Healing Environments: What Design Factors Really Matter According to Patients? An Exploratory Analysis

Objective: The main aim of this research was to identify the impact of design characteristics (DCs) of a patient room on self-reported patient well-being. Background: This knowledge enables the construction of healing environments focusing on DCs that maximize well-being. Six themes were identified...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:HERD 2016-10, Vol.10 (1), p.87-105
Hauptverfasser: Schreuder, Eliane, Lebesque, Layla, Bottenheft, Charelle
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 105
container_issue 1
container_start_page 87
container_title HERD
container_volume 10
creator Schreuder, Eliane
Lebesque, Layla
Bottenheft, Charelle
description Objective: The main aim of this research was to identify the impact of design characteristics (DCs) of a patient room on self-reported patient well-being. Background: This knowledge enables the construction of healing environments focusing on DCs that maximize well-being. Six themes were identified in literature that create healing environments: spatial comfort, safety and security, autonomy, sensory comfort, privacy, and social comfort. We wondered what themes and associated DCs should be prioritized if needed to maximize well-being. Method: The physical environment of patient rooms in four hospital locations was measured and patients who stayed in these rooms were asked to evaluate the room design on above mentioned themes and its contribution to their well-being. We used a machine-learning technique and regression analysis to find relations between the physical environment of a patient room and patient well-being. Results and Conclusions: We found that spatial comfort, safety and security, autonomy, and associated DCs have the strongest ability to influence patient’s self-reported well-being in a patient room. Privacy appears to have the smallest influence.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1937586716643951
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1822115057</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1937586716643951</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1822115057</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c318t-e41dfb945eb3d99552446cc1e1eff0bacfb1b4cb5d57bfd4e3e85d3d09228b7d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1Lw0AUxBdRbKzePHgSwYuX6L79zlFKtULBi55DdvdtSclHzTaC_70JrSIFT-8wv5l5DCFXQO8BtH6AjGtplAalBM8kHJGEgdKpBGDHJBnldNQn5CzGNaVKKc1OyYRpoGC4SMjlAouqbFY38-az7NqmxmYbz8lJKKqIF_s7Je9P87fZIl2-Pr_MHpep42C2KQrwwWZCouU-y6RkQijnAAFDoLZwwYIVzkovtQ1eIEcjPfc0Y8xY7fmU3O1yN1370WPc5nUZHVZV0WDbxxwMYwCSSj2gtwfouu27ZvhupEAYzpUZKLqjXNfG2GHIN11ZF91XDjQfF8sPFxss1_vg3tbofw0_Ew1AugNiscI_rf8FfgOk2XDS</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1821483368</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Healing Environments: What Design Factors Really Matter According to Patients? An Exploratory Analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Journals Online</source><creator>Schreuder, Eliane ; Lebesque, Layla ; Bottenheft, Charelle</creator><creatorcontrib>Schreuder, Eliane ; Lebesque, Layla ; Bottenheft, Charelle</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: The main aim of this research was to identify the impact of design characteristics (DCs) of a patient room on self-reported patient well-being. Background: This knowledge enables the construction of healing environments focusing on DCs that maximize well-being. Six themes were identified in literature that create healing environments: spatial comfort, safety and security, autonomy, sensory comfort, privacy, and social comfort. We wondered what themes and associated DCs should be prioritized if needed to maximize well-being. Method: The physical environment of patient rooms in four hospital locations was measured and patients who stayed in these rooms were asked to evaluate the room design on above mentioned themes and its contribution to their well-being. We used a machine-learning technique and regression analysis to find relations between the physical environment of a patient room and patient well-being. Results and Conclusions: We found that spatial comfort, safety and security, autonomy, and associated DCs have the strongest ability to influence patient’s self-reported well-being in a patient room. Privacy appears to have the smallest influence.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1937-5867</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2167-5112</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1937586716643951</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27101834</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Female ; Health Facility Environment ; Humans ; Inpatients - psychology ; Interior design ; Interior Design and Furnishings ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Netherlands ; Noise ; Patient Safety ; Patient Satisfaction ; Patients ; Patients' Rooms ; Personal Autonomy ; Privacy ; Sleep ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>HERD, 2016-10, Vol.10 (1), p.87-105</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2016</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2016.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c318t-e41dfb945eb3d99552446cc1e1eff0bacfb1b4cb5d57bfd4e3e85d3d09228b7d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1937586716643951$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1937586716643951$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27101834$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schreuder, Eliane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lebesque, Layla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bottenheft, Charelle</creatorcontrib><title>Healing Environments: What Design Factors Really Matter According to Patients? An Exploratory Analysis</title><title>HERD</title><addtitle>HERD</addtitle><description>Objective: The main aim of this research was to identify the impact of design characteristics (DCs) of a patient room on self-reported patient well-being. Background: This knowledge enables the construction of healing environments focusing on DCs that maximize well-being. Six themes were identified in literature that create healing environments: spatial comfort, safety and security, autonomy, sensory comfort, privacy, and social comfort. We wondered what themes and associated DCs should be prioritized if needed to maximize well-being. Method: The physical environment of patient rooms in four hospital locations was measured and patients who stayed in these rooms were asked to evaluate the room design on above mentioned themes and its contribution to their well-being. We used a machine-learning technique and regression analysis to find relations between the physical environment of a patient room and patient well-being. Results and Conclusions: We found that spatial comfort, safety and security, autonomy, and associated DCs have the strongest ability to influence patient’s self-reported well-being in a patient room. Privacy appears to have the smallest influence.