An economic model of amniocentesis choice

Medical practitioners typically utilize the following protocol when advising pregnant women about testing for the possibility of genetic disorders with their fetus. Pregnant women over the age of 35 should be tested for Down syndrome and other genetic disorders, while for younger women, such tests a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Advances in life course research 2010-03, Vol.15 (1), p.11-26
Hauptverfasser: Fajnzylber, Eduardo, Hotz, V. Joseph, Sanders, Seth G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 26
container_issue 1
container_start_page 11
container_title Advances in life course research
container_volume 15
creator Fajnzylber, Eduardo
Hotz, V. Joseph
Sanders, Seth G.
description Medical practitioners typically utilize the following protocol when advising pregnant women about testing for the possibility of genetic disorders with their fetus. Pregnant women over the age of 35 should be tested for Down syndrome and other genetic disorders, while for younger women, such tests are discouraged (or not discussed) as the test can cause a pregnancy to miscarry. The logic appears compelling. The rate at which amniocentesis causes a pregnancy to miscarry is constant while the rate of genetic disorder rises substantially over a woman's reproductive years. Hence the potential benefit from testing – being able to terminate a fetus that is known to have a genetic disorder – rises with maternal age. This article argues that this logic is incomplete. While the benefits to testing do rise with age, the costs rise as well. Undergoing an amniocentesis always entails the risk of inducing a miscarriage of a healthy fetus. However, these costs are lower at early ages, because there is a higher probability of being able to replace a miscarried fetus with a healthy birth at a later age. We develop and calibrate a dynamic model of amniocentesis choice to explore this tradeoff. For parameters that characterize realistic age patterns of chromosomal abnormalities, fertility rates and miscarriages following amniocentesis, our model implies a falling, rather than rising, rate of amniocentesis as women approach menopause.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.alcr.2010.08.001
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1826167395</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1040260810000274</els_id><sourcerecordid>1826167395</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-504a4daacd2a64b4001a443862f361b9d5c673ee1d20077916fb400c6c35a2033</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1PwzAMhiMEYtPYH-CAegMOLU6apq3EZZr4kiZxgXOUJa7I1DYj6ZD496RscNzJlvX4tfUQckkho0DF3SZTrfYZgziAKgOgJ2RKq7JORV3y09gDh5QJqCZkHsIGIlFTwYrinEwYLX7bKbld9Alq17vO6qRzBtvENYnqeus09gMGGxL94azGC3LWqDbg_FBn5P3x4W35nK5en16Wi1WqeVUOaQFccaOUNkwJvubxrOI8rwRrckHXtSm0KHNEahhAWcaXmhHSQueFYpDnM3K9z91697nDMMjOBo1tq3p0uyBLwTmLETSSN0dJWjFBI1kXEWV7VHsXgsdGbr3tlP-WFOToU27k6FOOPiVUMr4dl64O-bt1h-Z_5c9eBO73AEYfXxa9DNpir9FYj3qQxtlj-T-6GIMt</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1826167395</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An economic model of amniocentesis choice</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Fajnzylber, Eduardo ; Hotz, V. Joseph ; Sanders, Seth G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Fajnzylber, Eduardo ; Hotz, V. Joseph ; Sanders, Seth G.</creatorcontrib><description>Medical practitioners typically utilize the following protocol when advising pregnant women about testing for the possibility of genetic disorders with their fetus. Pregnant women over the age of 35 should be tested for Down syndrome and other genetic disorders, while for younger women, such tests are discouraged (or not discussed) as the test can cause a pregnancy to miscarry. The logic appears compelling. The rate at which amniocentesis causes a pregnancy to miscarry is constant while the rate of genetic disorder rises substantially over a woman's reproductive years. Hence the potential benefit from testing – being able to terminate a fetus that is known to have a genetic disorder – rises with maternal age. This article argues that this logic is incomplete. While the benefits to testing do rise with age, the costs rise as well. Undergoing an amniocentesis always entails the risk of inducing a miscarriage of a healthy fetus. However, these costs are lower at early ages, because there is a higher probability of being able to replace a miscarried fetus with a healthy birth at a later age. We develop and calibrate a dynamic model of amniocentesis choice to explore this tradeoff. For parameters that characterize realistic age patterns of chromosomal abnormalities, fertility rates and miscarriages following amniocentesis, our model implies a falling, rather than rising, rate of amniocentesis as women approach menopause.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1040-2608</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1569-4909</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-6974</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.alcr.2010.08.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21516255</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Amniocentesis ; Females ; Fertility ; Fetus ; Genetics ; Miscarriage ; Pregnancy</subject><ispartof>Advances in life course research, 2010-03, Vol.15 (1), p.11-26</ispartof><rights>2010 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-504a4daacd2a64b4001a443862f361b9d5c673ee1d20077916fb400c6c35a2033</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-504a4daacd2a64b4001a443862f361b9d5c673ee1d20077916fb400c6c35a2033</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923,33773</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21516255$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fajnzylber, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hotz, V. Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanders, Seth G.