Safety pharmacology investigations on the nervous system: An industry survey

The Safety Pharmacology Society (SPS) conducted an industry survey in 2015 to identify industry practices as they relate to central, peripheral and autonomic nervous system (‘CNS’) drug safety testing. One hundred fifty-eight (158) participants from Asia (16%), Europe (20%) and North America (56%) r...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods 2016-09, Vol.81, p.37-46
Hauptverfasser: Authier, Simon, Arezzo, Joseph, Delatte, Marcus S., Kallman, Mary-Jeanne, Markgraf, Carrie, Paquette, Dominique, Pugsley, Michael K., Ratcliffe, Sian, Redfern, William S., Stevens, Joanne, Valentin, Jean-Pierre, Vargas, Hugo M., Curtis, Michael J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 46
container_issue
container_start_page 37
container_title Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods
container_volume 81
creator Authier, Simon
Arezzo, Joseph
Delatte, Marcus S.
Kallman, Mary-Jeanne
Markgraf, Carrie
Paquette, Dominique
Pugsley, Michael K.
Ratcliffe, Sian
Redfern, William S.
Stevens, Joanne
Valentin, Jean-Pierre
Vargas, Hugo M.
Curtis, Michael J.
description The Safety Pharmacology Society (SPS) conducted an industry survey in 2015 to identify industry practices as they relate to central, peripheral and autonomic nervous system (‘CNS’) drug safety testing. One hundred fifty-eight (158) participants from Asia (16%), Europe (20%) and North America (56%) responded to the survey. 52% of participants were from pharmaceutical companies (>1000 employees). Oncology (67%) and neurology/psychiatry (66%) were the most frequent target indications pursued by companies followed by inflammation (48%), cardiovascular (43%), metabolic (39%), infectious (37%), orphan (32%) and respiratory (29%) diseases. Seizures (67% of participants), gait abnormalities (67%), tremors (65%), emesis (56%), sedation (52%) and salivation (47%) were the most commonly encountered CNS issues in pre-clinical drug development while headache (65%), emesis/nausea (60%), fatigue (51%) and dizziness (49%) were the most frequent issues encountered in Phase I clinical trials. 54% of respondents reported that a standard battery of tests applied to screen drug candidates was the approach most commonly used to address non-clinical CNS safety testing. A minority (14% of all participants) reported using electroencephalography (EEG) screening prior to animal inclusion on toxicology studies. The most frequent group size was n=8 for functional observation battery (FOB), polysomnography and seizure liability studies. FOB evaluations were conducted in a dedicated room (78%) by blinded personnel (66%) with control for circadian cycle (55%) effects (e.g., dosing at a standardized time; balancing time of day across treatment groups). The rat was reported as the most common species used for seizure liability, nerve conduction and drug-abuse liability testing.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.vascn.2016.06.001
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1824546477</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1056871916300570</els_id><sourcerecordid>1824546477</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-897dea3a175bb1873470e1589c08e06c15ea2761c721bc9a569ad049937f02983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kN9LwzAQx4Mobk7_AkH66EvrpU2bRPBBhr9g4IMKvoUsvW0ZazuTttD_3sxNH4WDu4PP3X3vS8glhYQCLW7WSa-9qZM0NAmEAHpExlTwLGZCfB6HGvIiFpzKETnzfg0AmaTslIxSnhaZyNiYzN70Atsh2q60q7RpNs1yiGzdo2_tUre2qX3U1FG7wqhG1zedj_zgW6xuo_s6gGXnWzdEvnM9DufkZKE3Hi8OeUI-Hh_ep8_x7PXpZXo_iw0D1sZC8hJ1pinP5_OdXsYBaS6kAYFQGJqjTnlBDU_p3EidF1KXwKTM-AJSKbIJud7v3brmqwtSVWW9wc1G1xgUKipSlrOCcR7QbI8a13jvcKG2zlbaDYqC2tmo1urHRrWzUUEIoGHq6nCgm1dY_s38-haAuz2A4c3eolPeWKwNltahaVXZ2H8PfAPRFoTI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1824546477</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Safety pharmacology investigations on the nervous system: An industry survey</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Authier, Simon ; Arezzo, Joseph ; Delatte, Marcus S. ; Kallman, Mary-Jeanne ; Markgraf, Carrie ; Paquette, Dominique ; Pugsley, Michael K. ; Ratcliffe, Sian ; Redfern, William S. ; Stevens, Joanne ; Valentin, Jean-Pierre ; Vargas, Hugo M. ; Curtis, Michael J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Authier, Simon ; Arezzo, Joseph ; Delatte, Marcus S. ; Kallman, Mary-Jeanne ; Markgraf, Carrie ; Paquette, Dominique ; Pugsley, Michael K. ; Ratcliffe, Sian ; Redfern, William S. ; Stevens, Joanne ; Valentin, Jean-Pierre ; Vargas, Hugo M. ; Curtis, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><description>The Safety Pharmacology Society (SPS) conducted an industry survey in 2015 to identify industry practices as they relate to central, peripheral and autonomic nervous system (‘CNS’) drug safety testing. One hundred fifty-eight (158) participants from Asia (16%), Europe (20%) and North America (56%) responded to the survey. 