Broken biosecurity? Veterinarians’ framing of biosecurity on dairy farms in England

•Interviews were conducted with farm animal veterinarians on dairy farm biosecurity.•Data was analysed using frame analysis to explore their views on biosecurity.•Veterinarians frame barriers as individual, interpersonal and contextual.•Veterinarians were framed as lacking consistency and coherence...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Preventive veterinary medicine 2016-09, Vol.132, p.20-31
Hauptverfasser: Shortall, Orla, Ruston, Annmarie, Green, Martin, Brennan, Marnie, Wapenaar, Wendela, Kaler, Jasmeet
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 31
container_issue
container_start_page 20
container_title Preventive veterinary medicine
container_volume 132
creator Shortall, Orla
Ruston, Annmarie
Green, Martin
Brennan, Marnie
Wapenaar, Wendela
Kaler, Jasmeet
description •Interviews were conducted with farm animal veterinarians on dairy farm biosecurity.•Data was analysed using frame analysis to explore their views on biosecurity.•Veterinarians frame barriers as individual, interpersonal and contextual.•Veterinarians were framed as lacking consistency and coherence in their knowledge.•Veterinarians and farmers may view biosecurity through incompatible frames. There is seen to be a need for better biosecurity – the control of disease spread on and off farm – in the dairy sector. Veterinarians play a key role in communicating and implementing biosecurity measures on farm, and little research has been carried out on how veterinarians see their own and farmers’ roles in improving biosecurity. In order to help address this gap, qualitative interviews were carried out with 28 veterinarians from Royal College of Veterinary Surgeon farm accredited practices in England. The results were analysed using a social ecology framework and frame analysis to explore not only what barriers vets identified, but also how vets saw the problem of inadequate biosecurity as being located. Veterinarians’ frames of biosecurity were analysed at the individual, interpersonal and contextual scales, following the social ecology framework, which see the problem in different ways with different solutions. Farmers and veterinarians were both framed by veterinarians as individualised groups lacking consistency. This means that best practice is not spread and veterinarians are finding it difficult to work as a group to move towards a “predict and prevent” model of veterinary intervention. But diversity and individualism were also framed as positive and necessary among veterinarians to the extent that they can tailor advice to individual farmers. Veterinarians saw their role in educating the farmer as not only being about giving advice to farmers, but trying to convince the farmer of their perspective and values on disease problems. Vets felt they were meeting with limited success because vets and farmers may be emphasising different framings of biosecurity. Vets emphasise the individual and interpersonal frames that disease problems are a problem on farm that can and should be controlled by individual farmers working with vets. According to vets, farmers may emphasise the contextual frame that biosecurity is largely outside of their control on dairy farms because of logistical, economic and geographical factors, and so some level of disease on dairy farms is
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2016.06.001
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1823463509</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S016758771630157X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1823463509</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-580d7c7ed31ffd97a2d7b2f95fcb63c29fb2fd110ff89593ab2b31f46fb8760e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtLAzEQx4Motj6-guboZWuyj2T3JLXUBxS8WK8hm0xKajdbk22hN7-GX89PYkpb8SYMDDPzm9cfoWtKBpRQdjsfLD2soWtAD9KYGJBohB6hPi15llBO2THqxwJPipLzHjoLYU4IYawsTlEv5YzleV700fTet-_gcG3bAGrlbbe5w2_QgbdOeitd-P78wsbLxroZbs1fELcOa2n9Bhvpm4Ctw2M3W0inL9CJkYsAl3t_jqYP49fRUzJ5eXweDSeJylPSxdOI5oqDzqgxuuIy1bxOTVUYVbNMpZWJkaaUGFNWRZXJOq0jmjNTl5wRyM7RzW7u0rcfKwidaGxQsIg3QLsKgpZplrOsIFVE-Q5Vvg3BgxFLbxvpN4ISsdVUzMWvpmKrqSDRCI2dV_slq3pbO_QdRIzAcAdAfHVtwYugLDgF2npQndCt_XfJD619jvs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1823463509</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Broken biosecurity? Veterinarians’ framing of biosecurity on dairy farms in England</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Shortall, Orla ; Ruston, Annmarie ; Green, Martin ; Brennan, Marnie ; Wapenaar, Wendela ; Kaler, Jasmeet</creator><creatorcontrib>Shortall, Orla ; Ruston, Annmarie ; Green, Martin ; Brennan, Marnie ; Wapenaar, Wendela ; Kaler, Jasmeet</creatorcontrib><description>•Interviews were conducted with farm animal veterinarians on dairy farm biosecurity.•Data was analysed using frame analysis to explore their views on biosecurity.•Veterinarians frame barriers as individual, interpersonal and contextual.•Veterinarians were framed as lacking consistency and coherence in their knowledge.