Comparison between TOMS, TOVS and DOBSON observations: satellite and surface views of total column ozone
TOVS infrared and microwave observations are now being used to estimate total column ozone over the globe by employing a new physical retrieval algorithm. The TOVS archives from 1979 to the present have been reprocessed, and the results during the great Antartic “ozone hole” of 1987 are compared wit...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Global and planetary change 1991, Vol.4 (1), p.61-67 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 67 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 61 |
container_title | Global and planetary change |
container_volume | 4 |
creator | Chesters, Dennis Neuendorffer, Arthur |
description | TOVS infrared and microwave observations are now being used to estimate total column ozone over the globe by employing a new physical retrieval algorithm. The TOVS archives from 1979 to the present have been reprocessed, and the results during the great Antartic “ozone hole” of 1987 are compared with the corresponding TOMS and DOBSON ultraviolet observations of total ozone. The TOVS total ozone patterns appear to be reliable on the synoptic scale and provide a unique opportunity to track ozone variations during polar night. However, there are times and places where each of the three ozone datasets contains errors that are significantly larger than a few percent. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/0921-8181(91)90071-4 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18240887</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0921818191900714</els_id><sourcerecordid>18240887</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c252t-ed7ade7ea40c9b7892e6ccff15465482586dbe0c138bf9803b315e29b4472e0c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LxDAQxYMouK5-Aw85iYLVJE3b1IOg619Y7WFXryFNpxjpNmuS7qKf3tYVj8IwA8N7w7wfQoeUnFFC03OSMxoJKuhxTk9yQjIa8S00oiJjURqnfBuN_iS7aM_7d0JoRhgbobeJXSyVM962uISwBmjxvHianfb9dYZVW-Gb4npWPGNbenArFYxt_QX2KkDTmAA_Et-5WmnAKwNrj22Ngw2qwdo23aLF9su2sI92atV4OPidY_RydzufPETT4v5xcjWNNEtYiKDKVAUZKE50XmYiZ5BqXdc04WnCBUtEWpVANI1FWeeCxGVME2B5yXnG-n08Rkebu0tnPzrwQS6M1_2vqgXbeUkF40SIrBfyjVA7672DWi6dWSj3KSmRA1Y5MJMDM5n3NWCVvLddbmzQh-jzOum1gVZDZRzoICtr_j_wDTUmftU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18240887</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison between TOMS, TOVS and DOBSON observations: satellite and surface views of total column ozone</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Chesters, Dennis ; Neuendorffer, Arthur</creator><creatorcontrib>Chesters, Dennis ; Neuendorffer, Arthur</creatorcontrib><description>TOVS infrared and microwave observations are now being used to estimate total column ozone over the globe by employing a new physical retrieval algorithm. The TOVS archives from 1979 to the present have been reprocessed, and the results during the great Antartic “ozone hole” of 1987 are compared with the corresponding TOMS and DOBSON ultraviolet observations of total ozone. The TOVS total ozone patterns appear to be reliable on the synoptic scale and provide a unique opportunity to track ozone variations during polar night. However, there are times and places where each of the three ozone datasets contains errors that are significantly larger than a few percent.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0921-8181</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6364</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0921-8181(91)90071-4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><ispartof>Global and planetary change, 1991, Vol.4 (1), p.61-67</ispartof><rights>1991</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c252t-ed7ade7ea40c9b7892e6ccff15465482586dbe0c138bf9803b315e29b4472e0c3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0921-8181(91)90071-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,4024,27923,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chesters, Dennis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neuendorffer, Arthur</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison between TOMS, TOVS and DOBSON observations: satellite and surface views of total column ozone</title><title>Global and planetary change</title><description>TOVS infrared and microwave observations are now being used to estimate total column ozone over the globe by employing a new physical retrieval algorithm. The TOVS archives from 1979 to the present have been reprocessed, and the results during the great Antartic “ozone hole” of 1987 are compared with the corresponding TOMS and DOBSON ultraviolet observations of total ozone. The TOVS total ozone patterns appear to be reliable on the synoptic scale and provide a unique opportunity to track ozone variations during polar night. However, there are times and places where each of the three ozone datasets contains errors that are significantly larger than a few percent.</description><issn>0921-8181</issn><issn>1872-6364</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1991</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE9LxDAQxYMouK5-Aw85iYLVJE3b1IOg619Y7WFXryFNpxjpNmuS7qKf3tYVj8IwA8N7w7wfQoeUnFFC03OSMxoJKuhxTk9yQjIa8S00oiJjURqnfBuN_iS7aM_7d0JoRhgbobeJXSyVM962uISwBmjxvHianfb9dYZVW-Gb4npWPGNbenArFYxt_QX2KkDTmAA_Et-5WmnAKwNrj22Ngw2qwdo23aLF9su2sI92atV4OPidY_RydzufPETT4v5xcjWNNEtYiKDKVAUZKE50XmYiZ5BqXdc04WnCBUtEWpVANI1FWeeCxGVME2B5yXnG-n08Rkebu0tnPzrwQS6M1_2vqgXbeUkF40SIrBfyjVA7672DWi6dWSj3KSmRA1Y5MJMDM5n3NWCVvLddbmzQh-jzOum1gVZDZRzoICtr_j_wDTUmftU</recordid><startdate>1991</startdate><enddate>1991</enddate><creator>Chesters, Dennis</creator><creator>Neuendorffer, Arthur</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>KL.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1991</creationdate><title>Comparison between TOMS, TOVS and DOBSON observations: satellite and surface views of total column ozone</title><author>Chesters, Dennis ; Neuendorffer, Arthur</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c252t-ed7ade7ea40c9b7892e6ccff15465482586dbe0c138bf9803b315e29b4472e0c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1991</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chesters, Dennis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neuendorffer, Arthur</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><jtitle>Global and planetary change</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chesters, Dennis</au><au>Neuendorffer, Arthur</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison between TOMS, TOVS and DOBSON observations: satellite and surface views of total column ozone</atitle><jtitle>Global and planetary change</jtitle><date>1991</date><risdate>1991</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>61</spage><epage>67</epage><pages>61-67</pages><issn>0921-8181</issn><eissn>1872-6364</eissn><abstract>TOVS infrared and microwave observations are now being used to estimate total column ozone over the globe by employing a new physical retrieval algorithm. The TOVS archives from 1979 to the present have been reprocessed, and the results during the great Antartic “ozone hole” of 1987 are compared with the corresponding TOMS and DOBSON ultraviolet observations of total ozone. The TOVS total ozone patterns appear to be reliable on the synoptic scale and provide a unique opportunity to track ozone variations during polar night. However, there are times and places where each of the three ozone datasets contains errors that are significantly larger than a few percent.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/0921-8181(91)90071-4</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0921-8181 |
ispartof | Global and planetary change, 1991, Vol.4 (1), p.61-67 |
issn | 0921-8181 1872-6364 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18240887 |
source | Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
title | Comparison between TOMS, TOVS and DOBSON observations: satellite and surface views of total column ozone |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T00%3A49%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20between%20TOMS,%20TOVS%20and%20DOBSON%20observations:%20satellite%20and%20surface%20views%20of%20total%20column%20ozone&rft.jtitle=Global%20and%20planetary%20change&rft.au=Chesters,%20Dennis&rft.date=1991&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=61&rft.epage=67&rft.pages=61-67&rft.issn=0921-8181&rft.eissn=1872-6364&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0921-8181(91)90071-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E18240887%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18240887&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=0921818191900714&rfr_iscdi=true |