Contourite vs gravity-flow deposits of the Pleistocene Faro Drift (Gulf of Cadiz): Sedimentological and mineralogical approaches

Pleistocene succession at Sites U1386 and U1387 (IODP 339) from palaeo-moat and drift domains of the Faro Drift has been examined to characterize the lithofacies and to identify the most useful criteria for distinguishing between contourite and gravity-flow deposits. Three lithofacies, A, B, and C,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Marine geology 2016-07, Vol.377, p.77-94
Hauptverfasser: Alonso, Belén, Ercilla, Gemma, Casas, David, Stow, Dorrik A.V., Rodríguez-Tovar, Francisco J., Dorador, Javier, Hernández-Molina, Francisco-Javier
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 94
container_issue
container_start_page 77
container_title Marine geology
container_volume 377
creator Alonso, Belén
Ercilla, Gemma
Casas, David
Stow, Dorrik A.V.
Rodríguez-Tovar, Francisco J.
Dorador, Javier
Hernández-Molina, Francisco-Javier
description Pleistocene succession at Sites U1386 and U1387 (IODP 339) from palaeo-moat and drift domains of the Faro Drift has been examined to characterize the lithofacies and to identify the most useful criteria for distinguishing between contourite and gravity-flow deposits. Three lithofacies, A, B, and C, are defined based on a combination of sedimentological and mineralogical analyses. The dominant lithofacies A corresponds to contourite deposits; lithofacies B and C comprise turbidites and debrites respectively. Three main criteria have been utilized to distinguish between these deposits: (i) the vertical trend of the grain-size and the sedimentary structures. The contourites show complete sequences (C1 to C5 divisions) and truncate sequences (basecut-out divisions, e.g., C3–C2–C1, and C3). The turbidites display mainly Td–Te divisions, although Tc division is also present to a lesser extent. The debrites display deformational and shearing structures; (ii) the modal frequency distribution. The contourite sequences show similar mode grain-size values in different textures suggesting that the steady conditions of supply are maintained over time. In contrast, turbidite and debrite sequences display different modes, primarily conditioned by mixing of components from allochthonous sources and their downslope gravitational transport; (iii) the sediment composition (clay mineral, bulk mineral and sand fraction) and provenance that reflect long- and short-distance transport modes. Most of the terrigenous components of the contourites come from the Guadalquivir drainage basin, whereas for the turbidites and debrites these are sourced from the neighbouring fluvial drainage basins (Guadiana, Tinto-Odiel). The biogenic components in the latter indicate shallow depositional environments prior to seafloor failure. The spatial and temporal distributions of the lithofacies reflect the different (palaeo) environments of the Faro Drift. Debrite and incomplete turbidite sequences characterize the palaeo-moat domain during the Early Pleistocene. Complete contourite sequences (C1 to C5) and basecut-out sequences (C3–C4–C5, and C3) characterize the proximal palaeo-drift domain during the Early and Middle Pleistocene and the complete contourite sequences represent the distal drift domain during the Late Pleistocene.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.margeo.2015.12.016
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1825466790</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0025322715300761</els_id><sourcerecordid>1825466790</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a395t-926e4de7197343b86ee27e6478f8e3c9f1c5297ee134b187e3e639f785cf51d03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUU1rGzEUFCWBOk7_QQ86pofd6Em70m4PheA0HxBooO1ZKNonR2a9ciXZJTnlp0fGJcfQ04NhZt6bN4R8BlYDA3m-qtcmLjHUnEFbA68L-IHMoFO8ktDCEZkxxttKcK4-kpOUVowxEMBn5GURphy20Weku0SX0ex8fqrcGP7SATch-ZxocDQ_Ir0f0accLE5Ir0wM9DJ6l-nZ9XZ0e87CDP75y1f6Ewe_xmI7hqW3ZqRmGujaTxjNG7LZxGDsI6ZTcuzMmPDTvzknv6--_1rcVHc_rm8XF3eVEX2bq55LbAZU0CvRiIdOInKFslGd61DY3oFtea8QQTQPJTgKlKJ3qmuta2FgYk7ODr5l8Z8tpqzXPlkcRzNh2CYNHW8bKVX_P1TWyU425ZQ5aQ5UG0NKEZ3eRF_KeNLA9L4bvdKHbvS-Gw1cF7DIvh1kWBLvPEadrMfJlsdFtFkPwb9v8ApuJJqd</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1808686497</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Contourite vs gravity-flow deposits of the Pleistocene Faro Drift (Gulf of Cadiz): Sedimentological and mineralogical approaches</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Alonso, Belén ; Ercilla, Gemma ; Casas, David ; Stow, Dorrik