Effects of different working fluid use on the energy and exergy performance for evacuated tube solar collector with thermosyphon heat pipe

In this study, the effects of six different working fluids, hexane, petroleum ether, chloroform, acetone, methanol and ethanol on the energy and exergy performance are investigated in evacuated tube solar collectors with thermosyphon heat pipe under three different air velocities as 2, 3 and 4 ms−1....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Renewable energy 2016-10, Vol.96, p.244-256
1. Verfasser: Ersoz, Mustafa Ali
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 256
container_issue
container_start_page 244
container_title Renewable energy
container_volume 96
creator Ersoz, Mustafa Ali
description In this study, the effects of six different working fluids, hexane, petroleum ether, chloroform, acetone, methanol and ethanol on the energy and exergy performance are investigated in evacuated tube solar collectors with thermosyphon heat pipe under three different air velocities as 2, 3 and 4 ms−1. The six evacuated tube solar collectors with thermosyphon heat pipe with the same dimensions and properties are designated for the air heating and tested under the outdoor climatic conditions of Uşak, Turkey. The lowest energy and exergy efficiencies occur in the THPETC-Hexane under 2, 3 and 4 ms−1, the highest energy efficiency occurs in the THPETC-Acetone for air velocity of 2 and 3 ms−1 and in the THPETC-Chloroform for air velocity of 4 ms−1. The highest exergy efficiency occurs in the THPETC-Acetone for air velocity of 2 ms−1 and in the THPETC-Chloroform for air velocity of 3 and 4 ms−1. •THPETC with different working fluids are investigated under different air velocities.•Hexane, petroleum ether, chloroform, acetone, methanol and ethanol are used.•Hexane has the lowest energy and exergy efficiency.•Acetone and chloroform show the best results for energy and exergy efficiency.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.renene.2016.04.058
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1825559746</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0960148116303603</els_id><sourcerecordid>1808629717</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-4412006939edaf7d5b418ecdca46e17d428c575c75e616194bbc8d50c76bf1143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1u1DAUhS1EJYbSN2DhJZsE34z_skFCVfmRKnVT1pZjX3c8ZOJgJy3zCn3qehjWCHnhc-VzvyvfQ8h7YC0wkB_3bcapnrarVct4y4R-RTagVd8wqbvXZMN6yRrgGt6Qt6XsGQOhFd-Q55sQ0C2FpkB9rLqSFvqU8s84PdAwrtHTtSBNE112SOuQ_HCkdvIUf_-RM-aQ8sFODmkVFB-tW-2Cni7rgLSk0Wbq0jjWKfX5KS67EykfUjnOu4rdoV3oHGd8Ry6CHQte_b0vyY8vN_fX35rbu6_frz_fNo7Ddmk4h44x2W979DYoLwYOGp13lksE5XmnnVDCKYESJPR8GJz2gjklhwDAt5fkw5k75_RrxbKYQywOx9FOmNZiQHdCiF5x-R9WpmXXK1DVys9Wl1MpGYOZczzYfDTAzCklszfnlMwpJcO4qSnVtk_nNqw_foyYTXER6zJ9zHVjxqf4b8ALFXqfnw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1808629717</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of different working fluid use on the energy and exergy performance for evacuated tube solar collector with thermosyphon heat pipe</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Ersoz, Mustafa Ali</creator><creatorcontrib>Ersoz, Mustafa Ali</creatorcontrib><description>In this study, the effects of six different working fluids, hexane, petroleum ether, chloroform, acetone, methanol and ethanol on the energy and exergy performance are investigated in evacuated tube solar collectors with thermosyphon heat pipe under three different air velocities as 2, 3 and 4 ms−1. The six evacuated tube solar collectors with thermosyphon heat pipe with the same dimensions and properties are designated for the air heating and tested under the outdoor climatic conditions of Uşak, Turkey. The lowest energy and exergy efficiencies occur in the THPETC-Hexane under 2, 3 and 4 ms−1, the highest energy efficiency occurs in the THPETC-Acetone for air velocity of 2 and 3 ms−1 and in the THPETC-Chloroform for air velocity of 4 ms−1. The highest exergy efficiency occurs in the THPETC-Acetone for air velocity of 2 ms−1 and in the THPETC-Chloroform for air velocity of 3 and 4 ms−1. •THPETC with different working fluids are investigated under different air velocities.•Hexane, petroleum ether, chloroform, acetone, methanol and ethanol are used.•Hexane has the lowest energy and exergy efficiency.•Acetone and chloroform show the best results for energy and exergy efficiency.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-1481</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0682</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2016.04.058</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Energy ; Energy management ; Evacuated tube ; Evacuation ; Exergy ; Heat pipes ; Solar collectors ; Thermosyphon heat pipe ; Thermosyphons ; Tubes ; Working fluid ; Working fluids</subject><ispartof>Renewable energy, 2016-10, Vol.96, p.244-256</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-4412006939edaf7d5b418ecdca46e17d428c575c75e616194bbc8d50c76bf1143</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-4412006939edaf7d5b418ecdca46e17d428c575c75e616194bbc8d50c76bf1143</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.04.058$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ersoz, Mustafa Ali</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of different working fluid use on the energy and exergy performance for evacuated tube solar collector with thermosyphon heat pipe</title><title>Renewable energy</title><description>In this study, the effects of six different working fluids, hexane, petroleum ether, chloroform, acetone, methanol and ethanol on the energy and exergy performance are investigated in evacuated tube solar collectors with thermosyphon heat pipe under three different air velocities as 2, 3 and 4 ms−1. The six evacuated tube solar collectors with thermosyphon heat pipe with the same dimensions and properties are designated for the air heating and tested under the outdoor climatic conditions of Uşak, Turkey. The lowest energy and exergy efficiencies occur in the THPETC-Hexane under 2, 3 and 4 ms−1, the highest energy efficiency occurs in the THPETC-Acetone for air velocity of 2 and 3 ms−1 and in the THPETC-Chloroform for air velocity of 4 ms−1. The highest exergy efficiency occurs in the THPETC-Acetone for air velocity of 2 ms−1 and in the THPETC-Chloroform for air velocity of 3 and 4 ms−1. •THPETC with different working fluids are investigated under different air velocities.