Passive-dynamic ankle–foot orthosis replicates soleus but not gastrocnemius muscle function during stance in gait: Insights for orthosis prescription
Background: Passive-dynamic ankle–foot orthosis characteristics, including bending stiffness, should be customized for individuals. However, while conventions for customizing passive-dynamic ankle–foot orthosis characteristics are often described and implemented in clinical practice, there is little...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Prosthetics and orthotics international 2016-10, Vol.40 (5), p.606-616 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background:
Passive-dynamic ankle–foot orthosis characteristics, including bending stiffness, should be customized for individuals. However, while conventions for customizing passive-dynamic ankle–foot orthosis characteristics are often described and implemented in clinical practice, there is little evidence to explain their biomechanical rationale.
Objectives:
To develop and combine a model of a customized passive-dynamic ankle–foot orthosis with a healthy musculoskeletal model and use simulation tools to explore the influence of passive-dynamic ankle–foot orthosis bending stiffness on plantar flexor function during gait.
Study design:
Dual case study.
Methods:
The customized passive-dynamic ankle–foot orthosis characteristics were integrated into a healthy musculoskeletal model available in OpenSim. Quasi-static forward dynamic simulations tracked experimental gait data under several passive-dynamic ankle–foot orthosis conditions. Predicted muscle activations were calculated through a computed muscle control optimization scheme.
Results:
Simulations predicted that the passive-dynamic ankle–foot orthoses substituted for soleus but not gastrocnemius function. Induced acceleration analyses revealed the passive-dynamic ankle–foot orthosis acts like a uniarticular plantar flexor by inducing knee extension accelerations, which are counterproductive to natural knee kinematics in early midstance.
Conclusion:
These passive-dynamic ankle–foot orthoses can provide plantar flexion moments during mid and late stance to supplement insufficient plantar flexor strength. However, the passive-dynamic ankle–foot orthoses negatively influenced knee kinematics in early midstance.
Clinical relevance
Identifying the role of passive-dynamic ankle–foot orthosis stiffness during gait provides biomechanical rationale for how to customize passive-dynamic ankle–foot orthoses for patients. Furthermore, these findings can be used in the future as the basis for developing objective prescription models to help drive the customization of passive-dynamic ankle–foot orthosis characteristics. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0309-3646 1746-1553 |
DOI: | 10.1177/0309364615592693 |