Comparative analysis of the digestibility of sewage fine sieved fraction and hygiene paper produced from virgin fibers and recycled fibers

•Sewage FSF is a heterogeneous substrate consisting of mainly toilet paper fibers.•Major component of all hygienic papers is cellulose fibers mostly from tree origin.•VPPP, VTP and RTP were selected as cellulosic fibers-based hygiene papers.•Biodegradability of all used cellulose fiber-based substra...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Waste management (Elmsford) 2016-07, Vol.53, p.156-164
Hauptverfasser: Ghasimi, Dara S.M., Zandvoort, Marcel H., Adriaanse, Michiel, van Lier, Jules B., de Kreuk, Merle
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 164
container_issue
container_start_page 156
container_title Waste management (Elmsford)
container_volume 53
creator Ghasimi, Dara S.M.
Zandvoort, Marcel H.
Adriaanse, Michiel
van Lier, Jules B.
de Kreuk, Merle
description •Sewage FSF is a heterogeneous substrate consisting of mainly toilet paper fibers.•Major component of all hygienic papers is cellulose fibers mostly from tree origin.•VPPP, VTP and RTP were selected as cellulosic fibers-based hygiene papers.•Biodegradability of all used cellulose fiber-based substrates was less than 50%.•MCC had highest BMP and biodegradability percentage among all tested substrates. Sewage fine sieved fraction (FSF) is a heterogeneous substrate consisting of mainly toilet paper fibers sequestered from municipal raw sewage by a fine screen. In earlier studies, a maximum biodegradation of 62% and 57% of the sewage FSF was found under thermophilic (55°C) and mesophilic (35°C) conditions, respectively. In order to research this limited biodegradability of sewage FSF, this study investigates the biodegradation of different types of cellulosic fibers-based hygiene papers including virgin fibers based toilet paper (VTP), recycled fiber based toilet paper (RTP), virgin pulp for paper production (VPPP) as a raw material, as well as microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) as a kind of fiberless reference material. The anaerobic biodegradation or digestibility tests were conducted under thermophilic and mesophilic conditions. Results of the experiments showed different biomethane potential (BMP) values for each tested cellulose fiber-based substrate, which might be associated with the physical characteristics of the fibers, type of pulping, presence of lignin encrusted fibers, and/or the presence of additive chemicals and refractory compounds. Higher hydrolysis rates (Kh), higher specific methane production rates (SMPR) and shorter required incubation times to achieve 90% of the BMP (t90%CH4), were achieved under thermophilic conditions for all examined substrates compared to the mesophilic ones. Furthermore, the biodegradability of all employed cellulose fiber-based substrates was in the same range, 38–45%, under both conditions and less than the observed FSF biodegradability, i.e. 57–62%. MCC achieved the highest BMP and biodegradability, 86–91%, among all cellulosic substrates.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.04.034
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1825514445</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0956053X16301970</els_id><sourcerecordid>1795870831</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c581t-e129f8e7cd3ea0246afc8bcc2b89323554bcb9bcb9a913d44f34c65d834d49dd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUtr3DAQgEVoSDaPf1CKjr3Y1dOWL4WyNEkhkEsCuQlZGm-0-FXJu8F_ob-68m7aY5uDEJr5RiPNh9BHSnJKaPFlm7-a2Jk-Z-mUE5ETLk7QiqqyypiQxQe0IpUsMiL58zm6iHFLCBWKkjN0zkpaMkXpCv1aD91ogpn8HrDpTTtHH_HQ4OkFsPMbiJOvfeuneQlGeDUbwI3vAUcPe3C4CcZOfuhTscMv88ZDyo1mhIDHMLidPTBDh_c-bHyfamsI8UAHsLNtl_whdoVOG9NGuH7bL9HTzffH9V12_3D7Y_3tPrNS0SkDyqpGQWkdB0OYKExjVW0tq1XFGZdS1LaulmUqyp0QDRe2kE5x4UTlHL9En4_3pvf93KUP6s5HC21rehh2UVPFpKRCCPkOlKiCMino_9Gykqokii-oOKI2DDEGaPQYfGfCrCnRi1u91Ue3enGridDJbSr79NZhV3fg_hb9kZmAr0cA0vT2HoKONulIBnwa9aTd4P_d4TdGqLnB</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1795870831</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative analysis of the digestibility of sewage fine sieved fraction and hygiene paper produced from virgin fibers and recycled fibers</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Ghasimi, Dara S.M. ; Zandvoort, Marcel H. ; Adriaanse, Michiel ; van Lier, Jules B. ; de Kreuk, Merle</creator><creatorcontrib>Ghasimi, Dara S.M. ; Zandvoort, Marcel H. ; Adriaanse, Michiel ; van Lier, Jules B. ; de Kreuk, Merle</creatorcontrib><description>•Sewage FSF is a heterogeneous substrate consisting of mainly toilet paper fibers.