A review of governmental support instruments channeling PV market growth in the Flanders region of Belgium (2006–2013)
How did a country in the middle of Western Europe, starting almost from scratch, reach the European top 3 in terms of solar PV capacity in five years? And what were the costs? We provide a systematic chronological review of the different governmental support instruments that drove the exponential gr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Renewable & sustainable energy reviews 2016-09, Vol.62, p.1282-1290 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1290 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 1282 |
container_title | Renewable & sustainable energy reviews |
container_volume | 62 |
creator | Huijben, J.C.C.M. Podoynitsyna, K.S. van Rijn, M.L.B. Verbong, G.P.J. |
description | How did a country in the middle of Western Europe, starting almost from scratch, reach the European top 3 in terms of solar PV capacity in five years? And what were the costs? We provide a systematic chronological review of the different governmental support instruments that drove the exponential growth of the solar energy market in the Flanders region of Belgium and calculate their relative contributions. The results of the economic calculations show that green electricity certificates had by far the greatest effect on both the rise and stagnation of the market, costing about 1.5 billion euro only for 2006–2013. The long-term societal costs of such growth proved to be even higher (6.7 billion for 2014–2031) and unevenly distributed, with residents paying the highest price via their energy bills. Companies continuously adapted their organizations to enact the available support instruments. Counter-intuitively, the substantial support shifted the attention of companies to the larger systems, even though the incentive for investment in PV was lower than for the smaller systems. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.rser.2016.04.058 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1825553250</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1364032116300910</els_id><sourcerecordid>1808635331</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-48741ee498cc775b63e4eb953e3ff05effecbfeba18dbbc842615a2e854aba553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc9O3DAQxqOqlUqhL9CTj3BIGMd24pW4UMSfSkjlAL1ajneS9TZrL7azwI136BvyJHW0nKueZjT6fZ9m5iuKbxQqCrQ5XVchYqjq3FfAKxDyQ3FAZbsooVnAx9yzhpfAavq5-BLjGoAK2bKD4vmcBNxZfCK-J4PfYXAbdEmPJE7brQ-JWBdTmOZhJGalncPRuoHc_SIbHX5jIkPwT2mVOZJWSK5G7ZYYYrYdrHez7XccBzttyHEN0Ly9_slbspOj4lOvx4hf3-th8XB1eX9xU97-vP5xcX5bGk4hlVy2nCLyhTSmbUXXMOTYLQRD1vcgsO_RdD12mspl1xnJ64YKXaMUXHdaCHZYHO99t8E_ThiT2thocMxrop-iorIWGasF_AcKsmGCMZrReo-a4GMM2KttsPkfL4qCmhNRazUnouZEFHCVE8mis70I873550FFY9EZXNqAJqmlt_-S_wXe0JYz</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1808635331</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A review of governmental support instruments channeling PV market growth in the Flanders region of Belgium (2006–2013)</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Huijben, J.C.C.M. ; Podoynitsyna, K.S. ; van Rijn, M.L.B. ; Verbong, G.P.J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Huijben, J.C.C.M. ; Podoynitsyna, K.S. ; van Rijn, M.L.B. ; Verbong, G.P.J.</creatorcontrib><description>How did a country in the middle of Western Europe, starting almost from scratch, reach the European top 3 in terms of solar PV capacity in five years? And what were the costs? We provide a systematic chronological review of the different governmental support instruments that drove the exponential growth of the solar energy market in the Flanders region of Belgium and calculate their relative contributions. The results of the economic calculations show that green electricity certificates had by far the greatest effect on both the rise and stagnation of the market, costing about 1.5 billion euro only for 2006–2013. The long-term societal costs of such growth proved to be even higher (6.7 billion for 2014–2031) and unevenly distributed, with residents paying the highest price via their energy bills. Companies continuously adapted their organizations to enact the available support instruments. Counter-intuitively, the substantial support shifted the attention of companies to the larger systems, even though the incentive for investment in PV was lower than for the smaller systems.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1364-0321</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0690</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.04.058</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Costs ; Economics ; Energy policy ; Financing ; Flanders ; Flanders region of Belgium ; Governmental support instruments ; Green certificates ; Markets ; Mathematical analysis ; PV market growth ; Societal costs ; Stagnation</subject><ispartof>Renewable & sustainable energy reviews, 2016-09, Vol.62, p.1282-1290</ispartof><rights>2016 The Authors</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-48741ee498cc775b63e4eb953e3ff05effecbfeba18dbbc842615a2e854aba553</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-48741ee498cc775b63e4eb953e3ff05effecbfeba18dbbc842615a2e854aba553</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032116300910$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Huijben, J.C.C.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Podoynitsyna, K.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Rijn, M.L.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verbong, G.P.J.