Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: Is it beneficial in the over 80s?
Introduction Advanced age is often associated with higher incidence of co-morbidities, advanced cancer and post-operative complications. The aim of this study was to compare the differences in pre-operative, co-morbidities, cancer stage and surgical outcome measures between patients over the age of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Scottish medical journal 2016-08, Vol.61 (3), p.132-135 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 135 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 132 |
container_title | Scottish medical journal |
container_volume | 61 |
creator | Tabbakh, Y Ihedioha, U Panteleimonitis, S Gevech, Z Evans, J Kang, P |
description | Introduction
Advanced age is often associated with higher incidence of co-morbidities, advanced cancer and post-operative complications. The aim of this study was to compare the differences in pre-operative, co-morbidities, cancer stage and surgical outcome measures between patients over the age of 80 and those below 80 undergoing elective laparoscopic colorectal resection.
Method
Data were analysed from a prospectively maintained database between February 2011 and June 2012 and patients were subdivided into two groups (over 80 and under 80). All patients underwent laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Their length of stay, high dependency unit/intensive therapy unit stay, American Society of Anaesthesiologists grade, co-morbidities, conversion rates, Dukes’ stage and post-operative complication rates were compared.
Results
Of the 67 patients in the study, 57 were 80 group, with 23% having an American Society of Anaesthesiologists grade of 3 compared to 60% in the >80%. The prognosis of the patients in the two groups based on Dukes’ stage was similar, with 63% of the 80 s. (Good prognosis = Dukes’ A or B). The conversion rates were similar (26% of the 80 s) Post-operative length of stay was also similar in both groups (80 s: median 5 vs. 5; p = 0.33). Post-operative complication rates were similar (17% of the 80 s).
Conclusion
The short-term outcomes following laparoscopic colorectal surgery in the elderly are similar to that of younger patients. Laparoscopic surgery should therefore be offered to all patients irrespective of age. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0036933015597175 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1826625645</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0036933015597175</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1826625645</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-f24829457ce7c53d75ff7fbf88513278fcde1c8c107ff45279e31f0ec2b4f5a53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kDtPwzAUhS0EolXpzoQ8sgT8dsKCoOJRqRILzJHjXhejNA52gtR_T6IWBiSmO3zfOdI9CJ1TckWp1teEcFVwTqiUhaZaHqEpI0JmSgh6jKYjzkY-QfOUfEUGSLnI1SmaMMVIoaiYovuVaU0MyYbWW2xDHSLYztQ49XEDcXeDlwn7DlfQgPPWD8Q3uHsHHL4g4pyk2zN04kydYH64M_T2-PC6eM5WL0_Lxd0qs5zrLnNM5KwQUlvQVvK1ls5pV7k8l5QznTu7BmpzS4l2TkimC-DUEbCsEk4ayWfoct_bxvDZQ-rKrU8W6to0EPpU0pwpxaQSo0r2qh1eSxFc2Ua_NXFXUlKO45V_xxsiF4f2vtrC-jfwM9UgZHshmQ2UH6GPzfDt_4Xfi1d0-g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1826625645</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: Is it beneficial in the over 80s?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Tabbakh, Y ; Ihedioha, U ; Panteleimonitis, S ; Gevech, Z ; Evans, J ; Kang, P</creator><creatorcontrib>Tabbakh, Y ; Ihedioha, U ; Panteleimonitis, S ; Gevech, Z ; Evans, J ; Kang, P</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction
Advanced age is often associated with higher incidence of co-morbidities, advanced cancer and post-operative complications. The aim of this study was to compare the differences in pre-operative, co-morbidities, cancer stage and surgical outcome measures between patients over the age of 80 and those below 80 undergoing elective laparoscopic colorectal resection.
Method
Data were analysed from a prospectively maintained database between February 2011 and June 2012 and patients were subdivided into two groups (over 80 and under 80). All patients underwent laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Their length of stay, high dependency unit/intensive therapy unit stay, American Society of Anaesthesiologists grade, co-morbidities, conversion rates, Dukes’ stage and post-operative complication rates were compared.
Results
Of the 67 patients in the study, 57 were <80 at the time of surgery. Their American Society of Anaesthesiologists grade prior to surgery, as expected, was better than that of the >80 group, with 23% having an American Society of Anaesthesiologists grade of 3 compared to 60% in the >80%. The prognosis of the patients in the two groups based on Dukes’ stage was similar, with 63% of the <80 s having a good prognosis, compared to 80% in the >80 s. (Good prognosis = Dukes’ A or B). The conversion rates were similar (26% of the <80 s compared to 20% of the > 80 s) Post-operative length of stay was also similar in both groups (<80 s vs. >80 s: median 5 vs. 5; p = 0.33). Post-operative complication rates were similar (17% of the <80 s vs. 20% of the >80 s).
