Healing Environments: What Design Factors Really Matter According to Patients? An Exploratory Analysis
Objective: The main aim of this research was to identify the impact of design characteristics (DCs) of a patient room on self-reported patient well-being. Background: This knowledge enables the construction of healing environments focusing on DCs that maximize well-being. Six themes were identified...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | HERD 2016-10, Vol.10 (1), p.87-105 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 105 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 87 |
container_title | HERD |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Schreuder, Eliane Lebesque, Layla Bottenheft, Charelle |
description | Objective:
The main aim of this research was to identify the impact of design characteristics (DCs) of a patient room on self-reported patient well-being.
Background:
This knowledge enables the construction of healing environments focusing on DCs that maximize well-being. Six themes were identified in literature that create healing environments: spatial comfort, safety and security, autonomy, sensory comfort, privacy, and social comfort. We wondered what themes and associated DCs should be prioritized if needed to maximize well-being.
Method:
The physical environment of patient rooms in four hospital locations was measured and patients who stayed in these rooms were asked to evaluate the room design on above mentioned themes and its contribution to their well-being. We used a machine-learning technique and regression analysis to find relations between the physical environment of a patient room and patient well-being.
Results and Conclusions:
We found that spatial comfort, safety and security, autonomy, and associated DCs have the strongest ability to influence patient’s self-reported well-being in a patient room. Privacy appears to have the smallest influence. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1937586716643951 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1822115057</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1937586716643951</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1822115057</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c318t-e41dfb945eb3d99552446cc1e1eff0bacfb1b4cb5d57bfd4e3e85d3d09228b7d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1Lw0AUxBdRbKzePHgSwYuX6L79zlFKtULBi55DdvdtSclHzTaC_70JrSIFT-8wv5l5DCFXQO8BtH6AjGtplAalBM8kHJGEgdKpBGDHJBnldNQn5CzGNaVKKc1OyYRpoGC4SMjlAouqbFY38-az7NqmxmYbz8lJKKqIF_s7Je9P87fZIl2-Pr_MHpep42C2KQrwwWZCouU-y6RkQijnAAFDoLZwwYIVzkovtQ1eIEcjPfc0Y8xY7fmU3O1yN1370WPc5nUZHVZV0WDbxxwMYwCSSj2gtwfouu27ZvhupEAYzpUZKLqjXNfG2GHIN11ZF91XDjQfF8sPFxss1_vg3tbofw0_Ew1AugNiscI_rf8FfgOk2XDS</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1821483368</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Healing Environments: What Design Factors Really Matter According to Patients? An Exploratory Analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Journals Online</source><creator>Schreuder, Eliane ; Lebesque, Layla ; Bottenheft, Charelle</creator><creatorcontrib>Schreuder, Eliane ; Lebesque, Layla ; Bottenheft, Charelle</creatorcontrib><description>Objective:
The main aim of this research was to identify the impact of design characteristics (DCs) of a patient room on self-reported patient well-being.
Background:
This knowledge enables the construction of healing environments focusing on DCs that maximize well-being. Six themes were identified in literature that create healing environments: spatial comfort, safety and security, autonomy, sensory comfort, privacy, and social comfort. We wondered what themes and associated DCs should be prioritized if needed to maximize well-being.
Method:
The physical environment of patient rooms in four hospital locations was measured and patients who stayed in these rooms were asked to evaluate the room design on above mentioned themes and its contribution to their well-being. We used a machine-learning technique and regression analysis to find relations between the physical environment of a patient room and patient well-being.
Results and Conclusions:
We found that spatial comfort, safety and security, autonomy, and associated DCs have the strongest ability to influence patient’s self-reported well-being in a patient room. Privacy appears to have the smallest influence.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1937-5867</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2167-5112</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1937586716643951</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27101834</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Female ; Health Facility Environment ; Humans ; Inpatients - psychology ; Interior design ; Interior Design and Furnishings ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Netherlands ; Noise ; Patient Safety ; Patient Satisfaction ; Patients ; Patients' Rooms ; Personal Autonomy ; Privacy ; Sleep ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>HERD, 2016-10, Vol.10 (1), p.87-105</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2016</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2016.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c318t-e41dfb945eb3d99552446cc1e1eff0bacfb1b4cb5d57bfd4e3e85d3d09228b7d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1937586716643951$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1937586716643951$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27101834$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schreuder, Eliane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lebesque, Layla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bottenheft, Charelle</creatorcontrib><title>Healing Environments: What Design Factors Really Matter According to Patients? An Exploratory Analysis</title><title>HERD</title><addtitle>HERD</addtitle><description>Objective:
The main aim of this research was to identify the impact of design characteristics (DCs) of a patient room on self-reported patient well-being.
Background:
This knowledge enables the construction of healing environments focusing on DCs that maximize well-being. Six themes were identified in literature that create healing environments: spatial comfort, safety and security, autonomy, sensory comfort, privacy, and social comfort. We wondered what themes and associated DCs should be prioritized if needed to maximize well-being.
