Inactivation of bacteriophages in water by means of non-ionizing (uv-253.7 nm) and ionizing (gamma) radiation: a comparative approach
The inactivation behaviour of the bacteriophages PHI X 174 (ssDNA virus), MS2 (ssRNA virus) and B40-8 (dsDNA) toward non-ionizing (UV-253.7 nm) as well as to ionizing radiation (gamma radiation) was studied in order to evaluate their potential as viral indicators for water disinfection by irradiatio...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Water research (Oxford) 2001-09, Vol.35 (13), p.3109-3116 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3116 |
---|---|
container_issue | 13 |
container_start_page | 3109 |
container_title | Water research (Oxford) |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | Sommer, Regina Pribil, Walter Appelt, Silvia Gehringer, Peter Eschweiler, Helmut Leth, Hermann Cabaj, Alexander Haider, Thomas |
description | The inactivation behaviour of the bacteriophages PHI X 174 (ssDNA virus), MS2 (ssRNA virus) and B40-8 (dsDNA) toward non-ionizing (UV-253.7
nm) as well as to ionizing radiation (gamma radiation) was studied in order to evaluate their potential as viral indicators for water disinfection by irradiation. Previous findings of the high UV-253.7
nm resistance of MS2 were confirmed whereas an unexpected high sensitivity to gamma radiation compared to the two other phages was found. On the other hand, PHI X 174 revealed an enhanced UV sensitivity but a high resistance to ionizing radiation. B40-8 had an intermediate position between the other two bacteriophages relative to both types of radiation. As expected, the data of
E. coli reconfirmed the unreliability of fecal indicator bacteria for the purpose of predicting responses of viruses to water treatment. In UV disinfection the influence of water matrix may be adequately controlled by considering the UV (253.7
nm) absorption of the water whereas so far no such parameter has existed for the influence of the water quality on ionizing irradiation with respect to the scavenger concentration. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00030-6 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18213321</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0043135401000306</els_id><sourcerecordid>18213321</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-f590ab1813c76434afcd08945e23a89fa4e87e57ebec3c3bb435fea8f489035b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1v1DAQhi0EotuFnwDyAaHuIcWOncTppaoqWipV4gCcrYkz3rra2KmdXdTe-7_xfohy42BZYz8z7-gh5ANnp5zx-ssPxqQouKjkCeMLxphgRf2KzLhq2qKUUr0ms7_IETlO6T5DZSnat-SIc6kazpoZeb7xYCa3gckFT4OlXS4xujDewRITdZ7-hvxAu0c6IPi0ZXzwRcbdk_NLerLeFGUlThvqhwUF39OXryUMAyxohN7tAs4oUBOGEWIuN0hhHGMAc_eOvLGwSvj-cM_Jr6uvPy-_Fbffr28uL24Lk_edClu1DDquuDBNLYUEa3qmWllhKUC1FiSqBqsGOzTCiK6TorIIykrVMlF1Yk4-7-fm2Ic1pkkPLhlcrcBjWCfNVcmFyGdOqj1oYkgpotVjdAPER82Z3vrXO_96K1czrnf-dZ37Ph4C1t2A_UvXQXgGPh0ASAZWNoI3Lv3DlXXZiIyd7zHMNjYOo07GoTfYu4hm0n1w_9nkD1-4oco</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18213321</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Inactivation of bacteriophages in water by means of non-ionizing (uv-253.7 nm) and ionizing (gamma) radiation: a comparative approach</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Sommer, Regina ; Pribil, Walter ; Appelt, Silvia ; Gehringer, Peter ; Eschweiler, Helmut ; Leth, Hermann ; Cabaj, Alexander ; Haider, Thomas</creator><creatorcontrib>Sommer, Regina ; Pribil, Walter ; Appelt, Silvia ; Gehringer, Peter ; Eschweiler, Helmut ; Leth, Hermann ; Cabaj, Alexander ; Haider, Thomas</creatorcontrib><description>The inactivation behaviour of the bacteriophages PHI X 174 (ssDNA virus), MS2 (ssRNA virus) and B40-8 (dsDNA) toward non-ionizing (UV-253.7
nm) as well as to ionizing radiation (gamma radiation) was studied in order to evaluate their potential as viral indicators for water disinfection by irradiation. Previous findings of the high UV-253.7
nm resistance of MS2 were confirmed whereas an unexpected high sensitivity to gamma radiation compared to the two other phages was found. On the other hand, PHI X 174 revealed an enhanced UV sensitivity but a high resistance to ionizing radiation. B40-8 had an intermediate position between the other two bacteriophages relative to both types of radiation. As expected, the data of
E. coli reconfirmed the unreliability of fecal indicator bacteria for the purpose of predicting responses of viruses to water treatment. In UV disinfection the influence of water matrix may be adequately controlled by considering the UV (253.7
