Comparative analysis of the digestibility of sewage fine sieved fraction and hygiene paper produced from virgin fibers and recycled fibers
•Sewage FSF is a heterogeneous substrate consisting of mainly toilet paper fibers.•Major component of all hygienic papers is cellulose fibers mostly from tree origin.•VPPP, VTP and RTP were selected as cellulosic fibers-based hygiene papers.•Biodegradability of all used cellulose fiber-based substra...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Waste management (Elmsford) 2016-07, Vol.53, p.156-164 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 164 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 156 |
container_title | Waste management (Elmsford) |
container_volume | 53 |
creator | Ghasimi, Dara S.M. Zandvoort, Marcel H. Adriaanse, Michiel van Lier, Jules B. de Kreuk, Merle |
description | •Sewage FSF is a heterogeneous substrate consisting of mainly toilet paper fibers.•Major component of all hygienic papers is cellulose fibers mostly from tree origin.•VPPP, VTP and RTP were selected as cellulosic fibers-based hygiene papers.•Biodegradability of all used cellulose fiber-based substrates was less than 50%.•MCC had highest BMP and biodegradability percentage among all tested substrates.
Sewage fine sieved fraction (FSF) is a heterogeneous substrate consisting of mainly toilet paper fibers sequestered from municipal raw sewage by a fine screen. In earlier studies, a maximum biodegradation of 62% and 57% of the sewage FSF was found under thermophilic (55°C) and mesophilic (35°C) conditions, respectively. In order to research this limited biodegradability of sewage FSF, this study investigates the biodegradation of different types of cellulosic fibers-based hygiene papers including virgin fibers based toilet paper (VTP), recycled fiber based toilet paper (RTP), virgin pulp for paper production (VPPP) as a raw material, as well as microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) as a kind of fiberless reference material. The anaerobic biodegradation or digestibility tests were conducted under thermophilic and mesophilic conditions. Results of the experiments showed different biomethane potential (BMP) values for each tested cellulose fiber-based substrate, which might be associated with the physical characteristics of the fibers, type of pulping, presence of lignin encrusted fibers, and/or the presence of additive chemicals and refractory compounds. Higher hydrolysis rates (Kh), higher specific methane production rates (SMPR) and shorter required incubation times to achieve 90% of the BMP (t90%CH4), were achieved under thermophilic conditions for all examined substrates compared to the mesophilic ones. Furthermore, the biodegradability of all employed cellulose fiber-based substrates was in the same range, 38–45%, under both conditions and less than the observed FSF biodegradability, i.e. 57–62%. MCC achieved the highest BMP and biodegradability, 86–91%, among all cellulosic substrates. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.04.034 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1825514445</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0956053X16301970</els_id><sourcerecordid>1795870831</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c581t-e129f8e7cd3ea0246afc8bcc2b89323554bcb9bcb9a913d44f34c65d834d49dd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUtr3DAQgEVoSDaPf1CKjr3Y1dOWL4WyNEkhkEsCuQlZGm-0-FXJu8F_ob-68m7aY5uDEJr5RiPNh9BHSnJKaPFlm7-a2Jk-Z-mUE5ETLk7QiqqyypiQxQe0IpUsMiL58zm6iHFLCBWKkjN0zkpaMkXpCv1aD91ogpn8HrDpTTtHH_HQ4OkFsPMbiJOvfeuneQlGeDUbwI3vAUcPe3C4CcZOfuhTscMv88ZDyo1mhIDHMLidPTBDh_c-bHyfamsI8UAHsLNtl_whdoVOG9NGuH7bL9HTzffH9V12_3D7Y_3tPrNS0SkDyqpGQWkdB0OYKExjVW0tq1XFGZdS1LaulmUqyp0QDRe2kE5x4UTlHL9En4_3pvf93KUP6s5HC21rehh2UVPFpKRCCPkOlKiCMino_9Gykqokii-oOKI2DDEGaPQYfGfCrCnRi1u91Ue3enGridDJbSr79NZhV3fg_hb9kZmAr0cA0vT2HoKONulIBnwa9aTd4P_d4TdGqLnB</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1795870831</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative analysis of the digestibility of sewage fine sieved fraction and hygiene paper produced from virgin fibers and recycled fibers</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Ghasimi, Dara S.M. ; Zandvoort, Marcel H. ; Adriaanse, Michiel ; van Lier, Jules B. ; de Kreuk, Merle</creator><creatorcontrib>Ghasimi, Dara S.M. ; Zandvoort, Marcel H. ; Adriaanse, Michiel ; van Lier, Jules B. ; de Kreuk, Merle</creatorcontrib><description>•Sewage FSF is a heterogeneous substrate consisting of mainly toilet paper fibers.•Major component of all hygienic papers is cellulose fibers mostly from tree origin.•VPPP, VTP and RTP were selected as cellulosic fibers-based hygiene papers.•Biodegradability of all used cellulose fiber-based substrates was less than 50%.•MCC had highest BMP and biodegradability percentage among all tested substrates.
