Temperature and Humidity Fields and Fluxes Over Low Hills

This paper describes a model of the effects of low hills upon scalar fields, particularly the temperature and humidity fields, in the planetary boundary layer under near‐neutral conditions. the approach is to use linearized equations and two‐layer asymptotic matching, similar to methods which are no...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Quarterly journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 1992-01, Vol.118 (504), p.191-225
Hauptverfasser: Raupach, M. R., Weng, W. S., Carruther, D. J., Huntd, J. C. R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 225
container_issue 504
container_start_page 191
container_title Quarterly journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
container_volume 118
creator Raupach, M. R.
Weng, W. S.
Carruther, D. J.
Huntd, J. C. R.
description This paper describes a model of the effects of low hills upon scalar fields, particularly the temperature and humidity fields, in the planetary boundary layer under near‐neutral conditions. the approach is to use linearized equations and two‐layer asymptotic matching, similar to methods which are now well‐established for the velocity field. In the inner region near the surface the scalar fields are affected by turbulent transfer from the surface and are represented using an eddy diffusivity. In the outer region the response of both the flow and the scalar fields to the hill is essentially inviscid. By matching these layers, hill‐induced perturbations in the concentrations and fluxes of an arbitrary scalar can be determined in terms of upwind and surface conditions, and the calculated mean and turbulent wind fields over the hill. the analysis separates these perturbations into components associated with (1) the convergence and divergence of the streamlines, (2) vertical stress gradients, and (3) changes in boundary conditions (surface stress and scalar flux density) over the hill. In order to describe coupled heat and water‐vapour transfer with this model, it is necessary to decouple the scalars by using two new scalar entities, essentially energy per unit volume and potential saturation deficit. This is a flow‐independent technique previously applied to sensible‐and latent‐heat fluxes in local advection and in convective boundary layers. an extension given here accounts for the effects of change in elevation on the evaporation process. Perturbations in the temperature and humidity fields and fluxes over the hill arise physically from slope‐induced radiative effects, aerodynamic effects induced by changes in the mean wind and stress fields, and elevation effects induced by adiabatic cooling on ascent. Three dimensionless parameters control these effects: the hill slope, H/L; the unperturbed Priestley‐Taylor ratio, α, (the ratio of surface latent‐heat flux density to available energy flux density, far from the hill); and an ‘elevation parameter’, Pelev, proportional to the change in saturation deficit induced by adiabatic cooling as air ascends through the hill height, H, normalized by the turbulence specific‐humidity scale. For the surface latent‐heat flux, radiatively‐induced perturbations scale on (H/L)α1−1 aerodynamically‐induced perturbations on (H/L)(α1‐1 ‐αeq−1) (where αeq is the thermodynamic equilibrium value of α 0.688 at 20°C); and elevation‐induc
doi_str_mv 10.1002/qj.49711850403
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18230832</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>18230832</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3473-a9f917eee3a9bb2bd2a12a87aab40ff20fafdd7835f9e46bb0ec3e1f59a2d9773</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEFLAzEQhYMoWKtXz3sQb1snya7ZHKXYVikUoYK3MLs7gZRst0261v57qy3Sm6eBx_e-gcfYLYcBBxAP68Ug04rzIocM5Bnr8UyptFDwcc56ADJPNYC-ZFcxLgAgV0L1mJ5Ts6KAmy5Qgss6mXSNq91ml4wc-Tr-ZiPffVFMZp8Ukmm7TSbO-3jNLiz6SDfH22fvo-f5cJJOZ-OX4dM0rWSmZIraaq6ISKIuS1HWArnAQiGWGVgrwKKta1XI3GrKHssSqJLEba5R1Fop2Wf3B-8qtOuO4sY0LlbkPS6p7aLhhZBQSLEHBwewCm2MgaxZBddg2BkO5mchs16Yk4X2hbujGWOF3gZcVi7-tXKR5VzxPaYP2NZ52v0jNW-vpy--AcjKdlQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18230832</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Temperature and Humidity Fields and Fluxes Over Low Hills</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><creator>Raupach, M. R. ; Weng, W. S. ; Carruther, D. J. ; Huntd, J. C. R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Raupach, M. R. ; Weng, W. S. ; Carruther, D. J. ; Huntd, J. C. R.