Carotid intima-media thickness and hemodynamic parameters: reproducibility of manual measurements with Doppler ultrasound
To evaluate the carotid ultrasound intra- and interobserver agreements in a common clinical scenario when making manual measurements of the intima-media thickness (IMT) and peak systolic (PSV) and end diastolic (EDV) velocities in the common (CCA) and the internal carotid (ICA) arteries. Three diffe...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Medical ultrasonography 2015-06, Vol.17 (2), p.167-167 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 167 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 167 |
container_title | Medical ultrasonography |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Plasencia Martínez, Juana M Garcia Santos, José M Paredes Martinez, Maria L Pastor, Ana Moreno |
description | To evaluate the carotid ultrasound intra- and interobserver agreements in a common clinical scenario when making manual measurements of the intima-media thickness (IMT) and peak systolic (PSV) and end diastolic (EDV) velocities in the common (CCA) and the internal carotid (ICA) arteries.
Three different experienced operators performed two time-point carotid ultrasounds in 21 patients with cardiovascular risk factors. Each operator measured freehand the CCA IMT three consecutive times in each examination. The CCA and ICA hemodynamic parameters were acquired just once. For our purpose we took the average (IMTmean) and maximum (IMTmax) IMT values. Quantitative variables were analyzed with the t-student, and ANOVA test. Agreements were evaluated with the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC).
IMTmean intraobserver agreement was better on the left (ICC: 0.930-0.851-0.916, operators 1-2-3) than on the right (ICC: 0.789-0.580-0.673, operators 1-2-3). IMTmax agreements (Left ICC: 0.821-0.723-0.853, operators 1-2-3; Right ICC: 0.669-0.421-0.480, operators 1-2-3) were lower and more variable. Interobserver agreements for IMTmean (ICC: 0.852-0.860; first-second ultrasound) and IMTmax (ICC: 0.859-0.835; first-second ultrasound) were excellent on the left, but fair-good and more variable on the right (IMTmean; ICC: 0.680-0.809; first-second ultrasound; IMTmax; 0.694-0.799; first-second ultrasound). Intraobserver agreements were fair-moderate for PSVs and good-excellent for EDVs. Interobserver agreements were good-excellent for both PSVs and EDVs. Overall, 95% confidence intervals were narrower for the left IMTmean and CCA velocities.
Intra and interobserver agreements in carotid ultrasound are variable. In order to improve carotid IMT agreements, IMTmean is preferable over IMTmax. |
doi_str_mv | 10.11152/mu.2013.2066.172.ci-m |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1823945173</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1823945173</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-bc0010f3678675300bca8a788bfbc7811b250744b5c40c946a408b74220e889b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkctuFDEQRS0ESkYhvxBZYsOmJ3617WaHBhKQIrEha8t2uzWGtt34ITR_j4cEFtlUqVS3Slf3AHCD0R5jPJLb0PYEYdoL53ssyN76IbwCu_M8SM7oa7DDkrGB9eUluC7FG0Qo5mKc0AW4JByNZOR8B04HnVP1M_Sx-qCH4GavYT16-zO6UqCOMzy6kOZT1MFbuOmsg6sulw8wuy2nuVlv_OrrCaYFBh2bXmFwurTsgou1wN--HuGntG2ry7CtNeuSWpzfgjeLXou7fu5X4PHu8_fDl-Hh2_3Xw8eHwVJB6mAsQhgtlAvZ3VOEjNVSCynNYqyQGBsyIsGYGS1DdmJcMySNYIQgJ-Vk6BV4__S3m_3VXKkq-GLduuroUisKS0InNmJBu_TdC-mP1HLs7hTmE57kOb6u4k8qm1Mp2S1qyz26fFIYqb98VGjqzEedeaiOQFmvQj-8eX7fTM_5_9k_GvQPuTmOig</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1691987590</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Carotid intima-media thickness and hemodynamic parameters: reproducibility of manual measurements with Doppler ultrasound</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Plasencia Martínez, Juana M ; Garcia Santos, José M ; Paredes Martinez, Maria L ; Pastor, Ana Moreno</creator><creatorcontrib>Plasencia Martínez, Juana M ; Garcia Santos, José M ; Paredes Martinez, Maria L ; Pastor, Ana Moreno</creatorcontrib><description>To evaluate the carotid ultrasound intra- and interobserver agreements in a common clinical scenario when making manual measurements of the intima-media thickness (IMT) and peak systolic (PSV) and end diastolic (EDV) velocities in the common (CCA) and the internal carotid (ICA) arteries.
Three different experienced operators performed two time-point carotid ultrasounds in 21 patients with cardiovascular risk factors. Each operator measured freehand the CCA IMT three consecutive times in each examination. The CCA and ICA hemodynamic parameters were acquired just once. For our purpose we took the average (IMTmean) and maximum (IMTmax) IMT values. Quantitative variables were analyzed with the t-student, and ANOVA test. Agreements were evaluated with the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC).
