Measuring the Elasticity of Poly-l-Proline Helices with Terahertz Spectroscopy

The rigidity of poly‐l‐proline is an important contributor to the stability of many protein secondary structures, where it has been shown to strongly influence bulk flexibility. The experimental Young's moduli of two known poly‐l‐proline helical forms, right‐handed all‐cis (Form I) and left‐han...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Angewandte Chemie 2016-06, Vol.128 (24), p.6991-6995
Hauptverfasser: Ruggiero, Michael T., Sibik, Juraj, Orlando, Roberto, Zeitler, J. Axel, Korter, Timothy M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 6995
container_issue 24
container_start_page 6991
container_title Angewandte Chemie
container_volume 128
creator Ruggiero, Michael T.
Sibik, Juraj
Orlando, Roberto
Zeitler, J. Axel
Korter, Timothy M.
description The rigidity of poly‐l‐proline is an important contributor to the stability of many protein secondary structures, where it has been shown to strongly influence bulk flexibility. The experimental Young's moduli of two known poly‐l‐proline helical forms, right‐handed all‐cis (Form I) and left‐handed all‐trans (Form II), were determined in the crystalline state by using an approach that combines terahertz time‐domain spectroscopy, X‐ray diffraction, and solid‐state density functional theory. Contrary to expectations, the helices were found to be considerably less rigid than many other natural and synthetic polymers, as well as differing greatly from each other, with Young's moduli of 4.9 and 9.6 GPa for Forms I and II, respectively. Die experimentellen Young‐Moduln der zwei bekannten helikalen Formen von Poly‐l‐prolin wurden durch eine Kombination aus zeitabhängiger Terahertz‐Spektroskopie, Röntgenbeugung und Festkörper‐DFT‐Theorie bestimmt. Entgegen der Erwartung zeigt sich, dass die Helizes weniger starr sind als viele andere natürliche und synthetische Polymere und sich stark voneinander unterscheiden.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ange.201602268
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1825473592</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1825473592</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2738-cd04f511d41eb9dbe88bb729bf793427f7da411f3659318646dbb91848583a023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcFP2zAUhy00JLrClXMkLruk87Od2D4i1KWTuoLUIo6Wk7xQg0k6O1XJ_vq1dEITF07v8n0_vfd7hFwCnQCl7LttH3HCKOSUsVydkBFkDFIuM_mFjCgVIlVM6DPyNcYnSmnOpB6RxS-0cRtc-5j0a0ym3sbeVa4fkq5J7jo_pD69C513LSYz9K7CmOxcv05WGOwaQ_8nWW6w6kMXq24znJPTxvqIF__mmNz_mK5uZun8tvh5cz1PKya5SquaiiYDqAVgqesSlSpLyXTZSM0Fk42srQBoeJ5pDioXeV2WGpRQmeKWMj4m3465m9D93mLszYuLFXpvW-y20YBimZA80wf06gP61G1Du9_OgNRMAoO3wMmRqvaXxICN2QT3YsNggJpDveZQr3mvdy_oo7BzHodPaHO9KKb_u-nRdbHH13fXhmeTy_3DzMOiMMUMVsVips2S_wXBPIyP</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1792712102</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Measuring the Elasticity of Poly-l-Proline Helices with Terahertz Spectroscopy</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Ruggiero, Michael T. ; Sibik, Juraj ; Orlando, Roberto ; Zeitler, J. Axel ; Korter, Timothy M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ruggiero, Michael T. ; Sibik, Juraj ; Orlando, Roberto ; Zeitler, J. Axel ; Korter, Timothy M.</creatorcontrib><description>The rigidity of poly‐l‐proline is an important contributor to the stability of many protein secondary structures, where it has been shown to strongly influence bulk flexibility. The experimental Young's moduli of two known poly‐l‐proline helical forms, right‐handed all‐cis (Form I) and left‐handed all‐trans (Form II), were determined in the crystalline state by using an approach that combines terahertz time‐domain spectroscopy, X‐ray diffraction, and solid‐state density functional theory. Contrary to expectations, the helices were found to be considerably less rigid than many other natural and synthetic polymers, as well as differing greatly from each other, with Young's moduli of 4.9 and 9.6 GPa for Forms I and II, respectively. Die experimentellen Young‐Moduln der zwei bekannten helikalen Formen von Poly‐l‐prolin wurden durch eine Kombination aus zeitabhängiger Terahertz‐Spektroskopie, Röntgenbeugung und Festkörper‐DFT‐Theorie bestimmt. Entgegen der Erwartung zeigt sich, dass die Helizes weniger starr sind als viele andere natürliche und synthetische Polymere und sich stark voneinander unterscheiden.