Conclusion
The short-term outcomes following laparoscopic colorectal surgery in the elderly are similar to that of younger patients. Laparoscopic surgery should therefore be offered to all patients irrespective of age.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0036-9330</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2045-6441</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0036933015597175</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26209614</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Age Factors ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Colorectal Neoplasms - mortality ; Colorectal Neoplasms - surgery ; Colorectal Surgery - economics ; Colorectal Surgery - mortality ; Comorbidity ; Female ; Humans ; Laparoscopy - economics ; Laparoscopy - mortality ; Length of Stay ; Male ; Postoperative Complications - economics ; Postoperative Complications - mortality ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Prospective Studies ; Risk Assessment ; United States - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>Scottish medical journal, 2016-08, Vol.61 (3), p.132-135</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2015</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2015.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-f24829457ce7c53d75ff7fbf88513278fcde1c8c107ff45279e31f0ec2b4f5a53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-f24829457ce7c53d75ff7fbf88513278fcde1c8c107ff45279e31f0ec2b4f5a53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0036933015597175$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0036933015597175$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26209614$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tabbakh, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ihedioha, U</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panteleimonitis, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gevech, Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evans, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kang, P</creatorcontrib><title>Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: Is it beneficial in the over 80s?</title><title>Scottish medical journal</title><addtitle>Scott Med J</addtitle><description>Introduction
Advanced age is often associated with higher incidence of co-morbidities, advanced cancer and post-operative complications. The aim of this study was to compare the differences in pre-operative, co-morbidities, cancer stage and surgical outcome measures between patients over the age of 80 and those below 80 undergoing elective laparoscopic colorectal resection.
Method
Data were analysed from a prospectively maintained database between February 2011 and June 2012 and patients were subdivided into two groups (over 80 and under 80). All patients underwent laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Their length of stay, high dependency unit/intensive therapy unit stay, American Society of Anaesthesiologists grade, co-morbidities, conversion rates, Dukes’ stage and post-operative complication rates were compared.
Results
Of the 67 patients in the study, 57 were <80 at the time of surgery. Their American Society of Anaesthesiologists grade prior to surgery, as expected, was better than that of the >80 group, with 23% having an American Society of Anaesthesiologists grade of 3 compared to 60% in the >80%. The prognosis of the patients in the two groups based on Dukes’ stage was similar, with 63% of the <80 s having a good prognosis, compared to 80% in the >80 s. (Good prognosis = Dukes’ A or B). The conversion rates were similar (26% of the <80 s compared to 20% of the > 80 s) Post-operative length of stay was also similar in both groups (<80 s vs. >80 s: median 5 vs. 5; p = 0.33). Post-operative complication rates were similar (17% of the <80 s vs. 20% of the >80 s).
Conclusion
The short-term outcomes following laparoscopic colorectal surgery in the elderly are similar to that of younger patients. Laparoscopic surgery should therefore be offered to all patients irrespective of age.</description><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Colorectal Surgery - economics</subject><subject>Colorectal Surgery - mortality</subject><subject>Comorbidity</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laparoscopy - economics</subject><subject>Laparoscopy - mortality</subject><subject>Length of Stay</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - economics</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - mortality</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>United States - epidemiology</subject><issn>0036-9330</issn><issn>2045-6441</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kDtPwzAUhS0EolXpzoQ8sgT8dsKCoOJRqRILzJHjXhejNA52gtR_T6IWBiSmO3zfOdI9CJ1TckWp1teEcFVwTqiUhaZaHqEpI0JmSgh6jKYjzkY-QfOUfEUGSLnI1SmaMMVIoaiYovuVaU0MyYbWW2xDHSLYztQ49XEDcXeDlwn7DlfQgPPWD8Q3uHsHHL4g4pyk2zN04kydYH64M_T2-PC6eM5WL0_Lxd0qs5zrLnNM5KwQUlvQVvK1ls5pV7k8l5QznTu7BmpzS4l2TkimC-DUEbCsEk4ayWfoct_bxvDZQ-rKrU8W6to0EPpU0pwpxaQSo0r2qh1eSxFc2Ua_NXFXUlKO45V_xxsiF4f2vtrC-jfwM9UgZHshmQ2UH6GPzfDt_4Xfi1d0-g</recordid><startdate>201608</startdate><enddate>201608</enddate><creator>Tabbakh, Y</creator><creator>Ihedioha, U</creator><creator>Panteleimonitis, S</creator><creator>Gevech, Z</creator><creator>Evans, J</creator><creator>Kang, P</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201608</creationdate><title>Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: Is it beneficial in the over 80s?