Conservation Value of Independently Evolving Units: Sacred Cow or Testable Hypothesis?

Many published scientific papers use molecular marker data to identify genetically distinct populations and some go on to advocate conserving each of these populations to preserve genetic diversity. An often unacknowledged assumption underlying this approach is that patterns at marker loci reflect t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Conservation biology 2001-06, Vol.15 (3), p.780-783
1. Verfasser: Pearman, Peter B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 783
container_issue 3
container_start_page 780
container_title Conservation biology
container_volume 15
creator Pearman, Peter B.
description Many published scientific papers use molecular marker data to identify genetically distinct populations and some go on to advocate conserving each of these populations to preserve genetic diversity. An often unacknowledged assumption underlying this approach is that patterns at marker loci reflect the distribution of among-population variation that increases evolutionary fitness and thus has conservation value. The article stresses the need for empirical testing of this assumption and provides background information by exploring the concept of conservation value and reviewing available evidence on the relationship between marker variation and characters important to fitness. Two important specific questions requiring research are identified.
doi_str_mv 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.015003780.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18248491</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3061458</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3061458</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4760-1793edd8aab0bca74b06abf0e148e1fad6a686385501e0e873e7785c44e8c5443</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVUU1v1DAUjCqQuhT-QQ8-ALeE59iJHYSEICrdlSp6oB9Hy0lewIsbb-3sdvff4yjVckRcng8znpk3L0neUsgo8PLDOqNFzlIqWJXlADQDWgAwISHbnySLI_giWYCUMpWyyk-TVyGsAaAqKF8kd7UbAvqdHo0byJ22WySuJ6uhww3GMYz2QC52zu7M8JPcDmYMH8kP3XrsSO2eiPPkBsOoG4tkedi48RcGEz6_Tl722gZ88_yeJbffLm7qZXp1fbmqv1ylLRclxHAVw66TWjfQtFrwBkrd9ICUS6S97kpdypLJogCKgFIwFEIWLeco24Jzdpa8n3U33j1uYxD1YEKL1uoB3TYoKnMueUX_TeSF5LKSkfhpJrbeheCxVxtvHrQ_KApqal2t1VSsmopVU-vq2Lrax-_vnn10aLXtvR5aE_5qcBAA-WRTz7wnY_HwXx6qvv66igdkEFXOZ5V1GJ0_qjAop30inM6wCSPuj7D2v1UpmCjU_fdLVTEWE1GhluwPDZ-uow</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14584898</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Conservation Value of Independently Evolving Units: Sacred Cow or Testable Hypothesis?</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Pearman, Peter B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Pearman, Peter B.</creatorcontrib><description>Many published scientific papers use molecular marker data to identify genetically distinct populations and some go on to advocate conserving each of these populations to preserve genetic diversity. An often unacknowledged assumption underlying this approach is that patterns at marker loci reflect the distribution of among-population variation that increases evolutionary fitness and thus has conservation value. The article stresses the need for empirical testing of this assumption and provides background information by exploring the concept of conservation value and reviewing available evidence on the relationship between marker variation and characters important to fitness. Two important specific questions requiring research are identified.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0888-8892</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1523-1739</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.015003780.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CBIOEF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston, MA, USA: Blackwell Science Inc</publisher><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Conservation biology ; Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife ; Ecological genetics ; Environmental conservation ; Evolutionary genetics ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Genetic loci ; Genetic variation ; Molecular genetics ; Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking ; Population ecology ; Population genetics ; Population structure ; Research Notes</subject><ispartof>Conservation biology, 2001-06, Vol.15 (3), p.780-783</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2001 Society for Conservation Biology</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4760-1793edd8aab0bca74b06abf0e148e1fad6a686385501e0e873e7785c44e8c5443</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4760-1793edd8aab0bca74b06abf0e148e1fad6a686385501e0e873e7785c44e8c5443</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3061458$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3061458$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=14070028$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pearman, Peter B.</creatorcontrib><title>Conservation Value of Independently Evolving Units: Sacred Cow or Testable Hypothesis?</title><title>Conservation biology</title><addtitle>Conservation Biology</addtitle><description>Many published scientific papers use molecular marker data to identify genetically distinct populations and some go on to advocate conserving each of these populations to preserve genetic diversity. An often unacknowledged assumption underlying this approach is that patterns at marker loci reflect the distribution of among-population variation that increases evolutionary fitness and thus has conservation value. The article stresses the need for empirical testing of this assumption and provides background information by exploring the concept of conservation value and reviewing available evidence on the relationship between marker variation and characters important to fitness. Two important specific questions requiring research are identified.