52% of participants were from pharmaceutical companies (&gt;1000 employees). Oncology (67%) and neurology/psychiatry (66%) were the most frequent target indications pursued by companies followed by inflammation (48%), cardiovascular (43%), metabolic (39%), infectious (37%), orphan (32%) and respiratory (29%) diseases. Seizures (67% of participants), gait abnormalities (67%), tremors (65%), emesis (56%), sedation (52%) and salivation (47%) were the most commonly encountered CNS issues in pre-clinical drug development while headache (65%), emesis/nausea (60%), fatigue (51%) and dizziness (49%) were the most frequent issues encountered in Phase I clinical trials. 54% of respondents reported that a standard battery of tests applied to screen drug candidates was the approach most commonly used to address non-clinical CNS safety testing. A minority (14% of all participants) reported using electroencephalography (EEG) screening prior to animal inclusion on toxicology studies. The most frequent group size was n=8 for functional observation battery (FOB), polysomnography and seizure liability studies. FOB evaluations were conducted in a dedicated room (78%) by blinded personnel (66%) with control for circadian cycle (55%) effects (e.g., dosing at a standardized time; balancing time of day across treatment groups). The rat was reported as the most common species used for seizure liability, nerve conduction and drug-abuse liability testing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1056-8719</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-488X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.vascn.2016.06.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27263834</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Abuse ; Aging ; Animals ; Behavior, Animal - drug effects ; Drug Evaluation, Preclinical ; Drug Industry - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions ; EEG ; Electroencephalography - drug effects ; Humans ; Mice ; Nervous System Diseases - chemically induced ; Nervous System Diseases - epidemiology ; Neural Conduction - drug effects ; Neurological functional observation battery ; Rats ; Safety ; Safety pharmacology ; Seizure ; Seizures - chemically induced ; Sleep ; Sleep - drug effects ; Substance-Related Disorders ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods, 2016-09, Vol.81, p.37-46</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-897dea3a175bb1873470e1589c08e06c15ea2761c721bc9a569ad049937f02983</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-897dea3a175bb1873470e1589c08e06c15ea2761c721bc9a569ad049937f02983</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1056871916300570$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27263834$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Authier, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arezzo, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delatte, Marcus S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kallman, Mary-Jeanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Markgraf, Carrie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paquette, Dominique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pugsley, Michael K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ratcliffe, Sian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Redfern, William S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stevens, Joanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valentin, Jean-Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vargas, Hugo M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Curtis, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><title>Safety pharmacology investigations on the nervous system: An industry survey</title><title>Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods</title><addtitle>J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods</addtitle><description>The Safety Pharmacology Society (SPS) conducted an industry survey in 2015 to identify industry practices as they relate to central, peripheral and autonomic nervous system (‘CNS’) drug safety testing. One hundred fifty-eight (158) participants from Asia (16%), Europe (20%) and North America (56%) responded to the survey. 52% of participants were from pharmaceutical companies (&gt;1000 employees). Oncology (67%) and neurology/psychiatry (66%) were the most frequent target indications pursued by companies followed by inflammation (48%), cardiovascular (43%), metabolic (39%), infectious (37%), orphan (32%) and respiratory (29%) diseases. Seizures (67% of participants), gait abnormalities (67%), tremors (65%), emesis (56%), sedation (52%) and salivation (47%) were the most commonly encountered CNS issues in pre-clinical drug development while headache (65%), emesis/nausea (60%), fatigue (51%) and dizziness (49%) were the most frequent issues encountered in Phase I clinical trials. 