</creatorcontrib><title>An economic model of amniocentesis choice</title><title>Advances in life course research</title><addtitle>Adv Life Course Res</addtitle><description>Medical practitioners typically utilize the following protocol when advising pregnant women about testing for the possibility of genetic disorders with their fetus. Pregnant women over the age of 35 should be tested for Down syndrome and other genetic disorders, while for younger women, such tests are discouraged (or not discussed) as the test can cause a pregnancy to miscarry. The logic appears compelling. The rate at which amniocentesis causes a pregnancy to miscarry is constant while the rate of genetic disorder rises substantially over a woman's reproductive years. Hence the potential benefit from testing – being able to terminate a fetus that is known to have a genetic disorder – rises with maternal age. This article argues that this logic is incomplete. While the benefits to testing do rise with age, the costs rise as well. Undergoing an amniocentesis always entails the risk of inducing a miscarriage of a healthy fetus. However, these costs are lower at early ages, because there is a higher probability of being able to replace a miscarried fetus with a healthy birth at a later age. We develop and calibrate a dynamic model of amniocentesis choice to explore this tradeoff. For parameters that characterize realistic age patterns of chromosomal abnormalities, fertility rates and miscarriages following amniocentesis, our model implies a falling, rather than rising, rate of amniocentesis as women approach menopause.</description><subject>Amniocentesis</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Fertility</subject><subject>Fetus</subject><subject>Genetics</subject><subject>Miscarriage</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><issn>1040-2608</issn><issn>1569-4909</issn><issn>1879-6974</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1PwzAMhiMEYtPYH-CAegMOLU6apq3EZZr4kiZxgXOUJa7I1DYj6ZD496RscNzJlvX4tfUQckkho0DF3SZTrfYZgziAKgOgJ2RKq7JORV3y09gDh5QJqCZkHsIGIlFTwYrinEwYLX7bKbld9Alq17vO6qRzBtvENYnqeus09gMGGxL94azGC3LWqDbg_FBn5P3x4W35nK5en16Wi1WqeVUOaQFccaOUNkwJvubxrOI8rwRrckHXtSm0KHNEahhAWcaXmhHSQueFYpDnM3K9z91697nDMMjOBo1tq3p0uyBLwTmLETSSN0dJWjFBI1kXEWV7VHsXgsdGbr3tlP-WFOToU27k6FOOPiVUMr4dl64O-bt1h-Z_5c9eBO73AEYfXxa9DNpir9FYj3qQxtlj-T-6GIMt</recordid><startdate>20100301</startdate><enddate>20100301</enddate><creator>Fajnzylber, Eduardo</creator><creator>Hotz, V. Joseph</creator><creator>Sanders, Seth G.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100301</creationdate><title>An economic model of amniocentesis choice</title><author>Fajnzylber, Eduardo ; Hotz, V. Joseph ; Sanders, Seth G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-504a4daacd2a64b4001a443862f361b9d5c673ee1d20077916fb400c6c35a2033</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Amniocentesis</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Fertility</topic><topic>Fetus</topic><topic>Genetics</topic><topic>Miscarriage</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fajnzylber, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hotz, V. Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanders, Seth G.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Advances in life course research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fajnzylber, Eduardo</au><au>Hotz, V. Joseph</au><au>Sanders, Seth G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An economic model of amniocentesis choice</atitle><jtitle>Advances in life course research</jtitle><addtitle>Adv Life Course Res</addtitle><date>2010-03-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>11</spage><epage>26</epage><pages>11-26</pages><issn>1040-2608</issn><issn>1569-4909</issn><eissn>1879-6974</eissn><abstract>Medical practitioners typically utilize the following protocol when advising pregnant women about testing for the possibility of genetic disorders with their fetus. Pregnant women over the age of 35 should be tested for Down syndrome and other genetic disorders, while for younger women, such tests are discouraged (or not discussed) as the test can cause a pregnancy to miscarry. The logic appears compelling. The rate at which amniocentesis causes a pregnancy to miscarry is constant while the rate of genetic disorder rises substantially over a woman's reproductive years. Hence the potential benefit from testing – being able to terminate a fetus that is known to have a genetic disorder – rises with maternal age. This article argues that this logic is incomplete. While the benefits to testing do rise with age, the costs rise as well. Undergoing an amniocentesis always entails the risk of inducing a miscarriage of a healthy fetus. However, these costs are lower at early ages, because there is a higher probability of being able to replace a miscarried fetus with a healthy birth at a later age. We develop and calibrate a dynamic model of amniocentesis choice to explore this tradeoff. For parameters that characterize realistic age patterns of chromosomal abnormalities, fertility rates and miscarriages following amniocentesis, our model implies a falling, rather than rising, rate of amniocentesis as women approach menopause.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>21516255</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.alcr.2010.08.001</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1040-2608
ispartof Advances in life course research, 2010-03, Vol.15 (1), p.11-26
issn 1040-2608
1569-4909
1879-6974
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1826167395
source Sociological Abstracts; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Amniocentesis
Females
Fertility
Fetus
Genetics
Miscarriage
Pregnancy
title An economic model of amniocentesis choice
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T20%3A35%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20economic%20model%20of%20amniocentesis%20choice&rft.jtitle=Advances%20in%20life%20course%20research&rft.au=Fajnzylber,%20Eduardo&rft.date=2010-03-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=11&rft.epage=26&rft.pages=11-26&rft.issn=1040-2608&rft.eissn=1879-6974&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.alcr.2010.08.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1826167395%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1826167395&rft_id=info:pmid/21516255&rft_els_id=S1040260810000274&rfr_iscdi=true