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper describes a model of the effects of low hills upon scalar fields, particularly the temperature and humidity fields, in the planetary boundary layer under near‐neutral conditions. the approach is to use linearized equations and two‐layer asymptotic matching, similar to methods which are now well‐established for the velocity field. In the inner region near the surface the scalar fields are affected by turbulent transfer from the surface and are represented using an eddy diffusivity. In the outer region the response of both the flow and the scalar fields to the hill is essentially inviscid. By matching these layers, hill‐induced perturbations in the concentrations and fluxes of an arbitrary scalar can be determined in terms of upwind and surface conditions, and the calculated mean and turbulent wind fields over the hill. the analysis separates these perturbations into components associated with (1) the convergence and divergence of the streamlines, (2) vertical stress gradients, and (3) changes in boundary conditions (surface stress and scalar flux density) over the hill. In order to describe coupled heat and water‐vapour transfer with this model, it is necessary to decouple the scalars by using two new scalar entities, essentially energy per unit volume and potential saturation deficit. This is a flow‐independent technique previously applied to sensible‐and latent‐heat fluxes in local advection and in convective boundary layers. an extension given here accounts for the effects of change in elevation on the evaporation process. Perturbations in the temperature and humidity fields and fluxes over the hill arise physically from slope‐induced radiative effects, aerodynamic effects induced by changes in the mean wind and stress fields, and elevation effects induced by adiabatic cooling on ascent. Three dimensionless parameters control these effects: the hill slope, H/L; the unperturbed Priestley‐Taylor ratio, α, (the ratio of surface latent‐heat flux density to available energy flux density, far from the hill); and an ‘elevation parameter’, Pelev, proportional to the change in saturation deficit induced by adiabatic cooling as air ascends through the hill height, H, normalized by the turbulence specific‐humidity scale. For the surface latent‐heat flux, radiatively‐induced perturbations scale on (H/L)α1−1 aerodynamically‐induced perturbations on (H/L)(α1‐1 ‐αeq−1) (where αeq is the thermodynamic equilibrium value of α 0.688 at 20°C); and elevation‐induced perturbations on Pelev. In general terms, the strongest influences on the perturbations of heat and water‐vapour fields and fluxes are aerodynamic effects associated with changes in surface shear stress, and elevation effects. For a hill of height 100m, surface resistance 50 s m−1 and slope H/L = 0.2, typical changes in potential temperature and specific humidity are of order 1 degC and 1 gkg−1, respectively, while typical perturbations in sensible‐ and latent‐heat fluxes are of order 20 per cent. The linear analysis predicts that spatial averages of heat and water‐vapour fluxes are independent of low‐terrain undulations, except for adiabatic elevation effects.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0035-9009</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-870X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/qj.49711850403</identifier><identifier>CODEN: QJRMAM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bracknell: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Convection, turbulence, diffusion. Boundary layer structure and dynamics ; Earth, ocean, space ; Exact sciences and technology ; External geophysics ; Meteorology</subject><ispartof>Quarterly journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 1992-01, Vol.118 (504), p.191-225</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1992 Royal Meteorological Society</rights><rights>1992 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3473-a9f917eee3a9bb2bd2a12a87aab40ff20fafdd7835f9e46bb0ec3e1f59a2d9773</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3473-a9f917eee3a9bb2bd2a12a87aab40ff20fafdd7835f9e46bb0ec3e1f59a2d9773</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fqj.49711850403$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fqj.49711850403$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,4010,27900,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=5245171$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Raupach, M. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weng, W. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carruther, D. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huntd, J. C. R.