 and those below 80 undergoing elective laparoscopic colorectal resection. Method Data were analysed from a prospectively maintained database between February 2011 and June 2012 and patients were subdivided into two groups (over 80 and under 80). All patients underwent laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Their length of stay, high dependency unit/intensive therapy unit stay, American Society of Anaesthesiologists grade, co-morbidities, conversion rates, Dukes’ stage and post-operative complication rates were compared. Results Of the 67 patients in the study, 57 were 80 group, with 23% having an American Society of Anaesthesiologists grade of 3 compared to 60% in the >80%. The prognosis of the patients in the two groups based on Dukes’ stage was similar, with 63% of the 80 s. (Good prognosis = Dukes’ A or B). The conversion rates were similar (26% of the  80 s) Post-operative length of stay was also similar in both groups (80 s: median 5 vs. 5; p = 0.33). Post-operative complication rates were similar (17% of the 80 s). Conclusion The short-term outcomes following laparoscopic colorectal surgery in the elderly are similar to that of younger patients. Laparoscopic surgery should therefore be offered to all patients irrespective of age.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0036933015597175
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1826625645</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0036933015597175</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1826625645</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-f24829457ce7c53d75ff7fbf88513278fcde1c8c107ff45279e31f0ec2b4f5a53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kDtPwzAUhS0EolXpzoQ8sgT8dsKCoOJRqRILzJHjXhejNA52gtR_T6IWBiSmO3zfOdI9CJ1TckWp1teEcFVwTqiUhaZaHqEpI0JmSgh6jKYjzkY-QfOUfEUGSLnI1SmaMMVIoaiYovuVaU0MyYbWW2xDHSLYztQ49XEDcXeDlwn7DlfQgPPWD8Q3uHsHHL4g4pyk2zN04kydYH64M_T2-PC6eM5WL0_Lxd0qs5zrLnNM5KwQUlvQVvK1ls5pV7k8l5QznTu7BmpzS4l2TkimC-DUEbCsEk4ayWfoct_bxvDZQ-rKrU8W6to0EPpU0pwpxaQSo0r2qh1eSxFc2Ua_NXFXUlKO45V_xxsiF4f2vtrC-jfwM9UgZHshmQ2UH6GPzfDt_4Xfi1d0-g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1826625645</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: Is it beneficial in the over 80s?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Tabbakh, Y ; Ihedioha, U ; Panteleimonitis, S ; Gevech, Z ; Evans, J ; Kang, P</creator><creatorcontrib>Tabbakh, Y ; Ihedioha, U ; Panteleimonitis, S ; Gevech, Z ; Evans, J ; Kang, P</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction Advanced age is often associated with higher incidence of co-morbidities, advanced cancer and post-operative complications. The aim of this study was to compare the differences in pre-operative, co-morbidities, cancer stage and surgical outcome measures between patients over the age of 80 and those below 80 undergoing elective laparoscopic colorectal resection. Method Data were analysed from a prospectively maintained database between February 2011 and June 2012 and patients were subdivided into two groups (over 80 and under 80). All patients underwent laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Their length of stay, high dependency unit/intensive therapy unit stay, American Society of Anaesthesiologists grade, co-morbidities, conversion rates, Dukes’ stage and post-operative complication rates were compared. Results Of the 67 patients in the study, 57 were &lt;80 at the time of surgery. Their American Society of Anaesthesiologists grade prior to surgery, as expected, was better than that of the &gt;80 group, with 23% having an American Society of Anaesthesiologists grade of 3 compared to 60% in the &gt;80%. The prognosis of the patients in the two groups based on Dukes’ stage was similar, with 63% of the &lt;80 s having a good prognosis, compared to 80% in the &gt;80 s. (Good prognosis = Dukes’ A or B). The conversion rates were similar (26% of the &lt;80 s compared to 20% of the &gt; 80 s) Post-operative length of stay was also similar in both groups (&lt;80 s vs. &gt;80 s: median 5 vs. 5; p = 0.33). Post-operative complication rates were similar (17% of the &lt;80 s vs. 20% of the &gt;80 s). Conclusion The short-term outcomes following laparoscopic colorectal surgery in the elderly are similar to that of younger patients. Laparoscopic surgery should therefore be offered to all patients irrespective of age.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0036-9330</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2045-6441</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0036933015597175</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26209614</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Age Factors ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Colorectal Neoplasms - mortality ; Colorectal Neoplasms - surgery ; Colorectal Surgery - economics ; Colorectal Surgery - mortality ; Comorbidity ; Female ; Humans ; Laparoscopy - economics ; Laparoscopy - mortality ; Length of Stay ; Male ; Postoperative Complications - economics ; Postoperative Complications - mortality ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Prospective Studies ; Risk Assessment ; United States - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>Scottish medical journal, 2016-08, Vol.61 (3), p.132-135</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2015</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2015.