IMTmean intraobserver agreement was better on the left (ICC: 0.930-0.851-0.916, operators 1-2-3) than on the right (ICC: 0.789-0.580-0.673, operators 1-2-3). IMTmax agreements (Left ICC: 0.821-0.723-0.853, operators 1-2-3; Right ICC: 0.669-0.421-0.480, operators 1-2-3) were lower and more variable. Interobserver agreements for IMTmean (ICC: 0.852-0.860; first-second ultrasound) and IMTmax (ICC: 0.859-0.835; first-second ultrasound) were excellent on the left, but fair-good and more variable on the right (IMTmean; ICC: 0.680-0.809; first-second ultrasound; IMTmax; 0.694-0.799; first-second ultrasound). Intraobserver agreements were fair-moderate for PSVs and good-excellent for EDVs. Interobserver agreements were good-excellent for both PSVs and EDVs. Overall, 95% confidence intervals were narrower for the left IMTmean and CCA velocities.
Intra and interobserver agreements in carotid ultrasound are variable. In order to improve carotid IMT agreements, IMTmean is preferable over IMTmax.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1844-4172</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2066-8643</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.11152/mu.2013.2066.172.ci-m</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26052566</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Romania: Romanian Society of Ultrasonography in Medicine and Biology</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Analysis of Variance ; Cardiovascular Diseases - diagnostic imaging ; Carotid Artery, Common - diagnostic imaging ; Carotid Artery, Internal - diagnostic imaging ; Carotid Intima-Media Thickness - statistics & numerical data ; Female ; Hemodynamics ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Observer Variation ; Reproducibility of Results ; Risk Factors ; Ultrasonography, Doppler, Duplex</subject><ispartof>Medical ultrasonography, 2015-06, Vol.17 (2), p.167-167</ispartof><rights>Copyright Romanian Society of Ultrasonography in Medicine and Biology 2015</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-bc0010f3678675300bca8a788bfbc7811b250744b5c40c946a408b74220e889b3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26052566$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Plasencia Martínez, Juana M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia Santos, José M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paredes Martinez, Maria L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pastor, Ana Moreno</creatorcontrib><title>Carotid intima-media thickness and hemodynamic parameters: reproducibility of manual measurements with Doppler ultrasound</title><title>Medical ultrasonography</title><addtitle>Med Ultrason</addtitle><description>To evaluate the carotid ultrasound intra- and interobserver agreements in a common clinical scenario when making manual measurements of the intima-media thickness (IMT) and peak systolic (PSV) and end diastolic (EDV) velocities in the common (CCA) and the internal carotid (ICA) arteries.
Three different experienced operators performed two time-point carotid ultrasounds in 21 patients with cardiovascular risk factors. Each operator measured freehand the CCA IMT three consecutive times in each examination. The CCA and ICA hemodynamic parameters were acquired just once. For our purpose we took the average (IMTmean) and maximum (IMTmax) IMT values. Quantitative variables were analyzed with the t-student, and ANOVA test. Agreements were evaluated with the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC).
IMTmean intraobserver agreement was better on the left (ICC: 0.930-0.851-0.916, operators 1-2-3) than on the right (ICC: 0.789-0.580-0.673, operators 1-2-3). IMTmax agreements (Left ICC: 0.821-0.723-0.853, operators 1-2-3; Right ICC: 0.669-0.421-0.480, operators 1-2-3) were lower and more variable. Interobserver agreements for IMTmean (ICC: 0.852-0.860; first-second ultrasound) and IMTmax (ICC: 0.859-0.835; first-second ultrasound) were excellent on the left, but fair-good and more variable on the right (IMTmean; ICC: 0.680-0.809; first-second ultrasound; IMTmax; 0.694-0.799; first-second ultrasound). Intraobserver agreements were fair-moderate for PSVs and good-excellent for EDVs. Interobserver agreements were good-excellent for both PSVs and EDVs. Overall, 95% confidence intervals were narrower for the left IMTmean and CCA velocities.
