Phylogenetic analysis of stomach adaptation in digestive strategies in African ruminants
The stomach morphology of 28 species of artiodactyls that differ in feeding style (browser, mixed feeder, grazer) was analysed using a multivariate approach and phylogenetic correction in order to test whether stomach morphology was correlated with feeding style when body mass was controlled for. A...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Oecologia 2001-12, Vol.129 (4), p.498-508 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 508 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 498 |
container_title | Oecologia |
container_volume | 129 |
creator | Pérez-Barbería, Javier F Gordon, Iain J Illius, Andrew W |
description | The stomach morphology of 28 species of artiodactyls that differ in feeding style (browser, mixed feeder, grazer) was analysed using a multivariate approach and phylogenetic correction in order to test whether stomach morphology was correlated with feeding style when body mass was controlled for. A total of 25 morphological traits of the stomach were used in the analysis. After the effects of body mass and phylogeny on stomach morphology were taken into account, there was no significant grouping of species according to feeding style. When information about the feeding style of each species was included in the analysis, the set of morphological traits separated the mixed feeders from the other two feeding styles, but grazers and browsers had similar morphological features. Most of the variance in stomach morphology was explained by body mass and a lesser proportion by phylogeny. The main morphological features that have previously been proposed as being adaptations in grazing species, namely, lengthening of the retention time of ingesta to achieve an increase in their fibre digestion capability by means of a larger relative stomach capacity, a greater subdivision of chambers and smaller openings, are not supported by the findings of this study. Thus, there is no consistent evidence to support a significant adaptive effect of stomach morphology to different diets in the Artiodactyla. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s004420100768 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18236678</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>4223113</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4223113</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-b0bea8ab15fb52ad9c58cdd44a40633f3ddbb34ac486ed0aabad6f2e5fb21edb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90M1LHDEYBvBQKrq1Hr1JO5eWXsa--ZrJHEX6BYKCFXob3nytkZnMmswK-9-bZbcWLz0l5Pnx5uUh5JTCOQVov2YAIRhs7416QxZUcFbTjndvyQKAdbWSojsi73J-AKCCSnlIjpiQbeHdgvy5ud8M09JFNwdTYcRhk0OuJl_leRrR3FdocTXjHKZYhVjZsHR5Dk-u5Alntwwub98vfAoGY5XWY4gY5_yeHHgcsjvZn8fk7vu335c_66vrH78uL65qw7t2rjVohwo1lV5LhrYzUhlrhUABDeeeW6s1F2iEapwFRI228cwVzqizmh-Tz7u5qzQ9rstu_RiyccOA0U3r3FPFeNO0qsAv_4cSSjuUs7bQekdNmnJOzverFEZMm55Cv226f9V68R_2o9d6dPZF_625gE97gNng4BNGE_K_qduPO0WLO9u5h9J-eskFY5xSXuKPu9jj1OMylRF3t2ULAQBKUin4M0hGnl4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1504151327</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Phylogenetic analysis of stomach adaptation in digestive strategies in African ruminants</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Pérez-Barbería, Javier F ; Gordon, Iain J ; Illius, Andrew W</creator><creatorcontrib>Pérez-Barbería, Javier F ; Gordon, Iain J ; Illius, Andrew W</creatorcontrib><description>The stomach morphology of 28 species of artiodactyls that differ in feeding style (browser, mixed feeder, grazer) was analysed using a multivariate approach and phylogenetic correction in order to test whether stomach morphology was correlated with feeding style when body mass was controlled for. A total of 25 morphological traits of the stomach were used in the analysis. After the effects of body mass and phylogeny on stomach morphology were taken into account, there was no significant grouping of species according to feeding style. When information about the feeding style of each species was included in the analysis, the set of morphological traits separated the mixed feeders from the other two feeding styles, but grazers and browsers had similar morphological features. Most of the variance in stomach morphology was explained by body mass and a lesser proportion by phylogeny. The main morphological features that have previously been proposed as being adaptations in grazing species, namely, lengthening of the retention time of ingesta to achieve an increase in their fibre digestion capability by means of a larger relative stomach capacity, a greater subdivision of chambers and smaller openings, are not supported by the findings of this study. Thus, there is no consistent evidence to support a significant adaptive effect of stomach morphology to different diets in the Artiodactyla.