The Glider registry
Background Provisional stenting of the side‐branch (SB) is the universally accepted gold standard while there is still controversy on the usefulness of routine dilatation of the SB ostium. Recrossing the struts of a previously deployed stent with a wire and a balloon can prove challenging and is occ...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions 2017-01, Vol.89 (1), p.E1-E6 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | E6 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | E1 |
container_title | Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions |
container_volume | 89 |
creator | Secco, Gioel Gabrio Rittger, Harald Hoffmann, Stefan Richardt, Gert Abdel‐Wahab, Mohamed Reinecke, Holger Lotan, Chaim Werner, Gerald Sievert, Horst Foin, Nicolas Di Mario, Carlo |
description | Background
Provisional stenting of the side‐branch (SB) is the universally accepted gold standard while there is still controversy on the usefulness of routine dilatation of the SB ostium. Recrossing the struts of a previously deployed stent with a wire and a balloon can prove challenging and is occasionally unsuccessful, mainly because the balloon tip hits a stent strut. This prospective multicenter international registry tested the crossing ability procedural results of a new‐dedicated ultrashort balloon specifically designed for side branch dilatation (Glider, TriReme Medical, Pleasanton, CA, USA).
Methods
One hundred and twenty five patients (for a total of 131 bifurcation lesions) were enrolled in the registry between January 2009 and May 2012. The Glider was used as first choice in alternative to conventional balloon (group I, 72%) or as bail‐out after unsuccessful previous attempt at crossing with small conventional low‐profile balloons (group II, 28%). Postprocedural coronary artery dissections and in‐hospital MACE (death, myocardial infarction and repeat revascularization) were assessed. Technical success was defined as the ability of the Glider to recross the struts of a previously deployed stent while procedural success was defined as less of residual 50% diameter stenosis at the origin of the SB with a final TIMI 3 and/or freedom from in‐hospital MACE.
Results
Technical success was achieved, respectively, in 92% (group I), and 83% (group II). Clinical and angiographic procedural success was achieved in 98% of the lesions. In Group II, no other balloon of the same size could cross in cases where Glider could not. A total of 13 complications were observed, including nine ostial SB dissection four of which needed a second stent on the SB, one stent loss, two severe coronary spasms, and two by thrombus formation.
Conclusion
The unique possibility offered by this short dedicated balloon to orientate its beveled tip provides an effective strategy for recrossing stent struts when conventional low profile balloons fail achieving greater SB ostial expansion thus reducing the incidence of strut malapposition during provisional treatment of bifurcational lesions. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ccd.25040 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1826571210</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4306755561</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3340-4e94e654fe60d3d646b98051ee19e516b7b25bfcffe7791f8caccfea5ff9875d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10M1LwzAYx_EgipsvB_EuAy966PYkzUtzlKpTGHiZ4C206RPt6NaZrMj-e6OdHgRPyeHDl4cfIWcUxhSATaytxkwAhz0ypIKxRDH5sr_7U83lgByFsAAALZk-JAOWKqZZxobkfP6Go2lTV-hHHl_rsPHbE3Lgiibg6e49Js_3d_P8IZk9TR_zm1li05RDwlFzlII7lFClleSy1BkIikg1CipLVTJROuscKqWpy2xhrcNCOKczJar0mFz13bVv3zsMG7Osg8WmKVbYdsHQjEmhKKMQ6eUfumg7v4rXRSVBCy5lFtV1r6xvQ_DozNrXy8JvDQXztZSJS5nvpaK92BW7conVr_yZJoJJDz7qBrf_l0ye3_bJT9zfb1I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1860954668</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Glider registry</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Secco, Gioel Gabrio ; Rittger, Harald ; Hoffmann, Stefan ; Richardt, Gert ; Abdel‐Wahab, Mohamed ; Reinecke, Holger ; Lotan, Chaim ; Werner, Gerald ; Sievert, Horst ; Foin, Nicolas ; Di Mario, Carlo</creator><creatorcontrib>Secco, Gioel Gabrio ; Rittger, Harald ; Hoffmann, Stefan ; Richardt, Gert ; Abdel‐Wahab, Mohamed ; Reinecke, Holger ; Lotan, Chaim ; Werner, Gerald ; Sievert, Horst ; Foin, Nicolas ; Di Mario, Carlo</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Provisional stenting of the side‐branch (SB) is the universally accepted gold standard while there is still controversy on the usefulness of routine dilatation of the SB ostium. Recrossing the struts of a previously deployed stent with a wire and a balloon can prove challenging and is occasionally unsuccessful, mainly because the balloon tip hits a stent strut. This prospective multicenter international registry tested the crossing ability procedural results of a new‐dedicated ultrashort balloon specifically designed for side branch dilatation (Glider, TriReme Medical, Pleasanton, CA, USA).
