Water spray protection of machinery spaces
This report provides an evaluation of the firefighting capabilities of fixed pressure water spray systems for machinery spaces as described in Regulation 10 of Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS). The objective of this evaluation was to determine if a system meeting the minimum SOLAS requirement can provi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Fire technology 2001-10, Vol.37 (4), p.317-326 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 326 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 317 |
container_title | Fire technology |
container_volume | 37 |
creator | HANSEN, Richard L BACK, Gerard G |
description | This report provides an evaluation of the firefighting capabilities of fixed pressure water spray systems for machinery spaces as described in Regulation 10 of Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS). The objective of this evaluation was to determine if a system meeting the minimum SOLAS requirement can provide adequate protection of shipboard machinery spaces. To meet this objective, the capabilities and limitations of twelve water spray systems were determined using the International Maritime Organization (IMO) test protocol for water mist systems (MSC 668 and 728) as the basis for this analysis. The tests were conducted in a simulated 500-m super(3) machinery space onboard the U.S. Coast Guard's test vessel STATE OF MAINE. Generally speaking, the trends in performance of water spray systems were similar to those observed for water mist systems. All systems were capable of extinguishing larger fires (4 kW/m super(3) and greater) with variations in system capabilities becoming apparent as the fire size was reduced (2 kW/m super(3) and below). Only about half of the systems were capable of extinguishing the 1.0 MW obstructed spray fire located on the side of the engine mock-up (similar to IMO-6). Water mist systems typically exhibit slightly better capabilities primarily against the smaller fires. It was concluded that the capabilities of these systems cannot be associated with a single parameter such as application rate and must be determined empirically. As a result, the approval of these systems needs to be performance based as with all other fire suppression systems required by SOLAS. It was recommended that SOLAS Regulation 10 be re-written to cover all water based machinery space systems with the caveat that they pass a modified IMO test protocol based on the one currently used for approving water mist systems [MSC 668 and 728]. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1023/A:1012720831429 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18252572</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>748702831</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c287t-c4992b69e934ac36ff96b26160c7f5d47b20d98cb56e414beb60f299fc92765a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdj0tLw0AUhQdRsD7WboOgCyF6751XrrtSfEHBjeIyTKYzmJImdSZd9N8bsCtXZ3E-Dt8R4grhHoHkw_wRAckSVBIV8ZGYobZUVsB8LGYAqEsylToVZzmvAYCtgZm4-3JjSEXeJrcvtmkYgx_boS-GWGyc_277kPZT63zIF-Ikui6Hy0Oei8_np4_Fa7l8f3lbzJelp8qOpVfM1BgOLJXz0sTIpiGDBryNeqVsQ7DiyjfaBIWqCY2BSMzRM1mjnTwXt3-7k87PLuSx3rTZh65zfRh2ucaKNE3XJvD6H7gedqmf3GpCqzRaqybo5gC57F0Xk-t9m-ttajcu7WuUiqwklr-fhFyy</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>217451774</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Water spray protection of machinery spaces</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>HANSEN, Richard L ; BACK, Gerard G</creator><creatorcontrib>HANSEN, Richard L ; BACK, Gerard G</creatorcontrib><description>This report provides an evaluation of the firefighting capabilities of fixed pressure water spray systems for machinery spaces as described in Regulation 10 of Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS). The objective of this evaluation was to determine if a system meeting the minimum SOLAS requirement can provide adequate protection of shipboard machinery spaces. To meet this objective, the capabilities and limitations of twelve water spray systems were determined using the International Maritime Organization (IMO) test protocol for water mist systems (MSC 668 and 728) as the basis for this analysis. The tests were conducted in a simulated 500-m super(3) machinery space onboard the U.S. Coast Guard's test vessel STATE OF MAINE. Generally speaking, the trends in performance of water spray systems were similar to those observed for water mist systems. All systems were capable of extinguishing larger fires (4 kW/m super(3) and greater) with variations in system capabilities becoming apparent as the fire size was reduced (2 kW/m super(3) and below). Only about half of the systems were capable of extinguishing the 1.0 MW obstructed spray fire located on the side of the engine mock-up (similar to IMO-6). Water mist systems typically exhibit slightly better capabilities primarily against the smaller fires. It was concluded that the capabilities of these systems cannot be associated with a single parameter such as application rate and must be determined empirically. As a result, the approval of these systems needs to be performance based as with all other fire suppression systems required by SOLAS. It was recommended that SOLAS Regulation 10 be re-written to cover all water based machinery space systems with the caveat that they pass a modified IMO test protocol based on the one currently used for approving water mist systems [MSC 668 and 728].