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0029-8549</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1939</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s004420100768</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24577689</identifier><identifier>CODEN: OECOBX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Artiodactyla ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biological taxonomies ; Datasets ; Diet ; digestion ; Ecophysiology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; grazing ; Mammalia ; Papillae ; Phylogenetics ; Phylogeny ; Principal components analysis ; Ruminants ; Statistical variance ; Stomach ; variance ; Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution</subject><ispartof>Oecologia, 2001-12, Vol.129 (4), p.498-508</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2001 Springer-Verlag</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-b0bea8ab15fb52ad9c58cdd44a40633f3ddbb34ac486ed0aabad6f2e5fb21edb3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4223113$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4223113$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=14151981$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24577689$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pérez-Barbería, Javier F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gordon, Iain J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Illius, Andrew W</creatorcontrib><title>Phylogenetic analysis of stomach adaptation in digestive strategies in African ruminants</title><title>Oecologia</title><addtitle>Oecologia</addtitle><description>The stomach morphology of 28 species of artiodactyls that differ in feeding style (browser, mixed feeder, grazer) was analysed using a multivariate approach and phylogenetic correction in order to test whether stomach morphology was correlated with feeding style when body mass was controlled for. A total of 25 morphological traits of the stomach were used in the analysis. After the effects of body mass and phylogeny on stomach morphology were taken into account, there was no significant grouping of species according to feeding style. When information about the feeding style of each species was included in the analysis, the set of morphological traits separated the mixed feeders from the other two feeding styles, but grazers and browsers had similar morphological features. Most of the variance in stomach morphology was explained by body mass and a lesser proportion by phylogeny. The main morphological features that have previously been proposed as being adaptations in grazing species, namely, lengthening of the retention time of ingesta to achieve an increase in their fibre digestion capability by means of a larger relative stomach capacity, a greater subdivision of chambers and smaller openings, are not supported by the findings of this study. Thus, there is no consistent evidence to support a significant adaptive effect of stomach morphology to different diets in the Artiodactyla.</description><subject>Artiodactyla</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biological taxonomies</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>digestion</subject><subject>Ecophysiology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>grazing</subject><subject>Mammalia</subject><subject>Papillae</subject><subject>Phylogenetics</subject><subject>Phylogeny</subject><subject>Principal components analysis</subject><subject>Ruminants</subject><subject>Statistical variance</subject><subject>Stomach</subject><subject>variance</subject><subject>Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution</subject><issn>0029-8549</issn><issn>1432-1939</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90M1LHDEYBvBQKrq1Hr1JO5eWXsa--ZrJHEX6BYKCFXob3nytkZnMmswK-9-bZbcWLz0l5Pnx5uUh5JTCOQVov2YAIRhs7416QxZUcFbTjndvyQKAdbWSojsi73J-AKCCSnlIjpiQbeHdgvy5ud8M09JFNwdTYcRhk0OuJl_leRrR3FdocTXjHKZYhVjZsHR5Dk-u5Alntwwub98vfAoGY5XWY4gY5_yeHHgcsjvZn8fk7vu335c_66vrH78uL65qw7t2rjVohwo1lV5LhrYzUhlrhUABDeeeW6s1F2iEapwFRI228cwVzqizmh-Tz7u5qzQ9rstu_RiyccOA0U3r3FPFeNO0qsAv_4cSSjuUs7bQekdNmnJOzverFEZMm55Cv226f9V68R_2o9d6dPZF_625gE97gNng4BNGE_K_qduPO0WLO9u5h9J-eskFY5xSXuKPu9jj1OMylRF3t2ULAQBKUin4M0hGnl4</recordid><startdate>20011201</startdate><enddate>20011201</enddate><creator>Pérez-Barbería, Javier F</creator><creator>Gordon, Iain J</creator><creator>Illius, Andrew W</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20011201</creationdate><title>Phylogenetic