Iodide Residues in Milk Vary between Iodine-Based Teat Disinfectants

Majority of iodine found in dairy milk comes from the diet and teat disinfection products used during milking process. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of 4 iodine‐based teat dips on milk iodide concentrations varying in iodine level (0.25% vs. 0.5%, w/w), normal low viscosity...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of food science 2016-07, Vol.81 (7), p.T1864-T1870
Hauptverfasser: French, Elizabeth A., Mukai, Motoko, Zurakowski, Michael, Rauch, Bradley, Gioia, Gloria, Hillebrandt, Joseph R., Henderson, Mark, Schukken, Ynte H., Hemling, Thomas C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page T1870
container_issue 7
container_start_page T1864
container_title Journal of food science
container_volume 81
creator French, Elizabeth A.
Mukai, Motoko
Zurakowski, Michael
Rauch, Bradley
Gioia, Gloria
Hillebrandt, Joseph R.
Henderson, Mark
Schukken, Ynte H.
Hemling, Thomas C.
description Majority of iodine found in dairy milk comes from the diet and teat disinfection products used during milking process. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of 4 iodine‐based teat dips on milk iodide concentrations varying in iodine level (0.25% vs. 0.5%, w/w), normal low viscosity dip versus barrier dip, and application method (dip vs. spray) to ensure safe iodine levels in dairy milk when these products are used. The iodine exposure study was performed during a 2‐wk period. The trial farm was purged of all iodine‐based disinfection products for 21 d during a prestudy “washout period,” which resulted in baseline milk iodide range of 145 to 182 ppb. During the experiment, iodine‐based teat dips were used as post‐milking teat disinfectants and compared to a non‐iodine control disinfectant. Milk iodide residue levels for each treatment was evaluated from composited group samples. Introduction of different iodine‐based teat disinfectants increased iodide residue content in milk relative to the control by between 8 and 29 μg/L when averaged across the full trial period. However, residues levels for any treatment remained well below the consumable limit of 500 μg/L. The 0.5% iodine disinfectant increased milk iodide levels by 20 μg/L more compared to the 0.25% iodine. Compared to dip‐cup application, spray application significantly increased milk iodide residue by 21 μg/L and utilized approximately 23% more teat dip. This carefully controlled study demonstrated an increase in milk iodide concentrations from iodine disinfectants, but increases were small and within acceptable limits. Practical Application Dairy products contain iodine from the cow's diet and teat disinfectants used in the milking process. Milk iodine was compared between teat disinfectants varying in iodine concentrations to a disinfectant without iodine. As iodine in teat disinfectant increased, so did the iodine residues in milk. Throughout the 2‐wk testing period, milk iodine remained at levels acceptable for human consumption.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1750-3841.13358
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1825546931</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1825546931</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6168-70e0a726a23f3feae15164e8872075a99c5150797296ab844e447b8a4688f63e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkTtP7DAQhS10ESyP-nZXkW5DE_D4nRJ2eYoF8ZZoLG8ykQzZBOKsgH-Pw8IWNOBmZOs7Z8ZzCPkLdBvi2QEtacqNgG3gXJolMli8_CEDShlLAYReJWshPND-ztUKWWWayQyUGJDRcVP4ApNLDL6YYUh8nYx99ZjcuvYtmWD3glgnPVRjuucCFsk1ui4Z-eDrEvPO1V3YIMulqwJuftZ1cnOwfz08Sk_PD4-Hu6dprkCZVFOkTjPlGC95iQ5BxhnQGM2oli7LcgmS6kyzTLmJEQKF0BPjhDKmVBz5Otma-z61zXMctrNTH3KsKldjMwsWDJNSqIzDL1Aa20qp2G9QprmiTET0_zf0oZm1dfxzT4FRwHgWqZ05lbdNCC2W9qn107hPC9T2sdk-JNuHZD9ii4p_n76zyRSLBf-VUwTUHHjxFb795GdPDkZXX87pXOhDh68LoWsfrdJcS3t3dmjvz8YgLvitHfN3_8asMQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1801861239</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Iodide Residues in Milk Vary between Iodine-Based Teat Disinfectants</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>French, Elizabeth A. ; Mukai, Motoko ; Zurakowski, Michael ; Rauch, Bradley ; Gioia, Gloria ; Hillebrandt, Joseph R. ; Henderson, Mark ; Schukken, Ynte H. ; Hemling, Thomas C.</creator><creatorcontrib>French, Elizabeth A. ; Mukai, Motoko ; Zurakowski, Michael ; Rauch, Bradley ; Gioia, Gloria ; Hillebrandt, Joseph R. ; Henderson, Mark ; Schukken, Ynte H. ; Hemling, Thomas C.</creatorcontrib><description>Majority of iodine found in dairy milk comes from the diet and teat disinfection products used during milking process. