Venous Thromboembolism After Spine Surgery

Retrospective cohort study. To measure the rate of postoperative venous thromboembolic events (VTE) after spine decompression and fusion procedures. VTE after spine surgery is a serious complication, but chemoprophylaxis is not without significant risk due to the concern of epidural hematoma. Curren...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976) Pa. 1976), 2014-05, Vol.39 (11), p.911-918
Hauptverfasser: Schairer, William W, Pedtke, Andrew C, Hu, Serena S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 918
container_issue 11
container_start_page 911
container_title Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976)
container_volume 39
creator Schairer, William W
Pedtke, Andrew C
Hu, Serena S
description Retrospective cohort study. To measure the rate of postoperative venous thromboembolic events (VTE) after spine decompression and fusion procedures. VTE after spine surgery is a serious complication, but chemoprophylaxis is not without significant risk due to the concern of epidural hematoma. Current literature report widely variable rates of VTE, and have weaknesses in sample size, specificity of diagnosis, and methodological problems with adequate patient follow-up. State-level inpatient, ambulatory surgery, and emergency department administrative databases were used to track patients for clinically significant VTE within 90 days of discharge after a spine procedure. Of 357,926 patients enrolled, one-third underwent spine decompression alone, whereas two-thirds received a spine fusion. The overall rate of VTE was 1.37% (95% CI: 1.33-1.41), but varied widely depending on diagnosis, 1.03% for structural degenerative diagnoses to 10.7% for spine infection. Posterior cervical fusion had a higher rate of VTE than anterior cervical fusion, whereas anterior thoracolumbar and lumbosacral fusions had higher rates than the respective posterior approaches. Additional risk factors included patients receiving long spine fusions and having multiple procedures during the hospitalization. Forty percent of VTEs discovered after discharge were diagnosed at a different hospital. The rate of spine VTE varies widely depending on diagnosis and procedure. It is important to risk-stratify patients who present for spine surgery to identify patients at increased risk who should be monitored for the development of VTE. It is important to know that nearly half of VTEs that occur after discharge are diagnosed at different hospitals, and thus the primary surgeon may be initially unaware of the complication. These results from a large selection of historical patients may provide a tool for estimating patient risk depending on diagnosis and type of procedure. 2.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000315
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1826590076</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1826590076</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-13f271ba06398989e06e43641352a93b1d9cd51e489de82e739c525202f2b9b13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkFtLxDAQhYMobl39ByJ9FKFrJmma5HFdvMGCYFdfQy9TrfRm0j7svzeyq4gzDPNyZs7hI-Qc6AKoltc3z-mC_i0O4oAEIJiKAIQ-JAHlCYtYzJMZOXHuw2sSDvqYzFgsQVEpA3L1il0_uXDzbvs279FPU7s2XFYj2jAd6g7DdLJvaLen5KjKGodn-z0nL3e3m9VDtH66f1wt11HBpRwj4BWTkGfeSyvfSBP0EWLggmWa51DqohSAsdIlKoaS60IwwSirWK5z4HNyufs72P5zQjeatnYFNk3WoY9qQLFEaEpl4qXxTlrY3jmLlRls3WZ2a4Cab0rGUzL_Kfmzi73DlLdY_h79YOFfIrVf2g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1826590076</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Venous Thromboembolism After Spine Surgery</title><source>Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload</source><creator>Schairer, William W ; Pedtke, Andrew C ; Hu, Serena S</creator><creatorcontrib>Schairer, William W ; Pedtke, Andrew C ; Hu, Serena S</creatorcontrib><description>Retrospective cohort study. To measure the rate of postoperative venous thromboembolic events (VTE) after spine decompression and fusion procedures. VTE after spine surgery is a serious complication, but chemoprophylaxis is not without significant risk due to the concern of epidural hematoma. Current literature report widely variable rates of VTE, and have weaknesses in sample size, specificity of diagnosis, and methodological problems with adequate patient follow-up. State-level inpatient, ambulatory surgery, and emergency department administrative databases were used to track patients for clinically significant VTE within 90 days of discharge after a spine procedure. Of 357,926 patients enrolled, one-third underwent spine decompression alone, whereas two-thirds received a spine fusion. The overall rate of VTE was 1.37% (95% CI: 1.33-1.41), but varied widely depending on diagnosis, 1.03% for structural degenerative diagnoses to 10.7% for spine infection. Posterior cervical fusion had a higher rate of VTE than anterior cervical fusion, whereas anterior thoracolumbar and lumbosacral fusions had higher rates than the respective posterior approaches. Additional risk factors included patients receiving long spine fusions and having multiple procedures during the hospitalization. Forty percent of VTEs discovered after discharge were diagnosed at a different hospital. The rate of spine VTE varies widely depending on diagnosis and procedure. It is important to risk-stratify patients who present for spine surgery to identify patients at increased risk who should be monitored for the development of VTE. It is important to know that nearly half of VTEs that occur after discharge are diagnosed at different hospitals, and thus the primary surgeon may be initially unaware of the complication. These results from a large selection of historical patients may provide a tool for estimating patient risk depending on diagnosis and type of procedure. 2.