</description><identifier>ISSN: 0015-2684</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-8099</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1023/A:1012720831429</identifier><identifier>CODEN: FITCAA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Secausus, NJ: Springer</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Exact sciences and technology ; Ground, air and sea transportation, marine construction ; Heat ; Marine and water way transportation and traffic ; Regulation ; safety regulations ; Sprinkler systems ; Temperature ; Trends ; Water</subject><ispartof>Fire technology, 2001-10, Vol.37 (4), p.317-326</ispartof><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Science & Business Media BV Oct 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c287t-c4992b69e934ac36ff96b26160c7f5d47b20d98cb56e414beb60f299fc92765a3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,23930,23931,25140,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=13427329$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>HANSEN, Richard L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BACK, Gerard G</creatorcontrib><title>Water spray protection of machinery spaces</title><title>Fire technology</title><description>This report provides an evaluation of the firefighting capabilities of fixed pressure water spray systems for machinery spaces as described in Regulation 10 of Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS). The objective of this evaluation was to determine if a system meeting the minimum SOLAS requirement can provide adequate protection of shipboard machinery spaces. To meet this objective, the capabilities and limitations of twelve water spray systems were determined using the International Maritime Organization (IMO) test protocol for water mist systems (MSC 668 and 728) as the basis for this analysis. The tests were conducted in a simulated 500-m super(3) machinery space onboard the U.S. Coast Guard's test vessel STATE OF MAINE. Generally speaking, the trends in performance of water spray systems were similar to those observed for water mist systems. All systems were capable of extinguishing larger fires (4 kW/m super(3) and greater) with variations in system capabilities becoming apparent as the fire size was reduced (2 kW/m super(3) and below). Only about half of the systems were capable of extinguishing the 1.0 MW obstructed spray fire located on the side of the engine mock-up (similar to IMO-6). Water mist systems typically exhibit slightly better capabilities primarily against the smaller fires. It was concluded that the capabilities of these systems cannot be associated with a single parameter such as application rate and must be determined empirically. As a result, the approval of these systems needs to be performance based as with all other fire suppression systems required by SOLAS. It was recommended that SOLAS Regulation 10 be re-written to cover all water based machinery space systems with the caveat that they pass a modified IMO test protocol based on the one currently used for approving water mist systems [MSC 668 and 728].</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Ground, air and sea transportation, marine construction</subject><subject>Heat</subject><subject>Marine and water way transportation and traffic</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><subject>safety regulations</subject><subject>Sprinkler systems</subject><subject>Temperature</subject><subject>Trends</subject><subject>Water</subject><issn>0015-2684</issn><issn>1572-8099</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpdj0tLw0AUhQdRsD7WboOgCyF6751XrrtSfEHBjeIyTKYzmJImdSZd9N8bsCtXZ3E-Dt8R4grhHoHkw_wRAckSVBIV8ZGYobZUVsB8LGYAqEsylToVZzmvAYCtgZm4-3JjSEXeJrcvtmkYgx_boS-GWGyc_277kPZT63zIF-Ikui6Hy0Oei8_np4_Fa7l8f3lbzJelp8qOpVfM1BgOLJXz0sTIpiGDBryNeqVsQ7DiyjfaBIWqCY2BSMzRM1mjnTwXt3-7k87PLuSx3rTZh65zfRh2ucaKNE3XJvD6H7gedqmf3GpCqzRaqybo5gC57F0Xk-t9m-ttajcu7WuUiqwklr-fhFyy</recordid><startdate>20011001</startdate><enddate>20011001</enddate><creator>HANSEN, Richard L</creator><creator>BACK, Gerard