Impact of the Conservation Reserve Program on Duck Recruitment in the U.S. Prairie Pothole Region

The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA)'s Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) resulted in the conversion of about 1.9 million ha of cropland to perennial grass cover in the Prairie Pothole Region of North Dakota, South Dakota, and northeastern Montana by 1992. Many wildlife managers believed t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of wildlife management 2001-10, Vol.65 (4), p.765-780
Hauptverfasser: Reynolds, Ronald E., Shaffer, Terry L., Renner, Randy W., Newton, Wesley E., Bruce D. J. Batt
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 780
container_issue 4
container_start_page 765
container_title The Journal of wildlife management
container_volume 65
creator Reynolds, Ronald E.
Shaffer, Terry L.
Renner, Randy W.
Newton, Wesley E.
Bruce D. J. Batt
description The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA)'s Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) resulted in the conversion of about 1.9 million ha of cropland to perennial grass cover in the Prairie Pothole Region of North Dakota, South Dakota, and northeastern Montana by 1992. Many wildlife managers believed this cover would provide benefits to wildlife, including upland nesting ducks. During 1992-1995, we evaluated success of 5 duck species nesting in CRP fields and nearby Waterfowl Production Areas (WPA) throughout the region. We examined relationships between daily survival rates (DSR) of duck nests in CRP cover and landscape-level habitat and population parameters. We computed DSR of duck nests in other major cover types in our study area from data collected during 1980-1984 (pre-CRP) and 1990-1994 (CRP) periods. We then applied recruitment models to estimate duck production in our study area during peak CRP years (1992-1997) and compared these results with those that simulated the scenario in which cropland was in place of CRP cover (i.e., the CRP had not occurred). DSR were higher in all habitats combined during the CRP period compared to the pre-CRP period. Regressions of DSR in CRP cover on the percent of each study plot in perennial cover and geographic location were significant (P < 0.01) for 4 of 5 duck (Anas spp.) species. Estimated nest success and recruitment rates for the 5 species combined during 1992-1997 were 46% and 30% higher, respectively, with CRP cover on the landscape compared to a scenario where we simulated cropland in place of CRP. Our model estimated an additional 12.4 million recruits from our study area to the fall flight as a consequence of the CRP during 1992-1997. Our results document benefits to 5 duck species in the norhtern plains associated with a farm program that provided financial incentives to landowners for planting undisturbed grass cover as an alternative to annual crops.
doi_str_mv 10.2307/3803027
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18221914</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3803027</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3803027</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c313t-1e751e28c84137a7448eef9f73ab400352577de2ae4af4e34309b60affab354e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10MtKAzEUBuAgCtYqvsIsvKym5jbNzFLqrVBQ1IK74TSetKkzk5qkgm9vaguuXJ3w8-XncAg5ZXTABVVXoqSCcrVHeqwSKuclU_ukRynneSHZ2yE5CmFJqWCsHPYIjNsV6Jg5k8UFZiPXBfRfEK3rsmfcvDF78m7uoc1SdLPWHynXfm1ji13MbPf7bzp4GSQH1tvkXVy4BpObp5pjcmCgCXiym30yvbt9HT3kk8f78eh6kmvBRMwZqoIhL3UpmVCgpCwRTWWUgJlM6xa8UOodOaAEI1FIQavZkIIxMBNFCvrkYtu78u5zjSHWrQ0amwY6dOtQs5JzVjGZ4OUWau9C8Gjqlbct-O-a0Xpzwnp3wiTPd5UQNDTGQ6dt-OOSSV4l2ydnW7cM0fl_634AhhB6Ww</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18221914</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of the Conservation Reserve Program on Duck Recruitment in the U.S. Prairie Pothole Region</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Reynolds, Ronald E. ; Shaffer, Terry L. ; Renner, Randy W. ; Newton, Wesley E. ; Bruce D. J. Batt</creator><creatorcontrib>Reynolds, Ronald E. ; Shaffer, Terry L. ; Renner, Randy W. ; Newton, Wesley E. ; Bruce D. J. Batt</creatorcontrib><description>The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA)'s Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) resulted in the conversion of about 1.9 million ha of cropland to perennial grass cover in the Prairie Pothole Region of North Dakota, South Dakota, and northeastern Montana by 1992. Many wildlife managers believed this cover would provide benefits to wildlife, including upland nesting ducks. During 1992-1995, we evaluated success of 5 duck species nesting in CRP fields and nearby Waterfowl Production Areas (WPA) throughout the region. We examined relationships between daily survival rates (DSR) of duck nests in CRP cover and landscape-level habitat and population parameters. We computed DSR of duck nests in other major cover types in our study area from data collected during 1980-1984 (pre-CRP) and 1990-1994 (CRP) periods. We then applied recruitment models to estimate duck production in our study area during peak CRP years (1992-1997) and compared these results with those that simulated the scenario in which cropland was in place of CRP cover (i.e., the CRP had not occurred). DSR were higher in all habitats combined during the CRP period compared to the pre-CRP period. Regressions of DSR in CRP cover on the percent of each study plot in perennial cover and geographic location were significant (P &lt; 0.01) for 4 of 5 duck (Anas spp.) species. Estimated nest success and recruitment rates for the 5 species combined during 1992-1997 were 46% and 30% higher, respectively, with CRP cover on the landscape compared to a scenario where we simulated cropland in place of CRP. Our model estimated an additional 12.4 million recruits from our study area to the fall flight as a consequence of the CRP during 1992-1997. Our results document benefits to 5 duck species in the norhtern plains associated with a farm program that provided financial incentives to landowners for planting undisturbed grass cover as an alternative to annual crops.