Sewage fine sieved fraction (FSF) is a heterogeneous substrate consisting of mainly toilet paper fibers sequestered from municipal raw sewage by a fine screen. In earlier studies, a maximum biodegradation of 62% and 57% of the sewage FSF was found under thermophilic (55°C) and mesophilic (35°C) conditions, respectively. In order to research this limited biodegradability of sewage FSF, this study investigates the biodegradation of different types of cellulosic fibers-based hygiene papers including virgin fibers based toilet paper (VTP), recycled fiber based toilet paper (RTP), virgin pulp for paper production (VPPP) as a raw material, as well as microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) as a kind of fiberless reference material. The anaerobic biodegradation or digestibility tests were conducted under thermophilic and mesophilic conditions. Results of the experiments showed different biomethane potential (BMP) values for each tested cellulose fiber-based substrate, which might be associated with the physical characteristics of the fibers, type of pulping, presence of lignin encrusted fibers, and/or the presence of additive chemicals and refractory compounds. Higher hydrolysis rates (Kh), higher specific methane production rates (SMPR) and shorter required incubation times to achieve 90% of the BMP (t90%CH4), were achieved under thermophilic conditions for all examined substrates compared to the mesophilic ones. Furthermore, the biodegradability of all employed cellulose fiber-based substrates was in the same range, 38–45%, under both conditions and less than the observed FSF biodegradability, i.e. 57–62%. MCC achieved the highest BMP and biodegradability, 86–91%, among all cellulosic substrates.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0956-053X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2456</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.04.034</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27172811</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Anaerobic digestion ; Biodegradability ; Biodegradation ; Biomethane potential ; Cellulose ; Fibers ; Fine sieved fraction ; Hygiene ; Mesophilic ; Sewage ; Substrates ; Thermophilic ; Toilet paper ; Toilets ; Virgin pulp ; Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods ; Waste Products</subject><ispartof>Waste management (Elmsford), 2016-07, Vol.53, p.156-164</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c581t-e129f8e7cd3ea0246afc8bcc2b89323554bcb9bcb9a913d44f34c65d834d49dd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c581t-e129f8e7cd3ea0246afc8bcc2b89323554bcb9bcb9a913d44f34c65d834d49dd3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9637-1081</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956053X16301970$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27172811$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ghasimi, Dara S.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zandvoort, Marcel H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adriaanse, Michiel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Lier, Jules B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Kreuk, Merle</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative analysis of the digestibility of sewage fine sieved fraction and hygiene paper produced from virgin fibers and recycled fibers</title><title>Waste management (Elmsford)</title><addtitle>Waste Manag</addtitle><description>•Sewage FSF is a heterogeneous substrate consisting of mainly toilet paper fibers.•Major component of all hygienic papers is cellulose fibers mostly from tree origin.•VPPP, VTP and RTP were selected as cellulosic fibers-based hygiene papers.•Biodegradability of all used cellulose fiber-based substrates was less than 50%.•MCC had highest BMP and biodegradability percentage among all tested substrates.