•Major component of all hygienic papers is cellulose fibers mostly from tree origin.•VPPP, VTP and RTP were selected as cellulosic fibers-based hygiene papers.•Biodegradability of all used cellulose fiber-based substrates was less than 50%.•MCC had highest BMP and biodegradability percentage among all tested substrates. Sewage fine sieved fraction (FSF) is a heterogeneous substrate consisting of mainly toilet paper fibers sequestered from municipal raw sewage by a fine screen. In earlier studies, a maximum biodegradation of 62% and 57% of the sewage FSF was found under thermophilic (55°C) and mesophilic (35°C) conditions, respectively. In order to research this limited biodegradability of sewage FSF, this study investigates the biodegradation of different types of cellulosic fibers-based hygiene papers including virgin fibers based toilet paper (VTP), recycled fiber based toilet paper (RTP), virgin pulp for paper production (VPPP) as a raw material, as well as microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) as a kind of fiberless reference material. The anaerobic biodegradation or digestibility tests were conducted under thermophilic and mesophilic conditions. Results of the experiments showed different biomethane potential (BMP) values for each tested cellulose fiber-based substrate, which might be associated with the physical characteristics of the fibers, type of pulping, presence of lignin encrusted fibers, and/or the presence of additive chemicals and refractory compounds. Higher hydrolysis rates (Kh), higher specific methane production rates (SMPR) and shorter required incubation times to achieve 90% of the BMP (t90%CH4), were achieved under thermophilic conditions for all examined substrates compared to the mesophilic ones. Furthermore, the biodegradability of all employed cellulose fiber-based substrates was in the same range, 38–45%, under both conditions and less than the observed FSF biodegradability, i.e. 57–62%. MCC achieved the highest BMP and biodegradability, 86–91%, among all cellulosic substrates.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0956-053X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2456</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.04.034</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27172811</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Anaerobic digestion ; Biodegradability ; Biodegradation ; Biomethane potential ; Cellulose ; Fibers ; Fine sieved fraction ; Hygiene ; Mesophilic ; Sewage ; Substrates ; Thermophilic ; Toilet paper ; Toilets ; Virgin pulp ; Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods ; Waste Products</subject><ispartof>Waste management (Elmsford), 2016-07, Vol.53, p.156-164</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c581t-e129f8e7cd3ea0246afc8bcc2b89323554bcb9bcb9a913d44f34c65d834d49dd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c581t-e129f8e7cd3ea0246afc8bcc2b89323554bcb9bcb9a913d44f34c65d834d49dd3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9637-1081</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956053X16301970$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27172811$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ghasimi, Dara S.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zandvoort, Marcel H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adriaanse, Michiel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Lier, Jules B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Kreuk, Merle</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative analysis of the digestibility of sewage fine sieved fraction and hygiene paper produced from virgin fibers and recycled fibers</title><title>Waste management (Elmsford)</title><addtitle>Waste Manag</addtitle><description>•Sewage FSF is a heterogeneous substrate consisting of mainly toilet paper fibers.•Major component of all hygienic papers is cellulose fibers mostly from tree origin.•VPPP, VTP and RTP were selected as cellulosic fibers-based hygiene papers.•Biodegradability of all used cellulose fiber-based substrates was less than 50%.