Impact of the Conservation Reserve Program on Duck Recruitment in the U.S. Prairie Pothole Region
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA)'s Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) resulted in the conversion of about 1.9 million ha of cropland to perennial grass cover in the Prairie Pothole Region of North Dakota, South Dakota, and northeastern Montana by 1992. Many wildlife managers believed t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of wildlife management 2001-10, Vol.65 (4), p.765-780 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 780 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 765 |
container_title | The Journal of wildlife management |
container_volume | 65 |
creator | Reynolds, Ronald E. Shaffer, Terry L. Renner, Randy W. Newton, Wesley E. Bruce D. J. Batt |
description | The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA)'s Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) resulted in the conversion of about 1.9 million ha of cropland to perennial grass cover in the Prairie Pothole Region of North Dakota, South Dakota, and northeastern Montana by 1992. Many wildlife managers believed this cover would provide benefits to wildlife, including upland nesting ducks. During 1992-1995, we evaluated success of 5 duck species nesting in CRP fields and nearby Waterfowl Production Areas (WPA) throughout the region. We examined relationships between daily survival rates (DSR) of duck nests in CRP cover and landscape-level habitat and population parameters. We computed DSR of duck nests in other major cover types in our study area from data collected during 1980-1984 (pre-CRP) and 1990-1994 (CRP) periods. We then applied recruitment models to estimate duck production in our study area during peak CRP years (1992-1997) and compared these results with those that simulated the scenario in which cropland was in place of CRP cover (i.e., the CRP had not occurred). DSR were higher in all habitats combined during the CRP period compared to the pre-CRP period. Regressions of DSR in CRP cover on the percent of each study plot in perennial cover and geographic location were significant (P < 0.01) for 4 of 5 duck (Anas spp.) species. Estimated nest success and recruitment rates for the 5 species combined during 1992-1997 were 46% and 30% higher, respectively, with CRP cover on the landscape compared to a scenario where we simulated cropland in place of CRP. Our model estimated an additional 12.4 million recruits from our study area to the fall flight as a consequence of the CRP during 1992-1997. Our results document benefits to 5 duck species in the norhtern plains associated with a farm program that provided financial incentives to landowners for planting undisturbed grass cover as an alternative to annual crops. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2307/3803027 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18221914</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3803027</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3803027</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c313t-1e751e28c84137a7448eef9f73ab400352577de2ae4af4e34309b60affab354e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10MtKAzEUBuAgCtYqvsIsvKym5jbNzFLqrVBQ1IK74TSetKkzk5qkgm9vaguuXJ3w8-XncAg5ZXTABVVXoqSCcrVHeqwSKuclU_ukRynneSHZ2yE5CmFJqWCsHPYIjNsV6Jg5k8UFZiPXBfRfEK3rsmfcvDF78m7uoc1SdLPWHynXfm1ji13MbPf7bzp4GSQH1tvkXVy4BpObp5pjcmCgCXiym30yvbt9HT3kk8f78eh6kmvBRMwZqoIhL3UpmVCgpCwRTWWUgJlM6xa8UOodOaAEI1FIQavZkIIxMBNFCvrkYtu78u5zjSHWrQ0amwY6dOtQs5JzVjGZ4OUWau9C8Gjqlbct-O-a0Xpzwnp3wiTPd5UQNDTGQ6dt-OOSSV4l2ydnW7cM0fl_634AhhB6Ww</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18221914</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of the Conservation Reserve Program on Duck Recruitment in the U.S. Prairie Pothole Region</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Reynolds, Ronald E. ; Shaffer, Terry L. ; Renner, Randy W. ; Newton, Wesley E. ; Bruce D. J. Batt</creator><creatorcontrib>Reynolds, Ronald E. ; Shaffer, Terry L. ; Renner, Randy W. ; Newton, Wesley E. ; Bruce D. J. Batt</creatorcontrib><description>The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA)'s Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) resulted in the conversion of about 1.9 million ha of cropland to perennial grass cover in the Prairie Pothole Region of North Dakota, South Dakota, and northeastern Montana by 1992. Many wildlife managers believed this cover would provide benefits to wildlife, including upland nesting ducks. During 1992-1995, we evaluated success of 5 duck species nesting in CRP fields and nearby Waterfowl Production Areas (WPA) throughout the region. We examined relationships between daily survival rates (DSR) of duck nests in CRP cover and landscape-level habitat and population parameters. We computed DSR of duck nests in other major cover types in our study area from data collected during 1980-1984 (pre-CRP) and 1990-1994 (CRP) periods. We then applied recruitment models to estimate duck production in our study area during peak CRP years (1992-1997) and compared these results with those that simulated the scenario in which cropland was in place of CRP cover (i.e., the CRP had not occurred). DSR were higher in all habitats combined during the CRP period compared to the pre-CRP period. Regressions of DSR in CRP cover on the percent of each study plot in perennial cover and geographic location were significant (P < 0.01) for 4 of 5 duck (Anas spp.) species. Estimated nest success and recruitment rates for the 5 species combined during 1992-1997 were 46% and 30% higher, respectively, with CRP cover on the landscape compared to a scenario where we simulated cropland in place of CRP. Our model estimated an additional 12.4 million recruits from our study area to the fall flight as a consequence of the CRP during 1992-1997. Our results document benefits to 5 duck species in the norhtern plains associated with a farm program that provided financial incentives to landowners for planting undisturbed grass cover as an alternative to annual crops.