Methods
One hundred and twenty five patients (for a total of 131 bifurcation lesions) were enrolled in the registry between January 2009 and May 2012. The Glider was used as first choice in alternative to conventional balloon (group I, 72%) or as bail‐out after unsuccessful previous attempt at crossing with small conventional low‐profile balloons (group II, 28%). Postprocedural coronary artery dissections and in‐hospital MACE (death, myocardial infarction and repeat revascularization) were assessed. Technical success was defined as the ability of the Glider to recross the struts of a previously deployed stent while procedural success was defined as less of residual 50% diameter stenosis at the origin of the SB with a final TIMI 3 and/or freedom from in‐hospital MACE.
Results
Technical success was achieved, respectively, in 92% (group I), and 83% (group II). Clinical and angiographic procedural success was achieved in 98% of the lesions. In Group II, no other balloon of the same size could cross in cases where Glider could not. A total of 13 complications were observed, including nine ostial SB dissection four of which needed a second stent on the SB, one stent loss, two severe coronary spasms, and two by thrombus formation.
Conclusion
The unique possibility offered by this short dedicated balloon to orientate its beveled tip provides an effective strategy for recrossing stent struts when conventional low profile balloons fail achieving greater SB ostial expansion thus reducing the incidence of strut malapposition during provisional treatment of bifurcational lesions. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1522-1946</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-726X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ccd.25040</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23729282</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CARIF2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary - adverse effects ; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary - instrumentation ; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary - mortality ; bifurcation ; Cardiac Catheters ; Coronary Angiography ; Coronary Artery Disease - diagnostic imaging ; Coronary Artery Disease - mortality ; Coronary Artery Disease - therapy ; Coronary Thrombosis - etiology ; Coronary Vasospasm - etiology ; drug eluting stents ; Female ; Germany ; Humans ; Israel ; kissing balloon ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Myocardial Infarction - etiology ; Prospective Studies ; Prosthesis Design ; Registries ; Risk Factors ; Stents ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome ; United Kingdom ; X-Ray Microtomography</subject><ispartof>Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions, 2017-01, Vol.89 (1), p.E1-E6</ispartof><rights>2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3340-4e94e654fe60d3d646b98051ee19e516b7b25bfcffe7791f8caccfea5ff9875d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3340-4e94e654fe60d3d646b98051ee19e516b7b25bfcffe7791f8caccfea5ff9875d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fccd.25040$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fccd.25040$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23729282$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Secco, Gioel Gabrio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rittger, Harald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoffmann, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richardt, Gert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdel‐Wahab, Mohamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reinecke, Holger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lotan, Chaim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Werner, Gerald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sievert, Horst</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foin, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Mario, Carlo</creatorcontrib><title>The Glider registry</title><title>Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions</title><addtitle>Catheter Cardiovasc Interv</addtitle><description>Background
Provisional stenting of the side‐branch (SB) is the universally accepted gold standard while there is still controversy on the usefulness of routine dilatation of the SB ostium. Recrossing the struts of a previously deployed stent with a wire and a balloon can prove challenging and is occasionally unsuccessful, mainly because the balloon tip hits a stent strut. This prospective multicenter international registry tested the crossing ability procedural results of a new‐dedicated ultrashort balloon specifically designed for side branch dilatation (Glider, TriReme Medical, Pleasanton, CA, USA).