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of 4 iodine‐based teat dips on milk iodide concentrations varying in iodine level (0.25% vs. 0.5%, w/w), normal low viscosity dip versus barrier dip, and application method (dip vs. spray) to ensure safe iodine levels in dairy milk when these products are used. The iodine exposure study was performed during a 2‐wk period. The trial farm was purged of all iodine‐based disinfection products for 21 d during a prestudy “washout period,” which resulted in baseline milk iodide range of 145 to 182 ppb. During the experiment, iodine‐based teat dips were used as post‐milking teat disinfectants and compared to a non‐iodine control disinfectant. Milk iodide residue levels for each treatment was evaluated from composited group samples. Introduction of different iodine‐based teat disinfectants increased iodide residue content in milk relative to the control by between 8 and 29 μg/L when averaged across the full trial period. However, residues levels for any treatment remained well below the consumable limit of 500 μg/L. The 0.5% iodine disinfectant increased milk iodide levels by 20 μg/L more compared to the 0.25% iodine. Compared to dip‐cup application, spray application significantly increased milk iodide residue by 21 μg/L and utilized approximately 23% more teat dip. This carefully controlled study demonstrated an increase in milk iodide concentrations from iodine disinfectants, but increases were small and within acceptable limits. Practical Application Dairy products contain iodine from the cow's diet and teat disinfectants used in the milking process. Milk iodine was compared between teat disinfectants varying in iodine concentrations to a disinfectant without iodine. As iodine in teat disinfectant increased, so did the iodine residues in milk. Throughout the 2‐wk testing period, milk iodine remained at levels acceptable for human consumption.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1147</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1750-3841</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1750-3841.13358</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27259164</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JFDSAZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; Dairy products ; Diet ; Dipping ; Disinfectants - chemistry ; Disinfection &amp; disinfectants ; Disinfection - methods ; Female ; Food Contamination - analysis ; Humans ; Iodides ; Iodides - analysis ; Iodine ; Iodine - analysis ; Mammary Glands, Animal ; Milk ; Milk - chemistry ; residue ; Residues ; Salicylates ; Sprayers ; Sprays ; Teats</subject><ispartof>Journal of food science, 2016-07, Vol.81 (7), p.T1864-T1870</ispartof><rights>2016 Institute of Food Technologists</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6168-70e0a726a23f3feae15164e8872075a99c5150797296ab844e447b8a4688f63e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6168-70e0a726a23f3feae15164e8872075a99c5150797296ab844e447b8a4688f63e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F1750-3841.13358$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F1750-3841.13358$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,27905,27906,45555,45556</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27259164$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>French, Elizabeth A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mukai, Motoko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zurakowski, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rauch, Bradley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gioia, Gloria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hillebrandt, Joseph R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henderson, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schukken, Ynte H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hemling, Thomas C.</creatorcontrib><title>Iodide Residues in Milk Vary between Iodine-Based Teat Disinfectants</title><title>Journal of food science</title><addtitle>Journal of Food Science</addtitle><description>Majority of iodine found in dairy milk comes from the diet and teat disinfection products used during milking process. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of 4 iodine‐based teat dips on milk iodide concentrations varying in iodine level (0.25% vs. 0.5%, w/w), normal low viscosity dip versus barrier dip, and application method (dip vs. spray) to ensure safe iodine levels in dairy milk when these products are used. The iodine exposure study was performed during a 2‐wk period. The trial farm was purged of all iodine‐based disinfection products for 21 d during a prestudy “washout period,” which resulted in baseline milk iodide range of 145 to 182 ppb. During the experiment, iodine‐based teat dips were used as post‐milking teat disinfectants and compared to a non‐iodine control disinfectant. Milk iodide residue levels for each treatment was evaluated from composited group samples. Introduction of different iodine‐based teat disinfectants increased iodide residue content in milk relative to the control by between 8 and 29 μg/L when averaged across the full trial period. However, residues levels for any treatment remained well below the consumable limit of 500 μg/L. The 0.5% iodine disinfectant increased milk iodide levels by 20 μg/L more compared to the 0.25% iodine. Compared to dip‐cup application, spray application significantly increased milk iodide residue by 21 μg/L and utilized approximately 23% more teat dip. This carefully controlled study demonstrated an increase in milk iodide concentrations from iodine disinfectants, but increases were small and within acceptable limits. Practical Application Dairy products contain iodine from the cow's diet and teat disinfectants used in the milking process. Milk iodine was compared between teat disinfectants varying in iodine concentrations to a disinfectant without iodine. As iodine in teat disinfectant increased, so did the iodine residues in milk. Throughout the 2‐wk testing period, milk iodine remained at levels acceptable for human consumption.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Dairy products</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Dipping</subject><subject>Disinfectants - chemistry</subject><subject>Disinfection &amp; disinfectants</subject><subject>Disinfection - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Food Contamination - analysis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Iodides</subject><subject>Iodides - analysis</subject><subject>Iodine</subject><subject>Iodine - analysis</subject><subject>Mammary Glands, Animal</subject><subject>Milk</subject><subject>Milk - chemistry</subject><subject>residue</subject><subject>Residues</subject><subject>Salicylates</subject><subject>Sprayers</subject><subject>Sprays</subject><subject>Teats</subject><issn>0022-1147</issn><issn>1750-3841</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkTtP7DAQhS10ESyP-nZXkW5DE_D4nRJ2eYoF8ZZoLG8ykQzZBOKsgH-Pw8IWNOBmZOs7Z8ZzCPkLdBvi2QEtacqNgG3gXJolMli8_CEDShlLAYReJWshPND-ztUKWWWayQyUGJDRcVP4ApNLDL6YYUh8nYx99ZjcuvYtmWD3glgnPVRjuucCFsk1ui4Z-eDrEvPO1V3YIMulqwJuftZ1cnOwfz08Sk_PD4-Hu6dprkCZVFOkTjPlGC95iQ5BxhnQGM2oli7LcgmS6kyzTLmJEQKF0BPjhDKmVBz5Otma-z61zXMctrNTH3KsKldjMwsWDJNSqIzDL1Aa20qp2G9QprmiTET0_zf0oZm1dfxzT4FRwHgWqZ05lbdNCC2W9qn107hPC9T2sdk-JNuHZD9ii4p_n76zyRSLBf-VUwTUHHjxFb795GdPDkZXX87pXOhDh68LoWsfrdJcS3t3dmjvz8YgLvitHfN3_8asMQ</recordid><startdate>201607</startdate><enddate>201607</enddate><creator>French, Elizabeth A.</creator><creator>Mukai, Motoko</creator><creator>Zurakowski, Michael</creator><creator>Rauch, Bradley</creator><creator>Gioia, Gloria</creator><creator>Hillebrandt, Joseph R.</creator><creator>Henderson, Mark</creator><creator>Schukken, Ynte H.</creator><creator>Hemling, Thomas C.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201607</creationdate><title>Iodide Residues in Milk Vary between Iodine-Based Teat Disinfectants</title><author>French, Elizabeth A. ; Mukai, Motoko ; Zurakowski, Michael ; Rauch, Bradley ; Gioia, Gloria ; Hillebrandt, Joseph R. ; Henderson, Mark ; Schukken, Ynte H. ; Hemling, Thomas C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6168-70e0a726a23f3feae15164e8872075a99c5150797296ab844e447b8a4688f63e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Dairy products</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Dipping</topic><topic>Disinfectants - chemistry</topic><topic>Disinfection &amp; disinfectants</topic><topic>Disinfection - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Food Contamination - analysis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Iodides</topic><topic>Iodides - analysis</topic><topic>Iodine</topic><topic>Iodine - analysis</topic><topic>Mammary Glands, Animal</topic><topic>Milk</topic><topic>Milk - chemistry</topic><topic>residue</topic><topic>Residues</topic><topic>Salicylates</topic><topic>Sprayers</topic><topic>Sprays</topic><topic>Teats</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>French, Elizabeth A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mukai, Motoko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zurakowski, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rauch, Bradley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gioia, Gloria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hillebrandt, Joseph R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henderson, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schukken, Ynte H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hemling, Thomas C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of food science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>French, Elizabeth A.