</creatorcontrib><title>Temperature and Humidity Fields and Fluxes Over Low Hills</title><title>Quarterly journal of the Royal Meteorological Society</title><description>This paper describes a model of the effects of low hills upon scalar fields, particularly the temperature and humidity fields, in the planetary boundary layer under near‐neutral conditions. the approach is to use linearized equations and two‐layer asymptotic matching, similar to methods which are now well‐established for the velocity field. In the inner region near the surface the scalar fields are affected by turbulent transfer from the surface and are represented using an eddy diffusivity. In the outer region the response of both the flow and the scalar fields to the hill is essentially inviscid. By matching these layers, hill‐induced perturbations in the concentrations and fluxes of an arbitrary scalar can be determined in terms of upwind and surface conditions, and the calculated mean and turbulent wind fields over the hill. the analysis separates these perturbations into components associated with (1) the convergence and divergence of the streamlines, (2) vertical stress gradients, and (3) changes in boundary conditions (surface stress and scalar flux density) over the hill. In order to describe coupled heat and water‐vapour transfer with this model, it is necessary to decouple the scalars by using two new scalar entities, essentially energy per unit volume and potential saturation deficit. This is a flow‐independent technique previously applied to sensible‐and latent‐heat fluxes in local advection and in convective boundary layers. an extension given here accounts for the effects of change in elevation on the evaporation process. Perturbations in the temperature and humidity fields and fluxes over the hill arise physically from slope‐induced radiative effects, aerodynamic effects induced by changes in the mean wind and stress fields, and elevation effects induced by adiabatic cooling on ascent. Three dimensionless parameters control these effects: the hill slope, H/L; the unperturbed Priestley‐Taylor ratio, α, (the ratio of surface latent‐heat flux density to available energy flux density, far from the hill); and an ‘elevation parameter’, Pelev, proportional to the change in saturation deficit induced by adiabatic cooling as air ascends through the hill height, H, normalized by the turbulence specific‐humidity scale. For the surface latent‐heat flux, radiatively‐induced perturbations scale on (H/L)α1−1 aerodynamically‐induced perturbations on (H/L)(α1‐1 ‐αeq−1) (where αeq is the thermodynamic equilibrium value of α 0.688 at 20°C); and elevation‐induced perturbations on Pelev. In general terms, the strongest influences on the perturbations of heat and water‐vapour fields and fluxes are aerodynamic effects associated with changes in surface shear stress, and elevation effects. For a hill of height 100m, surface resistance 50 s m−1 and slope H/L = 0.2, typical changes in potential temperature and specific humidity are of order 1 degC and 1 gkg−1, respectively, while typical perturbations in sensible‐ and latent‐heat fluxes are of order 20 per cent. The linear analysis predicts that spatial averages of heat and water‐vapour fluxes are independent of low‐terrain undulations, except for adiabatic elevation effects.</description><subject>Convection, turbulence, diffusion. Boundary layer structure and dynamics</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>External geophysics</subject><subject>Meteorology</subject><issn>0035-9009</issn><issn>1477-870X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1992</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEFLAzEQhYMoWKtXz3sQb1snya7ZHKXYVikUoYK3MLs7gZRst0261v57qy3Sm6eBx_e-gcfYLYcBBxAP68Ug04rzIocM5Bnr8UyptFDwcc56ADJPNYC-ZFcxLgAgV0L1mJ5Ts6KAmy5Qgss6mXSNq91ml4wc-Tr-ZiPffVFMZp8Ukmm7TSbO-3jNLiz6SDfH22fvo-f5cJJOZ-OX4dM0rWSmZIraaq6ISKIuS1HWArnAQiGWGVgrwKKta1XI3GrKHssSqJLEba5R1Fop2Wf3B-8qtOuO4sY0LlbkPS6p7aLhhZBQSLEHBwewCm2MgaxZBddg2BkO5mchs16Yk4X2hbujGWOF3gZcVi7-tXKR5VzxPaYP2NZ52v0jNW-vpy--AcjKdlQ</recordid><startdate>199201</startdate><enddate>199201</enddate><creator>Raupach, M. R.</creator><creator>Weng, W. S.</creator><creator>Carruther, D. J.</creator><creator>Huntd, J. C. R.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>KL.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199201</creationdate><title>Temperature and Humidity Fields and Fluxes Over Low Hills</title><author>Raupach, M. R. ; Weng, W. S. ; Carruther, D. J. ; Huntd, J. C. R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3473-a9f917eee3a9bb2bd2a12a87aab40ff20fafdd7835f9e46bb0ec3e1f59a2d9773</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1992</creationdate><topic>Convection, turbulence, diffusion. Boundary layer structure and dynamics</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>External geophysics</topic><topic>Meteorology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Raupach, M. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weng, W. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carruther, D. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huntd, J. C. R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><jtitle>Quarterly journal of the Royal Meteorological Society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Raupach, M. R.</au><au>Weng, W. S.</au><au>Carruther, D. J.