54% of respondents reported that a standard battery of tests applied to screen drug candidates was the approach most commonly used to address non-clinical CNS safety testing. A minority (14% of all participants) reported using electroencephalography (EEG) screening prior to animal inclusion on toxicology studies. The most frequent group size was n=8 for functional observation battery (FOB), polysomnography and seizure liability studies. FOB evaluations were conducted in a dedicated room (78%) by blinded personnel (66%) with control for circadian cycle (55%) effects (e.g., dosing at a standardized time; balancing time of day across treatment groups). The rat was reported as the most common species used for seizure liability, nerve conduction and drug-abuse liability testing.</description><subject>Abuse</subject><subject>Aging</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Behavior, Animal - drug effects</subject><subject>Drug Evaluation, Preclinical</subject><subject>Drug Industry - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions</subject><subject>EEG</subject><subject>Electroencephalography - drug effects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Nervous System Diseases - chemically induced</subject><subject>Nervous System Diseases - epidemiology</subject><subject>Neural Conduction - drug effects</subject><subject>Neurological functional observation battery</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Safety pharmacology</subject><subject>Seizure</subject><subject>Seizures - chemically induced</subject><subject>Sleep</subject><subject>Sleep - drug effects</subject><subject>Substance-Related Disorders</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>1056-8719</issn><issn>1873-488X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kN9LwzAQx4Mobk7_AkH66EvrpU2bRPBBhr9g4IMKvoUsvW0ZazuTttD_3sxNH4WDu4PP3X3vS8glhYQCLW7WSa-9qZM0NAmEAHpExlTwLGZCfB6HGvIiFpzKETnzfg0AmaTslIxSnhaZyNiYzN70Atsh2q60q7RpNs1yiGzdo2_tUre2qX3U1FG7wqhG1zedj_zgW6xuo_s6gGXnWzdEvnM9DufkZKE3Hi8OeUI-Hh_ep8_x7PXpZXo_iw0D1sZC8hJ1pinP5_OdXsYBaS6kAYFQGJqjTnlBDU_p3EidF1KXwKTM-AJSKbIJud7v3brmqwtSVWW9wc1G1xgUKipSlrOCcR7QbI8a13jvcKG2zlbaDYqC2tmo1urHRrWzUUEIoGHq6nCgm1dY_s38-haAuz2A4c3eolPeWKwNltahaVXZ2H8PfAPRFoTI</recordid><startdate>201609</startdate><enddate>201609</enddate><creator>Authier, Simon</creator><creator>Arezzo, Joseph</creator><creator>Delatte, Marcus S.</creator><creator>Kallman, Mary-Jeanne</creator><creator>Markgraf, Carrie</creator><creator>Paquette, Dominique</creator><creator>Pugsley, Michael K.</creator><creator>Ratcliffe, Sian</creator><creator>Redfern, William S.</creator><creator>Stevens, Joanne</creator><creator>Valentin, Jean-Pierre</creator><creator>Vargas, Hugo M.</creator><creator>Curtis, Michael J.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201609</creationdate><title>Safety pharmacology investigations on the nervous system: An industry survey</title><author>Authier, Simon ; Arezzo, Joseph ; Delatte, Marcus S. ; Kallman, Mary-Jeanne ; Markgraf, Carrie ; Paquette, Dominique ; Pugsley, Michael K. ; Ratcliffe, Sian ; Redfern, William S. ; Stevens, Joanne ; Valentin, Jean-Pierre ; Vargas, Hugo M. ; Curtis, Michael J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-897dea3a175bb1873470e1589c08e06c15ea2761c721bc9a569ad049937f02983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Abuse</topic><topic>Aging</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Behavior, Animal - drug effects</topic><topic>Drug Evaluation, Preclinical</topic><topic>Drug Industry - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions</topic><topic>EEG</topic><topic>Electroencephalography - drug effects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Nervous System Diseases - chemically induced</topic><topic>Nervous System Diseases - epidemiology</topic><topic>Neural Conduction - drug effects</topic><topic>Neurological functional observation battery</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Safety pharmacology</topic><topic>Seizure</topic><topic>Seizures - chemically induced</topic><topic>Sleep</topic><topic>Sleep - drug effects</topic><topic>Substance-Related Disorders</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Authier, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arezzo, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delatte, Marcus S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kallman, Mary-Jeanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Markgraf, Carrie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paquette, Dominique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pugsley, Michael K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ratcliffe, Sian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Redfern, William S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stevens, Joanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valentin, Jean-Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vargas, Hugo M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Curtis, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Authier, Simon</au><au>Arezzo, Joseph</au><au>Delatte, Marcus S.