Methods
One hundred and twenty five patients (for a total of 131 bifurcation lesions) were enrolled in the registry between January 2009 and May 2012. The Glider was used as first choice in alternative to conventional balloon (group I, 72%) or as bail‐out after unsuccessful previous attempt at crossing with small conventional low‐profile balloons (group II, 28%). Postprocedural coronary artery dissections and in‐hospital MACE (death, myocardial infarction and repeat revascularization) were assessed. Technical success was defined as the ability of the Glider to recross the struts of a previously deployed stent while procedural success was defined as less of residual 50% diameter stenosis at the origin of the SB with a final TIMI 3 and/or freedom from in‐hospital MACE.
Results
Technical success was achieved, respectively, in 92% (group I), and 83% (group II). Clinical and angiographic procedural success was achieved in 98% of the lesions. In Group II, no other balloon of the same size could cross in cases where Glider could not. A total of 13 complications were observed, including nine ostial SB dissection four of which needed a second stent on the SB, one stent loss, two severe coronary spasms, and two by thrombus formation.
Conclusion
The unique possibility offered by this short dedicated balloon to orientate its beveled tip provides an effective strategy for recrossing stent struts when conventional low profile balloons fail achieving greater SB ostial expansion thus reducing the incidence of strut malapposition during provisional treatment of bifurcational lesions. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary - adverse effects</subject><subject>Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary - instrumentation</subject><subject>Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary - mortality</subject><subject>bifurcation</subject><subject>Cardiac Catheters</subject><subject>Coronary Angiography</subject><subject>Coronary Artery Disease - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Coronary Artery Disease - mortality</subject><subject>Coronary Artery Disease - therapy</subject><subject>Coronary Thrombosis - etiology</subject><subject>Coronary Vasospasm - etiology</subject><subject>drug eluting stents</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Germany</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Israel</subject><subject>kissing balloon</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Myocardial Infarction - etiology</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Registries</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Stents</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><subject>X-Ray Microtomography</subject><issn>1522-1946</issn><issn>1522-726X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp10M1LwzAYx_EgipsvB_EuAy966PYkzUtzlKpTGHiZ4C206RPt6NaZrMj-e6OdHgRPyeHDl4cfIWcUxhSATaytxkwAhz0ypIKxRDH5sr_7U83lgByFsAAALZk-JAOWKqZZxobkfP6Go2lTV-hHHl_rsPHbE3Lgiibg6e49Js_3d_P8IZk9TR_zm1li05RDwlFzlII7lFClleSy1BkIikg1CipLVTJROuscKqWpy2xhrcNCOKczJar0mFz13bVv3zsMG7Osg8WmKVbYdsHQjEmhKKMQ6eUfumg7v4rXRSVBCy5lFtV1r6xvQ_DozNrXy8JvDQXztZSJS5nvpaK92BW7conVr_yZJoJJDz7qBrf_l0ye3_bJT9zfb1I</recordid><startdate>201701</startdate><enddate>201701</enddate><creator>Secco, Gioel Gabrio</creator><creator>Rittger, Harald</creator><creator>Hoffmann, Stefan</creator><creator>Richardt, Gert</creator><creator>Abdel‐Wahab, Mohamed</creator><creator>Reinecke, Holger</creator><creator>Lotan, Chaim</creator><creator>Werner, Gerald</creator><creator>Sievert, Horst</creator><creator>Foin, Nicolas</creator><creator>Di Mario, Carlo</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201701</creationdate><title>The Glider registry</title><author>Secco, Gioel Gabrio ; Rittger, Harald ; Hoffmann, Stefan ; Richardt, Gert ; Abdel‐Wahab, Mohamed ; Reinecke, Holger ; Lotan, Chaim ; Werner, Gerald ; Sievert, Horst ; Foin, Nicolas ; Di Mario, Carlo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3340-4e94e654fe60d3d646b98051ee19e516b7b25bfcffe7791f8caccfea5ff9875d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary - adverse effects</topic><topic>Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary - instrumentation</topic><topic>Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary - mortality</topic><topic>bifurcation</topic><topic>Cardiac Catheters</topic><topic>Coronary Angiography</topic><topic>Coronary Artery Disease - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Coronary Artery Disease - mortality</topic><topic>Coronary Artery Disease - therapy</topic><topic>Coronary Thrombosis - etiology</topic><topic>Coronary Vasospasm - etiology</topic><topic>drug eluting stents</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Germany</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Israel</topic><topic>kissing balloon</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Myocardial Infarction - etiology</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Registries</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Stents</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><topic>X-Ray Microtomography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Secco, Gioel