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Facility Environment</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inpatients - psychology</subject><subject>Interior design</subject><subject>Interior Design and Furnishings</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Netherlands</subject><subject>Noise</subject><subject>Patient Safety</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Patients' Rooms</subject><subject>Personal Autonomy</subject><subject>Privacy</subject><subject>Sleep</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>1937-5867</issn><issn>2167-5112</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1Lw0AUxBdRbKzePHgSwYuX6L79zlFKtULBi55DdvdtSclHzTaC_70JrSIFT-8wv5l5DCFXQO8BtH6AjGtplAalBM8kHJGEgdKpBGDHJBnldNQn5CzGNaVKKc1OyYRpoGC4SMjlAouqbFY38-az7NqmxmYbz8lJKKqIF_s7Je9P87fZIl2-Pr_MHpep42C2KQrwwWZCouU-y6RkQijnAAFDoLZwwYIVzkovtQ1eIEcjPfc0Y8xY7fmU3O1yN1370WPc5nUZHVZV0WDbxxwMYwCSSj2gtwfouu27ZvhupEAYzpUZKLqjXNfG2GHIN11ZF91XDjQfF8sPFxss1_vg3tbofw0_Ew1AugNiscI_rf8FfgOk2XDS</recordid><startdate>201610</startdate><enddate>201610</enddate><creator>Schreuder, Eliane</creator><creator>Lebesque, Layla</creator><creator>Bottenheft, Charelle</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4S-</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201610</creationdate><title>Healing Environments</title><author>Schreuder, Eliane ; Lebesque, Layla ; Bottenheft, Charelle</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c318t-e41dfb945eb3d99552446cc1e1eff0bacfb1b4cb5d57bfd4e3e85d3d09228b7d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Facility Environment</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inpatients - psychology</topic><topic>Interior design</topic><topic>Interior Design and Furnishings</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Netherlands</topic><topic>Noise</topic><topic>Patient Safety</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Patients' Rooms</topic><topic>Personal Autonomy</topic><topic>Privacy</topic><topic>Sleep</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schreuder, Eliane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lebesque, Layla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bottenheft, Charelle</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>BPIR.com Limited</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health Management</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>HERD</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schreuder, Eliane</au><au>Lebesque, Layla</au><au>Bottenheft, Charelle</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Healing Environments: What Design Factors Really Matter According to Patients? An Exploratory Analysis</atitle><jtitle>HERD</jtitle><addtitle>HERD</addtitle><date>2016-10</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>87</spage><epage>105</epage><pages>87-105</pages><issn>1937-5867</issn><eissn>2167-5112</eissn><abstract>Objective: The main aim of this research was to identify the impact of design characteristics (DCs) of a patient room on self-reported patient well-being. Background: This knowledge enables the construction of healing environments focusing on DCs that maximize well-being. Six themes were identified in literature that create healing environments: spatial comfort, safety and security, autonomy, sensory comfort, privacy, and social comfort. We wondered what themes and associated DCs should be prioritized if needed to maximize well-being. Method: The physical environment of patient rooms in four hospital locations was measured and patients who stayed in these rooms were asked to evaluate the room design on above mentioned themes and its contribution to their well-being. We used a machine-learning technique and regression analysis to find relations between the physical environment of a patient room and patient well-being. Results and Conclusions: We found that spatial comfort, safety and security, autonomy, and associated DCs have the strongest ability to influence patient’s self-reported well-being in a patient room. Privacy appears to have the smallest influence.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>27101834</pmid><doi>10.1177/1937586716643951</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1937-5867
ispartof HERD, 2016-10, Vol.10 (1), p.87-105
issn 1937-5867
2167-5112
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1822115057
source MEDLINE; SAGE Journals Online
subjects Adult
Aged
Female
Health Facility Environment
Humans
Inpatients - psychology
Interior design
Interior Design and Furnishings
Male
Middle Aged
Netherlands
Noise
Patient Safety
Patient Satisfaction
Patients
Patients' Rooms
Personal Autonomy
Privacy
Sleep
Surveys and Questionnaires
title Healing Environments: What Design Factors Really Matter According to Patients? An Exploratory Analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T22%3A38%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Healing%20Environments:%20What%20Design%20Factors%20Really%20Matter%20According%20to%20Patients?%20An%20Exploratory%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=HERD&rft.au=Schreuder,%20Eliane&rft.date=2016-10&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=87&rft.epage=105&rft.pages=87-105&rft.issn=1937-5867&rft.eissn=2167-5112&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1937586716643951&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1822115057%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1821483368&rft_id=info:pmid/27101834&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1937586716643951&rfr_iscdi=true