•Veterinarians and farmers may view biosecurity through incompatible frames. There is seen to be a need for better biosecurity – the control of disease spread on and off farm – in the dairy sector. Veterinarians play a key role in communicating and implementing biosecurity measures on farm, and little research has been carried out on how veterinarians see their own and farmers’ roles in improving biosecurity. In order to help address this gap, qualitative interviews were carried out with 28 veterinarians from Royal College of Veterinary Surgeon farm accredited practices in England. The results were analysed using a social ecology framework and frame analysis to explore not only what barriers vets identified, but also how vets saw the problem of inadequate biosecurity as being located. Veterinarians’ frames of biosecurity were analysed at the individual, interpersonal and contextual scales, following the social ecology framework, which see the problem in different ways with different solutions. Farmers and veterinarians were both framed by veterinarians as individualised groups lacking consistency. This means that best practice is not spread and veterinarians are finding it difficult to work as a group to move towards a “predict and prevent” model of veterinary intervention. But diversity and individualism were also framed as positive and necessary among veterinarians to the extent that they can tailor advice to individual farmers. Veterinarians saw their role in educating the farmer as not only being about giving advice to farmers, but trying to convince the farmer of their perspective and values on disease problems. Vets felt they were meeting with limited success because vets and farmers may be emphasising different framings of biosecurity. Vets emphasise the individual and interpersonal frames that disease problems are a problem on farm that can and should be controlled by individual farmers working with vets. According to vets, farmers may emphasise the contextual frame that biosecurity is largely outside of their control on dairy farms because of logistical, economic and geographical factors, and so some level of disease on dairy farms is not entirely unexpected or controllable. There needs to be a step back within the vet-farmer relationship to realise that there may be different perspectives at play, and within the wider debate to explore the question of what a biosecure dairy sector would look like within a rapidly changing agricultural landscape.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-5877</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-1716</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2016.06.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27664445</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Animal Husbandry - economics ; Animal Husbandry - education ; Animals ; Cattle ; Cattle Diseases - economics ; Cattle Diseases - prevention &amp; control ; Communication ; Dairy biosecurity ; Dairying - economics ; Dairying - education ; Decision making ; Disease control ; England ; Frame analysis ; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ; Health Promotion - economics ; Qualitative ; Security Measures - economics ; Time Factors ; Veterinarians ; Veterinary Medicine</subject><ispartof>Preventive veterinary medicine, 2016-09, Vol.132, p.20-31</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-580d7c7ed31ffd97a2d7b2f95fcb63c29fb2fd110ff89593ab2b31f46fb8760e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-580d7c7ed31ffd97a2d7b2f95fcb63c29fb2fd110ff89593ab2b31f46fb8760e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2016.06.001$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27664445$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shortall, Orla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruston, Annmarie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brennan, Marnie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wapenaar, Wendela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaler, Jasmeet</creatorcontrib><title>Broken biosecurity? Veterinarians’ framing of biosecurity on dairy farms in England</title><title>Preventive veterinary medicine</title><addtitle>Prev Vet Med</addtitle><description>•Interviews were conducted with farm animal veterinarians on dairy farm biosecurity.•Data was analysed using frame analysis to explore their views on biosecurity.•Veterinarians frame barriers as individual, interpersonal and contextual.•Veterinarians were framed as lacking consistency and coherence in their knowledge.