Methodology for estimating soil carbon for the forest carbon budget model of the United States, 2001

Development of soil C pool estimates for the FORCARB model. The largest carbon (C) pool in United States forests is the soil C pool. We present methodology and soil C pool estimates used in the FORCARB model, which estimates and projects forest carbon budgets for the United States. The methodology b...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental pollution (1987) 2002-01, Vol.116 (3), p.373-380
Hauptverfasser: Heath, L.S., Birdsey, R.A., Williams, D.W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 380
container_issue 3
container_start_page 373
container_title Environmental pollution (1987)
container_volume 116
creator Heath, L.S.
Birdsey, R.A.
Williams, D.W.
description Development of soil C pool estimates for the FORCARB model. The largest carbon (C) pool in United States forests is the soil C pool. We present methodology and soil C pool estimates used in the FORCARB model, which estimates and projects forest carbon budgets for the United States. The methodology balances knowledge, uncertainties, and ease of use. The estimates are calculated using the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service STATSGO database, with soil dynamics following assumptions based on results of site-specific studies, and area estimates from the USDA Forest Service, Forest Inventory and Analysis data and national-level land cover data sets. Harvesting is assumed to have no effect on soil C. Land use change and forest type transitions affect soil C. We apply the methodology to the southeastern region of the United States as a case study.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0269-7491(01)00213-5
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18254937</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0269749101002135</els_id><sourcerecordid>14601856</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-fae8c66cddc66b3e78a90fa39388983c50e1e422a7f8b2fddb3e4ba26149185d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkV1LHDEUhkNR6mr7Eypzo1hw2nxP5kpkaVVQemG9DpnkZE2ZndgkW_Dfm_2oXgohB5LnfL0vQl8I_kYwkd_vMZV92_GenGHyFWNKWCs-oBlRHWslp3wPzV6RA3SY8x-MMWeMfUQHhChKOyJmyN1BeYwujnHx3PiYGsglLE0J06LJMYyNNWmI0-arPMI6VuL_67ByCyjNMjoYm-g3xMMUCrjmvpgC-byhGJNPaN-bMcPnXTxCDz9__J5ft7e_rm7ml7et5YKV1htQVkrrXL0HBp0yPfaG9UypXjErMBDglJrOq4F65yrDB0MlqSsq4dgROt3WfUrx76rOqZchWxhHM0FcZV23Frxn3fsgl7hWlBUUW9CmmHMCr59SlSc9a4L12ge98UGvRda4nrUPWtS8412D1bAE95a1E74CJzvAZGtGn8xkQ37jGCdKClW5iy0HVbd_AZLONsBkwYUEtmgXwzujvADmCKQY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14601856</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Methodology for estimating soil carbon for the forest carbon budget model of the United States, 2001</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection (Elsevier)</source><creator>Heath, L.S. ; Birdsey, R.A. ; Williams, D.W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Heath, L.S. ; Birdsey, R.A. ; Williams, D.W.</creatorcontrib><description>Development of soil C pool estimates for the FORCARB model. The largest carbon (C) pool in United States forests is the soil C pool. We present methodology and soil C pool estimates used in the FORCARB model, which estimates and projects forest carbon budgets for the United States. The methodology balances knowledge, uncertainties, and ease of use. The estimates are calculated using the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service STATSGO database, with soil dynamics following assumptions based on results of site-specific studies, and area estimates from the USDA Forest Service, Forest Inventory and Analysis data and national-level land cover data sets. Harvesting is assumed to have no effect on soil C. Land use change and forest type transitions affect soil C. We apply the methodology to the southeastern region of the United States as a case study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-7491</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6424</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0269-7491(01)00213-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11822715</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ENVPAF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Biological and medical sciences ; Carbon - analysis ; Carbon - metabolism ; Carbon cycle ; Chemical, physicochemical, biochemical and biological properties ; Climate change ; Ecosystem ; Environmental Monitoring - methods ; FORCARB ; Forest inventory ; Forestry ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Greenhouse Effect ; Land use change ; Models, Theoretical ; Organic matter ; Physics, chemistry, biochemistry and biology of agricultural and forest soils ; Soil science ; Trees</subject><ispartof>Environmental pollution (1987), 2002-01, Vol.116 (3), p.373-380</ispartof><rights>2001</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-fae8c66cddc66b3e78a90fa39388983c50e1e422a7f8b2fddb3e4ba26149185d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-fae8c66cddc66b3e78a90fa39388983c50e1e422a7f8b2fddb3e4ba26149185d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0269-7491(01)00213-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,3550,23930,23931,25140,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=13418658$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11822715$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Heath, L.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Birdsey, R.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, D.W.</creatorcontrib><title>Methodology for estimating soil carbon for the forest carbon budget model of the United States, 2001</title><title>Environmental pollution (1987)</title><addtitle>Environ Pollut</addtitle><description>Development of soil C pool estimates for the FORCARB model. The largest carbon (C) pool in United States forests is the soil C pool. We present methodology and soil C pool estimates used in the FORCARB model, which estimates and projects forest carbon budgets for the United States. The methodology balances knowledge, uncertainties, and ease of use. The estimates are calculated using the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service STATSGO database, with soil dynamics following assumptions based on results of site-specific studies, and area estimates from the USDA Forest Service, Forest Inventory and Analysis data and national-level land cover data sets. Harvesting is assumed to have no effect on soil C. Land use change and forest type transitions affect soil C. We apply the methodology to the southeastern region of the United States as a case study.