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0362-2436</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-1159</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000315</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24718077</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><ispartof>Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976), 2014-05, Vol.39 (11), p.911-918</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-13f271ba06398989e06e43641352a93b1d9cd51e489de82e739c525202f2b9b13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-13f271ba06398989e06e43641352a93b1d9cd51e489de82e739c525202f2b9b13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24718077$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schairer, William W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pedtke, Andrew C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Serena S</creatorcontrib><title>Venous Thromboembolism After Spine Surgery</title><title>Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976)</title><addtitle>Spine (Phila Pa 1976)</addtitle><description>Retrospective cohort study. To measure the rate of postoperative venous thromboembolic events (VTE) after spine decompression and fusion procedures. VTE after spine surgery is a serious complication, but chemoprophylaxis is not without significant risk due to the concern of epidural hematoma. Current literature report widely variable rates of VTE, and have weaknesses in sample size, specificity of diagnosis, and methodological problems with adequate patient follow-up. State-level inpatient, ambulatory surgery, and emergency department administrative databases were used to track patients for clinically significant VTE within 90 days of discharge after a spine procedure. Of 357,926 patients enrolled, one-third underwent spine decompression alone, whereas two-thirds received a spine fusion. The overall rate of VTE was 1.37% (95% CI: 1.33-1.41), but varied widely depending on diagnosis, 1.03% for structural degenerative diagnoses to 10.7% for spine infection. Posterior cervical fusion had a higher rate of VTE than anterior cervical fusion, whereas anterior thoracolumbar and lumbosacral fusions had higher rates than the respective posterior approaches. Additional risk factors included patients receiving long spine fusions and having multiple procedures during the hospitalization. Forty percent of VTEs discovered after discharge were diagnosed at a different hospital. The rate of spine VTE varies widely depending on diagnosis and procedure. It is important to risk-stratify patients who present for spine surgery to identify patients at increased risk who should be monitored for the development of VTE. It is important to know that nearly half of VTEs that occur after discharge are diagnosed at different hospitals, and thus the primary surgeon may be initially unaware of the complication. These results from a large selection of historical patients may provide a tool for estimating patient risk depending on diagnosis and type of procedure. 2.</description><issn>0362-2436</issn><issn>1528-1159</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkFtLxDAQhYMobl39ByJ9FKFrJmma5HFdvMGCYFdfQy9TrfRm0j7svzeyq4gzDPNyZs7hI-Qc6AKoltc3z-mC_i0O4oAEIJiKAIQ-JAHlCYtYzJMZOXHuw2sSDvqYzFgsQVEpA3L1il0_uXDzbvs279FPU7s2XFYj2jAd6g7DdLJvaLen5KjKGodn-z0nL3e3m9VDtH66f1wt11HBpRwj4BWTkGfeSyvfSBP0EWLggmWa51DqohSAsdIlKoaS60IwwSirWK5z4HNyufs72P5zQjeatnYFNk3WoY9qQLFEaEpl4qXxTlrY3jmLlRls3WZ2a4Cab0rGUzL_Kfmzi73DlLdY_h79YOFfIrVf2g</recordid><startdate>20140515</startdate><enddate>20140515</enddate><creator>Schairer, William W</creator><creator>Pedtke, Andrew C</creator><creator>Hu, Serena S</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140515</creationdate><title>Venous Thromboembolism After Spine Surgery</title><author>Schairer, William W ; Pedtke, Andrew C ; Hu, Serena S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c377t-13f271ba06398989e06e43641352a93b1d9cd51e489de82e739c525202f2b9b13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schairer, William W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pedtke, Andrew C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Serena S</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schairer, William W</au><au>Pedtke, Andrew C</au><au>Hu, Serena S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Venous Thromboembolism After Spine Surgery</atitle><jtitle>Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976)</jtitle><addtitle>Spine (Phila Pa 1976)</addtitle><date>2014-05-15</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>911</spage><epage>918</epage><pages>911-918</pages><issn>0362-2436</issn><eissn>1528-1159</eissn><abstract>Retrospective cohort study. To measure the rate of postoperative venous thromboembolic events (VTE) after spine decompression and fusion procedures. VTE after spine surgery is a serious complication, but chemoprophylaxis is not without significant risk due to the concern of epidural hematoma. Current literature report widely variable rates of VTE, and have weaknesses in sample size, specificity of diagnosis, and methodological problems with adequate patient follow-up. State-level inpatient, ambulatory surgery, and emergency department administrative databases were used to track patients for clinically significant VTE within 90 days of discharge after a spine procedure. Of 357,926 patients enrolled, one-third underwent spine decompression alone, whereas two-thirds received a spine fusion. The overall rate of VTE was 1.37% (95% CI: 1.33-1.41), but varied widely depending on diagnosis, 1.03% for structural degenerative diagnoses to 10.7% for spine infection. Posterior cervical fusion had a higher rate of VTE than anterior cervical fusion, whereas anterior thoracolumbar and lumbosacral fusions had higher rates than the respective posterior approaches. Additional risk factors included patients receiving long spine fusions and having multiple procedures during the hospitalization. Forty percent of VTEs discovered after discharge were diagnosed at a different hospital. The rate of spine VTE varies widely depending on diagnosis and procedure. It is important to risk-stratify patients who present for spine surgery to identify patients at increased risk who should be monitored for the development of VTE. It is important to know that nearly half of VTEs that occur after discharge are diagnosed at different hospitals, and thus the primary surgeon may be initially unaware of the complication. These results from a large selection of historical patients may provide a tool for estimating patient risk depending on diagnosis and type of procedure. 2.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>24718077</pmid><doi>10.1097/BRS.0000000000000315</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0362-2436
ispartof Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976), 2014-05, Vol.39 (11), p.911-918
issn 0362-2436
1528-1159
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1826590076
source Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload
title Venous Thromboembolism After Spine Surgery
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T08%3A08%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Venous%20Thromboembolism%20After%20Spine%20Surgery&rft.jtitle=Spine%20(Philadelphia,%20Pa.%201976)&rft.au=Schairer,%20William%20W&rft.date=2014-05-15&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=911&rft.epage=918&rft.pages=911-918&rft.issn=0362-2436&rft.eissn=1528-1159&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/BRS.0000000000000315&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1826590076%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1826590076&rft_id=info:pmid/24718077&rfr_iscdi=true