•Veterinarians and farmers may view biosecurity through incompatible frames. There is seen to be a need for better biosecurity – the control of disease spread on and off farm – in the dairy sector. Veterinarians play a key role in communicating and implementing biosecurity measures on farm, and little research has been carried out on how veterinarians see their own and farmers’ roles in improving biosecurity. In order to help address this gap, qualitative interviews were carried out with 28 veterinarians from Royal College of Veterinary Surgeon farm accredited practices in England. The results were analysed using a social ecology framework and frame analysis to explore not only what barriers vets identified, but also how vets saw the problem of inadequate biosecurity as being located. Veterinarians’ frames of biosecurity were analysed at the individual, interpersonal and contextual scales, following the social ecology framework, which see the problem in different ways with different solutions. Farmers and veterinarians were both framed by veterinarians as individualised groups lacking consistency. This means that best practice is not spread and veterinarians are finding it difficult to work as a group to move towards a “predict and prevent” model of veterinary intervention. But diversity and individualism were also framed as positive and necessary among veterinarians to the extent that they can tailor advice to individual farmers. Veterinarians saw their role in educating the farmer as not only being about giving advice to farmers, but trying to convince the farmer of their perspective and values on disease problems. Vets felt they were meeting with limited success because vets and farmers may be emphasising different framings of biosecurity. Vets emphasise the individual and interpersonal frames that disease problems are a problem on farm that can and should be controlled by individual farmers working with vets. According to vets, farmers may emphasise the contextual frame that biosecurity is largely outside of their control on dairy farms because of logistical, economic and geographical factors, and so some level of disease on dairy farms is not entirely unexpected or controllable. There needs to be a step back within the vet-farmer relationship to realise that there may be different perspectives at play, and within the wider debate to explore the question of what a biosecure dairy sector would look like within a rapidly changing agricultural landscape.</description><subject>Animal Husbandry - economics</subject><subject>Animal Husbandry - education</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Cattle Diseases - economics</subject><subject>Cattle Diseases - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Dairy biosecurity</subject><subject>Dairying - economics</subject><subject>Dairying - education</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Disease control</subject><subject>England</subject><subject>Frame analysis</subject><subject>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</subject><subject>Health Promotion - economics</subject><subject>Qualitative</subject><subject>Security Measures - economics</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Veterinarians</subject><subject>Veterinary Medicine</subject><issn>0167-5877</issn><issn>1873-1716</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEtLAzEQx4Motj6-guboZWuyj2T3JLXUBxS8WK8hm0xKajdbk22hN7-GX89PYkpb8SYMDDPzm9cfoWtKBpRQdjsfLD2soWtAD9KYGJBohB6hPi15llBO2THqxwJPipLzHjoLYU4IYawsTlEv5YzleV700fTet-_gcG3bAGrlbbe5w2_QgbdOeitd-P78wsbLxroZbs1fELcOa2n9Bhvpm4Ctw2M3W0inL9CJkYsAl3t_jqYP49fRUzJ5eXweDSeJylPSxdOI5oqDzqgxuuIy1bxOTVUYVbNMpZWJkaaUGFNWRZXJOq0jmjNTl5wRyM7RzW7u0rcfKwidaGxQsIg3QLsKgpZplrOsIFVE-Q5Vvg3BgxFLbxvpN4ISsdVUzMWvpmKrqSDRCI2dV_slq3pbO_QdRIzAcAdAfHVtwYugLDgF2npQndCt_XfJD619jvs</recordid><startdate>20160915</startdate><enddate>20160915</enddate><creator>Shortall, Orla</creator><creator>Ruston, Annmarie</creator><creator>Green, Martin</creator><creator>Brennan, Marnie</creator><creator>Wapenaar, Wendela</creator><creator>Kaler, Jasmeet</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160915</creationdate><title>Broken biosecurity? Veterinarians’ framing of biosecurity on dairy farms in England</title><author>Shortall, Orla ; Ruston, Annmarie ; Green, Martin ; Brennan, Marnie ; Wapenaar, Wendela ; Kaler, Jasmeet</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-580d7c7ed31ffd97a2d7b2f95fcb63c29fb2fd110ff89593ab2b31f46fb8760e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Animal Husbandry - economics</topic><topic>Animal Husbandry - education</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Cattle Diseases - economics</topic><topic>Cattle Diseases - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Dairy biosecurity</topic><topic>Dairying - economics</topic><topic>Dairying - education</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Disease control</topic><topic>England</topic><topic>Frame analysis</topic><topic>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</topic><topic>Health Promotion - economics</topic><topic>Qualitative</topic><topic>Security Measures - economics</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Veterinarians</topic><topic>Veterinary Medicine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shortall, Orla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruston, Annmarie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brennan, Marnie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wapenaar, Wendela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaler, Jasmeet</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Preventive