Postbreeding Movements of the Dark Gopher Frog, Rana sevosa Goin and Netting: Implications for Conservation and Management
Conservation plans for amphibians often focus on activities at the breeding site, but for species that use terrestrial habitats for much of the year, an understanding of nonbreeding habitat use is also essential. We used radio telemetry to study the postbreeding movements of individuals of the only...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of herpetology 2001-06, Vol.35 (2), p.316-321 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 321 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 316 |
container_title | Journal of herpetology |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | Richter, Stephen C. Young, Jeanne E. Seigel, Richard A. Johnson, Glen N. |
description | Conservation plans for amphibians often focus on activities at the breeding site, but for species that use terrestrial habitats for much of the year, an understanding of nonbreeding habitat use is also essential. We used radio telemetry to study the postbreeding movements of individuals of the only known population of dark gopher frogs, Rana sevosa, during two breeding seasons (1994 and 1996). Movements away from the pond were relatively short (< 300 m) and usually occurred within a two-day period after frogs initially exited the breeding pond. However, dispersal distances for some individuals may have been constrained by a recent clearcut on adjacent private property. Final recorded locations for all individuals were underground retreats associated with stump holes, root mounds of fallen trees, or mammal burrows in surrounding upland areas. When implementing a conservation plan for Rana sevosa and other amphibians with similar habitat utilization patterns, we recommend that a terrestrial buffer zone of protection include the aquatic breeding site and adjacent nonbreeding season habitat. When the habitat is fragmented, the buffer zone should include additional habitat to lessen edge effects and provide connectivity between critical habitats. For our study site, we recommend a 1000-m buffer zone around the primary breeding site and each of two other potential breeding ponds. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2307/1566123 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18231933</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>1566123</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>1566123</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c283t-936f0fdbd6e6e21e6debd4ccef6a07342921e1475c687479216ea359976103083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1OwzAQhC0EEqUgXsEHBBcC_knshBsKtFRqASE4R66zaVOSONhuJXh6TNsrp92d_WZXGoTOKblhnMhbmghBGT9AA5pxGbGYpodoQAhjEU0oPUYnzq0IoYzIdIB-Xo3zcwtQ1t0Cz8wGWui8w6bCfgn4QdlPPDb9EiweWbO4xm-qU9jBxjgVFnWHVVfiZ_A--O_wpO2bWitfm87hylichwbsZqts0VnwL7ZPTtFRpRoHZ_s6RB-jx_f8KZq-jCf5_TTSLOU-yrioSFXOSwECGAVRwryMtYZKKCJ5zLIg0lgmWqQylmESoHiSZVJQwknKh-hyd7e35msNzhdt7TQ0jerArF1BU8ZDVDyAVztQW-Ocharobd0q-11QUvxlW-yzDeTFjlw5b-y_2C9qRXbC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18231933</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Postbreeding Movements of the Dark Gopher Frog, Rana sevosa Goin and Netting: Implications for Conservation and Management</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Richter, Stephen C. ; Young, Jeanne E. ; Seigel, Richard A. ; Johnson, Glen N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Richter, Stephen C. ; Young, Jeanne E. ; Seigel, Richard A. ; Johnson, Glen N.</creatorcontrib><description>Conservation plans for amphibians often focus on activities at the breeding site, but for species that use terrestrial habitats for much of the year, an understanding of nonbreeding habitat use is also essential. We used radio telemetry to study the postbreeding movements of individuals of the only known population of dark gopher frogs, Rana sevosa, during two breeding seasons (1994 and 1996). Movements away from the pond were relatively short (< 300 m) and usually occurred within a two-day period after frogs initially exited the breeding pond. However, dispersal distances for some individuals may have been constrained by a recent clearcut on adjacent private property. Final recorded locations for all individuals were underground retreats associated with stump holes, root mounds of fallen trees, or mammal burrows in surrounding upland areas. When implementing a conservation plan for Rana sevosa and other amphibians with similar habitat utilization patterns, we recommend that a terrestrial buffer zone of protection include the aquatic breeding site and adjacent nonbreeding season habitat. When the habitat is fragmented, the buffer zone should include additional habitat to lessen edge effects and provide connectivity between critical habitats. For our study site, we recommend a 1000-m buffer zone around the primary breeding site and each of two other potential breeding ponds.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1511</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1937-2418</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/1566123</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles</publisher><subject>Amphibians ; Breeding ; Breeding seasons ; Breeding sites ; Conservation ; Forest habitats ; Frogs ; Habitat conservation ; Habitat destruction ; Habitat selection ; Ponds ; Rana sevosa</subject><ispartof>Journal of herpetology, 2001-06, Vol.35 (2), p.316-321</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2001 Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c283t-936f0fdbd6e6e21e6debd4ccef6a07342921e1475c687479216ea359976103083</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1566123$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/1566123$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Richter, Stephen C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Young, Jeanne E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seigel, Richard A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Glen N.