</title><author>Tabbakh, Y ; Ihedioha, U ; Panteleimonitis, S ; Gevech, Z ; Evans, J ; Kang, P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-f24829457ce7c53d75ff7fbf88513278fcde1c8c107ff45279e31f0ec2b4f5a53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Colorectal Surgery - economics</topic><topic>Colorectal Surgery - mortality</topic><topic>Comorbidity</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laparoscopy - economics</topic><topic>Laparoscopy - mortality</topic><topic>Length of Stay</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - economics</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - mortality</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>United States - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tabbakh, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ihedioha, U</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panteleimonitis, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gevech, Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evans, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kang, P</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Scottish medical journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tabbakh, Y</au><au>Ihedioha, U</au><au>Panteleimonitis, S</au><au>Gevech, Z</au><au>Evans, J</au><au>Kang, P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: Is it beneficial in the over 80s?</atitle><jtitle>Scottish medical journal</jtitle><addtitle>Scott Med J</addtitle><date>2016-08</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>132</spage><epage>135</epage><pages>132-135</pages><issn>0036-9330</issn><eissn>2045-6441</eissn><abstract>Introduction
Advanced age is often associated with higher incidence of co-morbidities, advanced cancer and post-operative complications. The aim of this study was to compare the differences in pre-operative, co-morbidities, cancer stage and surgical outcome measures between patients over the age of 80 and those below 80 undergoing elective laparoscopic colorectal resection.
Method
Data were analysed from a prospectively maintained database between February 2011 and June 2012 and patients were subdivided into two groups (over 80 and under 80). All patients underwent laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Their length of stay, high dependency unit/intensive therapy unit stay, American Society of Anaesthesiologists grade, co-morbidities, conversion rates, Dukes’ stage and post-operative complication rates were compared.
Results
Of the 67 patients in the study, 57 were <80 at the time of surgery. Their American Society of Anaesthesiologists grade prior to surgery, as expected, was better than that of the >80 group, with 23% having an American Society of Anaesthesiologists grade of 3 compared to 60% in the >80%. The prognosis of the patients in the two groups based on Dukes’ stage was similar, with 63% of the <80 s having a good prognosis, compared to 80% in the >80 s. (Good prognosis = Dukes’ A or B). The conversion rates were similar (26% of the <80 s compared to 20% of the > 80 s) Post-operative length of stay was also similar in both groups (<80 s vs. >80 s: median 5 vs. 5; p = 0.33). Post-operative complication rates were similar (17% of the <80 s vs. 20% of the >80 s).
Conclusion
The short-term outcomes following laparoscopic colorectal surgery in the elderly are similar to that of younger patients. Laparoscopic surgery should therefore be offered to all patients irrespective of age.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>26209614</pmid><doi>10.1177/0036933015597175</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0036-9330 |
ispartof | Scottish medical journal, 2016-08, Vol.61 (3), p.132-135 |
issn | 0036-9330 2045-6441 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1826625645 |
source | MEDLINE; SAGE Complete A-Z List |
subjects | Age Factors Aged Aged, 80 and over Colorectal Neoplasms - mortality Colorectal Neoplasms - surgery Colorectal Surgery - economics Colorectal Surgery - mortality Comorbidity Female Humans Laparoscopy - economics Laparoscopy - mortality Length of Stay Male Postoperative Complications - economics Postoperative Complications - mortality Practice Guidelines as Topic Prospective Studies Risk Assessment United States - epidemiology |
title | Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: Is it beneficial in the over 80s? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T16%3A11%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Laparoscopic%20colorectal%20surgery:%20Is%20it%20beneficial%20in%20the%20over%2080s?&rft.jtitle=Scottish%20medical%20journal&rft.au=Tabbakh,%20Y&rft.date=2016-08&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=132&rft.epage=135&rft.pages=132-135&rft.issn=0036-9330&rft.eissn=2045-6441&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0036933015597175&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1826625645%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1826625645&rft_id=info:pmid/26209614&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0036933015597175&rfr_iscdi=true |