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0044-8249</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1521-3757</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ange.201602268</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Weinheim: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Biopolymere ; Chemistry ; Crystal structure ; Density functional theory ; Diffraction ; Elasticity ; Elastizität ; Flexibility ; Helices ; Modulus of elasticity ; Polymers ; Polyprolin ; Proteine ; Spectroscopy ; Spectrum analysis ; Terahertz-Spektroskopie</subject><ispartof>Angewandte Chemie, 2016-06, Vol.128 (24), p.6991-6995</ispartof><rights>2016 The Authors. Published by Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH &amp; Co. KGaA.</rights><rights>2016 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH &amp; Co. KGaA, Weinheim</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2738-cd04f511d41eb9dbe88bb729bf793427f7da411f3659318646dbb91848583a023</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2738-cd04f511d41eb9dbe88bb729bf793427f7da411f3659318646dbb91848583a023</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fange.201602268$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fange.201602268$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ruggiero, Michael T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sibik, Juraj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orlando, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeitler, J. Axel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Korter, Timothy M.</creatorcontrib><title>Measuring the Elasticity of Poly-l-Proline Helices with Terahertz Spectroscopy</title><title>Angewandte Chemie</title><addtitle>Angew. Chem</addtitle><description>The rigidity of poly‐l‐proline is an important contributor to the stability of many protein secondary structures, where it has been shown to strongly influence bulk flexibility. The experimental Young's moduli of two known poly‐l‐proline helical forms, right‐handed all‐cis (Form I) and left‐handed all‐trans (Form II), were determined in the crystalline state by using an approach that combines terahertz time‐domain spectroscopy, X‐ray diffraction, and solid‐state density functional theory. Contrary to expectations, the helices were found to be considerably less rigid than many other natural and synthetic polymers, as well as differing greatly from each other, with Young's moduli of 4.9 and 9.6 GPa for Forms I and II, respectively. Die experimentellen Young‐Moduln der zwei bekannten helikalen Formen von Poly‐l‐prolin wurden durch eine Kombination aus zeitabhängiger Terahertz‐Spektroskopie, Röntgenbeugung und Festkörper‐DFT‐Theorie bestimmt. Entgegen der Erwartung zeigt sich, dass die Helizes weniger starr sind als viele andere natürliche und synthetische Polymere und sich stark voneinander unterscheiden.</description><subject>Biopolymere</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Crystal structure</subject><subject>Density functional theory</subject><subject>Diffraction</subject><subject>Elasticity</subject><subject>Elastizität</subject><subject>Flexibility</subject><subject>Helices</subject><subject>Modulus of elasticity</subject><subject>Polymers</subject><subject>Polyprolin</subject><subject>Proteine</subject><subject>Spectroscopy</subject><subject>Spectrum analysis</subject><subject>Terahertz-Spektroskopie</subject><issn>0044-8249</issn><issn>1521-3757</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkcFP2zAUhy00JLrClXMkLruk87Od2D4i1KWTuoLUIo6Wk7xQg0k6O1XJ_vq1dEITF07v8n0_vfd7hFwCnQCl7LttH3HCKOSUsVydkBFkDFIuM_mFjCgVIlVM6DPyNcYnSmnOpB6RxS-0cRtc-5j0a0ym3sbeVa4fkq5J7jo_pD69C513LSYz9K7CmOxcv05WGOwaQ_8nWW6w6kMXq24znJPTxvqIF__mmNz_mK5uZun8tvh5cz1PKya5SquaiiYDqAVgqesSlSpLyXTZSM0Fk42srQBoeJ5pDioXeV2WGpRQmeKWMj4m3465m9D93mLszYuLFXpvW-y20YBimZA80wf06gP61G1Du9_OgNRMAoO3wMmRqvaXxICN2QT3YsNggJpDveZQr3mvdy_oo7BzHodPaHO9KKb_u-nRdbHH13fXhmeTy_3DzMOiMMUMVsVips2S_wXBPIyP</recordid><startdate>20160606</startdate><enddate>20160606</enddate><creator>Ruggiero, Michael T.</creator><creator>Sibik, Juraj</creator><creator>Orlando, Roberto</creator><creator>Zeitler, J. Axel</creator><creator>Korter, Timothy M.