Knee Arthroplasty After Subchondroplasty: Early Results, Complications, and Technical Challenges
Abstract Background Calcium phosphate bone substitutes (CPBS) are commonly used to augment and repair bone voids and defects after fractures around the knee joint. The purpose of this study was to determine whether prior arthroscopic application of a CPBS, for repair of magnetic resonance imaging–id...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of arthroplasty 2016-10, Vol.31 (10), p.2188-2192 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2192 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 2188 |
container_title | The Journal of arthroplasty |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Yoo, Joanne Y., BS O'Malley, Michael J., MD Matsen Ko, Laura J., MD Cohen, Steven B., MD Sharkey, Peter F., MD |
description | Abstract Background Calcium phosphate bone substitutes (CPBS) are commonly used to augment and repair bone voids and defects after fractures around the knee joint. The purpose of this study was to determine whether prior arthroscopic application of a CPBS, for repair of magnetic resonance imaging–identified subchondral fractures associated with osteoarthritis (procedure referred to as subchondroplasty) adversely affected the performance and/or outcome of subsequent knee arthroplasty. Methods Twenty-two patients who had arthroscopic repair of a periarticular fracture combined with use of a CPBS who later had knee arthroplasty were identified. Average follow-up for study patients was 23.5 months (range 12-52 months). These patients were matched demographically and for follow-up duration in a 2:1 ratio to a group of control subjects undergoing arthroplasty who had not undergone prior surgery. Results Technical challenges related to surgical performance, clinical outcomes, and complications were determined for both the groups. At most recent follow-up, study patients had an average Oxford score of 40.6 (range, 25-48) compared with control subjects with an average score of 40.1 (range, 12-48). There was no difference in complications or surgical complexity between groups, and only standard primary components were used. Conclusion The results of our study suggest that prior arthroscopic repair combined with CPBS of periarticular fractures around the knee does not compromise the early outcomes and surgical performance or increase complications related to subsequent arthroplasty. However, longer follow-up of these patients is warranted to confirm that implant durability remains uncompromised. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.arth.2015.12.051 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1824546955</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0883540316000188</els_id><sourcerecordid>1824546955</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-9fa9bc6d0d5a2f08a6cb0d7a25e9c382f36038f784338427f09830050dfcdd423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9vEzEQxS0EoqHwBTigPXJgl_G_jRchpChqAVEJiZazcexZssGxU3sXKd8eb9Ny4MBpNKP3njS_R8hLCg0F2r7dNSaN24YBlQ1lDUj6iCyo5KxWAtrHZAFK8VoK4GfkWc47AEqlFE_JGVsKDlTBgvz4EhCrVclJ8eBNHo_Vqh8xVdfTxm5jcA_nd9WFSf5YfcM8-TG_qdZxf_CDNeMQQ1lNcNUN2m0oJ1-tt8Z7DD8xPydPeuMzvrif5-T75cXN-lN99fXj5_XqqraC0rHuetNtbOvAScN6UKa1G3BLwyR2livW8xa46pdKcK4EW_bQKQ4gwfXWOcH4OXl9yj2keDthHvV-yBa9NwHjlDVVTEjRdlIWKTtJbYo5J-z1IQ17k46agp7J6p2eyeqZrKZMF7LF9Oo-f9rs0f21PKAsgvcnAZYvfw-YdLYDBotuSGhH7eLw__wP_9itH-5g_sIj5l2cUij8NNW5GPT13O1cLW2h9FqWP0QtnxE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1824546955</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Knee Arthroplasty After Subchondroplasty: Early Results, Complications, and Technical Challenges</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Yoo, Joanne Y., BS ; O'Malley, Michael J., MD ; Matsen Ko, Laura J., MD ; Cohen, Steven B., MD ; Sharkey, Peter F., MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Yoo, Joanne Y., BS ; O'Malley, Michael J., MD ; Matsen Ko, Laura J., MD ; Cohen, Steven B., MD ; Sharkey, Peter F., MD</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Calcium phosphate bone substitutes (CPBS) are commonly used to augment and repair bone voids and defects after fractures around the knee joint. The purpose of this study was to determine whether prior arthroscopic application of a CPBS, for repair of magnetic resonance imaging–identified subchondral fractures associated with osteoarthritis (procedure referred to as subchondroplasty) adversely affected the performance and/or outcome of subsequent knee arthroplasty. Methods Twenty-two patients who had arthroscopic repair of a periarticular fracture combined with use of a CPBS who later had knee arthroplasty were identified. Average follow-up for study patients was 23.5 months (range 12-52 months). These patients were matched demographically and for follow-up duration in a 2:1 ratio to a group of control subjects undergoing arthroplasty who had not undergone prior surgery. Results Technical challenges related to surgical performance, clinical outcomes, and complications were determined for both the groups. At most recent follow-up, study patients had an average Oxford score of 40.6 (range, 25-48) compared with control subjects with an average score of 40.1 (range, 12-48). There was no difference in complications or surgical complexity between groups, and only standard primary components were used. Conclusion The results of our study suggest that prior arthroscopic repair combined with CPBS of periarticular fractures around the knee does not compromise the early outcomes and surgical performance or increase complications related to subsequent arthroplasty. However, longer follow-up of these patients is warranted to confirm that implant durability remains uncompromised.