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-541X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1937-2817</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/3803027</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JWMAA9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bethesda, MD: The Wildlife Society</publisher><subject>Anas ; Animal nesting ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bird nesting ; Breeding ; Conservation Reserve Program ; Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife ; Ducks ; Farmlands ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Grasses ; Habitat conservation ; Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking ; Prairies ; Wetlands ; Wildlife management</subject><ispartof>The Journal of wildlife management, 2001-10, Vol.65 (4), p.765-780</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2001 The Wildlife Society</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c313t-1e751e28c84137a7448eef9f73ab400352577de2ae4af4e34309b60affab354e3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3803027$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3803027$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=14142980$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Reynolds, Ronald E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaffer, Terry L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Renner, Randy W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newton, Wesley E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruce D. J. Batt</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of the Conservation Reserve Program on Duck Recruitment in the U.S. Prairie Pothole Region</title><title>The Journal of wildlife management</title><description>The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA)'s Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) resulted in the conversion of about 1.9 million ha of cropland to perennial grass cover in the Prairie Pothole Region of North Dakota, South Dakota, and northeastern Montana by 1992. Many wildlife managers believed this cover would provide benefits to wildlife, including upland nesting ducks. During 1992-1995, we evaluated success of 5 duck species nesting in CRP fields and nearby Waterfowl Production Areas (WPA) throughout the region. We examined relationships between daily survival rates (DSR) of duck nests in CRP cover and landscape-level habitat and population parameters. We computed DSR of duck nests in other major cover types in our study area from data collected during 1980-1984 (pre-CRP) and 1990-1994 (CRP) periods. We then applied recruitment models to estimate duck production in our study area during peak CRP years (1992-1997) and compared these results with those that simulated the scenario in which cropland was in place of CRP cover (i.e., the CRP had not occurred). DSR were higher in all habitats combined during the CRP period compared to the pre-CRP period. Regressions of DSR in CRP cover on the percent of each study plot in perennial cover and geographic location were significant (P < 0.01) for 4 of 5 duck (Anas spp.) species. Estimated nest success and recruitment rates for the 5 species combined during 1992-1997 were 46% and 30% higher, respectively, with CRP cover on the landscape compared to a scenario where we simulated cropland in place of CRP. Our model estimated an additional 12.4 million recruits from our study area to the fall flight as a consequence of the CRP during 1992-1997. Our results document benefits to 5 duck species in the norhtern plains associated with a farm program that provided financial incentives to landowners for planting undisturbed grass cover as an alternative to annual crops.</description><subject>Anas</subject><subject>Animal nesting</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bird nesting</subject><subject>Breeding</subject><subject>Conservation Reserve Program</subject><subject>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</subject><subject>Ducks</subject><subject>Farmlands</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Grasses</subject><subject>Habitat conservation</subject><subject>Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking</subject><subject>Prairies</subject><subject>Wetlands</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><issn>0022-541X</issn><issn>1937-2817</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10MtKAzEUBuAgCtYqvsIsvKym5jbNzFLqrVBQ1IK74TSetKkzk5qkgm9vaguuXJ3w8-XncAg5ZXTABVVXoqSCcrVHeqwSKuclU_ukRynneSHZ2yE5CmFJqWCsHPYIjNsV6Jg5k8UFZiPXBfRfEK3rsmfcvDF78m7uoc1SdLPWHynXfm1ji13MbPf7bzp4GSQH1tvkXVy4BpObp5pjcmCgCXiym30yvbt9HT3kk8f78eh6kmvBRMwZqoIhL3UpmVCgpCwRTWWUgJlM6xa8UOodOaAEI1FIQavZkIIxMBNFCvrkYtu78u5zjSHWrQ0amwY6dOtQs5JzVjGZ4OUWau9C8Gjqlbct-O-a0Xpzwnp3wiTPd5UQNDTGQ6dt-OOSSV4l2ydnW7cM0fl_634AhhB6Ww</recordid><startdate>20011001</startdate><enddate>20011001</enddate><creator>Reynolds, Ronald E.</creator><creator>Shaffer, Terry L.</creator><creator>Renner, Randy W.</creator><creator>Newton, Wesley E.