•Hexane, petroleum ether, chloroform, acetone, methanol and ethanol are used.•Hexane has the lowest energy and exergy efficiency.•Acetone and chloroform show the best results for energy and exergy efficiency.</description><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy management</subject><subject>Evacuated tube</subject><subject>Evacuation</subject><subject>Exergy</subject><subject>Heat pipes</subject><subject>Solar collectors</subject><subject>Thermosyphon heat pipe</subject><subject>Thermosyphons</subject><subject>Tubes</subject><subject>Working fluid</subject><subject>Working fluids</subject><issn>0960-1481</issn><issn>1879-0682</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkc1u1DAUhS1EJYbSN2DhJZsE34z_skFCVfmRKnVT1pZjX3c8ZOJgJy3zCn3qehjWCHnhc-VzvyvfQ8h7YC0wkB_3bcapnrarVct4y4R-RTagVd8wqbvXZMN6yRrgGt6Qt6XsGQOhFd-Q55sQ0C2FpkB9rLqSFvqU8s84PdAwrtHTtSBNE112SOuQ_HCkdvIUf_-RM-aQ8sFODmkVFB-tW-2Cni7rgLSk0Wbq0jjWKfX5KS67EykfUjnOu4rdoV3oHGd8Ry6CHQte_b0vyY8vN_fX35rbu6_frz_fNo7Ddmk4h44x2W979DYoLwYOGp13lksE5XmnnVDCKYESJPR8GJz2gjklhwDAt5fkw5k75_RrxbKYQywOx9FOmNZiQHdCiF5x-R9WpmXXK1DVys9Wl1MpGYOZczzYfDTAzCklszfnlMwpJcO4qSnVtk_nNqw_foyYTXER6zJ9zHVjxqf4b8ALFXqfnw</recordid><startdate>20161001</startdate><enddate>20161001</enddate><creator>Ersoz, Mustafa Ali</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161001</creationdate><title>Effects of different working fluid use on the energy and exergy performance for evacuated tube solar collector with thermosyphon heat pipe</title><author>Ersoz, Mustafa Ali</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-4412006939edaf7d5b418ecdca46e17d428c575c75e616194bbc8d50c76bf1143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy management</topic><topic>Evacuated tube</topic><topic>Evacuation</topic><topic>Exergy</topic><topic>Heat pipes</topic><topic>Solar collectors</topic><topic>Thermosyphon heat pipe</topic><topic>Thermosyphons</topic><topic>Tubes</topic><topic>Working fluid</topic><topic>Working fluids</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ersoz, Mustafa Ali</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Renewable energy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ersoz, Mustafa Ali</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of different working fluid use on the energy and exergy performance for evacuated tube solar collector with thermosyphon heat pipe</atitle><jtitle>Renewable energy</jtitle><date>2016-10-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>96</volume><spage>244</spage><epage>256</epage><pages>244-256</pages><issn>0960-1481</issn><eissn>1879-0682</eissn><abstract>In this study, the effects of six different working fluids, hexane, petroleum ether, chloroform, acetone, methanol and ethanol on the energy and exergy performance are investigated in evacuated tube solar collectors with thermosyphon heat pipe under three different air velocities as 2, 3 and 4 ms−1. The six evacuated tube solar collectors with thermosyphon heat pipe with the same dimensions and properties are designated for the air heating and tested under the outdoor climatic conditions of Uşak, Turkey. The lowest energy and exergy efficiencies occur in the THPETC-Hexane under 2, 3 and 4 ms−1, the highest energy efficiency occurs in the THPETC-Acetone for air velocity of 2 and 3 ms−1 and in the THPETC-Chloroform for air velocity of 4 ms−1. The highest exergy efficiency occurs in the THPETC-Acetone for air velocity of 2 ms−1 and in the THPETC-Chloroform for air velocity of 3 and 4 ms−1. •THPETC with different working fluids are investigated under different air velocities.•Hexane, petroleum ether, chloroform, acetone, methanol and ethanol are used.•Hexane has the lowest energy and exergy efficiency.•Acetone and chloroform show the best results for energy and exergy efficiency.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.renene.2016.04.058</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0960-1481
ispartof Renewable energy, 2016-10, Vol.96, p.244-256
issn 0960-1481
1879-0682
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1825559746
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Energy
Energy management
Evacuated tube
Evacuation
Exergy
Heat pipes
Solar collectors
Thermosyphon heat pipe
Thermosyphons
Tubes
Working fluid
Working fluids
title Effects of different working fluid use on the energy and exergy performance for evacuated tube solar collector with thermosyphon heat pipe
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T04%3A28%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20different%20working%20fluid%20use%20on%20the%20energy%20and%20exergy%20performance%20for%20evacuated%20tube%20solar%20collector%20with%20thermosyphon%20heat%20pipe&rft.jtitle=Renewable%20energy&rft.au=Ersoz,%20Mustafa%20Ali&rft.date=2016-10-01&rft.volume=96&rft.spage=244&rft.epage=256&rft.pages=244-256&rft.issn=0960-1481&rft.eissn=1879-0682&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.renene.2016.04.058&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1808629717%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1808629717&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0960148116303603&rfr_iscdi=true