Gabrio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rittger, Harald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoffmann, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richardt, Gert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdel‐Wahab, Mohamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reinecke, Holger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lotan, Chaim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Werner, Gerald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sievert, Horst</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foin, Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Mario, Carlo</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Secco, Gioel Gabrio</au><au>Rittger, Harald</au><au>Hoffmann, Stefan</au><au>Richardt, Gert</au><au>Abdel‐Wahab, Mohamed</au><au>Reinecke, Holger</au><au>Lotan, Chaim</au><au>Werner, Gerald</au><au>Sievert, Horst</au><au>Foin, Nicolas</au><au>Di Mario, Carlo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Glider registry</atitle><jtitle>Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions</jtitle><addtitle>Catheter Cardiovasc Interv</addtitle><date>2017-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>89</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>E1</spage><epage>E6</epage><pages>E1-E6</pages><issn>1522-1946</issn><eissn>1522-726X</eissn><coden>CARIF2</coden><abstract>Background
Provisional stenting of the side‐branch (SB) is the universally accepted gold standard while there is still controversy on the usefulness of routine dilatation of the SB ostium. Recrossing the struts of a previously deployed stent with a wire and a balloon can prove challenging and is occasionally unsuccessful, mainly because the balloon tip hits a stent strut. This prospective multicenter international registry tested the crossing ability procedural results of a new‐dedicated ultrashort balloon specifically designed for side branch dilatation (Glider, TriReme Medical, Pleasanton, CA, USA).
Methods
One hundred and twenty five patients (for a total of 131 bifurcation lesions) were enrolled in the registry between January 2009 and May 2012. The Glider was used as first choice in alternative to conventional balloon (group I, 72%) or as bail‐out after unsuccessful previous attempt at crossing with small conventional low‐profile balloons (group II, 28%). Postprocedural coronary artery dissections and in‐hospital MACE (death, myocardial infarction and repeat revascularization) were assessed. Technical success was defined as the ability of the Glider to recross the struts of a previously deployed stent while procedural success was defined as less of residual 50% diameter stenosis at the origin of the SB with a final TIMI 3 and/or freedom from in‐hospital MACE.
Results
Technical success was achieved, respectively, in 92% (group I), and 83% (group II). Clinical and angiographic procedural success was achieved in 98% of the lesions. In Group II, no other balloon of the same size could cross in cases where Glider could not. A total of 13 complications were observed, including nine ostial SB dissection four of which needed a second stent on the SB, one stent loss, two severe coronary spasms, and two by thrombus formation.
Conclusion
The unique possibility offered by this short dedicated balloon to orientate its beveled tip provides an effective strategy for recrossing stent struts when conventional low profile balloons fail achieving greater SB ostial expansion thus reducing the incidence of strut malapposition during provisional treatment of bifurcational lesions. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>23729282</pmid><doi>10.1002/ccd.25040</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1522-1946 |
ispartof | Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions, 2017-01, Vol.89 (1), p.E1-E6 |
issn | 1522-1946 1522-726X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1826571210 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Aged Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary - adverse effects Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary - instrumentation Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary - mortality bifurcation Cardiac Catheters Coronary Angiography Coronary Artery Disease - diagnostic imaging Coronary Artery Disease - mortality Coronary Artery Disease - therapy Coronary Thrombosis - etiology Coronary Vasospasm - etiology drug eluting stents Female Germany Humans Israel kissing balloon Male Middle Aged Myocardial Infarction - etiology Prospective Studies Prosthesis Design Registries Risk Factors Stents Time Factors Treatment Outcome United Kingdom X-Ray Microtomography |
title | The Glider registry |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T08%3A47%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Glider%20registry&rft.jtitle=Catheterization%20and%20cardiovascular%20interventions&rft.au=Secco,%20Gioel%20Gabrio&rft.date=2017-01&rft.volume=89&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=E1&rft.epage=E6&rft.pages=E1-E6&rft.issn=1522-1946&rft.eissn=1522-726X&rft.coden=CARIF2&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ccd.25040&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4306755561%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1860954668&rft_id=info:pmid/23729282&rfr_iscdi=true |