</description><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Carbon - analysis</subject><subject>Carbon - metabolism</subject><subject>Carbon cycle</subject><subject>Chemical, physicochemical, biochemical and biological properties</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring - methods</subject><subject>FORCARB</subject><subject>Forest inventory</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Greenhouse Effect</subject><subject>Land use change</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Organic matter</subject><subject>Physics, chemistry, biochemistry and biology of agricultural and forest soils</subject><subject>Soil science</subject><subject>Trees</subject><issn>0269-7491</issn><issn>1873-6424</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkV1LHDEUhkNR6mr7Eypzo1hw2nxP5kpkaVVQemG9DpnkZE2ZndgkW_Dfm_2oXgohB5LnfL0vQl8I_kYwkd_vMZV92_GenGHyFWNKWCs-oBlRHWslp3wPzV6RA3SY8x-MMWeMfUQHhChKOyJmyN1BeYwujnHx3PiYGsglLE0J06LJMYyNNWmI0-arPMI6VuL_67ByCyjNMjoYm-g3xMMUCrjmvpgC-byhGJNPaN-bMcPnXTxCDz9__J5ft7e_rm7ml7et5YKV1htQVkrrXL0HBp0yPfaG9UypXjErMBDglJrOq4F65yrDB0MlqSsq4dgROt3WfUrx76rOqZchWxhHM0FcZV23Frxn3fsgl7hWlBUUW9CmmHMCr59SlSc9a4L12ge98UGvRda4nrUPWtS8412D1bAE95a1E74CJzvAZGtGn8xkQ37jGCdKClW5iy0HVbd_AZLONsBkwYUEtmgXwzujvADmCKQY</recordid><startdate>20020101</startdate><enddate>20020101</enddate><creator>Heath, L.S.</creator><creator>Birdsey, R.A.</creator><creator>Williams, D.W.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TV</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020101</creationdate><title>Methodology for estimating soil carbon for the forest carbon budget model of the United States, 2001</title><author>Heath, L.S. ; Birdsey, R.A. ; Williams, D.W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-fae8c66cddc66b3e78a90fa39388983c50e1e422a7f8b2fddb3e4ba26149185d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Carbon - analysis</topic><topic>Carbon - metabolism</topic><topic>Carbon cycle</topic><topic>Chemical, physicochemical, biochemical and biological properties</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring - methods</topic><topic>FORCARB</topic><topic>Forest inventory</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Greenhouse Effect</topic><topic>Land use change</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Organic matter</topic><topic>Physics, chemistry, biochemistry and biology of agricultural and forest soils</topic><topic>Soil science</topic><topic>Trees</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Heath, L.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Birdsey, R.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, D.W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environmental pollution (1987)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Heath, L.S.</au><au>Birdsey, R.A.</au><au>Williams, D.W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Methodology for estimating soil carbon for the forest carbon budget model of the United States, 2001</atitle><jtitle>Environmental pollution (1987)</jtitle><addtitle>Environ Pollut</addtitle><date>2002-01-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>116</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>373</spage><epage>380</epage><pages>373-380</pages><issn>0269-7491</issn><eissn>1873-6424</eissn><coden>ENVPAF</coden><abstract>Development of soil C pool estimates for the FORCARB model. The largest carbon (C) pool in United States forests is the soil C pool. We present methodology and soil C pool estimates used in the FORCARB model, which estimates and projects forest carbon budgets for the United States. The methodology balances knowledge, uncertainties, and ease of use. The estimates are calculated using the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service STATSGO database, with soil dynamics following assumptions based on results of site-specific studies, and area estimates from the USDA Forest Service, Forest Inventory and Analysis data and national-level land cover data sets. Harvesting is assumed to have no effect on soil C. Land use change and forest type transitions affect soil C. We apply the methodology to the southeastern region of the United States as a case study.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>11822715</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0269-7491(01)00213-5</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0269-7491
ispartof Environmental pollution (1987), 2002-01, Vol.116 (3), p.373-380
issn 0269-7491
1873-6424
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18254937
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Freedom Collection (Elsevier)
subjects Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions
Biological and medical sciences
Carbon - analysis
Carbon - metabolism
Carbon cycle
Chemical, physicochemical, biochemical and biological properties
Climate change
Ecosystem
Environmental Monitoring - methods
FORCARB
Forest inventory
Forestry
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Greenhouse Effect
Land use change
Models, Theoretical
Organic matter
Physics, chemistry, biochemistry and biology of agricultural and forest soils
Soil science
Trees
title Methodology for estimating soil carbon for the forest carbon budget model of the United States, 2001
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T06%3A54%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Methodology%20for%20estimating%20soil%20carbon%20for%20the%20forest%20carbon%20budget%20model%20of%20the%20United%20States,%202001&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20pollution%20(1987)&rft.au=Heath,%20L.S.&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=116&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=373&rft.epage=380&rft.pages=373-380&rft.issn=0269-7491&rft.eissn=1873-6424&rft.coden=ENVPAF&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0269-7491(01)00213-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E14601856%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14601856&rft_id=info:pmid/11822715&rft_els_id=S0269749101002135&rfr_iscdi=true