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-541X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1937-2817</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/3803027</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JWMAA9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bethesda, MD: The Wildlife Society</publisher><subject>Anas ; Animal nesting ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bird nesting ; Breeding ; Conservation Reserve Program ; Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife ; Ducks ; Farmlands ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Grasses ; Habitat conservation ; Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking ; Prairies ; Wetlands ; Wildlife management</subject><ispartof>The Journal of wildlife management, 2001-10, Vol.65 (4), p.765-780</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2001 The Wildlife Society</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c313t-1e751e28c84137a7448eef9f73ab400352577de2ae4af4e34309b60affab354e3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3803027$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3803027$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=14142980$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Reynolds, Ronald E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaffer, Terry L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Renner, Randy W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newton, Wesley E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruce D. J. Batt</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of the Conservation Reserve Program on Duck Recruitment in the U.S. Prairie Pothole Region</title><title>The Journal of wildlife management</title><description>The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA)'s Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) resulted in the conversion of about 1.9 million ha of cropland to perennial grass cover in the Prairie Pothole Region of North Dakota, South Dakota, and northeastern Montana by 1992. Many wildlife managers believed this cover would provide benefits to wildlife, including upland nesting ducks. During 1992-1995, we evaluated success of 5 duck species nesting in CRP fields and nearby Waterfowl Production Areas (WPA) throughout the region. We examined relationships between daily survival rates (DSR) of duck nests in CRP cover and landscape-level habitat and population parameters. We computed DSR of duck nests in other major cover types in our study area from data collected during 1980-1984 (pre-CRP) and 1990-1994 (CRP) periods. We then applied recruitment models to estimate duck production in our study area during peak CRP years (1992-1997) and compared these results with those that simulated the scenario in which cropland was in place of CRP cover (i.e., the CRP had not occurred). DSR were higher in all habitats combined during the CRP period compared to the pre-CRP period. Regressions of DSR in CRP cover on the percent of each study plot in perennial cover and geographic location were significant (P &lt; 0.01) for 4 of 5 duck (Anas spp.) species. Estimated nest success and recruitment rates for the 5 species combined during 1992-1997 were 46% and 30% higher, respectively, with CRP cover on the landscape compared to a scenario where we simulated cropland in place of CRP. Our model estimated an additional 12.4 million recruits from our study area to the fall flight as a consequence of the CRP during 1992-1997. Our results document benefits to 5 duck species in the norhtern plains associated with a farm program that provided financial incentives to landowners for planting undisturbed grass cover as an alternative to annual crops.</description><subject>Anas</subject><subject>Animal nesting</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bird nesting</subject><subject>Breeding</subject><subject>Conservation Reserve Program</subject><subject>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</subject><subject>Ducks</subject><subject>Farmlands</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Grasses</subject><subject>Habitat conservation</subject><subject>Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking</subject><subject>Prairies</subject><subject>Wetlands</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><issn>0022-541X</issn><issn>1937-2817</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10MtKAzEUBuAgCtYqvsIsvKym5jbNzFLqrVBQ1IK74TSetKkzk5qkgm9vaguuXJ3w8-XncAg5ZXTABVVXoqSCcrVHeqwSKuclU_ukRynneSHZ2yE5CmFJqWCsHPYIjNsV6Jg5k8UFZiPXBfRfEK3rsmfcvDF78m7uoc1SdLPWHynXfm1ji13MbPf7bzp4GSQH1tvkXVy4BpObp5pjcmCgCXiym30yvbt9HT3kk8f78eh6kmvBRMwZqoIhL3UpmVCgpCwRTWWUgJlM6xa8UOodOaAEI1FIQavZkIIxMBNFCvrkYtu78u5zjSHWrQ0amwY6dOtQs5JzVjGZ4OUWau9C8Gjqlbct-O-a0Xpzwnp3wiTPd5UQNDTGQ6dt-OOSSV4l2ydnW7cM0fl_634AhhB6Ww</recordid><startdate>20011001</startdate><enddate>20011001</enddate><creator>Reynolds, Ronald E.</creator><creator>Shaffer, Terry L.</creator><creator>Renner, Randy W.</creator><creator>Newton, Wesley E.