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0883-5403</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8406</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.12.051</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27430180</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - statistics & numerical data ; Arthroplasty, Subchondral ; arthroscopic repair ; Arthroscopy ; Bone Substitutes ; calcium phosphate bone substitutes ; Calcium Phosphates ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Knee - surgery ; knee arthroplasty ; Knee Joint - surgery ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Orthopedics ; Osteoarthritis - surgery ; Osteoarthritis, Knee - diagnostic imaging ; Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery ; Oxford Knee Score ; subchondral bone ; subchondroplasty</subject><ispartof>The Journal of arthroplasty, 2016-10, Vol.31 (10), p.2188-2192</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2016 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-9fa9bc6d0d5a2f08a6cb0d7a25e9c382f36038f784338427f09830050dfcdd423</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-9fa9bc6d0d5a2f08a6cb0d7a25e9c382f36038f784338427f09830050dfcdd423</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883540316000188$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27430180$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yoo, Joanne Y., BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Malley, Michael J., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsen Ko, Laura J., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Steven B., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharkey, Peter F., MD</creatorcontrib><title>Knee Arthroplasty After Subchondroplasty: Early Results, Complications, and Technical Challenges</title><title>The Journal of arthroplasty</title><addtitle>J Arthroplasty</addtitle><description>Abstract Background Calcium phosphate bone substitutes (CPBS) are commonly used to augment and repair bone voids and defects after fractures around the knee joint. The purpose of this study was to determine whether prior arthroscopic application of a CPBS, for repair of magnetic resonance imaging–identified subchondral fractures associated with osteoarthritis (procedure referred to as subchondroplasty) adversely affected the performance and/or outcome of subsequent knee arthroplasty. Methods Twenty-two patients who had arthroscopic repair of a periarticular fracture combined with use of a CPBS who later had knee arthroplasty were identified. Average follow-up for study patients was 23.5 months (range 12-52 months). These patients were matched demographically and for follow-up duration in a 2:1 ratio to a group of control subjects undergoing arthroplasty who had not undergone prior surgery. Results Technical challenges related to surgical performance, clinical outcomes, and complications were determined for both the groups. At most recent follow-up, study patients had an average Oxford score of 40.6 (range, 25-48) compared with control subjects with an average score of 40.1 (range, 12-48). There was no difference in complications or surgical complexity between groups, and only standard primary components were used. Conclusion The results of our study suggest that prior arthroscopic repair combined with CPBS of periarticular fractures around the knee does not compromise the early outcomes and surgical performance or increase complications related to subsequent arthroplasty. However, longer follow-up of these patients is warranted to confirm that implant durability remains uncompromised.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Subchondral</subject><subject>arthroscopic repair</subject><subject>Arthroscopy</subject><subject>Bone Substitutes</subject><subject>calcium phosphate bone substitutes</subject><subject>Calcium Phosphates</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Knee - surgery</subject><subject>knee arthroplasty</subject><subject>Knee Joint - surgery</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis - surgery</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis, Knee - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery</subject><subject>Oxford Knee Score</subject><subject>subchondral bone</subject><subject>subchondroplasty</subject><issn>0883-5403</issn><issn>1532-8406</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU9vEzEQxS0EoqHwBTigPXJgl_G_jRchpChqAVEJiZazcexZssGxU3sXKd8eb9Ny4MBpNKP3njS_R8hLCg0F2r7dNSaN24YBlQ1lDUj6iCyo5KxWAtrHZAFK8VoK4GfkWc47AEqlFE_JGVsKDlTBgvz4EhCrVclJ8eBNHo_Vqh8xVdfTxm5jcA_nd9WFSf5YfcM8-TG_qdZxf_CDNeMQQ1lNcNUN2m0oJ1-tt8Z7DD8xPydPeuMzvrif5-T75cXN-lN99fXj5_XqqraC0rHuetNtbOvAScN6UKa1G3BLwyR2livW8xa46pdKcK4EW_bQKQ4gwfXWOcH4OXl9yj2keDthHvV-yBa9NwHjlDVVTEjRdlIWKTtJbYo5J-z1IQ17k46agp7J6p2eyeqZrKZMF7LF9Oo-f9rs0f21PKAsgvcnAZYvfw-YdLYDBotuSGhH7eLw__wP_9itH-5g_sIj5l2cUij8NNW5GPT13O1cLW2h9FqWP0QtnxE</recordid><startdate>20161001</startdate><enddate>20161001</enddate><creator>Yoo, Joanne Y., BS</creator><creator>O'Malley, Michael J., MD</creator><creator>Matsen Ko, Laura J., MD</creator><creator>Cohen, Steven B., MD</creator><creator>Sharkey, Peter F., MD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161001</creationdate><title>Knee Arthroplasty After Subchondroplasty: Early Results, Complications, and