Tillage, crop rotation, and organic amendment effect on changes in soil organic matter
The models CQESTR and RUSLE were used to estimate carbon sequestration in agricultural soils. Carbon sequestration in agricultural soils is controlled by the balance of added organic residues and microbial oxidation of both residues and native organic matter (OM) as moderated by management and tilla...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental pollution (1987) 2002-01, Vol.116 (3), p.405-411 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 411 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 405 |
| container_title | Environmental pollution (1987) |
| container_volume | 116 |
| creator | Rickman, R Douglas, C Albrecht, S Berc, J |
| description | The models CQESTR and RUSLE were used to estimate carbon sequestration in agricultural soils.
Carbon sequestration in agricultural soils is controlled by the balance of added organic residues and microbial oxidation of both residues and native organic matter (OM) as moderated by management and tillage. The PC-based model CQESTR predicts decomposition of residues, organic amendments and soil OM, based on cropping practices. CQESTR uses RUSLE (Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation) crop rotation and management practice, crop production, and operation databases. These data are supplemented with residue nitrogen and soil OM, bulk density, and layer thickness. CQESTR was calibrated with soil carbon data from 70-year-long experiments at the Research Center at Pendleton, OR. The calibrated model provides estimates with a 95% confidence interval of 0.33% OM. Validation at 11 independent sites resulted in a matching of observed with calculated OM with a 95% confidence interval of 0.55% OM. A 12th site, with a history of severe erosion, provided a poor match. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0269-7491(01)00217-2 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18255558</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0269749101002172</els_id><sourcerecordid>18255558</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c519t-185af4b23cd0fd75ccd23cb726980d057d4c740645e910744d38fc698c5989653</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkFFrFDEQgIMo9qz-BCUvikJXZ3aTzeapSNG2UPDB6mvIJbNnZDc5kz2h_96cd7SPDQkTyDeTmY-x1wgfEbD_9B3aXjdKaHwP-AGgRdW0T9gKB9U1vWjFU7a6R07Yi1J-A4Douu45O0Ec2lahXrGft2Ga7IbOuMtpy3Na7BJSPOM2ep7yxsbguJ0p-noWTuNIbuEpcvfLxg0VHiIvKUz37GyXhfJL9my0U6FXx3jKfnz9cntx1dx8u7y--HzTOIl6aXCQdhTrtnMeRq-kc77e16r2PYAHqbxwSkAvJGkEJYTvhtHVRyf1oHvZnbJ3h7rbnP7sqCxmDsVRHSlS2hVT55R1DY-DogfUqCsoD2D1UUqm0WxzmG2-Mwhmb978N2_2Wg3UvTdv2pr35vjBbj2Tf8g6qq7A2yNgi7PTmG10oTxwncCh7_eFzg8cVW9_A2VTXKDoyIdc3RufwiOt_APuZ55q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14601919</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Tillage, crop rotation, and organic amendment effect on changes in soil organic matter</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Rickman, R ; Douglas, C ; Albrecht, S ; Berc, J</creator><creatorcontrib>Rickman, R ; Douglas, C ; Albrecht, S ; Berc, J</creatorcontrib><description>The models CQESTR and RUSLE were used to estimate carbon sequestration in agricultural soils.
