Inactivation of bacteriophages in water by means of non-ionizing (uv-253.7 nm) and ionizing (gamma) radiation: a comparative approach

The inactivation behaviour of the bacteriophages PHI X 174 (ssDNA virus), MS2 (ssRNA virus) and B40-8 (dsDNA) toward non-ionizing (UV-253.7 nm) as well as to ionizing radiation (gamma radiation) was studied in order to evaluate their potential as viral indicators for water disinfection by irradiatio...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Water research (Oxford) 2001-09, Vol.35 (13), p.3109-3116
Hauptverfasser: Sommer, Regina, Pribil, Walter, Appelt, Silvia, Gehringer, Peter, Eschweiler, Helmut, Leth, Hermann, Cabaj, Alexander, Haider, Thomas
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3116
container_issue 13
container_start_page 3109
container_title Water research (Oxford)
container_volume 35
creator Sommer, Regina
Pribil, Walter
Appelt, Silvia
Gehringer, Peter
Eschweiler, Helmut
Leth, Hermann
Cabaj, Alexander
Haider, Thomas
description The inactivation behaviour of the bacteriophages PHI X 174 (ssDNA virus), MS2 (ssRNA virus) and B40-8 (dsDNA) toward non-ionizing (UV-253.7 nm) as well as to ionizing radiation (gamma radiation) was studied in order to evaluate their potential as viral indicators for water disinfection by irradiation. Previous findings of the high UV-253.7 nm resistance of MS2 were confirmed whereas an unexpected high sensitivity to gamma radiation compared to the two other phages was found. On the other hand, PHI X 174 revealed an enhanced UV sensitivity but a high resistance to ionizing radiation. B40-8 had an intermediate position between the other two bacteriophages relative to both types of radiation. As expected, the data of E. coli reconfirmed the unreliability of fecal indicator bacteria for the purpose of predicting responses of viruses to water treatment. In UV disinfection the influence of water matrix may be adequately controlled by considering the UV (253.7 nm) absorption of the water whereas so far no such parameter has existed for the influence of the water quality on ionizing irradiation with respect to the scavenger concentration.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00030-6
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18213321</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0043135401000306</els_id><sourcerecordid>18213321</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-f590ab1813c76434afcd08945e23a89fa4e87e57ebec3c3bb435fea8f489035b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1v1DAQhi0EotuFnwDyAaHuIcWOncTppaoqWipV4gCcrYkz3rra2KmdXdTe-7_xfohy42BZYz8z7-gh5ANnp5zx-ssPxqQouKjkCeMLxphgRf2KzLhq2qKUUr0ms7_IETlO6T5DZSnat-SIc6kazpoZeb7xYCa3gckFT4OlXS4xujDewRITdZ7-hvxAu0c6IPi0ZXzwRcbdk_NLerLeFGUlThvqhwUF39OXryUMAyxohN7tAs4oUBOGEWIuN0hhHGMAc_eOvLGwSvj-cM_Jr6uvPy-_Fbffr28uL24Lk_edClu1DDquuDBNLYUEa3qmWllhKUC1FiSqBqsGOzTCiK6TorIIykrVMlF1Yk4-7-fm2Ic1pkkPLhlcrcBjWCfNVcmFyGdOqj1oYkgpotVjdAPER82Z3vrXO_96K1czrnf-dZ37Ph4C1t2A_UvXQXgGPh0ASAZWNoI3Lv3DlXXZiIyd7zHMNjYOo07GoTfYu4hm0n1w_9nkD1-4oco</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18213321</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Inactivation of bacteriophages in water by means of non-ionizing (uv-253.7 nm) and ionizing (gamma) radiation: a comparative approach</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Sommer, Regina ; Pribil, Walter ; Appelt, Silvia ; Gehringer, Peter ; Eschweiler, Helmut ; Leth, Hermann ; Cabaj, Alexander ; Haider, Thomas</creator><creatorcontrib>Sommer, Regina ; Pribil, Walter ; Appelt, Silvia ; Gehringer, Peter ; Eschweiler, Helmut ; Leth, Hermann ; Cabaj, Alexander ; Haider, Thomas</creatorcontrib><description>The inactivation behaviour of the bacteriophages PHI X 174 (ssDNA virus), MS2 (ssRNA virus) and B40-8 (dsDNA) toward non-ionizing (UV-253.7 nm) as well as to ionizing radiation (gamma radiation) was studied in order to evaluate their potential as viral indicators for water disinfection by irradiation. Previous findings of the high UV-253.7 nm resistance of MS2 were confirmed whereas an unexpected high sensitivity to gamma radiation compared to the two other phages was found. On the other hand, PHI X 174 revealed an enhanced UV sensitivity but a high resistance to ionizing radiation. B40-8 had an intermediate position between the other two bacteriophages relative to both types of radiation. As expected, the data of E. coli reconfirmed the unreliability of fecal indicator bacteria for the purpose of predicting responses of viruses to water treatment. In UV disinfection the influence of water matrix may be adequately controlled by considering the UV (253.7 nm) absorption of the water whereas so far no such parameter has existed for the influence of the water quality on ionizing irradiation with respect to the scavenger concentration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1354</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2448</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00030-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11487107</identifier><identifier>CODEN: WATRAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; bacteriophages ; Bacteriophages - physiology ; Bacteriophages - radiation effects ; disinfection ; Drinking water and swimming-pool water. Desalination ; Escherichia coli - radiation effects ; Escherichia coli - virology ; Exact sciences and technology ; Feces - microbiology ; Gamma Rays ; General purification processes ; inactivation ; Indicators and Reagents ; ionizing radiation ; Pollution ; Radiation Dosage ; Radiation Tolerance - radiation effects ; Ultraviolet Rays ; UV radiation ; Wastewaters ; water ; Water Microbiology - standards ; Water Purification - methods ; Water Purification - standards ; Water treatment and pollution</subject><ispartof>Water research (Oxford), 2001-09, Vol.35 (13), p.3109-3116</ispartof><rights>2001 Elsevier Science Ltd</rights><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-f590ab1813c76434afcd08945e23a89fa4e87e57ebec3c3bb435fea8f489035b3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0043135401000306$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1126273$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11487107$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sommer, Regina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pribil, Walter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Appelt, Silvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gehringer, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eschweiler, Helmut</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leth, Hermann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cabaj, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haider, Thomas</creatorcontrib><title>Inactivation of bacteriophages in water by means of non-ionizing (uv-253.7 nm) and ionizing (gamma) radiation: a comparative approach</title><title>Water research (Oxford)</title><addtitle>Water Res</addtitle><description>The inactivation behaviour of the bacteriophages PHI X 174 (ssDNA virus), MS2 (ssRNA virus) and B40-8 (dsDNA) toward non-ionizing (UV-253.7 nm) as well as to ionizing radiation (gamma radiation) was studied in order to evaluate their potential as viral indicators for water disinfection by irradiation. Previous findings of the high UV-253.7 nm resistance of MS2 were confirmed whereas an unexpected high sensitivity to gamma radiation compared to the two other phages was found. On the other hand, PHI X 174 revealed an enhanced UV sensitivity but a high resistance to ionizing radiation. B40-8 had an intermediate position between the other two bacteriophages relative to both types of radiation. As expected, the data of E. coli reconfirmed the unreliability of fecal indicator bacteria for the purpose of predicting responses of viruses to water treatment. In UV disinfection the influence of water matrix may be adequately controlled by considering the UV (253.7 nm) absorption of the water whereas so far no such parameter has existed for the influence of the water quality on ionizing irradiation with respect to the scavenger concentration.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>bacteriophages</subject><subject>Bacteriophages - physiology</subject><subject>Bacteriophages - radiation effects</subject><subject>disinfection</subject><subject>Drinking water and swimming-pool water. Desalination</subject><subject>Escherichia coli - radiation effects</subject><subject>Escherichia coli - virology</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Feces - microbiology</subject><subject>Gamma Rays</subject><subject>General purification processes</subject><subject>inactivation</subject><subject>Indicators and Reagents</subject><subject>ionizing radiation</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Radiation Dosage</subject><subject>Radiation Tolerance - radiation effects</subject><subject>Ultraviolet Rays</subject><subject>UV radiation</subject><subject>Wastewaters</subject><subject>water</subject><subject>Water Microbiology - standards</subject><subject>Water Purification - methods</subject><subject>Water Purification - standards</subject><subject>Water treatment and pollution</subject><issn>0043-1354</issn><issn>1879-2448</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1v1DAQhi0EotuFnwDyAaHuIcWOncTppaoqWipV4gCcrYkz3rra2KmdXdTe-7_xfohy42BZYz8z7-gh5ANnp5zx-ssPxqQouKjkCeMLxphgRf2KzLhq2qKUUr0ms7_IETlO6T5DZSnat-SIc6kazpoZeb7xYCa3gckFT4OlXS4xujDewRITdZ7-hvxAu0c6IPi0ZXzwRcbdk_NLerLeFGUlThvqhwUF39OXryUMAyxohN7tAs4oUBOGEWIuN0hhHGMAc_eOvLGwSvj-cM_Jr6uvPy-_Fbffr28uL24Lk_edClu1DDquuDBNLYUEa3qmWllhKUC1FiSqBqsGOzTCiK6TorIIykrVMlF1Yk4-7-fm2Ic1pkkPLhlcrcBjWCfNVcmFyGdOqj1oYkgpotVjdAPER82Z3vrXO_96K1czrnf-dZ37Ph4C1t2A_UvXQXgGPh0ASAZWNoI3Lv3DlXXZiIyd7zHMNjYOo07GoTfYu4hm0n1w_9nkD1-4oco</recordid><startdate>20010901</startdate><enddate>20010901</enddate><creator>Sommer, Regina</creator><creator>Pribil, Walter</creator><creator>Appelt, Silvia</creator><creator>Gehringer, Peter</creator><creator>Eschweiler, Helmut</creator><creator>Leth, Hermann</creator><creator>Cabaj, Alexander</creator><creator>Haider, Thomas</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010901</creationdate><title>Inactivation of bacteriophages in water by means of non-ionizing (uv-253.7 nm) and ionizing (gamma) radiation: a comparative approach</title><author>Sommer, Regina ; Pribil, Walter ; Appelt, Silvia ; Gehringer, Peter ; Eschweiler, Helmut ; Leth, Hermann ; Cabaj, Alexander ; Haider, Thomas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-f590ab1813c76434afcd08945e23a89fa4e87e57ebec3c3bb435fea8f489035b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>bacteriophages</topic><topic>Bacteriophages - physiology</topic><topic>Bacteriophages - radiation effects</topic><topic>disinfection</topic><topic>Drinking water and swimming-pool water. Desalination</topic><topic>Escherichia coli - radiation effects</topic><topic>Escherichia coli - virology</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Feces - microbiology</topic><topic>Gamma Rays</topic><topic>General purification processes</topic><topic>inactivation</topic><topic>Indicators and Reagents</topic><topic>ionizing radiation</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Radiation Dosage</topic><topic>Radiation Tolerance - radiation effects</topic><topic>Ultraviolet Rays</topic><topic>UV radiation</topic><topic>Wastewaters</topic><topic>water</topic><topic>Water Microbiology - standards</topic><topic>Water Purification - methods</topic><topic>Water Purification - standards</topic><topic>Water treatment and pollution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sommer, Regina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pribil, Walter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Appelt, Silvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gehringer, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eschweiler, Helmut</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leth, Hermann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cabaj, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haider, Thomas</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Water research (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sommer, Regina</au><au>Pribil, Walter</au><au>Appelt, Silvia</au><au>Gehringer, Peter</au><au>Eschweiler, Helmut</au><au>Leth, Hermann</au><au>Cabaj, Alexander</au><au>Haider, Thomas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Inactivation of bacteriophages in water by means of non-ionizing (uv-253.7 nm) and ionizing (gamma) radiation: a comparative approach</atitle><jtitle>Water research (Oxford)</jtitle><addtitle>Water Res</addtitle><date>2001-09-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>13</issue><spage>3109</spage><epage>3116</epage><pages>3109-3116</pages><issn>0043-1354</issn><eissn>1879-2448</eissn><coden>WATRAG</coden><abstract>The inactivation behaviour of the bacteriophages PHI X 174 (ssDNA virus), MS2 (ssRNA virus) and B40-8 (dsDNA) toward non-ionizing (UV-253.7 nm) as well as to ionizing radiation (gamma radiation) was studied in order to evaluate their potential as viral indicators for water disinfection by irradiation. Previous findings of the high UV-253.7 nm resistance of MS2 were confirmed whereas an unexpected high sensitivity to gamma radiation compared to the two other phages was found. On the other hand, PHI X 174 revealed an enhanced UV sensitivity but a high resistance to ionizing radiation. B40-8 had an intermediate position between the other two bacteriophages relative to both types of radiation. As expected, the data of E. coli reconfirmed the unreliability of fecal indicator bacteria for the purpose of predicting responses of viruses to water treatment. In UV disinfection the influence of water matrix may be adequately controlled by considering the UV (253.7 nm) absorption of the water whereas so far no such parameter has existed for the influence of the water quality on ionizing irradiation with respect to the scavenger concentration.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>11487107</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00030-6</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0043-1354
ispartof Water research (Oxford), 2001-09, Vol.35 (13), p.3109-3116
issn 0043-1354
1879-2448
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18213321
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Applied sciences
bacteriophages
Bacteriophages - physiology
Bacteriophages - radiation effects
disinfection
Drinking water and swimming-pool water. Desalination
Escherichia coli - radiation effects
Escherichia coli - virology
Exact sciences and technology
Feces - microbiology
Gamma Rays
General purification processes
inactivation
Indicators and Reagents
ionizing radiation
Pollution
Radiation Dosage
Radiation Tolerance - radiation effects
Ultraviolet Rays
UV radiation
Wastewaters
water
Water Microbiology - standards
Water Purification - methods
Water Purification - standards
Water treatment and pollution
title Inactivation of bacteriophages in water by means of non-ionizing (uv-253.7 nm) and ionizing (gamma) radiation: a comparative approach
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T17%3A40%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Inactivation%20of%20bacteriophages%20in%20water%20by%20means%20of%20non-ionizing%20(uv-253.7%20nm)%20and%20ionizing%20(gamma)%20radiation:%20a%20comparative%20approach&rft.jtitle=Water%20research%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Sommer,%20Regina&rft.date=2001-09-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=13&rft.spage=3109&rft.epage=3116&rft.pages=3109-3116&rft.issn=0043-1354&rft.eissn=1879-2448&rft.coden=WATRAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00030-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E18213321%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18213321&rft_id=info:pmid/11487107&rft_els_id=S0043135401000306&rfr_iscdi=true