nm) absorption of the water whereas so far no such parameter has existed for the influence of the water quality on ionizing irradiation with respect to the scavenger concentration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1354</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2448</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00030-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11487107</identifier><identifier>CODEN: WATRAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; bacteriophages ; Bacteriophages - physiology ; Bacteriophages - radiation effects ; disinfection ; Drinking water and swimming-pool water. Desalination ; Escherichia coli - radiation effects ; Escherichia coli - virology ; Exact sciences and technology ; Feces - microbiology ; Gamma Rays ; General purification processes ; inactivation ; Indicators and Reagents ; ionizing radiation ; Pollution ; Radiation Dosage ; Radiation Tolerance - radiation effects ; Ultraviolet Rays ; UV radiation ; Wastewaters ; water ; Water Microbiology - standards ; Water Purification - methods ; Water Purification - standards ; Water treatment and pollution</subject><ispartof>Water research (Oxford), 2001-09, Vol.35 (13), p.3109-3116</ispartof><rights>2001 Elsevier Science Ltd</rights><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-f590ab1813c76434afcd08945e23a89fa4e87e57ebec3c3bb435fea8f489035b3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0043135401000306$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1126273$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11487107$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sommer, Regina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pribil, Walter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Appelt, Silvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gehringer, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eschweiler, Helmut</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leth, Hermann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cabaj, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haider, Thomas</creatorcontrib><title>Inactivation of bacteriophages in water by means of non-ionizing (uv-253.7 nm) and ionizing (gamma) radiation: a comparative approach</title><title>Water research (Oxford)</title><addtitle>Water Res</addtitle><description>The inactivation behaviour of the bacteriophages PHI X 174 (ssDNA virus), MS2 (ssRNA virus) and B40-8 (dsDNA) toward non-ionizing (UV-253.7
nm) as well as to ionizing radiation (gamma radiation) was studied in order to evaluate their potential as viral indicators for water disinfection by irradiation. Previous findings of the high UV-253.7
nm resistance of MS2 were confirmed whereas an unexpected high sensitivity to gamma radiation compared to the two other phages was found. On the other hand, PHI X 174 revealed an enhanced UV sensitivity but a high resistance to ionizing radiation. B40-8 had an intermediate position between the other two bacteriophages relative to both types of radiation. As expected, the data of
E. coli reconfirmed the unreliability of fecal indicator bacteria for the purpose of predicting responses of viruses to water treatment. In UV disinfection the influence of water matrix may be adequately controlled by considering the UV (253.7
nm) absorption of the water whereas so far no such parameter has existed for the influence of the water quality on ionizing irradiation with respect to the scavenger concentration.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>bacteriophages</subject><subject>Bacteriophages - physiology</subject><subject>Bacteriophages - radiation effects</subject><subject>disinfection</subject><subject>Drinking water and swimming-pool water. Desalination</subject><subject>Escherichia coli - radiation effects</subject><subject>Escherichia coli - virology</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Feces - microbiology</subject><subject>Gamma Rays</subject><subject>General purification processes</subject><subject>inactivation</subject><subject>Indicators and Reagents</subject><subject>ionizing radiation</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Radiation Dosage</subject><subject>Radiation Tolerance - radiation effects</subject><subject>Ultraviolet Rays</subject><subject>UV radiation</subject><subject>Wastewaters</subject><subject>water</subject><subject>Water Microbiology - standards</subject><subject>Water Purification - methods</subject><subject>Water Purification - standards</subject><subject>Water treatment and pollution</subject><issn>0043-1354</issn><issn>1879-2448</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1v1DAQhi0EotuFnwDyAaHuIcWOncTppaoqWipV4gCcrYkz3rra2KmdXdTe-7_xfohy42BZYz8z7-gh5ANnp5zx-ssPxqQouKjkCeMLxphgRf2KzLhq2qKUUr0ms7_IETlO6T5DZSnat-SIc6kazpoZeb7xYCa3gckFT4OlXS4xujDewRITdZ7-hvxAu0c6IPi0ZXzwRcbdk_NLerLeFGUlThvqhwUF39OXryUMAyxohN7tAs4oUBOGEWIuN0hhHGMAc_eOvLGwSvj-cM_Jr6uvPy-_Fbffr28uL24Lk_edClu1DDquuDBNLYUEa3qmWllhKUC1FiSqBqsGOzTCiK6TorIIykrVMlF1Yk4-7-fm2Ic1pkkPLhlcrcBjWCfNVcmFyGdOqj1oYkgpotVjdAPER82Z3vrXO_96K1czrnf-dZ37Ph4C1t2A_UvXQXgGPh0ASAZWNoI3Lv3DlXXZiIyd7zHMNjYOo07GoTfYu4hm0n1w_9nkD1-4oco</recordid><startdate>20010901</startdate><enddate>20010901</enddate><creator>Sommer, Regina</creator><creator>Pribil, Walter</creator><creator>Appelt, Silvia</creator><creator>Gehringer, Peter</creator><creator>Eschweiler, Helmut</creator><creator>Leth, Hermann</creator><creator>Cabaj, Alexander</creator><creator>Haider, Thomas</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010901</creationdate><title>Inactivation of bacteriophages in water by means of non-ionizing (uv-253.7 nm) and ionizing (gamma) radiation: a comparative approach</title><author>Sommer, Regina ; Pribil, Walter ; Appelt, Silvia ; Gehringer, Peter ; Eschweiler, Helmut ; Leth, Hermann ; Cabaj, Alexander ; Haider, Thomas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-f590ab1813c76434afcd08945e23a89fa4e87e57ebec3c3bb435fea8f489035b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>bacteriophages</topic><topic>Bacteriophages - physiology</topic><topic>Bacteriophages - radiation effects</topic><topic>disinfection</topic><topic>Drinking water and swimming-pool water. Desalination</topic><topic>Escherichia coli - radiation effects</topic><topic>Escherichia coli - virology</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Feces - microbiology</topic><topic>Gamma Rays</topic><topic>General purification processes</topic><topic>inactivation</topic><topic>Indicators and Reagents</topic><topic>ionizing radiation</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Radiation Dosage</topic><topic>Radiation Tolerance - radiation effects</topic><topic>Ultraviolet Rays</topic><topic>UV radiation</topic><topic>Wastewaters</topic><topic>water</topic><topic>Water Microbiology - standards</topic><topic>Water Purification - methods</topic><topic>Water Purification - standards</topic><topic>Water treatment and pollution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sommer, Regina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pribil, Walter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Appelt, Silvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gehringer, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eschweiler, Helmut</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leth, Hermann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cabaj, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haider, Thomas</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Water research (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sommer, Regina</au><au>Pribil, Walter</au><au>Appelt, Silvia</au><au>Gehringer, Peter</au><au>Eschweiler, Helmut</au><au>Leth, Hermann</au><au>Cabaj, Alexander</au><au>Haider, Thomas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Inactivation of bacteriophages in water by means of non-ionizing (uv-253.7 nm) and ionizing (gamma) radiation: a comparative approach</atitle><jtitle>Water research (Oxford)</jtitle><addtitle>Water Res</addtitle><date>2001-09-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>13</issue><spage>3109</spage><epage>3116</epage><pages>3109-3116</pages><issn>0043-1354</issn><eissn>1879-2448</eissn><coden>WATRAG</coden><abstract>The inactivation behaviour of the bacteriophages PHI X 174 (ssDNA virus), MS2 (ssRNA virus) and B40-8 (dsDNA) toward non-ionizing (UV-253.7
nm) as well as to ionizing radiation (gamma radiation) was studied in order to evaluate their potential as viral indicators for water disinfection by irradiation. Previous findings of the high UV-253.7
nm resistance of MS2 were confirmed whereas an unexpected high sensitivity to gamma radiation compared to the two other phages was found. On the other hand, PHI X 174 revealed an enhanced UV sensitivity but a high resistance to ionizing radiation. B40-8 had an intermediate position between the other two bacteriophages relative to both types of radiation. As expected, the data of
E. coli reconfirmed the unreliability of fecal indicator bacteria for the purpose of predicting responses of viruses to water treatment. In UV disinfection the influence of water matrix may be adequately controlled by considering the UV (253.7
nm) absorption of the water whereas so far no such parameter has existed for the influence of the water quality on ionizing irradiation with respect to the scavenger concentration.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>11487107</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00030-6</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0043-1354 |
ispartof | Water research (Oxford), 2001-09, Vol.35 (13), p.3109-3116 |
issn | 0043-1354 1879-2448 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18213321 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Applied sciences bacteriophages Bacteriophages - physiology Bacteriophages - radiation effects disinfection Drinking water and swimming-pool water. Desalination Escherichia coli - radiation effects Escherichia coli - virology Exact sciences and technology Feces - microbiology Gamma Rays General purification processes inactivation Indicators and Reagents ionizing radiation Pollution Radiation Dosage Radiation Tolerance - radiation effects Ultraviolet Rays UV radiation Wastewaters water Water Microbiology - standards Water Purification - methods Water Purification - standards Water treatment and pollution |
title | Inactivation of bacteriophages in water by means of non-ionizing (uv-253.7 nm) and ionizing (gamma) radiation: a comparative approach |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T17%3A40%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Inactivation%20of%20bacteriophages%20in%20water%20by%20means%20of%20non-ionizing%20(uv-253.7%20nm)%20and%20ionizing%20(gamma)%20radiation:%20a%20comparative%20approach&rft.jtitle=Water%20research%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Sommer,%20Regina&rft.date=2001-09-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=13&rft.spage=3109&rft.epage=3116&rft.pages=3109-3116&rft.issn=0043-1354&rft.eissn=1879-2448&rft.coden=WATRAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00030-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E18213321%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18213321&rft_id=info:pmid/11487107&rft_els_id=S0043135401000306&rfr_iscdi=true |