Carbon sequestration in agricultural soils is controlled by the balance of added organic residues and microbial oxidation of both residues and native organic matter (OM) as moderated by management and tillage. The PC-based model CQESTR predicts decomposition of residues, organic amendments and soil OM, based on cropping practices. CQESTR uses RUSLE (Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation) crop rotation and management practice, crop production, and operation databases. These data are supplemented with residue nitrogen and soil OM, bulk density, and layer thickness. CQESTR was calibrated with soil carbon data from 70-year-long experiments at the Research Center at Pendleton, OR. The calibrated model provides estimates with a 95% confidence interval of 0.33% OM. Validation at 11 independent sites resulted in a matching of observed with calculated OM with a 95% confidence interval of 0.55% OM. A 12th site, with a history of severe erosion, provided a poor match.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-7491</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6424</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0269-7491(01)00217-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11822719</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ENVPAF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Agricultural soils ; Agriculture ; Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Biological and medical sciences ; Calibration ; Carbon - analysis ; Carbon - metabolism ; Carbon - pharmacokinetics ; Carbon sequestration ; Chemical, physicochemical, biochemical and biological properties ; Crop rotation ; Environmental Monitoring ; Fertilizers ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Organic Chemicals - analysis ; Organic matter ; Oxidation-Reduction ; Physics, chemistry, biochemistry and biology of agricultural and forest soils ; Plants ; Soil ; Soil Microbiology ; Soil science ; Tillage</subject><ispartof>Environmental pollution (1987), 2002-01, Vol.116 (3), p.405-411</ispartof><rights>2001</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c519t-185af4b23cd0fd75ccd23cb726980d057d4c740645e910744d38fc698c5989653</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c519t-185af4b23cd0fd75ccd23cb726980d057d4c740645e910744d38fc698c5989653</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0269749101002172$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,776,780,785,786,3537,23909,23910,25118,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=13418662$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11822719$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rickman, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Douglas, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albrecht, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berc, J</creatorcontrib><title>Tillage, crop rotation, and organic amendment effect on changes in soil organic matter</title><title>Environmental pollution (1987)</title><addtitle>Environ Pollut</addtitle><description>The models CQESTR and RUSLE were used to estimate carbon sequestration in agricultural soils.
Carbon sequestration in agricultural soils is controlled by the balance of added organic residues and microbial oxidation of both residues and native organic matter (OM) as moderated by management and tillage. The PC-based model CQESTR predicts decomposition of residues, organic amendments and soil OM, based on cropping practices. CQESTR uses RUSLE (Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation) crop rotation and management practice, crop production, and operation databases. These data are supplemented with residue nitrogen and soil OM, bulk density, and layer thickness. CQESTR was calibrated with soil carbon data from 70-year-long experiments at the Research Center at Pendleton, OR. The calibrated model provides estimates with a 95% confidence interval of 0.33% OM. Validation at 11 independent sites resulted in a matching of observed with calculated OM with a 95% confidence interval of 0.55% OM. A 12th site, with a history of severe erosion, provided a poor match.</description><subject>Agricultural soils</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Carbon - analysis</subject><subject>Carbon - metabolism</subject><subject>Carbon - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Carbon sequestration</subject><subject>Chemical, physicochemical, biochemical and biological properties</subject><subject>Crop rotation</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring</subject><subject>Fertilizers</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Organic Chemicals - analysis</subject><subject>Organic matter</subject><subject>Oxidation-Reduction</subject><subject>Physics, chemistry, biochemistry and biology of agricultural and forest soils</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Soil Microbiology</subject><subject>Soil science</subject><subject>Tillage</subject><issn>0269-7491</issn><issn>1873-6424</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkFFrFDEQgIMo9qz-BCUvikJXZ3aTzeapSNG2UPDB6mvIJbNnZDc5kz2h_96cd7SPDQkTyDeTmY-x1wgfEbD_9B3aXjdKaHwP-AGgRdW0T9gKB9U1vWjFU7a6R07Yi1J-A4Douu45O0Ec2lahXrGft2Ga7IbOuMtpy3Na7BJSPOM2ep7yxsbguJ0p-noWTuNIbuEpcvfLxg0VHiIvKUz37GyXhfJL9my0U6FXx3jKfnz9cntx1dx8u7y--HzTOIl6aXCQdhTrtnMeRq-kc77e16r2PYAHqbxwSkAvJGkEJYTvhtHVRyf1oHvZnbJ3h7rbnP7sqCxmDsVRHSlS2hVT55R1DY-DogfUqCsoD2D1UUqm0WxzmG2-Mwhmb978N2_2Wg3UvTdv2pr35vjBbj2Tf8g6qq7A2yNgi7PTmG10oTxwncCh7_eFzg8cVW9_A2VTXKDoyIdc3RufwiOt_APuZ55q</recordid><startdate>20020101</startdate><enddate>20020101</enddate><creator>Rickman, R</creator><creator>Douglas, C</creator><creator>Albrecht, S</creator><creator>Berc, J</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TV</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020101</creationdate><title>Tillage, crop