Intra and interobserver agreements in carotid ultrasound are variable. In order to improve carotid IMT agreements, IMTmean is preferable over IMTmax.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Cardiovascular Diseases - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Carotid Artery, Common - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Carotid Artery, Internal - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Carotid Intima-Media Thickness - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hemodynamics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Doppler, Duplex</subject><issn>1844-4172</issn><issn>2066-8643</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkctuFDEQRS0ESkYhvxBZYsOmJ3617WaHBhKQIrEha8t2uzWGtt34ITR_j4cEFtlUqVS3Slf3AHCD0R5jPJLb0PYEYdoL53ssyN76IbwCu_M8SM7oa7DDkrGB9eUluC7FG0Qo5mKc0AW4JByNZOR8B04HnVP1M_Sx-qCH4GavYT16-zO6UqCOMzy6kOZT1MFbuOmsg6sulw8wuy2nuVlv_OrrCaYFBh2bXmFwurTsgou1wN--HuGntG2ry7CtNeuSWpzfgjeLXou7fu5X4PHu8_fDl-Hh2_3Xw8eHwVJB6mAsQhgtlAvZ3VOEjNVSCynNYqyQGBsyIsGYGS1DdmJcMySNYIQgJ-Vk6BV4__S3m_3VXKkq-GLduuroUisKS0InNmJBu_TdC-mP1HLs7hTmE57kOb6u4k8qm1Mp2S1qyz26fFIYqb98VGjqzEedeaiOQFmvQj-8eX7fTM_5_9k_GvQPuTmOig</recordid><startdate>20150601</startdate><enddate>20150601</enddate><creator>Plasencia Martínez, Juana M</creator><creator>Garcia Santos, José M</creator><creator>Paredes Martinez, Maria L</creator><creator>Pastor, Ana Moreno</creator><general>Romanian Society of Ultrasonography in Medicine and Biology</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BYOGL</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150601</creationdate><title>Carotid intima-media thickness and hemodynamic parameters: reproducibility of manual measurements with Doppler ultrasound</title><author>Plasencia Martínez, Juana M ; Garcia Santos, José M ; Paredes Martinez, Maria L ; Pastor, Ana Moreno</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-bc0010f3678675300bca8a788bfbc7811b250744b5c40c946a408b74220e889b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Cardiovascular Diseases - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Carotid Artery, Common - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Carotid Artery, Internal - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Carotid Intima-Media Thickness - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hemodynamics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Doppler, Duplex</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Plasencia Martínez, Juana M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia Santos, José M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paredes Martinez, Maria L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pastor, Ana Moreno</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>East Europe, Central Europe Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Medical ultrasonography</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Plasencia Martínez, Juana M</au><au>Garcia Santos, José M</au><au>Paredes Martinez, Maria L</au><au>Pastor, Ana Moreno</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Carotid intima-media thickness and hemodynamic parameters: reproducibility of manual measurements with Doppler ultrasound</atitle><jtitle>Medical ultrasonography</jtitle><addtitle>Med Ultrason</addtitle><date>2015-06-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>167</spage><epage>167</epage><pages>167-167</pages><issn>1844-4172</issn><eissn>2066-8643</eissn><abstract>To evaluate the carotid ultrasound intra- and interobserver agreements in a common clinical scenario when making manual measurements of the intima-media thickness (IMT) and peak systolic (PSV) and end diastolic (EDV) velocities in the common (CCA) and the internal carotid (ICA) arteries.
Three different experienced operators performed two time-point carotid ultrasounds in 21 patients with cardiovascular risk factors. Each operator measured freehand the CCA IMT three consecutive times in each examination. The CCA and ICA hemodynamic parameters were acquired just once. For our purpose we took the average (IMTmean) and maximum (IMTmax) IMT values. Quantitative variables were analyzed with the t-student, and ANOVA test. Agreements were evaluated with the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC).
IMTmean intraobserver agreement was better on the left (ICC: 0.930-0.851-0.916, operators 1-2-3) than on the right (ICC: 0.789-0.580-0.673, operators 1-2-3). IMTmax agreements (Left ICC: 0.821-0.723-0.853, operators 1-2-3; Right ICC: 0.669-0.421-0.480, operators 1-2-3) were lower and more variable. Interobserver agreements for IMTmean (ICC: 0.852-0.860; first-second ultrasound) and IMTmax (ICC: 0.859-0.835; first-second ultrasound) were excellent on the left, but fair-good and more variable on the right (IMTmean; ICC: 0.680-0.809; first-second ultrasound; IMTmax; 0.694-0.799; first-second ultrasound). Intraobserver agreements were fair-moderate for PSVs and good-excellent for EDVs. Interobserver agreements were good-excellent for both PSVs and EDVs. Overall, 95% confidence intervals were narrower for the left IMTmean and CCA velocities.
Intra and interobserver agreements in carotid ultrasound are variable. In order to improve carotid IMT agreements, IMTmean is preferable over IMTmax.</abstract><cop>Romania</cop><pub>Romanian Society of Ultrasonography in Medicine and Biology</pub><pmid>26052566</pmid><doi>10.11152/mu.2013.2066.172.ci-m</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1844-4172 |
ispartof | Medical ultrasonography, 2015-06, Vol.17 (2), p.167-167 |
issn | 1844-4172 2066-8643 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1823945173 |
source | MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Adult Aged Analysis of Variance Cardiovascular Diseases - diagnostic imaging Carotid Artery, Common - diagnostic imaging Carotid Artery, Internal - diagnostic imaging Carotid Intima-Media Thickness - statistics & numerical data Female Hemodynamics Humans Male Middle Aged Observer Variation Reproducibility of Results Risk Factors Ultrasonography, Doppler, Duplex |
title | Carotid intima-media thickness and hemodynamic parameters: reproducibility of manual measurements with Doppler ultrasound |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T08%3A01%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Carotid%20intima-media%20thickness%20and%20hemodynamic%20parameters:%20reproducibility%20of%20manual%20measurements%20with%20Doppler%20ultrasound&rft.jtitle=Medical%20ultrasonography&rft.au=Plasencia%20Mart%C3%ADnez,%20Juana%20M&rft.date=2015-06-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=167&rft.epage=167&rft.pages=167-167&rft.issn=1844-4172&rft.eissn=2066-8643&rft_id=info:doi/10.11152/mu.2013.2066.172.ci-m&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1823945173%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1691987590&rft_id=info:pmid/26052566&rfr_iscdi=true |