Safety pharmacology investigations on the nervous system: An industry survey
The Safety Pharmacology Society (SPS) conducted an industry survey in 2015 to identify industry practices as they relate to central, peripheral and autonomic nervous system (‘CNS’) drug safety testing. One hundred fifty-eight (158) participants from Asia (16%), Europe (20%) and North America (56%) r...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods 2016-09, Vol.81, p.37-46 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 46 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 37 |
container_title | Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods |
container_volume | 81 |
creator | Authier, Simon Arezzo, Joseph Delatte, Marcus S. Kallman, Mary-Jeanne Markgraf, Carrie Paquette, Dominique Pugsley, Michael K. Ratcliffe, Sian Redfern, William S. Stevens, Joanne Valentin, Jean-Pierre Vargas, Hugo M. Curtis, Michael J. |
description | The Safety Pharmacology Society (SPS) conducted an industry survey in 2015 to identify industry practices as they relate to central, peripheral and autonomic nervous system (‘CNS’) drug safety testing. One hundred fifty-eight (158) participants from Asia (16%), Europe (20%) and North America (56%) responded to the survey. 52% of participants were from pharmaceutical companies (>1000 employees). Oncology (67%) and neurology/psychiatry (66%) were the most frequent target indications pursued by companies followed by inflammation (48%), cardiovascular (43%), metabolic (39%), infectious (37%), orphan (32%) and respiratory (29%) diseases. Seizures (67% of participants), gait abnormalities (67%), tremors (65%), emesis (56%), sedation (52%) and salivation (47%) were the most commonly encountered CNS issues in pre-clinical drug development while headache (65%), emesis/nausea (60%), fatigue (51%) and dizziness (49%) were the most frequent issues encountered in Phase I clinical trials. 54% of respondents reported that a standard battery of tests applied to screen drug candidates was the approach most commonly used to address non-clinical CNS safety testing. A minority (14% of all participants) reported using electroencephalography (EEG) screening prior to animal inclusion on toxicology studies. The most frequent group size was n=8 for functional observation battery (FOB), polysomnography and seizure liability studies. FOB evaluations were conducted in a dedicated room (78%) by blinded personnel (66%) with control for circadian cycle (55%) effects (e.g., dosing at a standardized time; balancing time of day across treatment groups). The rat was reported as the most common species used for seizure liability, nerve conduction and drug-abuse liability testing. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.vascn.2016.06.001 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1824546477</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1056871916300570</els_id><sourcerecordid>1824546477</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-897dea3a175bb1873470e1589c08e06c15ea2761c721bc9a569ad049937f02983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kN9LwzAQx4Mobk7_AkH66EvrpU2bRPBBhr9g4IMKvoUsvW0ZazuTttD_3sxNH4WDu4PP3X3vS8glhYQCLW7WSa-9qZM0NAmEAHpExlTwLGZCfB6HGvIiFpzKETnzfg0AmaTslIxSnhaZyNiYzN70Atsh2q60q7RpNs1yiGzdo2_tUre2qX3U1FG7wqhG1zedj_zgW6xuo_s6gGXnWzdEvnM9DufkZKE3Hi8OeUI-Hh_ep8_x7PXpZXo_iw0D1sZC8hJ1pinP5_OdXsYBaS6kAYFQGJqjTnlBDU_p3EidF1KXwKTM-AJSKbIJud7v3brmqwtSVWW9wc1G1xgUKipSlrOCcR7QbI8a13jvcKG2zlbaDYqC2tmo1urHRrWzUUEIoGHq6nCgm1dY_s38-haAuz2A4c3eolPeWKwNltahaVXZ2H8PfAPRFoTI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1824546477</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Safety pharmacology investigations on the nervous system: An industry survey</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Authier, Simon ; Arezzo, Joseph ; Delatte, Marcus S. ; Kallman, Mary-Jeanne ; Markgraf, Carrie ; Paquette, Dominique ; Pugsley, Michael K. ; Ratcliffe, Sian ; Redfern, William S. ; Stevens, Joanne ; Valentin, Jean-Pierre ; Vargas, Hugo M. ; Curtis, Michael J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Authier, Simon ; Arezzo, Joseph ; Delatte, Marcus S. ; Kallman, Mary-Jeanne ; Markgraf, Carrie ; Paquette, Dominique ; Pugsley, Michael K. ; Ratcliffe, Sian ; Redfern, William S. ; Stevens, Joanne ; Valentin, Jean-Pierre ; Vargas, Hugo M. ; Curtis, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><description>The Safety Pharmacology Society (SPS) conducted an industry survey in 2015 to identify industry practices as they relate to central, peripheral and autonomic nervous system (‘CNS’) drug safety testing. One hundred fifty-eight (158) participants from Asia (16%), Europe (20%) and North America (56%) responded to the survey. 