</creator><creator>Bruce D. J. Batt</creator><general>The Wildlife Society</general><general>Wildlife Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H98</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20011001</creationdate><title>Impact of the Conservation Reserve Program on Duck Recruitment in the U.S. Prairie Pothole Region</title><author>Reynolds, Ronald E. ; Shaffer, Terry L. ; Renner, Randy W. ; Newton, Wesley E. ; Bruce D. J. Batt</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c313t-1e751e28c84137a7448eef9f73ab400352577de2ae4af4e34309b60affab354e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Anas</topic><topic>Animal nesting</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bird nesting</topic><topic>Breeding</topic><topic>Conservation Reserve Program</topic><topic>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</topic><topic>Ducks</topic><topic>Farmlands</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Grasses</topic><topic>Habitat conservation</topic><topic>Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking</topic><topic>Prairies</topic><topic>Wetlands</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Reynolds, Ronald E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaffer, Terry L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Renner, Randy W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newton, Wesley E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruce D. J. Batt</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Aquaculture Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Reynolds, Ronald E.</au><au>Shaffer, Terry L.</au><au>Renner, Randy W.</au><au>Newton, Wesley E.</au><au>Bruce D. J. Batt</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of the Conservation Reserve Program on Duck Recruitment in the U.S. Prairie Pothole Region</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle><date>2001-10-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>765</spage><epage>780</epage><pages>765-780</pages><issn>0022-541X</issn><eissn>1937-2817</eissn><coden>JWMAA9</coden><abstract>The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA)'s Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) resulted in the conversion of about 1.9 million ha of cropland to perennial grass cover in the Prairie Pothole Region of North Dakota, South Dakota, and northeastern Montana by 1992. Many wildlife managers believed this cover would provide benefits to wildlife, including upland nesting ducks. During 1992-1995, we evaluated success of 5 duck species nesting in CRP fields and nearby Waterfowl Production Areas (WPA) throughout the region. We examined relationships between daily survival rates (DSR) of duck nests in CRP cover and landscape-level habitat and population parameters. We computed DSR of duck nests in other major cover types in our study area from data collected during 1980-1984 (pre-CRP) and 1990-1994 (CRP) periods. We then applied recruitment models to estimate duck production in our study area during peak CRP years (1992-1997) and compared these results with those that simulated the scenario in which cropland was in place of CRP cover (i.e., the CRP had not occurred). DSR were higher in all habitats combined during the CRP period compared to the pre-CRP period. Regressions of DSR in CRP cover on the percent of each study plot in perennial cover and geographic location were significant (P &lt; 0.01) for 4 of 5 duck (Anas spp.) species. Estimated nest success and recruitment rates for the 5 species combined during 1992-1997 were 46% and 30% higher, respectively, with CRP cover on the landscape compared to a scenario where we simulated cropland in place of CRP. Our model estimated an additional 12.4 million recruits from our study area to the fall flight as a consequence of the CRP during 1992-1997. Our results document benefits to 5 duck species in the norhtern plains associated with a farm program that provided financial incentives to landowners for planting undisturbed grass cover as an alternative to annual crops.</abstract><cop>Bethesda, MD</cop><pub>The Wildlife Society</pub><doi>10.2307/3803027</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-541X
ispartof The Journal of wildlife management, 2001-10, Vol.65 (4), p.765-780
issn 0022-541X
1937-2817
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18221914
source Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects Anas
Animal nesting
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Applied ecology
Biological and medical sciences
Bird nesting
Breeding
Conservation Reserve Program
Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife
Ducks
Farmlands
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Grasses
Habitat conservation
Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking
Prairies
Wetlands
Wildlife management
title Impact of the Conservation Reserve Program on Duck Recruitment in the U.S. Prairie Pothole Region
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T22%3A06%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20the%20Conservation%20Reserve%20Program%20on%20Duck%20Recruitment%20in%20the%20U.S.%20Prairie%20Pothole%20Region&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20wildlife%20management&rft.au=Reynolds,%20Ronald%20E.&rft.date=2001-10-01&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=765&rft.epage=780&rft.pages=765-780&rft.issn=0022-541X&rft.eissn=1937-2817&rft.coden=JWMAA9&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/3803027&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3803027%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18221914&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3803027&rfr_iscdi=true