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-f24829457ce7c53d75ff7fbf88513278fcde1c8c107ff45279e31f0ec2b4f5a53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-f24829457ce7c53d75ff7fbf88513278fcde1c8c107ff45279e31f0ec2b4f5a53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0036933015597175$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0036933015597175$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26209614$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tabbakh, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ihedioha, U</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panteleimonitis, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gevech, Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evans, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kang, P</creatorcontrib><title>Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: Is it beneficial in the over 80s?</title><title>Scottish medical journal</title><addtitle>Scott Med J</addtitle><description>Introduction Advanced age is often associated with higher incidence of co-morbidities, advanced cancer and post-operative complications. The aim of this study was to compare the differences in pre-operative, co-morbidities, cancer stage and surgical outcome measures between patients over the age of 80 and those below 80 undergoing elective laparoscopic colorectal resection. Method Data were analysed from a prospectively maintained database between February 2011 and June 2012 and patients were subdivided into two groups (over 80 and under 80). All patients underwent laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Their length of stay, high dependency unit/intensive therapy unit stay, American Society of Anaesthesiologists grade, co-morbidities, conversion rates, Dukes’ stage and post-operative complication rates were compared. Results Of the 67 patients in the study, 57 were &lt;80 at the time of surgery. Their American Society of Anaesthesiologists grade prior to surgery, as expected, was better than that of the &gt;80 group, with 23% having an American Society of Anaesthesiologists grade of 3 compared to 60% in the &gt;80%. The prognosis of the patients in the two groups based on Dukes’ stage was similar, with 63% of the &lt;80 s having a good prognosis, compared to 80% in the &gt;80 s. (Good prognosis = Dukes’ A or B). The conversion rates were similar (26% of the &lt;80 s compared to 20% of the &gt; 80 s) Post-operative length of stay was also similar in both groups (&lt;80 s vs. &gt;80 s: median 5 vs. 5; p = 0.33). Post-operative complication rates were similar (17% of the &lt;80 s vs. 20% of the &gt;80 s). Conclusion The short-term outcomes following laparoscopic colorectal surgery in the elderly are similar to that of younger patients. Laparoscopic surgery should therefore be offered to all patients irrespective of age.</description><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Colorectal Surgery - economics</subject><subject>Colorectal Surgery - mortality</subject><subject>Comorbidity</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laparoscopy - economics</subject><subject>Laparoscopy - mortality</subject><subject>Length of Stay</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - economics</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - mortality</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>United States - epidemiology</subject><issn>0036-9330</issn><issn>2045-6441</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kDtPwzAUhS0EolXpzoQ8sgT8dsKCoOJRqRILzJHjXhejNA52gtR_T6IWBiSmO3zfOdI9CJ1TckWp1teEcFVwTqiUhaZaHqEpI0JmSgh6jKYjzkY-QfOUfEUGSLnI1SmaMMVIoaiYovuVaU0MyYbWW2xDHSLYztQ49XEDcXeDlwn7DlfQgPPWD8Q3uHsHHL4g4pyk2zN04kydYH64M_T2-PC6eM5WL0_Lxd0qs5zrLnNM5KwQUlvQVvK1ls5pV7k8l5QznTu7BmpzS4l2TkimC-DUEbCsEk4ayWfoct_bxvDZQ-rKrU8W6to0EPpU0pwpxaQSo0r2qh1eSxFc2Ua_NXFXUlKO45V_xxsiF4f2vtrC-jfwM9UgZHshmQ2UH6GPzfDt_4Xfi1d0-g</recordid><startdate>201608</startdate><enddate>201608</enddate><creator>Tabbakh, Y</creator><creator>Ihedioha, U</creator><creator>Panteleimonitis, S</creator><creator>Gevech, Z</creator><creator>Evans, J</creator><creator>Kang, P</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201608</creationdate><title>Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: Is it beneficial in the over 80s?