</description><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Conservation biology</subject><subject>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</subject><subject>Ecological genetics</subject><subject>Environmental conservation</subject><subject>Evolutionary genetics</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Genetic loci</subject><subject>Genetic variation</subject><subject>Molecular genetics</subject><subject>Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking</subject><subject>Population ecology</subject><subject>Population genetics</subject><subject>Population structure</subject><subject>Research Notes</subject><issn>0888-8892</issn><issn>1523-1739</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVUU1v1DAUjCqQuhT-QQ8-ALeE59iJHYSEICrdlSp6oB9Hy0lewIsbb-3sdvff4yjVckRcng8znpk3L0neUsgo8PLDOqNFzlIqWJXlADQDWgAwISHbnySLI_giWYCUMpWyyk-TVyGsAaAqKF8kd7UbAvqdHo0byJ22WySuJ6uhww3GMYz2QC52zu7M8JPcDmYMH8kP3XrsSO2eiPPkBsOoG4tkedi48RcGEz6_Tl722gZ88_yeJbffLm7qZXp1fbmqv1ylLRclxHAVw66TWjfQtFrwBkrd9ICUS6S97kpdypLJogCKgFIwFEIWLeco24Jzdpa8n3U33j1uYxD1YEKL1uoB3TYoKnMueUX_TeSF5LKSkfhpJrbeheCxVxtvHrQ_KApqal2t1VSsmopVU-vq2Lrax-_vnn10aLXtvR5aE_5qcBAA-WRTz7wnY_HwXx6qvv66igdkEFXOZ5V1GJ0_qjAop30inM6wCSPuj7D2v1UpmCjU_fdLVTEWE1GhluwPDZ-uow</recordid><startdate>200106</startdate><enddate>200106</enddate><creator>Pearman, Peter B.</creator><general>Blackwell Science Inc</general><general>Blackwell Science</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SN</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200106</creationdate><title>Conservation Value of Independently Evolving Units: Sacred Cow or Testable Hypothesis?</title><author>Pearman, Peter B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4760-1793edd8aab0bca74b06abf0e148e1fad6a686385501e0e873e7785c44e8c5443</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Conservation biology</topic><topic>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</topic><topic>Ecological genetics</topic><topic>Environmental conservation</topic><topic>Evolutionary genetics</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Genetic loci</topic><topic>Genetic variation</topic><topic>Molecular genetics</topic><topic>Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking</topic><topic>Population ecology</topic><topic>Population genetics</topic><topic>Population structure</topic><topic>Research Notes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pearman, Peter B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Conservation biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pearman, Peter B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Conservation Value of Independently Evolving Units: Sacred Cow or Testable Hypothesis?</atitle><jtitle>Conservation biology</jtitle><addtitle>Conservation Biology</addtitle><date>2001-06</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>780</spage><epage>783</epage><pages>780-783</pages><issn>0888-8892</issn><eissn>1523-1739</eissn><coden>CBIOEF</coden><abstract>Many published scientific papers use molecular marker data to identify genetically distinct populations and some go on to advocate conserving each of these populations to preserve genetic diversity. An often unacknowledged assumption underlying this approach is that patterns at marker loci reflect the distribution of among-population variation that increases evolutionary fitness and thus has conservation value. The article stresses the need for empirical testing of this assumption and provides background information by exploring the concept of conservation value and reviewing available evidence on the relationship between marker variation and characters important to fitness. Two important specific questions requiring research are identified.</abstract><cop>Boston, MA, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Science Inc</pub><doi>10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.015003780.x</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0888-8892
ispartof Conservation biology, 2001-06, Vol.15 (3), p.780-783
issn 0888-8892
1523-1739
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18248491
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Applied ecology
Biological and medical sciences
Conservation biology
Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife
Ecological genetics
Environmental conservation
Evolutionary genetics
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Genetic loci
Genetic variation
Molecular genetics
Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking
Population ecology
Population genetics
Population structure
Research Notes
title Conservation Value of Independently Evolving Units: Sacred Cow or Testable Hypothesis?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T19%3A50%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Conservation%20Value%20of%20Independently%20Evolving%20Units:%20Sacred%20Cow%20or%20Testable%20Hypothesis?&rft.jtitle=Conservation%20biology&rft.au=Pearman,%20Peter%20B.&rft.date=2001-06&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=780&rft.epage=783&rft.pages=780-783&rft.issn=0888-8892&rft.eissn=1523-1739&rft.coden=CBIOEF&rft_id=info:doi/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.015003780.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3061458%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14584898&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3061458&rfr_iscdi=true