Sewage fine sieved fraction (FSF) is a heterogeneous substrate consisting of mainly toilet paper fibers sequestered from municipal raw sewage by a fine screen. In earlier studies, a maximum biodegradation of 62% and 57% of the sewage FSF was found under thermophilic (55°C) and mesophilic (35°C) conditions, respectively. In order to research this limited biodegradability of sewage FSF, this study investigates the biodegradation of different types of cellulosic fibers-based hygiene papers including virgin fibers based toilet paper (VTP), recycled fiber based toilet paper (RTP), virgin pulp for paper production (VPPP) as a raw material, as well as microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) as a kind of fiberless reference material. The anaerobic biodegradation or digestibility tests were conducted under thermophilic and mesophilic conditions. Results of the experiments showed different biomethane potential (BMP) values for each tested cellulose fiber-based substrate, which might be associated with the physical characteristics of the fibers, type of pulping, presence of lignin encrusted fibers, and/or the presence of additive chemicals and refractory compounds. Higher hydrolysis rates (Kh), higher specific methane production rates (SMPR) and shorter required incubation times to achieve 90% of the BMP (t90%CH4), were achieved under thermophilic conditions for all examined substrates compared to the mesophilic ones. Furthermore, the biodegradability of all employed cellulose fiber-based substrates was in the same range, 38–45%, under both conditions and less than the observed FSF biodegradability, i.e. 57–62%. MCC achieved the highest BMP and biodegradability, 86–91%, among all cellulosic substrates.</description><subject>Anaerobic digestion</subject><subject>Biodegradability</subject><subject>Biodegradation</subject><subject>Biomethane potential</subject><subject>Cellulose</subject><subject>Fibers</subject><subject>Fine sieved fraction</subject><subject>Hygiene</subject><subject>Mesophilic</subject><subject>Sewage</subject><subject>Substrates</subject><subject>Thermophilic</subject><subject>Toilet paper</subject><subject>Toilets</subject><subject>Virgin pulp</subject><subject>Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods</subject><subject>Waste Products</subject><issn>0956-053X</issn><issn>1879-2456</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUtr3DAQgEVoSDaPf1CKjr3Y1dOWL4WyNEkhkEsCuQlZGm-0-FXJu8F_ob-68m7aY5uDEJr5RiPNh9BHSnJKaPFlm7-a2Jk-Z-mUE5ETLk7QiqqyypiQxQe0IpUsMiL58zm6iHFLCBWKkjN0zkpaMkXpCv1aD91ogpn8HrDpTTtHH_HQ4OkFsPMbiJOvfeuneQlGeDUbwI3vAUcPe3C4CcZOfuhTscMv88ZDyo1mhIDHMLidPTBDh_c-bHyfamsI8UAHsLNtl_whdoVOG9NGuH7bL9HTzffH9V12_3D7Y_3tPrNS0SkDyqpGQWkdB0OYKExjVW0tq1XFGZdS1LaulmUqyp0QDRe2kE5x4UTlHL9En4_3pvf93KUP6s5HC21rehh2UVPFpKRCCPkOlKiCMino_9Gykqokii-oOKI2DDEGaPQYfGfCrCnRi1u91Ue3enGridDJbSr79NZhV3fg_hb9kZmAr0cA0vT2HoKONulIBnwa9aTd4P_d4TdGqLnB</recordid><startdate>20160701</startdate><enddate>20160701</enddate><creator>Ghasimi, Dara S.M.</creator><creator>Zandvoort, Marcel H.</creator><creator>Adriaanse, Michiel</creator><creator>van Lier, Jules B.</creator><creator>de Kreuk, Merle</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9637-1081</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20160701</creationdate><title>Comparative analysis of the digestibility of sewage fine sieved fraction and hygiene paper produced from virgin fibers and recycled fibers</title><author>Ghasimi, Dara S.M. ; Zandvoort, Marcel H. ; Adriaanse, Michiel ; van Lier, Jules B. ; de Kreuk, Merle</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c581t-e129f8e7cd3ea0246afc8bcc2b89323554bcb9bcb9a913d44f34c65d834d49dd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Anaerobic digestion</topic><topic>Biodegradability</topic><topic>Biodegradation</topic><topic>Biomethane potential</topic><topic>Cellulose</topic><topic>Fibers</topic><topic>Fine sieved fraction</topic><topic>Hygiene</topic><topic>Mesophilic</topic><topic>Sewage</topic><topic>Substrates</topic><topic>Thermophilic</topic><topic>Toilet paper</topic><topic>Toilets</topic><topic>Virgin pulp</topic><topic>Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods</topic><topic>Waste Products</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ghasimi, Dara S.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zandvoort, Marcel H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adriaanse, Michiel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Lier, Jules B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Kreuk, Merle</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Waste management (Elmsford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ghasimi, Dara S.M.