Effects of nozzle inner surface roughness on the cavitation erosion characteristics of high speed submerged jets

•Effects of nozzle inner surface roughness on cavitation erosion were investigated.•Macroscopic appearances and mass losses of eroded specimens were analyzed.•Cavitation erosion efficiency affected by surface roughness was studied.•Inlet pressure greatly affects the effects of nozzle inner surface roughness.•The erosion intensity and efficiency can be improved by appropriate surface roughness. Cavitating jet is now being widely used in a variety of situations due to its strong aggressive erosion ability. In order to push the erosion capability to a maximum, the effects of nozzle inner surface roughness on the cavitation erosion characteristics of submerged cavitating jets were experimentally investigated for the first time with respect to aggressive erosion intensity and efficiency. By impinging the submerged jets on specimens of pure aluminum (1070A) using six organ-pipe cavitating nozzles of different surface roughness values (0.8μm , 1.6μm, 3.2μm, 6.3μm, 12.5μm, and 25μm), the mass loss and specific energy consumption at various inlet pressures and standoff distances were measured and analyzed. And the macroscopic appearances of eroded specimens at optimum standoff distances corresponding to each inlet pressure were displayed and analyzed. Results show that surface roughness can have great effects on cavitation erosion intensity at standoff distances around the optimum and on erosion efficiency at standoff distances exceeding the optimum. The influence of surface roughness on cavitation erosion, adverse or advantageous, depends largely on the inlet pressure which determines the viscous sublayer thickness. More specifically, at inlet pressure of 10MPa and 15MPa, surface roughness value of 12.5μm is the best for achieving the strongest erosion intensity and maximum efficiency at standoff distance around 50mm; while at inlet pressure of 20MPa and 25MPa, roughness value of 6.3μm replaces 12.5μm to be the best one with the optimum standoff distance increased to 60mm. After standoff distance exceeds the optimum value, the specific energy consumption greatly increases, especially at relative lower inlet pressures, indicating a dramatic decrease of erosion efficiency. It can be concluded that excessive smooth surface is not conducive to the formation of cavitation bubbles, leading to an attenuated intensity of cavitation erosion; while excessive rough surface causes much energy dissipation and leads to divergent jets, resulting in a significant reduction of ero