52% of participants were from pharmaceutical companies (>1000 employees). Oncology (67%) and neurology/psychiatry (66%) were the most frequent target indications pursued by companies followed by inflammation (48%), cardiovascular (43%), metabolic (39%), infectious (37%), orphan (32%) and respiratory (29%) diseases. Seizures (67% of participants), gait abnormalities (67%), tremors (65%), emesis (56%), sedation (52%) and salivation (47%) were the most commonly encountered CNS issues in pre-clinical drug development while headache (65%), emesis/nausea (60%), fatigue (51%) and dizziness (49%) were the most frequent issues encountered in Phase I clinical trials. 54% of respondents reported that a standard battery of tests applied to screen drug candidates was the approach most commonly used to address non-clinical CNS safety testing. A minority (14% of all participants) reported using electroencephalography (EEG) screening prior to animal inclusion on toxicology studies. The most frequent group size was n=8 for functional observation battery (FOB), polysomnography and seizure liability studies. FOB evaluations were conducted in a dedicated room (78%) by blinded personnel (66%) with control for circadian cycle (55%) effects (e.g., dosing at a standardized time; balancing time of day across treatment groups). The rat was reported as the most common species used for seizure liability, nerve conduction and drug-abuse liability testing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1056-8719</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-488X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.vascn.2016.06.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27263834</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Abuse ; Aging ; Animals ; Behavior, Animal - drug effects ; Drug Evaluation, Preclinical ; Drug Industry - statistics & numerical data ; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions ; EEG ; Electroencephalography - drug effects ; Humans ; Mice ; Nervous System Diseases - chemically induced ; Nervous System Diseases - epidemiology ; Neural Conduction - drug effects ; Neurological functional observation battery ; Rats ; Safety ; Safety pharmacology ; Seizure ; Seizures - chemically induced ; Sleep ; Sleep - drug effects ; Substance-Related Disorders ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods, 2016-09, Vol.81, p.37-46</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-897dea3a175bb1873470e1589c08e06c15ea2761c721bc9a569ad049937f02983</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-897dea3a175bb1873470e1589c08e06c15ea2761c721bc9a569ad049937f02983</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1056871916300570$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27263834$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Authier, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arezzo, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delatte, Marcus S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kallman, Mary-Jeanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Markgraf, Carrie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paquette, Dominique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pugsley, Michael K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ratcliffe, Sian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Redfern, William S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stevens, Joanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valentin, Jean-Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vargas, Hugo M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Curtis, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><title>Safety pharmacology investigations on the nervous system: An industry survey</title><title>Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods</title><addtitle>J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods</addtitle><description>The Safety Pharmacology Society (SPS) conducted an industry survey in 2015 to identify industry practices as they relate to central, peripheral and autonomic nervous system (‘CNS’) drug safety testing. One hundred fifty-eight (158) participants from Asia (16%), Europe (20%) and North America (56%) responded to the survey. 52% of participants were from pharmaceutical companies (>1000 employees). Oncology (67%) and neurology/psychiatry (66%) were the most frequent target indications pursued by companies followed by inflammation (48%), cardiovascular (43%), metabolic (39%), infectious (37%), orphan (32%) and respiratory (29%) diseases. Seizures (67% of participants), gait abnormalities (67%), tremors (65%), emesis (56%), sedation (52%) and salivation (47%) were the most commonly encountered CNS issues in pre-clinical drug development while headache (65%), emesis/nausea (60%), fatigue (51%) and dizziness (49%) were the most frequent issues encountered in Phase I clinical trials. 