</au><au>Kallman, Mary-Jeanne</au><au>Markgraf, Carrie</au><au>Paquette, Dominique</au><au>Pugsley, Michael K.</au><au>Ratcliffe, Sian</au><au>Redfern, William S.</au><au>Stevens, Joanne</au><au>Valentin, Jean-Pierre</au><au>Vargas, Hugo M.</au><au>Curtis, Michael J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Safety pharmacology investigations on the nervous system: An industry survey</atitle><jtitle>Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods</jtitle><addtitle>J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods</addtitle><date>2016-09</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>81</volume><spage>37</spage><epage>46</epage><pages>37-46</pages><issn>1056-8719</issn><eissn>1873-488X</eissn><abstract>The Safety Pharmacology Society (SPS) conducted an industry survey in 2015 to identify industry practices as they relate to central, peripheral and autonomic nervous system (‘CNS’) drug safety testing. One hundred fifty-eight (158) participants from Asia (16%), Europe (20%) and North America (56%) responded to the survey. 52% of participants were from pharmaceutical companies (&gt;1000 employees). Oncology (67%) and neurology/psychiatry (66%) were the most frequent target indications pursued by companies followed by inflammation (48%), cardiovascular (43%), metabolic (39%), infectious (37%), orphan (32%) and respiratory (29%) diseases. Seizures (67% of participants), gait abnormalities (67%), tremors (65%), emesis (56%), sedation (52%) and salivation (47%) were the most commonly encountered CNS issues in pre-clinical drug development while headache (65%), emesis/nausea (60%), fatigue (51%) and dizziness (49%) were the most frequent issues encountered in Phase I clinical trials. 54% of respondents reported that a standard battery of tests applied to screen drug candidates was the approach most commonly used to address non-clinical CNS safety testing. A minority (14% of all participants) reported using electroencephalography (EEG) screening prior to animal inclusion on toxicology studies. The most frequent group size was n=8 for functional observation battery (FOB), polysomnography and seizure liability studies. FOB evaluations were conducted in a dedicated room (78%) by blinded personnel (66%) with control for circadian cycle (55%) effects (e.g., dosing at a standardized time; balancing time of day across treatment groups). The rat was reported as the most common species used for seizure liability, nerve conduction and drug-abuse liability testing.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>27263834</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.vascn.2016.06.001</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1056-8719
ispartof Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods, 2016-09, Vol.81, p.37-46
issn 1056-8719
1873-488X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1824546477
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Abuse
Aging
Animals
Behavior, Animal - drug effects
Drug Evaluation, Preclinical
Drug Industry - statistics & numerical data
Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions
EEG
Electroencephalography - drug effects
Humans
Mice
Nervous System Diseases - chemically induced
Nervous System Diseases - epidemiology
Neural Conduction - drug effects
Neurological functional observation battery
Rats
Safety
Safety pharmacology
Seizure
Seizures - chemically induced
Sleep
Sleep - drug effects
Substance-Related Disorders
Surveys and Questionnaires
title Safety pharmacology investigations on the nervous system: An industry survey
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T12%3A29%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Safety%20pharmacology%20investigations%20on%20the%20nervous%20system:%20An%20industry%20survey&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20pharmacological%20and%20toxicological%20methods&rft.au=Authier,%20Simon&rft.date=2016-09&rft.volume=81&rft.spage=37&rft.epage=46&rft.pages=37-46&rft.issn=1056-8719&rft.eissn=1873-488X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.vascn.2016.06.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1824546477%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1824546477&rft_id=info:pmid/27263834&rft_els_id=S1056871916300570&rfr_iscdi=true