•MCC had highest BMP and biodegradability percentage among all tested substrates. Sewage fine sieved fraction (FSF) is a heterogeneous substrate consisting of mainly toilet paper fibers sequestered from municipal raw sewage by a fine screen. In earlier studies, a maximum biodegradation of 62% and 57% of the sewage FSF was found under thermophilic (55°C) and mesophilic (35°C) conditions, respectively. In order to research this limited biodegradability of sewage FSF, this study investigates the biodegradation of different types of cellulosic fibers-based hygiene papers including virgin fibers based toilet paper (VTP), recycled fiber based toilet paper (RTP), virgin pulp for paper production (VPPP) as a raw material, as well as microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) as a kind of fiberless reference material. The anaerobic biodegradation or digestibility tests were conducted under thermophilic and mesophilic conditions. Results of the experiments showed different biomethane potential (BMP) values for each tested cellulose fiber-based substrate, which might be associated with the physical characteristics of the fibers, type of pulping, presence of lignin encrusted fibers, and/or the presence of additive chemicals and refractory compounds. Higher hydrolysis rates (Kh), higher specific methane production rates (SMPR) and shorter required incubation times to achieve 90% of the BMP (t90%CH4), were achieved under thermophilic conditions for all examined substrates compared to the mesophilic ones. Furthermore, the biodegradability of all employed cellulose fiber-based substrates was in the same range, 38–45%, under both conditions and less than the observed FSF biodegradability, i.e. 57–62%. MCC achieved the highest BMP and biodegradability, 86–91%, among all cellulosic substrates.</description><subject>Anaerobic digestion</subject><subject>Biodegradability</subject><subject>Biodegradation</subject><subject>Biomethane potential</subject><subject>Cellulose</subject><subject>Fibers</subject><subject>Fine sieved fraction</subject><subject>Hygiene</subject><subject>Mesophilic</subject><subject>Sewage</subject><subject>Substrates</subject><subject>Thermophilic</subject><subject>Toilet paper</subject><subject>Toilets</subject><subject>Virgin pulp</subject><subject>Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods</subject><subject>Waste Products</subject><issn>0956-053X</issn><issn>1879-2456</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUtr3DAQgEVoSDaPf1CKjr3Y1dOWL4WyNEkhkEsCuQlZGm-0-FXJu8F_ob-68m7aY5uDEJr5RiPNh9BHSnJKaPFlm7-a2Jk-Z-mUE5ETLk7QiqqyypiQxQe0IpUsMiL58zm6iHFLCBWKkjN0zkpaMkXpCv1aD91ogpn8HrDpTTtHH_HQ4OkFsPMbiJOvfeuneQlGeDUbwI3vAUcPe3C4CcZOfuhTscMv88ZDyo1mhIDHMLidPTBDh_c-bHyfamsI8UAHsLNtl_whdoVOG9NGuH7bL9HTzffH9V12_3D7Y_3tPrNS0SkDyqpGQWkdB0OYKExjVW0tq1XFGZdS1LaulmUqyp0QDRe2kE5x4UTlHL9En4_3pvf93KUP6s5HC21rehh2UVPFpKRCCPkOlKiCMino_9Gykqokii-oOKI2DDEGaPQYfGfCrCnRi1u91Ue3enGridDJbSr79NZhV3fg_hb9kZmAr0cA0vT2HoKONulIBnwa9aTd4P_d4TdGqLnB</recordid><startdate>20160701</startdate><enddate>20160701</enddate><creator>Ghasimi, Dara S.M.</creator><creator>Zandvoort, Marcel H.</creator><creator>Adriaanse, Michiel</creator><creator>van Lier, Jules B.</creator><creator>de Kreuk, Merle</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9637-1081</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20160701</creationdate><title>Comparative analysis of the digestibility of sewage fine sieved fraction and hygiene paper produced from virgin fibers and recycled fibers</title><author>Ghasimi, Dara S.M. ; Zandvoort, Marcel H. ; Adriaanse, Michiel ; van Lier, Jules B. ; de Kreuk, Merle</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c581t-e129f8e7cd3ea0246afc8bcc2b89323554bcb9bcb9a913d44f34c65d834d49dd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Anaerobic digestion</topic><topic>Biodegradability</topic><topic>Biodegradation</topic><topic>Biomethane potential</topic><topic>Cellulose</topic><topic>Fibers</topic><topic>Fine sieved fraction</topic><topic>Hygiene</topic><topic>Mesophilic</topic><topic>Sewage</topic><topic>Substrates</topic><topic>Thermophilic</topic><topic>Toilet paper</topic><topic>Toilets</topic><topic>Virgin pulp</topic><topic>Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods</topic><topic>Waste Products</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ghasimi, Dara S.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zandvoort, Marcel H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adriaanse, Michiel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Lier, Jules B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Kreuk, Merle</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Waste management (Elmsford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ghasimi, Dara S.M.