</au><au>Zandvoort, Marcel H.</au><au>Adriaanse, Michiel</au><au>van Lier, Jules B.</au><au>de Kreuk, Merle</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative analysis of the digestibility of sewage fine sieved fraction and hygiene paper produced from virgin fibers and recycled fibers</atitle><jtitle>Waste management (Elmsford)</jtitle><addtitle>Waste Manag</addtitle><date>2016-07-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>53</volume><spage>156</spage><epage>164</epage><pages>156-164</pages><issn>0956-053X</issn><eissn>1879-2456</eissn><abstract>•Sewage FSF is a heterogeneous substrate consisting of mainly toilet paper fibers.•Major component of all hygienic papers is cellulose fibers mostly from tree origin.•VPPP, VTP and RTP were selected as cellulosic fibers-based hygiene papers.•Biodegradability of all used cellulose fiber-based substrates was less than 50%.•MCC had highest BMP and biodegradability percentage among all tested substrates.
Sewage fine sieved fraction (FSF) is a heterogeneous substrate consisting of mainly toilet paper fibers sequestered from municipal raw sewage by a fine screen. In earlier studies, a maximum biodegradation of 62% and 57% of the sewage FSF was found under thermophilic (55°C) and mesophilic (35°C) conditions, respectively. In order to research this limited biodegradability of sewage FSF, this study investigates the biodegradation of different types of cellulosic fibers-based hygiene papers including virgin fibers based toilet paper (VTP), recycled fiber based toilet paper (RTP), virgin pulp for paper production (VPPP) as a raw material, as well as microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) as a kind of fiberless reference material. The anaerobic biodegradation or digestibility tests were conducted under thermophilic and mesophilic conditions. Results of the experiments showed different biomethane potential (BMP) values for each tested cellulose fiber-based substrate, which might be associated with the physical characteristics of the fibers, type of pulping, presence of lignin encrusted fibers, and/or the presence of additive chemicals and refractory compounds. Higher hydrolysis rates (Kh), higher specific methane production rates (SMPR) and shorter required incubation times to achieve 90% of the BMP (t90%CH4), were achieved under thermophilic conditions for all examined substrates compared to the mesophilic ones. Furthermore, the biodegradability of all employed cellulose fiber-based substrates was in the same range, 38–45%, under both conditions and less than the observed FSF biodegradability, i.e. 57–62%. MCC achieved the highest BMP and biodegradability, 86–91%, among all cellulosic substrates.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>27172811</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.wasman.2016.04.034</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9637-1081</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0956-053X |
ispartof | Waste management (Elmsford), 2016-07, Vol.53, p.156-164 |
issn | 0956-053X 1879-2456 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1825514445 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Anaerobic digestion Biodegradability Biodegradation Biomethane potential Cellulose Fibers Fine sieved fraction Hygiene Mesophilic Sewage Substrates Thermophilic Toilet paper Toilets Virgin pulp Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods Waste Products |
title | Comparative analysis of the digestibility of sewage fine sieved fraction and hygiene paper produced from virgin fibers and recycled fibers |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T18%3A07%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20analysis%20of%20the%20digestibility%20of%20sewage%20fine%20sieved%20fraction%20and%20hygiene%20paper%20produced%20from%20virgin%20fibers%20and%20recycled%20fibers&rft.jtitle=Waste%20management%20(Elmsford)&rft.au=Ghasimi,%20Dara%20S.M.&rft.date=2016-07-01&rft.volume=53&rft.spage=156&rft.epage=164&rft.pages=156-164&rft.issn=0956-053X&rft.eissn=1879-2456&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.04.034&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1795870831%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1795870831&rft_id=info:pmid/27172811&rft_els_id=S0956053X16301970&rfr_iscdi=true |