54% of respondents reported that a standard battery of tests applied to screen drug candidates was the approach most commonly used to address non-clinical CNS safety testing. A minority (14% of all participants) reported using electroencephalography (EEG) screening prior to animal inclusion on toxicology studies. The most frequent group size was n=8 for functional observation battery (FOB), polysomnography and seizure liability studies. FOB evaluations were conducted in a dedicated room (78%) by blinded personnel (66%) with control for circadian cycle (55%) effects (e.g., dosing at a standardized time; balancing time of day across treatment groups). The rat was reported as the most common species used for seizure liability, nerve conduction and drug-abuse liability testing.</description><subject>Abuse</subject><subject>Aging</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Behavior, Animal - drug effects</subject><subject>Drug Evaluation, Preclinical</subject><subject>Drug Industry - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions</subject><subject>EEG</subject><subject>Electroencephalography - drug effects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Nervous System Diseases - chemically induced</subject><subject>Nervous System Diseases - epidemiology</subject><subject>Neural Conduction - drug effects</subject><subject>Neurological functional observation battery</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Safety pharmacology</subject><subject>Seizure</subject><subject>Seizures - chemically induced</subject><subject>Sleep</subject><subject>Sleep - drug effects</subject><subject>Substance-Related Disorders</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>1056-8719</issn><issn>1873-488X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kN9LwzAQx4Mobk7_AkH66EvrpU2bRPBBhr9g4IMKvoUsvW0ZazuTttD_3sxNH4WDu4PP3X3vS8glhYQCLW7WSa-9qZM0NAmEAHpExlTwLGZCfB6HGvIiFpzKETnzfg0AmaTslIxSnhaZyNiYzN70Atsh2q60q7RpNs1yiGzdo2_tUre2qX3U1FG7wqhG1zedj_zgW6xuo_s6gGXnWzdEvnM9DufkZKE3Hi8OeUI-Hh_ep8_x7PXpZXo_iw0D1sZC8hJ1pinP5_OdXsYBaS6kAYFQGJqjTnlBDU_p3EidF1KXwKTM-AJSKbIJud7v3brmqwtSVWW9wc1G1xgUKipSlrOCcR7QbI8a13jvcKG2zlbaDYqC2tmo1urHRrWzUUEIoGHq6nCgm1dY_s38-haAuz2A4c3eolPeWKwNltahaVXZ2H8PfAPRFoTI</recordid><startdate>201609</startdate><enddate>201609</enddate><creator>Authier, Simon</creator><creator>Arezzo, Joseph</creator><creator>Delatte, Marcus S.</creator><creator>Kallman, Mary-Jeanne</creator><creator>Markgraf, Carrie</creator><creator>Paquette, Dominique</creator><creator>Pugsley, Michael K.</creator><creator>Ratcliffe, Sian</creator><creator>Redfern, William S.</creator><creator>Stevens, Joanne</creator><creator>Valentin, Jean-Pierre</creator><creator>Vargas, Hugo M.</creator><creator>Curtis, Michael J.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201609</creationdate><title>Safety pharmacology investigations on the nervous system: An industry survey</title><author>Authier, Simon ; Arezzo, Joseph ; Delatte, Marcus S. ; Kallman, Mary-Jeanne ; Markgraf, Carrie ; Paquette, Dominique ; Pugsley, Michael K. ; Ratcliffe, Sian ; Redfern, William S. ; Stevens, Joanne ; Valentin, Jean-Pierre ; Vargas, Hugo M. ; Curtis, Michael J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-897dea3a175bb1873470e1589c08e06c15ea2761c721bc9a569ad049937f02983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Abuse</topic><topic>Aging</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Behavior, Animal - drug effects</topic><topic>Drug Evaluation, Preclinical</topic><topic>Drug Industry - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions</topic><topic>EEG</topic><topic>Electroencephalography - drug effects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Nervous System Diseases - chemically induced</topic><topic>Nervous System Diseases - epidemiology</topic><topic>Neural Conduction - drug effects</topic><topic>Neurological functional observation battery</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Safety pharmacology</topic><topic>Seizure</topic><topic>Seizures - chemically induced</topic><topic>Sleep</topic><topic>Sleep - drug effects</topic><topic>Substance-Related Disorders</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Authier, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arezzo, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delatte, Marcus S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kallman, Mary-Jeanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Markgraf, Carrie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paquette, Dominique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pugsley, Michael K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ratcliffe, Sian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Redfern, William S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stevens, Joanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valentin, Jean-Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vargas, Hugo M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Curtis, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Authier, Simon</au><au>Arezzo, Joseph</au><au>Delatte, Marcus S.