</au><au>Mukai, Motoko</au><au>Zurakowski, Michael</au><au>Rauch, Bradley</au><au>Gioia, Gloria</au><au>Hillebrandt, Joseph R.</au><au>Henderson, Mark</au><au>Schukken, Ynte H.</au><au>Hemling, Thomas C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Iodide Residues in Milk Vary between Iodine-Based Teat Disinfectants</atitle><jtitle>Journal of food science</jtitle><addtitle>Journal of Food Science</addtitle><date>2016-07</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>81</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>T1864</spage><epage>T1870</epage><pages>T1864-T1870</pages><issn>0022-1147</issn><eissn>1750-3841</eissn><coden>JFDSAZ</coden><abstract>Majority of iodine found in dairy milk comes from the diet and teat disinfection products used during milking process. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of 4 iodine‐based teat dips on milk iodide concentrations varying in iodine level (0.25% vs. 0.5%, w/w), normal low viscosity dip versus barrier dip, and application method (dip vs. spray) to ensure safe iodine levels in dairy milk when these products are used. The iodine exposure study was performed during a 2‐wk period. The trial farm was purged of all iodine‐based disinfection products for 21 d during a prestudy “washout period,” which resulted in baseline milk iodide range of 145 to 182 ppb. During the experiment, iodine‐based teat dips were used as post‐milking teat disinfectants and compared to a non‐iodine control disinfectant. Milk iodide residue levels for each treatment was evaluated from composited group samples. Introduction of different iodine‐based teat disinfectants increased iodide residue content in milk relative to the control by between 8 and 29 μg/L when averaged across the full trial period. However, residues levels for any treatment remained well below the consumable limit of 500 μg/L. The 0.5% iodine disinfectant increased milk iodide levels by 20 μg/L more compared to the 0.25% iodine. Compared to dip‐cup application, spray application significantly increased milk iodide residue by 21 μg/L and utilized approximately 23% more teat dip. This carefully controlled study demonstrated an increase in milk iodide concentrations from iodine disinfectants, but increases were small and within acceptable limits. Practical Application Dairy products contain iodine from the cow's diet and teat disinfectants used in the milking process. Milk iodine was compared between teat disinfectants varying in iodine concentrations to a disinfectant without iodine. As iodine in teat disinfectant increased, so did the iodine residues in milk. Throughout the 2‐wk testing period, milk iodine remained at levels acceptable for human consumption.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>27259164</pmid><doi>10.1111/1750-3841.13358</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-1147
ispartof Journal of food science, 2016-07, Vol.81 (7), p.T1864-T1870
issn 0022-1147
1750-3841
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1825546931
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Animals
Dairy products
Diet
Dipping
Disinfectants - chemistry
Disinfection & disinfectants
Disinfection - methods
Female
Food Contamination - analysis
Humans
Iodides
Iodides - analysis
Iodine
Iodine - analysis
Mammary Glands, Animal
Milk
Milk - chemistry
residue
Residues
Salicylates
Sprayers
Sprays
Teats
title Iodide Residues in Milk Vary between Iodine-Based Teat Disinfectants
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T18%3A58%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Iodide%20Residues%20in%20Milk%20Vary%20between%20Iodine-Based%20Teat%20Disinfectants&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20food%20science&rft.au=French,%20Elizabeth%20A.&rft.date=2016-07&rft.volume=81&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=T1864&rft.epage=T1870&rft.pages=T1864-T1870&rft.issn=0022-1147&rft.eissn=1750-3841&rft.coden=JFDSAZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1750-3841.13358&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1825546931%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1801861239&rft_id=info:pmid/27259164&rfr_iscdi=true