veterinary medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shortall, Orla</au><au>Ruston, Annmarie</au><au>Green, Martin</au><au>Brennan, Marnie</au><au>Wapenaar, Wendela</au><au>Kaler, Jasmeet</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Broken biosecurity? Veterinarians’ framing of biosecurity on dairy farms in England</atitle><jtitle>Preventive veterinary medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Prev Vet Med</addtitle><date>2016-09-15</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>132</volume><spage>20</spage><epage>31</epage><pages>20-31</pages><issn>0167-5877</issn><eissn>1873-1716</eissn><abstract>•Interviews were conducted with farm animal veterinarians on dairy farm biosecurity.•Data was analysed using frame analysis to explore their views on biosecurity.•Veterinarians frame barriers as individual, interpersonal and contextual.•Veterinarians were framed as lacking consistency and coherence in their knowledge.•Veterinarians and farmers may view biosecurity through incompatible frames. There is seen to be a need for better biosecurity – the control of disease spread on and off farm – in the dairy sector. Veterinarians play a key role in communicating and implementing biosecurity measures on farm, and little research has been carried out on how veterinarians see their own and farmers’ roles in improving biosecurity. In order to help address this gap, qualitative interviews were carried out with 28 veterinarians from Royal College of Veterinary Surgeon farm accredited practices in England. The results were analysed using a social ecology framework and frame analysis to explore not only what barriers vets identified, but also how vets saw the problem of inadequate biosecurity as being located. Veterinarians’ frames of biosecurity were analysed at the individual, interpersonal and contextual scales, following the social ecology framework, which see the problem in different ways with different solutions. Farmers and veterinarians were both framed by veterinarians as individualised groups lacking consistency. This means that best practice is not spread and veterinarians are finding it difficult to work as a group to move towards a “predict and prevent” model of veterinary intervention. But diversity and individualism were also framed as positive and necessary among veterinarians to the extent that they can tailor advice to individual farmers. Veterinarians saw their role in educating the farmer as not only being about giving advice to farmers, but trying to convince the farmer of their perspective and values on disease problems. Vets felt they were meeting with limited success because vets and farmers may be emphasising different framings of biosecurity. Vets emphasise the individual and interpersonal frames that disease problems are a problem on farm that can and should be controlled by individual farmers working with vets. According to vets, farmers may emphasise the contextual frame that biosecurity is largely outside of their control on dairy farms because of logistical, economic and geographical factors, and so some level of disease on dairy farms is not entirely unexpected or controllable. There needs to be a step back within the vet-farmer relationship to realise that there may be different perspectives at play, and within the wider debate to explore the question of what a biosecure dairy sector would look like within a rapidly changing agricultural landscape.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>27664445</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.prevetmed.2016.06.001</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0167-5877
ispartof Preventive veterinary medicine, 2016-09, Vol.132, p.20-31
issn 0167-5877
1873-1716
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1823463509
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Animal Husbandry - economics
Animal Husbandry - education
Animals
Cattle
Cattle Diseases - economics
Cattle Diseases - prevention & control
Communication
Dairy biosecurity
Dairying - economics
Dairying - education
Decision making
Disease control
England
Frame analysis
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Health Promotion - economics
Qualitative
Security Measures - economics
Time Factors
Veterinarians
Veterinary Medicine
title Broken biosecurity? Veterinarians’ framing of biosecurity on dairy farms in England
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T09%3A35%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Broken%20biosecurity?%20Veterinarians%E2%80%99%20framing%20of%20biosecurity%20on%20dairy%20farms%20in%20England&rft.jtitle=Preventive%20veterinary%20medicine&rft.au=Shortall,%20Orla&rft.date=2016-09-15&rft.volume=132&rft.spage=20&rft.epage=31&rft.pages=20-31&rft.issn=0167-5877&rft.eissn=1873-1716&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2016.06.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1823463509%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1823463509&rft_id=info:pmid/27664445&rft_els_id=S016758771630157X&rfr_iscdi=true