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160606</creationdate><title>Measuring the Elasticity of Poly-l-Proline Helices with Terahertz Spectroscopy</title><author>Ruggiero, Michael T. ; Sibik, Juraj ; Orlando, Roberto ; Zeitler, J. Axel ; Korter, Timothy M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2738-cd04f511d41eb9dbe88bb729bf793427f7da411f3659318646dbb91848583a023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Biopolymere</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Crystal structure</topic><topic>Density functional theory</topic><topic>Diffraction</topic><topic>Elasticity</topic><topic>Elastizität</topic><topic>Flexibility</topic><topic>Helices</topic><topic>Modulus of elasticity</topic><topic>Polymers</topic><topic>Polyprolin</topic><topic>Proteine</topic><topic>Spectroscopy</topic><topic>Spectrum analysis</topic><topic>Terahertz-Spektroskopie</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ruggiero, Michael T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sibik, Juraj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orlando, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeitler, J. Axel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Korter, Timothy M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Free Content</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Angewandte Chemie</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ruggiero, Michael T.</au><au>Sibik, Juraj</au><au>Orlando, Roberto</au><au>Zeitler, J. Axel</au><au>Korter, Timothy M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Measuring the Elasticity of Poly-l-Proline Helices with Terahertz Spectroscopy</atitle><jtitle>Angewandte Chemie</jtitle><addtitle>Angew. Chem</addtitle><date>2016-06-06</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>128</volume><issue>24</issue><spage>6991</spage><epage>6995</epage><pages>6991-6995</pages><issn>0044-8249</issn><eissn>1521-3757</eissn><abstract>The rigidity of poly‐l‐proline is an important contributor to the stability of many protein secondary structures, where it has been shown to strongly influence bulk flexibility. The experimental Young's moduli of two known poly‐l‐proline helical forms, right‐handed all‐cis (Form I) and left‐handed all‐trans (Form II), were determined in the crystalline state by using an approach that combines terahertz time‐domain spectroscopy, X‐ray diffraction, and solid‐state density functional theory. Contrary to expectations, the helices were found to be considerably less rigid than many other natural and synthetic polymers, as well as differing greatly from each other, with Young's moduli of 4.9 and 9.6 GPa for Forms I and II, respectively. Die experimentellen Young‐Moduln der zwei bekannten helikalen Formen von Poly‐l‐prolin wurden durch eine Kombination aus zeitabhängiger Terahertz‐Spektroskopie, Röntgenbeugung und Festkörper‐DFT‐Theorie bestimmt. Entgegen der Erwartung zeigt sich, dass die Helizes weniger starr sind als viele andere natürliche und synthetische Polymere und sich stark voneinander unterscheiden.</abstract><cop>Weinheim</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/ange.201602268</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0044-8249
ispartof Angewandte Chemie, 2016-06, Vol.128 (24), p.6991-6995
issn 0044-8249
1521-3757
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1825473592
source Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Biopolymere
Chemistry
Crystal structure
Density functional theory
Diffraction
Elasticity
Elastizität
Flexibility
Helices
Modulus of elasticity
Polymers
Polyprolin
Proteine
Spectroscopy
Spectrum analysis
Terahertz-Spektroskopie
title Measuring the Elasticity of Poly-l-Proline Helices with Terahertz Spectroscopy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T14%3A34%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Measuring%20the%20Elasticity%20of%20Poly-l-Proline%20Helices%20with%20Terahertz%20Spectroscopy&rft.jtitle=Angewandte%20Chemie&rft.au=Ruggiero,%20Michael%20T.&rft.date=2016-06-06&rft.volume=128&rft.issue=24&rft.spage=6991&rft.epage=6995&rft.pages=6991-6995&rft.issn=0044-8249&rft.eissn=1521-3757&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ange.201602268&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1825473592%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1792712102&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true