</creatorcontrib><title>A review of governmental support instruments channeling PV market growth in the Flanders region of Belgium (2006–2013)</title><title>Renewable & sustainable energy reviews</title><description>How did a country in the middle of Western Europe, starting almost from scratch, reach the European top 3 in terms of solar PV capacity in five years? And what were the costs? We provide a systematic chronological review of the different governmental support instruments that drove the exponential growth of the solar energy market in the Flanders region of Belgium and calculate their relative contributions. The results of the economic calculations show that green electricity certificates had by far the greatest effect on both the rise and stagnation of the market, costing about 1.5 billion euro only for 2006–2013. The long-term societal costs of such growth proved to be even higher (6.7 billion for 2014–2031) and unevenly distributed, with residents paying the highest price via their energy bills. Companies continuously adapted their organizations to enact the available support instruments. Counter-intuitively, the substantial support shifted the attention of companies to the larger systems, even though the incentive for investment in PV was lower than for the smaller systems.</description><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Energy policy</subject><subject>Financing</subject><subject>Flanders</subject><subject>Flanders region of Belgium</subject><subject>Governmental support instruments</subject><subject>Green certificates</subject><subject>Markets</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>PV market growth</subject><subject>Societal costs</subject><subject>Stagnation</subject><issn>1364-0321</issn><issn>1879-0690</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkc9O3DAQxqOqlUqhL9CTj3BIGMd24pW4UMSfSkjlAL1ajneS9TZrL7azwI136BvyJHW0nKueZjT6fZ9m5iuKbxQqCrQ5XVchYqjq3FfAKxDyQ3FAZbsooVnAx9yzhpfAavq5-BLjGoAK2bKD4vmcBNxZfCK-J4PfYXAbdEmPJE7brQ-JWBdTmOZhJGalncPRuoHc_SIbHX5jIkPwT2mVOZJWSK5G7ZYYYrYdrHez7XccBzttyHEN0Ly9_slbspOj4lOvx4hf3-th8XB1eX9xU97-vP5xcX5bGk4hlVy2nCLyhTSmbUXXMOTYLQRD1vcgsO_RdD12mspl1xnJ64YKXaMUXHdaCHZYHO99t8E_ThiT2thocMxrop-iorIWGasF_AcKsmGCMZrReo-a4GMM2KttsPkfL4qCmhNRazUnouZEFHCVE8mis70I873550FFY9EZXNqAJqmlt_-S_wXe0JYz</recordid><startdate>201609</startdate><enddate>201609</enddate><creator>Huijben, J.C.C.M.</creator><creator>Podoynitsyna, K.S.</creator><creator>van Rijn, M.L.B.</creator><creator>Verbong, G.P.J.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201609</creationdate><title>A review of governmental support instruments channeling PV market growth in the Flanders region of Belgium (2006–2013)</title><author>Huijben, J.C.C.M. ; Podoynitsyna, K.S. ; van Rijn, M.L.B. ; Verbong, G.P.J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-48741ee498cc775b63e4eb953e3ff05effecbfeba18dbbc842615a2e854aba553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Energy policy</topic><topic>Financing</topic><topic>Flanders</topic><topic>Flanders region of Belgium</topic><topic>Governmental support instruments</topic><topic>Green certificates</topic><topic>Markets</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>PV market growth</topic><topic>Societal costs</topic><topic>Stagnation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Huijben, J.C.C.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Podoynitsyna, K.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Rijn, M.L.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verbong, G.P.J.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Renewable & sustainable energy reviews</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Huijben, J.C.C.M.</au><au>Podoynitsyna, K.S.</au><au>van Rijn, M.L.B.</au><au>Verbong, G.P.J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A review of governmental support instruments channeling PV market growth in the Flanders region of Belgium (2006–2013)</atitle><jtitle>Renewable & sustainable energy reviews</jtitle><date>2016-09</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>62</volume><spage>1282</spage><epage>1290</epage><pages>1282-1290</pages><issn>1364-0321</issn><eissn>1879-0690</eissn><abstract>How did a country in the middle of Western Europe, starting almost from scratch, reach the European top 3 in terms of solar PV capacity in five years? And what were the costs? We provide a systematic chronological review of the different governmental support instruments that drove the exponential growth of the solar energy market in the Flanders region of Belgium and calculate their relative contributions. The results of the economic calculations show that green electricity certificates had by far the greatest effect on both the rise and stagnation of the market, costing about 1.5 billion euro only for 2006–2013. The long-term societal costs of such growth proved to be even higher (6.7 billion for 2014–2031) and unevenly distributed, with residents paying the highest price via their energy bills. Companies continuously adapted their organizations to enact the available support instruments. Counter-intuitively, the substantial support shifted the attention of companies to the larger systems, even though the incentive for investment in PV was lower than for the smaller systems.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.rser.2016.04.058</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1364-0321 |
ispartof | Renewable & sustainable energy reviews, 2016-09, Vol.62, p.1282-1290 |
issn | 1364-0321 1879-0690 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1825553250 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Costs Economics Energy policy Financing Flanders Flanders region of Belgium Governmental support instruments Green certificates Markets Mathematical analysis PV market growth Societal costs Stagnation |
title | A review of governmental support instruments channeling PV market growth in the Flanders region of Belgium (2006–2013) |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T15%3A54%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20review%20of%20governmental%20support%20instruments%20channeling%20PV%20market%20growth%20in%20the%20Flanders%20region%20of%20Belgium%20(2006%E2%80%932013)&rft.jtitle=Renewable%20&%20sustainable%20energy%20reviews&rft.au=Huijben,%20J.C.C.M.&rft.date=2016-09&rft.volume=62&rft.spage=1282&rft.epage=1290&rft.pages=1282-1290&rft.issn=1364-0321&rft.eissn=1879-0690&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.rser.2016.04.058&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1808635331%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1808635331&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1364032116300910&rfr_iscdi=true |