analysis of stomach adaptation in digestive strategies in African ruminants</title><author>Pérez-Barbería, Javier F ; Gordon, Iain J ; Illius, Andrew W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-b0bea8ab15fb52ad9c58cdd44a40633f3ddbb34ac486ed0aabad6f2e5fb21edb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Artiodactyla</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biological taxonomies</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>digestion</topic><topic>Ecophysiology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>grazing</topic><topic>Mammalia</topic><topic>Papillae</topic><topic>Phylogenetics</topic><topic>Phylogeny</topic><topic>Principal components analysis</topic><topic>Ruminants</topic><topic>Statistical variance</topic><topic>Stomach</topic><topic>variance</topic><topic>Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pérez-Barbería, Javier F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gordon, Iain J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Illius, Andrew W</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Oecologia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pérez-Barbería, Javier F</au><au>Gordon, Iain J</au><au>Illius, Andrew W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Phylogenetic analysis of stomach adaptation in digestive strategies in African ruminants</atitle><jtitle>Oecologia</jtitle><addtitle>Oecologia</addtitle><date>2001-12-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>129</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>498</spage><epage>508</epage><pages>498-508</pages><issn>0029-8549</issn><eissn>1432-1939</eissn><coden>OECOBX</coden><abstract>The stomach morphology of 28 species of artiodactyls that differ in feeding style (browser, mixed feeder, grazer) was analysed using a multivariate approach and phylogenetic correction in order to test whether stomach morphology was correlated with feeding style when body mass was controlled for. A total of 25 morphological traits of the stomach were used in the analysis. After the effects of body mass and phylogeny on stomach morphology were taken into account, there was no significant grouping of species according to feeding style. When information about the feeding style of each species was included in the analysis, the set of morphological traits separated the mixed feeders from the other two feeding styles, but grazers and browsers had similar morphological features. Most of the variance in stomach morphology was explained by body mass and a lesser proportion by phylogeny. The main morphological features that have previously been proposed as being adaptations in grazing species, namely, lengthening of the retention time of ingesta to achieve an increase in their fibre digestion capability by means of a larger relative stomach capacity, a greater subdivision of chambers and smaller openings, are not supported by the findings of this study. Thus, there is no consistent evidence to support a significant adaptive effect of stomach morphology to different diets in the Artiodactyla.</abstract><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>24577689</pmid><doi>10.1007/s004420100768</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0029-8549 |
ispartof | Oecologia, 2001-12, Vol.129 (4), p.498-508 |
issn | 0029-8549 1432-1939 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18236678 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Artiodactyla Biological and medical sciences Biological taxonomies Datasets Diet digestion Ecophysiology Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology grazing Mammalia Papillae Phylogenetics Phylogeny Principal components analysis Ruminants Statistical variance Stomach variance Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution |
title | Phylogenetic analysis of stomach adaptation in digestive strategies in African ruminants |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T16%3A47%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Phylogenetic%20analysis%20of%20stomach%20adaptation%20in%20digestive%20strategies%20in%20African%20ruminants&rft.jtitle=Oecologia&rft.au=P%C3%A9rez-Barber%C3%ADa,%20Javier%20F&rft.date=2001-12-01&rft.volume=129&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=498&rft.epage=508&rft.pages=498-508&rft.issn=0029-8549&rft.eissn=1432-1939&rft.coden=OECOBX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s004420100768&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E4223113%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1504151327&rft_id=info:pmid/24577689&rft_jstor_id=4223113&rfr_iscdi=true |