A.V. ; Rodríguez-Tovar, Francisco J. ; Dorador, Javier ; Hernández-Molina, Francisco-Javier</creator><creatorcontrib>Alonso, Belén ; Ercilla, Gemma ; Casas, David ; Stow, Dorrik A.V. ; Rodríguez-Tovar, Francisco J. ; Dorador, Javier ; Hernández-Molina, Francisco-Javier</creatorcontrib><description>Pleistocene succession at Sites U1386 and U1387 (IODP 339) from palaeo-moat and drift domains of the Faro Drift has been examined to characterize the lithofacies and to identify the most useful criteria for distinguishing between contourite and gravity-flow deposits. Three lithofacies, A, B, and C, are defined based on a combination of sedimentological and mineralogical analyses. The dominant lithofacies A corresponds to contourite deposits; lithofacies B and C comprise turbidites and debrites respectively. Three main criteria have been utilized to distinguish between these deposits: (i) the vertical trend of the grain-size and the sedimentary structures. The contourites show complete sequences (C1 to C5 divisions) and truncate sequences (basecut-out divisions, e.g., C3–C2–C1, and C3). The turbidites display mainly Td–Te divisions, although Tc division is also present to a lesser extent. The debrites display deformational and shearing structures; (ii) the modal frequency distribution. The contourite sequences show similar mode grain-size values in different textures suggesting that the steady conditions of supply are maintained over time. In contrast, turbidite and debrite sequences display different modes, primarily conditioned by mixing of components from allochthonous sources and their downslope gravitational transport; (iii) the sediment composition (clay mineral, bulk mineral and sand fraction) and provenance that reflect long- and short-distance transport modes. Most of the terrigenous components of the contourites come from the Guadalquivir drainage basin, whereas for the turbidites and debrites these are sourced from the neighbouring fluvial drainage basins (Guadiana, Tinto-Odiel). The biogenic components in the latter indicate shallow depositional environments prior to seafloor failure. The spatial and temporal distributions of the lithofacies reflect the different (palaeo) environments of the Faro Drift. Debrite and incomplete turbidite sequences characterize the palaeo-moat domain during the Early Pleistocene. Complete contourite sequences (C1 to C5) and basecut-out sequences (C3–C4–C5, and C3) characterize the proximal palaeo-drift domain during the Early and Middle Pleistocene and the complete contourite sequences represent the distal drift domain during the Late Pleistocene.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0025-3227</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6151</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.margeo.2015.12.016</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Bulk mineral ; Clay mineral ; Contourites ; Criteria ; Debrites ; Deposits ; Division ; Drainage basins ; Drift ; Freshwater ; Grain-size ; Gulf of Cadiz ; Marine ; Sand ; Shape ; Texture ; Turbidites</subject><ispartof>Marine geology, 2016-07, Vol.377, p.77-94</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a395t-926e4de7197343b86ee27e6478f8e3c9f1c5297ee134b187e3e639f785cf51d03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a395t-926e4de7197343b86ee27e6478f8e3c9f1c5297ee134b187e3e639f785cf51d03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0025322715300761$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alonso, Belén</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ercilla, Gemma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casas, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stow, Dorrik A.V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez-Tovar, Francisco J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dorador, Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernández-Molina, Francisco-Javier</creatorcontrib><title>Contourite vs gravity-flow deposits of the Pleistocene Faro Drift (Gulf of Cadiz): Sedimentological and mineralogical approaches</title><title>Marine geology</title><description>Pleistocene succession at Sites U1386 and U1387 (IODP 339) from palaeo-moat and drift domains of the Faro Drift has been examined to characterize the lithofacies and to identify the most useful criteria for distinguishing between contourite and gravity-flow deposits. Three lithofacies, A, B, and C, are defined based on a combination of sedimentological and mineralogical analyses. The dominant lithofacies A corresponds to contourite