G</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>883</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0F</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>7U2</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20011001</creationdate><title>Water spray protection of machinery spaces</title><author>HANSEN, Richard L ; BACK, Gerard G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c287t-c4992b69e934ac36ff96b26160c7f5d47b20d98cb56e414beb60f299fc92765a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Ground, air and sea transportation, marine construction</topic><topic>Heat</topic><topic>Marine and water way transportation and traffic</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><topic>safety regulations</topic><topic>Sprinkler systems</topic><topic>Temperature</topic><topic>Trends</topic><topic>Water</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>HANSEN, Richard L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BACK, Gerard G</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Access via ABI/INFORM (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Trade & Industry (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM trade & industry</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><jtitle>Fire technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>HANSEN, Richard L</au><au>BACK, Gerard G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Water spray protection of machinery spaces</atitle><jtitle>Fire technology</jtitle><date>2001-10-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>317</spage><epage>326</epage><pages>317-326</pages><issn>0015-2684</issn><eissn>1572-8099</eissn><coden>FITCAA</coden><abstract>This report provides an evaluation of the firefighting capabilities of fixed pressure water spray systems for machinery spaces as described in Regulation 10 of Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS). The objective of this evaluation was to determine if a system meeting the minimum SOLAS requirement can provide adequate protection of shipboard machinery spaces. To meet this objective, the capabilities and limitations of twelve water spray systems were determined using the International Maritime Organization (IMO) test protocol for water mist systems (MSC 668 and 728) as the basis for this analysis. The tests were conducted in a simulated 500-m super(3) machinery space onboard the U.S. Coast Guard's test vessel STATE OF MAINE. Generally speaking, the trends in performance of water spray systems were similar to those observed for water mist systems. All systems were capable of extinguishing larger fires (4 kW/m super(3) and greater) with variations in system capabilities becoming apparent as the fire size was reduced (2 kW/m super(3) and below). Only about half of the systems were capable of extinguishing the 1.0 MW obstructed spray fire located on the side of the engine mock-up (similar to IMO-6). Water mist systems typically exhibit slightly better capabilities primarily against the smaller fires. It was concluded that the capabilities of these systems cannot be associated with a single parameter such as application rate and must be determined empirically. As a result, the approval of these systems needs to be performance based as with all other fire suppression systems required by SOLAS. It was recommended that SOLAS Regulation 10 be re-written to cover all water based machinery space systems with the caveat that they pass a modified IMO test protocol based on the one currently used for approving water mist systems [MSC 668 and 728].</abstract><cop>Secausus, NJ</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1023/A:1012720831429</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0015-2684 |
ispartof | Fire technology, 2001-10, Vol.37 (4), p.317-326 |
issn | 0015-2684 1572-8099 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18252572 |
source | SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Applied sciences Exact sciences and technology Ground, air and sea transportation, marine construction Heat Marine and water way transportation and traffic Regulation safety regulations Sprinkler systems Temperature Trends Water |
title | Water spray protection of machinery spaces |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T18%3A20%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Water%20spray%20protection%20of%20machinery%20spaces&rft.jtitle=Fire%20technology&rft.au=HANSEN,%20Richard%20L&rft.date=2001-10-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=317&rft.epage=326&rft.pages=317-326&rft.issn=0015-2684&rft.eissn=1572-8099&rft.coden=FITCAA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1023/A:1012720831429&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pasca%3E748702831%3C/proquest_pasca%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=217451774&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |