Hormaphis hamamelidis and gall size: a test of the plant vigor hypothesis [Hamamelis virginiana]

We tested the Plant Vigor Hypothesis by determining the distribution of galls formed on leaves of witch hazel, Hamamelis virginiana, by the aphid Hormaphis hamamelidis, and by determining various factors that affect the fecundity of the gall-forming fundatrices. We also studied the role of the funda...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Oikos 2001-10, Vol.95 (1), p.94-104
Hauptverfasser: Rehill, Brian J., Schultz, Jack C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 104
container_issue 1
container_start_page 94
container_title Oikos
container_volume 95
creator Rehill, Brian J.
Schultz, Jack C.
description We tested the Plant Vigor Hypothesis by determining the distribution of galls formed on leaves of witch hazel, Hamamelis virginiana, by the aphid Hormaphis hamamelidis, and by determining various factors that affect the fecundity of the gall-forming fundatrices. We also studied the role of the fundatrix in host plant manipulation. While the mean number of galls per leaf was low, galls had an aggregated distribution among leaves. Among trees, the average number of galls per leaf was not related to the mean leaf size, contrary to the preference prediction of the Plant Vigor Hypothesis. While fundatrices preferred the distal leaves of buds, which grew more than the proximal leaves, being on distal leaves conferred no increase in fecundity for fundatrices, contrary to predictions of the Plant Vigor Hypothesis. Gall size was the factor that explained the largest proportion of variation in fundatrix fecundity; fundatrix size explained somewhat less of the variation. Also, gall position on the leaf, number of aphid galls on the leaf, and on which leaf of the bud the gall was located all played small, statistically significant roles in explaining fundatrix fecundity, but their effects were variable between experiments. Removal of fundatrices shortly after galls had enclosed them limited the growth of galls, indicating the role of the fundatrices in gall growth. We compare and contrast this system versus other gall-forming insects, as well as discuss the adaptive significance of the aphid manipulation of the host plant. Much of the data contradict predictions of the Plant Vigor Hypothesis, and we discuss how gall size, as a measure of plant growth caused by insect manipulation, explains the observed patterns.
doi_str_mv 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2001.950111.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18212337</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3547352</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3547352</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5241-aa01f0acbbcbabe3c2857a5ef371eb1d1602c6abed3f3b49b83d9273f622f3f33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUMFu1DAQjRCVWFr-ACRzgFvC2E7iDSegC91qC72AqISQmST2rrdJHOwUdvn6OspquVay5NG8N2_evCh6SSGhwNM324TmADEIyBMGQJMiA0ppsnsUzY7I42gGwCGmrCieRE-93wKAECKdRb-W1rXYb4wnG2yxVY2pQ41dTdbYNMSbf-otQTIoPxCrybBRpG-wG8gfs7aObPa9DT0fZn4sDwI-YG5tOoMd_jyLTjQ2Xj07_KfRt08fv54v46vri8vz91dxlbGUxohANWBVllWJpeIVm2cCM6W5oKqkdbiFVXlAaq55mRblnNcFE1znjOnQ4qfR60m3d_b3XXArW-Mr1QSvyt55SeeMMs5FIBYTsXLWe6e07J1p0e0lBTlmKrdyTE6OyckxUzllKndh9tVhCfoKG-2wq4z_L5DSjNFiHnjvJt5f06j9wxfI68vVVAeJ55PE1g_WHSV4lgqesQDHE2z8oHZHGN2tzAUXmfz-5ULeLD4vbharD3J09GLia7QS1y64XqzG3eEVKfB7twitNA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18212337</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Hormaphis hamamelidis and gall size: a test of the plant vigor hypothesis [Hamamelis virginiana]</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Rehill, Brian J. ; Schultz, Jack C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rehill, Brian J. ; Schultz, Jack C.</creatorcontrib><description>We tested the Plant Vigor Hypothesis by determining the distribution of galls formed on leaves of witch hazel, Hamamelis virginiana, by the aphid Hormaphis hamamelidis, and by determining various factors that affect the fecundity of the gall-forming fundatrices. We also studied the role of the fundatrix in host plant manipulation. While the mean number of galls per leaf was low, galls had an aggregated distribution among leaves. Among trees, the average number of galls per leaf was not related to the mean leaf size, contrary to the preference prediction of the Plant Vigor Hypothesis. While fundatrices preferred the distal leaves of buds, which grew more than the proximal leaves, being on distal leaves conferred no increase in fecundity for fundatrices, contrary to predictions of the Plant Vigor Hypothesis. Gall size was the factor that explained the largest proportion of variation in fundatrix fecundity; fundatrix size explained somewhat less of the variation. Also, gall position on the leaf, number of aphid galls on the leaf, and on which leaf of the bud the gall was located all played small, statistically significant roles in explaining fundatrix fecundity, but their effects were variable between experiments. Removal of fundatrices shortly after galls had enclosed them limited the growth of galls, indicating the role of the fundatrices in gall growth. We compare and contrast this system versus other gall-forming insects, as well as discuss the adaptive significance of the aphid manipulation of the host plant. Much of the data contradict predictions of the Plant Vigor Hypothesis, and we discuss how gall size, as a measure of plant growth caused by insect manipulation, explains the observed patterns.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0030-1299</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0706</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2001.950111.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: OIKSAA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Copenhagen: Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><subject>AGALLAS ; Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Aphididae ; APHIDOIDEA ; Autoecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Fecundity ; FEUILLE ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; GALLE ; HAMAMELIS ; Hamamelis virginiana ; Herbivores ; HOJAS ; Homoptera ; Hormaphis hamamelidis ; Host plants ; Leaf area ; Leaf buds ; LEAVES ; PENNSYLVANIA ; PENNSYLVANIE ; Phytophagous insects ; Plant gall ; PLANT GALLS ; Plants ; Plants and fungi ; Trees</subject><ispartof>Oikos, 2001-10, Vol.95 (1), p.94-104</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2001 Oikos</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5241-aa01f0acbbcbabe3c2857a5ef371eb1d1602c6abed3f3b49b83d9273f622f3f33</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3547352$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3547352$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,800,1412,27905,27906,45555,45556,57998,58231</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=14152198$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rehill, Brian J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schultz, Jack C.</creatorcontrib><title>Hormaphis hamamelidis and gall size: a test of the plant vigor hypothesis [Hamamelis virginiana]</title><title>Oikos</title><addtitle>Oikos</addtitle><description>We tested the Plant Vigor Hypothesis by determining the distribution of galls formed on leaves of witch hazel, Hamamelis virginiana, by the aphid Hormaphis hamamelidis, and by determining various factors that affect the fecundity of the gall-forming fundatrices. We also studied the role of the fundatrix in host plant manipulation. While the mean number of galls per leaf was low, galls had an aggregated distribution among leaves. Among trees, the average number of galls per leaf was not related to the mean leaf size, contrary to the preference prediction of the Plant Vigor Hypothesis. While fundatrices preferred the distal leaves of buds, which grew more than the proximal leaves, being on distal leaves conferred no increase in fecundity for fundatrices, contrary to predictions of the Plant Vigor Hypothesis. Gall size was the factor that explained the largest proportion of variation in fundatrix fecundity; fundatrix size explained somewhat less of the variation. Also, gall position on the leaf, number of aphid galls on the leaf, and on which leaf of the bud the gall was located all played small, statistically significant roles in explaining fundatrix fecundity, but their effects were variable between experiments. Removal of fundatrices shortly after galls had enclosed them limited the growth of galls, indicating the role of the fundatrices in gall growth. We compare and contrast this system versus other gall-forming insects, as well as discuss the adaptive significance of the aphid manipulation of the host plant. Much of the data contradict predictions of the Plant Vigor Hypothesis, and we discuss how gall size, as a measure of plant growth caused by insect manipulation, explains the observed patterns.</description><subject>AGALLAS</subject><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Aphididae</subject><subject>APHIDOIDEA</subject><subject>Autoecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Fecundity</subject><subject>FEUILLE</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>GALLE</subject><subject>HAMAMELIS</subject><subject>Hamamelis virginiana</subject><subject>Herbivores</subject><subject>HOJAS</subject><subject>Homoptera</subject><subject>Hormaphis hamamelidis</subject><subject>Host plants</subject><subject>Leaf area</subject><subject>Leaf buds</subject><subject>LEAVES</subject><subject>PENNSYLVANIA</subject><subject>PENNSYLVANIE</subject><subject>Phytophagous insects</subject><subject>Plant gall</subject><subject>PLANT GALLS</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Plants and fungi</subject><subject>Trees</subject><issn>0030-1299</issn><issn>1600-0706</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNUMFu1DAQjRCVWFr-ACRzgFvC2E7iDSegC91qC72AqISQmST2rrdJHOwUdvn6OspquVay5NG8N2_evCh6SSGhwNM324TmADEIyBMGQJMiA0ppsnsUzY7I42gGwCGmrCieRE-93wKAECKdRb-W1rXYb4wnG2yxVY2pQ41dTdbYNMSbf-otQTIoPxCrybBRpG-wG8gfs7aObPa9DT0fZn4sDwI-YG5tOoMd_jyLTjQ2Xj07_KfRt08fv54v46vri8vz91dxlbGUxohANWBVllWJpeIVm2cCM6W5oKqkdbiFVXlAaq55mRblnNcFE1znjOnQ4qfR60m3d_b3XXArW-Mr1QSvyt55SeeMMs5FIBYTsXLWe6e07J1p0e0lBTlmKrdyTE6OyckxUzllKndh9tVhCfoKG-2wq4z_L5DSjNFiHnjvJt5f06j9wxfI68vVVAeJ55PE1g_WHSV4lgqesQDHE2z8oHZHGN2tzAUXmfz-5ULeLD4vbharD3J09GLia7QS1y64XqzG3eEVKfB7twitNA</recordid><startdate>200110</startdate><enddate>200110</enddate><creator>Rehill, Brian J.</creator><creator>Schultz, Jack C.</creator><general>Munksgaard International Publishers</general><general>Munksgaard International Publishers, Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200110</creationdate><title>Hormaphis hamamelidis and gall size: a test of the plant vigor hypothesis [Hamamelis virginiana]</title><author>Rehill, Brian J. ; Schultz, Jack C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5241-aa01f0acbbcbabe3c2857a5ef371eb1d1602c6abed3f3b49b83d9273f622f3f33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>AGALLAS</topic><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Aphididae</topic><topic>APHIDOIDEA</topic><topic>Autoecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Fecundity</topic><topic>FEUILLE</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>GALLE</topic><topic>HAMAMELIS</topic><topic>Hamamelis virginiana</topic><topic>Herbivores</topic><topic>HOJAS</topic><topic>Homoptera</topic><topic>Hormaphis hamamelidis</topic><topic>Host plants</topic><topic>Leaf area</topic><topic>Leaf buds</topic><topic>LEAVES</topic><topic>PENNSYLVANIA</topic><topic>PENNSYLVANIE</topic><topic>Phytophagous insects</topic><topic>Plant gall</topic><topic>PLANT GALLS</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Plants and fungi</topic><topic>Trees</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rehill, Brian J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schultz, Jack C.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Oikos</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rehill, Brian J.</au><au>Schultz, Jack C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Hormaphis hamamelidis and gall size: a test of the plant vigor hypothesis [Hamamelis virginiana]</atitle><jtitle>Oikos</jtitle><addtitle>Oikos</addtitle><date>2001-10</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>95</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>94</spage><epage>104</epage><pages>94-104</pages><issn>0030-1299</issn><eissn>1600-0706</eissn><coden>OIKSAA</coden><abstract>We tested the Plant Vigor Hypothesis by determining the distribution of galls formed on leaves of witch hazel, Hamamelis virginiana, by the aphid Hormaphis hamamelidis, and by determining various factors that affect the fecundity of the gall-forming fundatrices. We also studied the role of the fundatrix in host plant manipulation. While the mean number of galls per leaf was low, galls had an aggregated distribution among leaves. Among trees, the average number of galls per leaf was not related to the mean leaf size, contrary to the preference prediction of the Plant Vigor Hypothesis. While fundatrices preferred the distal leaves of buds, which grew more than the proximal leaves, being on distal leaves conferred no increase in fecundity for fundatrices, contrary to predictions of the Plant Vigor Hypothesis. Gall size was the factor that explained the largest proportion of variation in fundatrix fecundity; fundatrix size explained somewhat less of the variation. Also, gall position on the leaf, number of aphid galls on the leaf, and on which leaf of the bud the gall was located all played small, statistically significant roles in explaining fundatrix fecundity, but their effects were variable between experiments. Removal of fundatrices shortly after galls had enclosed them limited the growth of galls, indicating the role of the fundatrices in gall growth. We compare and contrast this system versus other gall-forming insects, as well as discuss the adaptive significance of the aphid manipulation of the host plant. Much of the data contradict predictions of the Plant Vigor Hypothesis, and we discuss how gall size, as a measure of plant growth caused by insect manipulation, explains the observed patterns.</abstract><cop>Copenhagen</cop><pub>Munksgaard International Publishers</pub><doi>10.1034/j.1600-0706.2001.950111.x</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0030-1299
ispartof Oikos, 2001-10, Vol.95 (1), p.94-104
issn 0030-1299
1600-0706
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18212337
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects AGALLAS
Animal and plant ecology
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Aphididae
APHIDOIDEA
Autoecology
Biological and medical sciences
Fecundity
FEUILLE
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
GALLE
HAMAMELIS
Hamamelis virginiana
Herbivores
HOJAS
Homoptera
Hormaphis hamamelidis
Host plants
Leaf area
Leaf buds
LEAVES
PENNSYLVANIA
PENNSYLVANIE
Phytophagous insects
Plant gall
PLANT GALLS
Plants
Plants and fungi
Trees
title Hormaphis hamamelidis and gall size: a test of the plant vigor hypothesis [Hamamelis virginiana]
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T11%3A33%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Hormaphis%20hamamelidis%20and%20gall%20size:%20a%20test%20of%20the%20plant%20vigor%20hypothesis%20%5BHamamelis%20virginiana%5D&rft.jtitle=Oikos&rft.au=Rehill,%20Brian%20J.&rft.date=2001-10&rft.volume=95&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=94&rft.epage=104&rft.pages=94-104&rft.issn=0030-1299&rft.eissn=1600-0706&rft.coden=OIKSAA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1034/j.1600-0706.2001.950111.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3547352%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18212337&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3547352&rfr_iscdi=true