deposits; lithofacies B and C comprise turbidites and debrites respectively. Three main criteria have been utilized to distinguish between these deposits: (i) the vertical trend of the grain-size and the sedimentary structures. The contourites show complete sequences (C1 to C5 divisions) and truncate sequences (basecut-out divisions, e.g., C3–C2–C1, and C3). The turbidites display mainly Td–Te divisions, although Tc division is also present to a lesser extent. The debrites display deformational and shearing structures; (ii) the modal frequency distribution. The contourite sequences show similar mode grain-size values in different textures suggesting that the steady conditions of supply are maintained over time. In contrast, turbidite and debrite sequences display different modes, primarily conditioned by mixing of components from allochthonous sources and their downslope gravitational transport; (iii) the sediment composition (clay mineral, bulk mineral and sand fraction) and provenance that reflect long- and short-distance transport modes. Most of the terrigenous components of the contourites come from the Guadalquivir drainage basin, whereas for the turbidites and debrites these are sourced from the neighbouring fluvial drainage basins (Guadiana, Tinto-Odiel). The biogenic components in the latter indicate shallow depositional environments prior to seafloor failure. The spatial and temporal distributions of the lithofacies reflect the different (palaeo) environments of the Faro Drift. Debrite and incomplete turbidite sequences characterize the palaeo-moat domain during the Early Pleistocene. Complete contourite sequences (C1 to C5) and basecut-out sequences (C3–C4–C5, and C3) characterize the proximal palaeo-drift domain during the Early and Middle Pleistocene and the complete contourite sequences represent the distal drift domain during the Late Pleistocene.</description><subject>Bulk mineral</subject><subject>Clay mineral</subject><subject>Contourites</subject><subject>Criteria</subject><subject>Debrites</subject><subject>Deposits</subject><subject>Division</subject><subject>Drainage basins</subject><subject>Drift</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Grain-size</subject><subject>Gulf of Cadiz</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Sand</subject><subject>Shape</subject><subject>Texture</subject><subject>Turbidites</subject><issn>0025-3227</issn><issn>1872-6151</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNUU1rGzEUFCWBOk7_QQ86pofd6Em70m4PheA0HxBooO1ZKNonR2a9ciXZJTnlp0fGJcfQ04NhZt6bN4R8BlYDA3m-qtcmLjHUnEFbA68L-IHMoFO8ktDCEZkxxttKcK4-kpOUVowxEMBn5GURphy20Weku0SX0ex8fqrcGP7SATch-ZxocDQ_Ir0f0accLE5Ir0wM9DJ6l-nZ9XZ0e87CDP75y1f6Ewe_xmI7hqW3ZqRmGujaTxjNG7LZxGDsI6ZTcuzMmPDTvzknv6--_1rcVHc_rm8XF3eVEX2bq55LbAZU0CvRiIdOInKFslGd61DY3oFtea8QQTQPJTgKlKJ3qmuta2FgYk7ODr5l8Z8tpqzXPlkcRzNh2CYNHW8bKVX_P1TWyU425ZQ5aQ5UG0NKEZ3eRF_KeNLA9L4bvdKHbvS-Gw1cF7DIvh1kWBLvPEadrMfJlsdFtFkPwb9v8ApuJJqd</recordid><startdate>20160701</startdate><enddate>20160701</enddate><creator>Alonso, Belén</creator><creator>Ercilla, Gemma</creator><creator>Casas, David</creator><creator>Stow, Dorrik A.V.</creator><creator>Rodríguez-Tovar, Francisco J.</creator><creator>Dorador, Javier</creator><creator>Hernández-Molina, Francisco-Javier</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160701</creationdate><title>Contourite vs gravity-flow deposits of the Pleistocene Faro Drift (Gulf of Cadiz): Sedimentological and mineralogical approaches</title><author>Alonso, Belén ; Ercilla, Gemma ; Casas, David ; Stow, Dorrik A.V. ; Rodríguez-Tovar, Francisco J. ; Dorador, Javier ; Hernández-Molina, Francisco-Javier</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a395t-926e4de7197343b86ee27e6478f8e3c9f1c5297ee134b187e3e639f785cf51d03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Bulk mineral</topic><topic>Clay mineral</topic><topic>Contourites</topic><topic>Criteria</topic><topic>Debrites</topic><topic>Deposits</topic><topic>Division</topic><topic>Drainage basins</topic><topic>Drift</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Grain-size</topic><topic>Gulf of Cadiz</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Sand</topic><topic>Shape</topic><topic>Texture</topic><topic>Turbidites</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alonso, Belén</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ercilla, Gemma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casas, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stow, Dorrik A.V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez-Tovar, Francisco J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dorador, Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernández-Molina, Francisco-Javier</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Marine geology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alonso, Belén</au><au>Ercilla, Gemma</au><au>Casas, David</au><au>Stow, Dorrik A.V.