</au><au>Huntd, J. C. R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Temperature and Humidity Fields and Fluxes Over Low Hills</atitle><jtitle>Quarterly journal of the Royal Meteorological Society</jtitle><date>1992-01</date><risdate>1992</risdate><volume>118</volume><issue>504</issue><spage>191</spage><epage>225</epage><pages>191-225</pages><issn>0035-9009</issn><eissn>1477-870X</eissn><coden>QJRMAM</coden><abstract>This paper describes a model of the effects of low hills upon scalar fields, particularly the temperature and humidity fields, in the planetary boundary layer under near‐neutral conditions. the approach is to use linearized equations and two‐layer asymptotic matching, similar to methods which are now well‐established for the velocity field. In the inner region near the surface the scalar fields are affected by turbulent transfer from the surface and are represented using an eddy diffusivity. In the outer region the response of both the flow and the scalar fields to the hill is essentially inviscid. By matching these layers, hill‐induced perturbations in the concentrations and fluxes of an arbitrary scalar can be determined in terms of upwind and surface conditions, and the calculated mean and turbulent wind fields over the hill. the analysis separates these perturbations into components associated with (1) the convergence and divergence of the streamlines, (2) vertical stress gradients, and (3) changes in boundary conditions (surface stress and scalar flux density) over the hill. In order to describe coupled heat and water‐vapour transfer with this model, it is necessary to decouple the scalars by using two new scalar entities, essentially energy per unit volume and potential saturation deficit. This is a flow‐independent technique previously applied to sensible‐and latent‐heat fluxes in local advection and in convective boundary layers. an extension given here accounts for the effects of change in elevation on the evaporation process. Perturbations in the temperature and humidity fields and fluxes over the hill arise physically from slope‐induced radiative effects, aerodynamic effects induced by changes in the mean wind and stress fields, and elevation effects induced by adiabatic cooling on ascent. Three dimensionless parameters control these effects: the hill slope, H/L; the unperturbed Priestley‐Taylor ratio, α, (the ratio of surface latent‐heat flux density to available energy flux density, far from the hill); and an ‘elevation parameter’, Pelev, proportional to the change in saturation deficit induced by adiabatic cooling as air ascends through the hill height, H, normalized by the turbulence specific‐humidity scale. For the surface latent‐heat flux, radiatively‐induced perturbations scale on (H/L)α1−1 aerodynamically‐induced perturbations on (H/L)(α1‐1 ‐αeq−1) (where αeq is the thermodynamic equilibrium value of α 0.688 at 20°C); and elevation‐induced perturbations on Pelev. In general terms, the strongest influences on the perturbations of heat and water‐vapour fields and fluxes are aerodynamic effects associated with changes in surface shear stress, and elevation effects. For a hill of height 100m, surface resistance 50 s m−1 and slope H/L = 0.2, typical changes in potential temperature and specific humidity are of order 1 degC and 1 gkg−1, respectively, while typical perturbations in sensible‐ and latent‐heat fluxes are of order 20 per cent. The linear analysis predicts that spatial averages of heat and water‐vapour fluxes are independent of low‐terrain undulations, except for adiabatic elevation effects.</abstract><cop>Bracknell</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/qj.49711850403</doi><tpages>35</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0035-9009
ispartof Quarterly journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 1992-01, Vol.118 (504), p.191-225
issn 0035-9009
1477-870X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18230832
source Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals
subjects Convection, turbulence, diffusion. Boundary layer structure and dynamics
Earth, ocean, space
Exact sciences and technology
External geophysics
Meteorology
title Temperature and Humidity Fields and Fluxes Over Low Hills
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T06%3A16%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Temperature%20and%20Humidity%20Fields%20and%20Fluxes%20Over%20Low%20Hills&rft.jtitle=Quarterly%20journal%20of%20the%20Royal%20Meteorological%20Society&rft.au=Raupach,%20M.%20R.&rft.date=1992-01&rft.volume=118&rft.issue=504&rft.spage=191&rft.epage=225&rft.pages=191-225&rft.issn=0035-9009&rft.eissn=1477-870X&rft.coden=QJRMAM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/qj.49711850403&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E18230832%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18230832&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true