Broken biosecurity? Veterinarians’ framing of biosecurity on dairy farms in England
•Interviews were conducted with farm animal veterinarians on dairy farm biosecurity.•Data was analysed using frame analysis to explore their views on biosecurity.•Veterinarians frame barriers as individual, interpersonal and contextual.•Veterinarians were framed as lacking consistency and coherence...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Preventive veterinary medicine 2016-09, Vol.132, p.20-31 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •Interviews were conducted with farm animal veterinarians on dairy farm biosecurity.•Data was analysed using frame analysis to explore their views on biosecurity.•Veterinarians frame barriers as individual, interpersonal and contextual.•Veterinarians were framed as lacking consistency and coherence in their knowledge.•Veterinarians and farmers may view biosecurity through incompatible frames.
There is seen to be a need for better biosecurity – the control of disease spread on and off farm – in the dairy sector. Veterinarians play a key role in communicating and implementing biosecurity measures on farm, and little research has been carried out on how veterinarians see their own and farmers’ roles in improving biosecurity. In order to help address this gap, qualitative interviews were carried out with 28 veterinarians from Royal College of Veterinary Surgeon farm accredited practices in England. The results were analysed using a social ecology framework and frame analysis to explore not only what barriers vets identified, but also how vets saw the problem of inadequate biosecurity as being located.
Veterinarians’ frames of biosecurity were analysed at the individual, interpersonal and contextual scales, following the social ecology framework, which see the problem in different ways with different solutions. Farmers and veterinarians were both framed by veterinarians as individualised groups lacking consistency. This means that best practice is not spread and veterinarians are finding it difficult to work as a group to move towards a “predict and prevent” model of veterinary intervention. But diversity and individualism were also framed as positive and necessary among veterinarians to the extent that they can tailor advice to individual farmers.
Veterinarians saw their role in educating the farmer as not only being about giving advice to farmers, but trying to convince the farmer of their perspective and values on disease problems. Vets felt they were meeting with limited success because vets and farmers may be emphasising different framings of biosecurity. Vets emphasise the individual and interpersonal frames that disease problems are a problem on farm that can and should be controlled by individual farmers working with vets. According to vets, farmers may emphasise the contextual frame that biosecurity is largely outside of their control on dairy farms because of logistical, economic and geographical factors, and so some level of disease on dairy farms is |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0167-5877 1873-1716 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2016.06.001 |