</au><au>Rodríguez-Tovar, Francisco J.</au><au>Dorador, Javier</au><au>Hernández-Molina, Francisco-Javier</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Contourite vs gravity-flow deposits of the Pleistocene Faro Drift (Gulf of Cadiz): Sedimentological and mineralogical approaches</atitle><jtitle>Marine geology</jtitle><date>2016-07-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>377</volume><spage>77</spage><epage>94</epage><pages>77-94</pages><issn>0025-3227</issn><eissn>1872-6151</eissn><abstract>Pleistocene succession at Sites U1386 and U1387 (IODP 339) from palaeo-moat and drift domains of the Faro Drift has been examined to characterize the lithofacies and to identify the most useful criteria for distinguishing between contourite and gravity-flow deposits. Three lithofacies, A, B, and C, are defined based on a combination of sedimentological and mineralogical analyses. The dominant lithofacies A corresponds to contourite deposits; lithofacies B and C comprise turbidites and debrites respectively. Three main criteria have been utilized to distinguish between these deposits: (i) the vertical trend of the grain-size and the sedimentary structures. The contourites show complete sequences (C1 to C5 divisions) and truncate sequences (basecut-out divisions, e.g., C3–C2–C1, and C3). The turbidites display mainly Td–Te divisions, although Tc division is also present to a lesser extent. The debrites display deformational and shearing structures; (ii) the modal frequency distribution. The contourite sequences show similar mode grain-size values in different textures suggesting that the steady conditions of supply are maintained over time. In contrast, turbidite and debrite sequences display different modes, primarily conditioned by mixing of components from allochthonous sources and their downslope gravitational transport; (iii) the sediment composition (clay mineral, bulk mineral and sand fraction) and provenance that reflect long- and short-distance transport modes. Most of the terrigenous components of the contourites come from the Guadalquivir drainage basin, whereas for the turbidites and debrites these are sourced from the neighbouring fluvial drainage basins (Guadiana, Tinto-Odiel). The biogenic components in the latter indicate shallow depositional environments prior to seafloor failure. The spatial and temporal distributions of the lithofacies reflect the different (palaeo) environments of the Faro Drift. Debrite and incomplete turbidite sequences characterize the palaeo-moat domain during the Early Pleistocene. Complete contourite sequences (C1 to C5) and basecut-out sequences (C3–C4–C5, and C3) characterize the proximal palaeo-drift domain during the Early and Middle Pleistocene and the complete contourite sequences represent the distal drift domain during the Late Pleistocene.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.margeo.2015.12.016</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0025-3227
ispartof Marine geology, 2016-07, Vol.377, p.77-94
issn 0025-3227
1872-6151
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1825466790
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Bulk mineral
Clay mineral
Contourites
Criteria
Debrites
Deposits
Division
Drainage basins
Drift
Freshwater
Grain-size
Gulf of Cadiz
Marine
Sand
Shape
Texture
Turbidites
title Contourite vs gravity-flow deposits of the Pleistocene Faro Drift (Gulf of Cadiz): Sedimentological and mineralogical approaches
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T23%3A08%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Contourite%20vs%20gravity-flow%20deposits%20of%20the%20Pleistocene%20Faro%20Drift%20(Gulf%20of%20Cadiz):%20Sedimentological%20and%20mineralogical%20approaches&rft.jtitle=Marine%20geology&rft.au=Alonso,%20Bel%C3%A9n&rft.date=2016-07-01&rft.volume=377&rft.spage=77&rft.epage=94&rft.pages=77-94&rft.issn=0025-3227&rft.eissn=1872-6151&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.margeo.2015.12.016&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1825466790%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1808686497&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0025322715300761&rfr_iscdi=true