</au><au>Kallman, Mary-Jeanne</au><au>Markgraf, Carrie</au><au>Paquette, Dominique</au><au>Pugsley, Michael K.</au><au>Ratcliffe, Sian</au><au>Redfern, William S.</au><au>Stevens, Joanne</au><au>Valentin, Jean-Pierre</au><au>Vargas, Hugo M.</au><au>Curtis, Michael J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Safety pharmacology investigations on the nervous system: An industry survey</atitle><jtitle>Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods</jtitle><addtitle>J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods</addtitle><date>2016-09</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>81</volume><spage>37</spage><epage>46</epage><pages>37-46</pages><issn>1056-8719</issn><eissn>1873-488X</eissn><abstract>The Safety Pharmacology Society (SPS) conducted an industry survey in 2015 to identify industry practices as they relate to central, peripheral and autonomic nervous system (‘CNS’) drug safety testing. One hundred fifty-eight (158) participants from Asia (16%), Europe (20%) and North America (56%) responded to the survey. 52% of participants were from pharmaceutical companies (>1000 employees). Oncology (67%) and neurology/psychiatry (66%) were the most frequent target indications pursued by companies followed by inflammation (48%), cardiovascular (43%), metabolic (39%), infectious (37%), orphan (32%) and respiratory (29%) diseases. Seizures (67% of participants), gait abnormalities (67%), tremors (65%), emesis (56%), sedation (52%) and salivation (47%) were the most commonly encountered CNS issues in pre-clinical drug development while headache (65%), emesis/nausea (60%), fatigue (51%) and dizziness (49%) were the most frequent issues encountered in Phase I clinical trials. 54% of respondents reported that a standard battery of tests applied to screen drug candidates was the approach most commonly used to address non-clinical CNS safety testing. A minority (14% of all participants) reported using electroencephalography (EEG) screening prior to animal inclusion on toxicology studies. The most frequent group size was n=8 for functional observation battery (FOB), polysomnography and seizure liability studies. FOB evaluations were conducted in a dedicated room (78%) by blinded personnel (66%) with control for circadian cycle (55%) effects (e.g., dosing at a standardized time; balancing time of day across treatment groups). The rat was reported as the most common species used for seizure liability, nerve conduction and drug-abuse liability testing.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>27263834</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.vascn.2016.06.001</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1056-8719 |
ispartof | Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods, 2016-09, Vol.81, p.37-46 |
issn | 1056-8719 1873-488X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1824546477 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Abuse Aging Animals Behavior, Animal - drug effects Drug Evaluation, Preclinical Drug Industry - statistics & numerical data Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions EEG Electroencephalography - drug effects Humans Mice Nervous System Diseases - chemically induced Nervous System Diseases - epidemiology Neural Conduction - drug effects Neurological functional observation battery Rats Safety Safety pharmacology Seizure Seizures - chemically induced Sleep Sleep - drug effects Substance-Related Disorders Surveys and Questionnaires |
title | Safety pharmacology investigations on the nervous system: An industry survey |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T12%3A29%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Safety%20pharmacology%20investigations%20on%20the%20nervous%20system:%20An%20industry%20survey&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20pharmacological%20and%20toxicological%20methods&rft.au=Authier,%20Simon&rft.date=2016-09&rft.volume=81&rft.spage=37&rft.epage=46&rft.pages=37-46&rft.issn=1056-8719&rft.eissn=1873-488X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.vascn.2016.06.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1824546477%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1824546477&rft_id=info:pmid/27263834&rft_els_id=S1056871916300570&rfr_iscdi=true |