Method:
The physical environment of patient rooms in four hospital locations was measured and patients who stayed in these rooms were asked to evaluate the room design on above mentioned themes and its contribution to their well-being. We used a machine-learning technique and regression analysis to find relations between the physical environment of a patient room and patient well-being.
Results and Conclusions:
We found that spatial comfort, safety and security, autonomy, and associated DCs have the strongest ability to influence patient’s self-reported well-being in a patient room. Privacy appears to have the smallest influence.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Facility Environment</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inpatients - psychology</subject><subject>Interior design</subject><subject>Interior Design and Furnishings</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Netherlands</subject><subject>Noise</subject><subject>Patient Safety</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Patients' Rooms</subject><subject>Personal Autonomy</subject><subject>Privacy</subject><subject>Sleep</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>1937-5867</issn><issn>2167-5112</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1Lw0AUxBdRbKzePHgSwYuX6L79zlFKtULBi55DdvdtSclHzTaC_70JrSIFT-8wv5l5DCFXQO8BtH6AjGtplAalBM8kHJGEgdKpBGDHJBnldNQn5CzGNaVKKc1OyYRpoGC4SMjlAouqbFY38-az7NqmxmYbz8lJKKqIF_s7Je9P87fZIl2-Pr_MHpep42C2KQrwwWZCouU-y6RkQijnAAFDoLZwwYIVzkovtQ1eIEcjPfc0Y8xY7fmU3O1yN1370WPc5nUZHVZV0WDbxxwMYwCSSj2gtwfouu27ZvhupEAYzpUZKLqjXNfG2GHIN11ZF91XDjQfF8sPFxss1_vg3tbofw0_Ew1AugNiscI_rf8FfgOk2XDS</recordid><startdate>201610</startdate><enddate>201610</enddate><creator>Schreuder, Eliane</creator><creator>Lebesque, Layla</creator><creator>Bottenheft, Charelle</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4S-</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201610</creationdate><title>Healing Environments</title><author>Schreuder, Eliane ; Lebesque, Layla ; Bottenheft, Charelle</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c318t-e41dfb945eb3d99552446cc1e1eff0bacfb1b4cb5d57bfd4e3e85d3d09228b7d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Facility Environment</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inpatients - psychology</topic><topic>Interior design</topic><topic>Interior Design and Furnishings</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Netherlands</topic><topic>Noise</topic><topic>Patient Safety</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Patients' Rooms</topic><topic>Personal Autonomy</topic><topic>Privacy</topic><topic>Sleep</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schreuder, Eliane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lebesque, Layla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bottenheft, Charelle</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>BPIR.com Limited</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health Management</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>HERD</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schreuder, Eliane</au><au>Lebesque, Layla</au><au>Bottenheft, Charelle</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Healing Environments: What Design Factors Really Matter According to Patients? An Exploratory Analysis</atitle><jtitle>HERD</jtitle><addtitle>HERD</addtitle><date>2016-10</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>87</spage><epage>105</epage><pages>87-105</pages><issn>1937-5867</issn><eissn>2167-5112</eissn><abstract>Objective:
The main aim of this research was to identify the impact of design characteristics (DCs) of a patient room on self-reported patient well-being.
Background:
This knowledge enables the construction of healing environments focusing on DCs that maximize well-being. Six themes were identified in literature that create healing environments: spatial comfort, safety and security, autonomy, sensory comfort, privacy, and social comfort. We wondered what themes and associated DCs should be prioritized if needed to maximize well-being.
Method:
The physical environment of patient rooms in four hospital locations was measured and patients who stayed in these rooms were asked to evaluate the room design on above mentioned themes and its contribution to their well-being. We used a machine-learning technique and regression analysis to find relations between the physical environment of a patient room and patient well-being.
Results and Conclusions:
We found that spatial comfort, safety and security, autonomy, and associated DCs have the strongest ability to influence patient’s self-reported well-being in a patient room. Privacy appears to have the smallest influence.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>27101834</pmid><doi>10.1177/1937586716643951</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1937-5867 |
ispartof | HERD, 2016-10, Vol.10 (1), p.87-105 |
issn | 1937-5867 2167-5112 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1822115057 |
source | MEDLINE; SAGE Journals Online |
subjects | Adult Aged Female Health Facility Environment Humans Inpatients - psychology Interior design Interior Design and Furnishings Male Middle Aged Netherlands Noise Patient Safety Patient Satisfaction Patients Patients' Rooms Personal Autonomy Privacy Sleep Surveys and Questionnaires |
title | Healing Environments: What Design Factors Really Matter According to Patients? An Exploratory Analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T22%3A38%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Healing%20Environments:%20What%20Design%20Factors%20Really%20Matter%20According%20to%20Patients?%20An%20Exploratory%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=HERD&rft.au=Schreuder,%20Eliane&rft.date=2016-10&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=87&rft.epage=105&rft.pages=87-105&rft.issn=1937-5867&rft.eissn=2167-5112&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1937586716643951&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1822115057%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1821483368&rft_id=info:pmid/27101834&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1937586716643951&rfr_iscdi=true |