</creatorcontrib><title>Postbreeding Movements of the Dark Gopher Frog, Rana sevosa Goin and Netting: Implications for Conservation and Management</title><title>Journal of herpetology</title><description>Conservation plans for amphibians often focus on activities at the breeding site, but for species that use terrestrial habitats for much of the year, an understanding of nonbreeding habitat use is also essential. We used radio telemetry to study the postbreeding movements of individuals of the only known population of dark gopher frogs, Rana sevosa, during two breeding seasons (1994 and 1996). Movements away from the pond were relatively short (< 300 m) and usually occurred within a two-day period after frogs initially exited the breeding pond. However, dispersal distances for some individuals may have been constrained by a recent clearcut on adjacent private property. Final recorded locations for all individuals were underground retreats associated with stump holes, root mounds of fallen trees, or mammal burrows in surrounding upland areas. When implementing a conservation plan for Rana sevosa and other amphibians with similar habitat utilization patterns, we recommend that a terrestrial buffer zone of protection include the aquatic breeding site and adjacent nonbreeding season habitat. When the habitat is fragmented, the buffer zone should include additional habitat to lessen edge effects and provide connectivity between critical habitats. For our study site, we recommend a 1000-m buffer zone around the primary breeding site and each of two other potential breeding ponds.</description><subject>Amphibians</subject><subject>Breeding</subject><subject>Breeding seasons</subject><subject>Breeding sites</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Forest habitats</subject><subject>Frogs</subject><subject>Habitat conservation</subject><subject>Habitat destruction</subject><subject>Habitat selection</subject><subject>Ponds</subject><subject>Rana sevosa</subject><issn>0022-1511</issn><issn>1937-2418</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kM1OwzAQhC0EEqUgXsEHBBcC_knshBsKtFRqASE4R66zaVOSONhuJXh6TNsrp92d_WZXGoTOKblhnMhbmghBGT9AA5pxGbGYpodoQAhjEU0oPUYnzq0IoYzIdIB-Xo3zcwtQ1t0Cz8wGWui8w6bCfgn4QdlPPDb9EiweWbO4xm-qU9jBxjgVFnWHVVfiZ_A--O_wpO2bWitfm87hylichwbsZqts0VnwL7ZPTtFRpRoHZ_s6RB-jx_f8KZq-jCf5_TTSLOU-yrioSFXOSwECGAVRwryMtYZKKCJ5zLIg0lgmWqQylmESoHiSZVJQwknKh-hyd7e35msNzhdt7TQ0jerArF1BU8ZDVDyAVztQW-Ocharobd0q-11QUvxlW-yzDeTFjlw5b-y_2C9qRXbC</recordid><startdate>20010601</startdate><enddate>20010601</enddate><creator>Richter, Stephen C.</creator><creator>Young, Jeanne E.</creator><creator>Seigel, Richard A.</creator><creator>Johnson, Glen N.</creator><general>Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010601</creationdate><title>Postbreeding Movements of the Dark Gopher Frog, Rana sevosa Goin and Netting: Implications for Conservation and Management</title><author>Richter, Stephen C. ; Young, Jeanne E. ; Seigel, Richard A. ; Johnson, Glen N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c283t-936f0fdbd6e6e21e6debd4ccef6a07342921e1475c687479216ea359976103083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Amphibians</topic><topic>Breeding</topic><topic>Breeding seasons</topic><topic>Breeding sites</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Forest habitats</topic><topic>Frogs</topic><topic>Habitat conservation</topic><topic>Habitat destruction</topic><topic>Habitat selection</topic><topic>Ponds</topic><topic>Rana sevosa</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Richter, Stephen C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Young, Jeanne E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seigel, Richard A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Glen N.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Journal of herpetology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Richter, Stephen C.</au><au>Young, Jeanne E.</au><au>Seigel, Richard A.</au><au>Johnson, Glen N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Postbreeding Movements of the Dark Gopher Frog, Rana sevosa Goin and Netting: Implications for Conservation and Management</atitle><jtitle>Journal of herpetology</jtitle><date>2001-06-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>316</spage><epage>321</epage><pages>316-321</pages><issn>0022-1511</issn><eissn>1937-2418</eissn><abstract>Conservation plans for amphibians often focus on activities at the breeding site, but for species that use terrestrial habitats for much of the year, an understanding of nonbreeding habitat use is also essential. We used radio telemetry to study the postbreeding movements of individuals of the only known population of dark gopher frogs, Rana sevosa, during two breeding seasons (1994 and 1996). Movements away from the pond were relatively short (< 300 m) and usually occurred within a two-day period after frogs initially exited the breeding pond. However, dispersal distances for some individuals may have been constrained by a recent clearcut on adjacent private property. Final recorded locations for all individuals were underground retreats associated with stump holes, root mounds of fallen trees, or mammal burrows in surrounding upland areas. When implementing a conservation plan for Rana sevosa and other amphibians with similar habitat utilization patterns, we recommend that a terrestrial buffer zone of protection include the aquatic breeding site and adjacent nonbreeding season habitat. When the habitat is fragmented, the buffer zone should include additional habitat to lessen edge effects and provide connectivity between critical habitats. For our study site, we recommend a 1000-m buffer zone around the primary breeding site and each of two other potential breeding ponds.</abstract><pub>Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles</pub><doi>10.2307/1566123</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-1511 |
ispartof | Journal of herpetology, 2001-06, Vol.35 (2), p.316-321 |
issn | 0022-1511 1937-2418 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18231933 |
source | JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
subjects | Amphibians Breeding Breeding seasons Breeding sites Conservation Forest habitats Frogs Habitat conservation Habitat destruction Habitat selection Ponds Rana sevosa |
title | Postbreeding Movements of the Dark Gopher Frog, Rana sevosa Goin and Netting: Implications for Conservation and Management |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T05%3A24%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Postbreeding%20Movements%20of%20the%20Dark%20Gopher%20Frog,%20Rana%20sevosa%20Goin%20and%20Netting:%20Implications%20for%20Conservation%20and%20Management&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20herpetology&rft.au=Richter,%20Stephen%20C.&rft.date=2001-06-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=316&rft.epage=321&rft.pages=316-321&rft.issn=0022-1511&rft.eissn=1937-2418&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/1566123&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E1566123%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18231933&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=1566123&rfr_iscdi=true |