rotation, and organic amendment effect on changes in soil organic matter</title><author>Rickman, R ; Douglas, C ; Albrecht, S ; Berc, J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c519t-185af4b23cd0fd75ccd23cb726980d057d4c740645e910744d38fc698c5989653</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Agricultural soils</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Carbon - analysis</topic><topic>Carbon - metabolism</topic><topic>Carbon - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Carbon sequestration</topic><topic>Chemical, physicochemical, biochemical and biological properties</topic><topic>Crop rotation</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring</topic><topic>Fertilizers</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Organic Chemicals - analysis</topic><topic>Organic matter</topic><topic>Oxidation-Reduction</topic><topic>Physics, chemistry, biochemistry and biology of agricultural and forest soils</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Soil Microbiology</topic><topic>Soil science</topic><topic>Tillage</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rickman, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Douglas, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Albrecht, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berc, J</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environmental pollution (1987)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rickman, R</au><au>Douglas, C</au><au>Albrecht, S</au><au>Berc, J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Tillage, crop rotation, and organic amendment effect on changes in soil organic matter</atitle><jtitle>Environmental pollution (1987)</jtitle><addtitle>Environ Pollut</addtitle><date>2002-01-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>116</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>405</spage><epage>411</epage><pages>405-411</pages><issn>0269-7491</issn><eissn>1873-6424</eissn><coden>ENVPAF</coden><abstract>The models CQESTR and RUSLE were used to estimate carbon sequestration in agricultural soils.
Carbon sequestration in agricultural soils is controlled by the balance of added organic residues and microbial oxidation of both residues and native organic matter (OM) as moderated by management and tillage. The PC-based model CQESTR predicts decomposition of residues, organic amendments and soil OM, based on cropping practices. CQESTR uses RUSLE (Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation) crop rotation and management practice, crop production, and operation databases. These data are supplemented with residue nitrogen and soil OM, bulk density, and layer thickness. CQESTR was calibrated with soil carbon data from 70-year-long experiments at the Research Center at Pendleton, OR. The calibrated model provides estimates with a 95% confidence interval of 0.33% OM. Validation at 11 independent sites resulted in a matching of observed with calculated OM with a 95% confidence interval of 0.55% OM. A 12th site, with a history of severe erosion, provided a poor match.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>11822719</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0269-7491(01)00217-2</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0269-7491 |
| ispartof | Environmental pollution (1987), 2002-01, Vol.116 (3), p.405-411 |
| issn | 0269-7491 1873-6424 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18255558 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
| subjects | Agricultural soils Agriculture Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions Biological and medical sciences Calibration Carbon - analysis Carbon - metabolism Carbon - pharmacokinetics Carbon sequestration Chemical, physicochemical, biochemical and biological properties Crop rotation Environmental Monitoring Fertilizers Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Organic Chemicals - analysis Organic matter Oxidation-Reduction Physics, chemistry, biochemistry and biology of agricultural and forest soils Plants Soil Soil Microbiology Soil science Tillage |
| title | Tillage, crop rotation, and organic amendment effect on changes in soil organic matter |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T16%3A06%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Tillage,%20crop%20rotation,%20and%20organic%20amendment%20effect%20on%20changes%20in%20soil%20organic%20matter&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20pollution%20(1987)&rft.au=Rickman,%20R&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=116&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=405&rft.epage=411&rft.pages=405-411&rft.issn=0269-7491&rft.eissn=1873-6424&rft.coden=ENVPAF&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0269-7491(01)00217-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E18255558%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14601919&rft_id=info:pmid/11822719&rft_els_id=S0269749101002172&rfr_iscdi=true |