Technical Challenges</title><author>Yoo, Joanne Y., BS ; O'Malley, Michael J., MD ; Matsen Ko, Laura J., MD ; Cohen, Steven B., MD ; Sharkey, Peter F., MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-9fa9bc6d0d5a2f08a6cb0d7a25e9c382f36038f784338427f09830050dfcdd423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Subchondral</topic><topic>arthroscopic repair</topic><topic>Arthroscopy</topic><topic>Bone Substitutes</topic><topic>calcium phosphate bone substitutes</topic><topic>Calcium Phosphates</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Knee - surgery</topic><topic>knee arthroplasty</topic><topic>Knee Joint - surgery</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis - surgery</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis, Knee - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery</topic><topic>Oxford Knee Score</topic><topic>subchondral bone</topic><topic>subchondroplasty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yoo, Joanne Y., BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Malley, Michael J., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsen Ko, Laura J., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Steven B., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharkey, Peter F., MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of arthroplasty</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yoo, Joanne Y., BS</au><au>O'Malley, Michael J., MD</au><au>Matsen Ko, Laura J., MD</au><au>Cohen, Steven B., MD</au><au>Sharkey, Peter F., MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Knee Arthroplasty After Subchondroplasty: Early Results, Complications, and Technical Challenges</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of arthroplasty</jtitle><addtitle>J Arthroplasty</addtitle><date>2016-10-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>2188</spage><epage>2192</epage><pages>2188-2192</pages><issn>0883-5403</issn><eissn>1532-8406</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background Calcium phosphate bone substitutes (CPBS) are commonly used to augment and repair bone voids and defects after fractures around the knee joint. The purpose of this study was to determine whether prior arthroscopic application of a CPBS, for repair of magnetic resonance imaging–identified subchondral fractures associated with osteoarthritis (procedure referred to as subchondroplasty) adversely affected the performance and/or outcome of subsequent knee arthroplasty. Methods Twenty-two patients who had arthroscopic repair of a periarticular fracture combined with use of a CPBS who later had knee arthroplasty were identified. Average follow-up for study patients was 23.5 months (range 12-52 months). These patients were matched demographically and for follow-up duration in a 2:1 ratio to a group of control subjects undergoing arthroplasty who had not undergone prior surgery. Results Technical challenges related to surgical performance, clinical outcomes, and complications were determined for both the groups. At most recent follow-up, study patients had an average Oxford score of 40.6 (range, 25-48) compared with control subjects with an average score of 40.1 (range, 12-48). There was no difference in complications or surgical complexity between groups, and only standard primary components were used. Conclusion The results of our study suggest that prior arthroscopic repair combined with CPBS of periarticular fractures around the knee does not compromise the early outcomes and surgical performance or increase complications related to subsequent arthroplasty. However, longer follow-up of these patients is warranted to confirm that implant durability remains uncompromised.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>27430180</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.arth.2015.12.051</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0883-5403 |
ispartof | The Journal of arthroplasty, 2016-10, Vol.31 (10), p.2188-2192 |
issn | 0883-5403 1532-8406 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1824546955 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Aged Aged, 80 and over Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - statistics & numerical data Arthroplasty, Subchondral arthroscopic repair Arthroscopy Bone Substitutes calcium phosphate bone substitutes Calcium Phosphates Female Follow-Up Studies Humans Knee - surgery knee arthroplasty Knee Joint - surgery Magnetic Resonance Imaging Male Middle Aged Orthopedics Osteoarthritis - surgery Osteoarthritis, Knee - diagnostic imaging Osteoarthritis, Knee - surgery Oxford Knee Score subchondral bone subchondroplasty |
title | Knee Arthroplasty After Subchondroplasty: Early Results, Complications, and Technical Challenges |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T01%3A04%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Knee%20Arthroplasty%20After%20Subchondroplasty:%20Early%20Results,%20Complications,%20and%20Technical%20Challenges&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20arthroplasty&rft.au=Yoo,%20Joanne%20Y.,%20BS&rft.date=2016-10-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2188&rft.epage=2192&rft.pages=2188-2192&rft.issn=0883-5403&rft.eissn=1532-8406&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.arth.2015.12.051&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1824546955%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1824546955&rft_id=info:pmid/27430180&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0883540316000188&rfr_iscdi=true |