</title><author>Tabbakh, Y ; Ihedioha, U ; Panteleimonitis, S ; Gevech, Z ; Evans, J ; Kang, P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-f24829457ce7c53d75ff7fbf88513278fcde1c8c107ff45279e31f0ec2b4f5a53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Colorectal Surgery - economics</topic><topic>Colorectal Surgery - mortality</topic><topic>Comorbidity</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laparoscopy - economics</topic><topic>Laparoscopy - mortality</topic><topic>Length of Stay</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - economics</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - mortality</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>United States - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tabbakh, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ihedioha, U</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panteleimonitis, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gevech, Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evans, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kang, P</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Scottish medical journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tabbakh, Y</au><au>Ihedioha, U</au><au>Panteleimonitis, S</au><au>Gevech, Z</au><au>Evans, J</au><au>Kang, P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: Is it beneficial in the over 80s?</atitle><jtitle>Scottish medical journal</jtitle><addtitle>Scott Med J</addtitle><date>2016-08</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>132</spage><epage>135</epage><pages>132-135</pages><issn>0036-9330</issn><eissn>2045-6441</eissn><abstract>Introduction Advanced age is often associated with higher incidence of co-morbidities, advanced cancer and post-operative complications. The aim of this study was to compare the differences in pre-operative, co-morbidities, cancer stage and surgical outcome measures between patients over the age of 80 and those below 80 undergoing elective laparoscopic colorectal resection. Method Data were analysed from a prospectively maintained database between February 2011 and June 2012 and patients were subdivided into two groups (over 80 and under 80). All patients underwent laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Their length of stay, high dependency unit/intensive therapy unit stay, American Society of Anaesthesiologists grade, co-morbidities, conversion rates, Dukes’ stage and post-operative complication rates were compared. Results Of the 67 patients in the study, 57 were &lt;80 at the time of surgery. Their American Society of Anaesthesiologists grade prior to surgery, as expected, was better than that of the &gt;80 group, with 23% having an American Society of Anaesthesiologists grade of 3 compared to 60% in the &gt;80%. The prognosis of the patients in the two groups based on Dukes’ stage was similar, with 63% of the &lt;80 s having a good prognosis, compared to 80% in the &gt;80 s. (Good prognosis = Dukes’ A or B). The conversion rates were similar (26% of the &lt;80 s compared to 20% of the &gt; 80 s) Post-operative length of stay was also similar in both groups (&lt;80 s vs. &gt;80 s: median 5 vs. 5; p = 0.33). Post-operative complication rates were similar (17% of the &lt;80 s vs. 20% of the &gt;80 s). Conclusion The short-term outcomes following laparoscopic colorectal surgery in the elderly are similar to that of younger patients. Laparoscopic surgery should therefore be offered to all patients irrespective of age.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>26209614</pmid><doi>10.1177/0036933015597175</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0036-9330
ispartof Scottish medical journal, 2016-08, Vol.61 (3), p.132-135
issn 0036-9330
2045-6441
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1826625645
source MEDLINE; SAGE Complete A-Z List
subjects Age Factors
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Colorectal Neoplasms - mortality
Colorectal Neoplasms - surgery
Colorectal Surgery - economics
Colorectal Surgery - mortality
Comorbidity
Female
Humans
Laparoscopy - economics
Laparoscopy - mortality
Length of Stay
Male
Postoperative Complications - economics
Postoperative Complications - mortality
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Prospective Studies
Risk Assessment
United States - epidemiology
title Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: Is it beneficial in the over 80s?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T16%3A11%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Laparoscopic%20colorectal%20surgery:%20Is%20it%20beneficial%20in%20the%20over%2080s?&rft.jtitle=Scottish%20medical%20journal&rft.au=Tabbakh,%20Y&rft.date=2016-08&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=132&rft.epage=135&rft.pages=132-135&rft.issn=0036-9330&rft.eissn=2045-6441&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0036933015597175&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1826625645%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1826625645&rft_id=info:pmid/26209614&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0036933015597175&rfr_iscdi=true