</creator><creator>Bruce D. J. Batt</creator><general>The Wildlife Society</general><general>Wildlife Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H98</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20011001</creationdate><title>Impact of the Conservation Reserve Program on Duck Recruitment in the U.S. Prairie Pothole Region</title><author>Reynolds, Ronald E. ; Shaffer, Terry L. ; Renner, Randy W. ; Newton, Wesley E. ; Bruce D. J. Batt</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c313t-1e751e28c84137a7448eef9f73ab400352577de2ae4af4e34309b60affab354e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Anas</topic><topic>Animal nesting</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bird nesting</topic><topic>Breeding</topic><topic>Conservation Reserve Program</topic><topic>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</topic><topic>Ducks</topic><topic>Farmlands</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Grasses</topic><topic>Habitat conservation</topic><topic>Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking</topic><topic>Prairies</topic><topic>Wetlands</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Reynolds, Ronald E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaffer, Terry L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Renner, Randy W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newton, Wesley E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruce D. J. Batt</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Aquaculture Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Reynolds, Ronald E.</au><au>Shaffer, Terry L.</au><au>Renner, Randy W.</au><au>Newton, Wesley E.</au><au>Bruce D. J. Batt</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of the Conservation Reserve Program on Duck Recruitment in the U.S. Prairie Pothole Region</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle><date>2001-10-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>765</spage><epage>780</epage><pages>765-780</pages><issn>0022-541X</issn><eissn>1937-2817</eissn><coden>JWMAA9</coden><abstract>The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA)'s Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) resulted in the conversion of about 1.9 million ha of cropland to perennial grass cover in the Prairie Pothole Region of North Dakota, South Dakota, and northeastern Montana by 1992. Many wildlife managers believed this cover would provide benefits to wildlife, including upland nesting ducks. During 1992-1995, we evaluated success of 5 duck species nesting in CRP fields and nearby Waterfowl Production Areas (WPA) throughout the region. We examined relationships between daily survival rates (DSR) of duck nests in CRP cover and landscape-level habitat and population parameters. We computed DSR of duck nests in other major cover types in our study area from data collected during 1980-1984 (pre-CRP) and 1990-1994 (CRP) periods. We then applied recruitment models to estimate duck production in our study area during peak CRP years (1992-1997) and compared these results with those that simulated the scenario in which cropland was in place of CRP cover (i.e., the CRP had not occurred). DSR were higher in all habitats combined during the CRP period compared to the pre-CRP period. Regressions of DSR in CRP cover on the percent of each study plot in perennial cover and geographic location were significant (P < 0.01) for 4 of 5 duck (Anas spp.) species. Estimated nest success and recruitment rates for the 5 species combined during 1992-1997 were 46% and 30% higher, respectively, with CRP cover on the landscape compared to a scenario where we simulated cropland in place of CRP. Our model estimated an additional 12.4 million recruits from our study area to the fall flight as a consequence of the CRP during 1992-1997. Our results document benefits to 5 duck species in the norhtern plains associated with a farm program that provided financial incentives to landowners for planting undisturbed grass cover as an alternative to annual crops.</abstract><cop>Bethesda, MD</cop><pub>The Wildlife Society</pub><doi>10.2307/3803027</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-541X |
ispartof | The Journal of wildlife management, 2001-10, Vol.65 (4), p.765-780 |
issn | 0022-541X 1937-2817 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18221914 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy |
subjects | Anas Animal nesting Animal, plant and microbial ecology Applied ecology Biological and medical sciences Bird nesting Breeding Conservation Reserve Program Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife Ducks Farmlands Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Grasses Habitat conservation Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking Prairies Wetlands Wildlife management |
title | Impact of the Conservation Reserve Program on Duck Recruitment in the U.S. Prairie Pothole Region |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T22%3A06%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20the%20Conservation%20Reserve%20Program%20on%20Duck%20Recruitment%20in%20the%20U.S.%20Prairie%20Pothole%20Region&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20wildlife%20management&rft.au=Reynolds,%20Ronald%20E.&rft.date=2001-10-01&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=765&rft.epage=780&rft.pages=765-780&rft.issn=0022-541X&rft.eissn=1937-2817&rft.coden=JWMAA9&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/3803027&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3803027%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18221914&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3803027&rfr_iscdi=true |