</au><au>Zandvoort, Marcel H.</au><au>Adriaanse, Michiel</au><au>van Lier, Jules B.</au><au>de Kreuk, Merle</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative analysis of the digestibility of sewage fine sieved fraction and hygiene paper produced from virgin fibers and recycled fibers</atitle><jtitle>Waste management (Elmsford)</jtitle><addtitle>Waste Manag</addtitle><date>2016-07-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>53</volume><spage>156</spage><epage>164</epage><pages>156-164</pages><issn>0956-053X</issn><eissn>1879-2456</eissn><abstract>•Sewage FSF is a heterogeneous substrate consisting of mainly toilet paper fibers.•Major component of all hygienic papers is cellulose fibers mostly from tree origin.•VPPP, VTP and RTP were selected as cellulosic fibers-based hygiene papers.•Biodegradability of all used cellulose fiber-based substrates was less than 50%.•MCC had highest BMP and biodegradability percentage among all tested substrates. Sewage fine sieved fraction (FSF) is a heterogeneous substrate consisting of mainly toilet paper fibers sequestered from municipal raw sewage by a fine screen. In earlier studies, a maximum biodegradation of 62% and 57% of the sewage FSF was found under thermophilic (55°C) and mesophilic (35°C) conditions, respectively. In order to research this limited biodegradability of sewage FSF, this study investigates the biodegradation of different types of cellulosic fibers-based hygiene papers including virgin fibers based toilet paper (VTP), recycled fiber based toilet paper (RTP), virgin pulp for paper production (VPPP) as a raw material, as well as microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) as a kind of fiberless reference material. The anaerobic biodegradation or digestibility tests were conducted under thermophilic and mesophilic conditions. Results of the experiments showed different biomethane potential (BMP) values for each tested cellulose fiber-based substrate, which might be associated with the physical characteristics of the fibers, type of pulping, presence of lignin encrusted fibers, and/or the presence of additive chemicals and refractory compounds. Higher hydrolysis rates (Kh), higher specific methane production rates (SMPR) and shorter required incubation times to achieve 90% of the BMP (t90%CH4), were achieved under thermophilic conditions for all examined substrates compared to the mesophilic ones. Furthermore, the biodegradability of all employed cellulose fiber-based substrates was in the same range, 38–45%, under both conditions and less than the observed FSF biodegradability, i.e. 57–62%. MCC achieved the highest BMP and biodegradability, 86–91%, among all cellulosic substrates.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>27172811</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.wasman.2016.04.034</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9637-1081</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0956-053X
ispartof Waste management (Elmsford), 2016-07, Vol.53, p.156-164
issn 0956-053X
1879-2456
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1825514445
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Anaerobic digestion
Biodegradability
Biodegradation
Biomethane potential
Cellulose
Fibers
Fine sieved fraction
Hygiene
Mesophilic
Sewage
Substrates
Thermophilic
Toilet paper
Toilets
Virgin pulp
Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods
Waste Products
title Comparative analysis of the digestibility of sewage fine sieved fraction and hygiene paper produced from virgin fibers and recycled fibers
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T18%3A07%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20analysis%20of%20the%20digestibility%20of%20sewage%20fine%20sieved%20fraction%20and%20hygiene%20paper%20produced%20from%20virgin%20fibers%20and%20recycled%20fibers&rft.jtitle=Waste%20management%20(Elmsford)&rft.au=Ghasimi,%20Dara%20S.M.&rft.date=2016-07-01&rft.volume=53&rft.spage=156&rft.epage=164&rft.pages=156-164&rft.issn=0956-053X&rft.eissn=1879-2456&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.04.034&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1795870831%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1795870831&rft_id=info:pmid/27172811&rft_els_id=S0956053X16301970&rfr_iscdi=true