Chemical and ruminal in vitro evaluation of Canadian canola meals produced over 4 years

To test the effects of year and processing plant on the nutritional value of canola meal (CM), 3 CM samples/yr were collected from each of 12 Canadian production plants over 4yr (total=144). Samples of CM were analyzed for differences in chemical composition and for in vitro ruminal protein degradab...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of dairy science 2016-10, Vol.99 (10), p.7956-7970
Hauptverfasser: Broderick, Glen A, Colombini, Stefania, Costa, Sara, Karsli, Mehmet A, Faciola, Antonio P
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 7970
container_issue 10
container_start_page 7956
container_title Journal of dairy science
container_volume 99
creator Broderick, Glen A
Colombini, Stefania
Costa, Sara
Karsli, Mehmet A
Faciola, Antonio P
description To test the effects of year and processing plant on the nutritional value of canola meal (CM), 3 CM samples/yr were collected from each of 12 Canadian production plants over 4yr (total=144). Samples of CM were analyzed for differences in chemical composition and for in vitro ruminal protein degradability using the Michaelis-Menten inhibitor in vitro (MMIIV) method. In the MMIIV method, protein degradation rate (kd) was estimated by 2 methods: from net release (i.e., blank corrected) of (1) ammonia plus AA determined by o-phthaldialdehyde fluorescence (OPAF) assay or (2) ammonia, AA, plus oligopeptides determined by o-phthaldialdehyde absorbance (OPAA) assay; rumen-undegradable protein (RUP) was computed assuming passage rates of 0.16 and 0.06/h for, respectively, soluble and insoluble protein. Casein, solvent soybean meal (SSBM), and expeller soybean meal (ESBM) were included in all incubations as standard proteins. Differences among years and plants were assessed using the mixed procedures of SAS. Small but significant differences were found in CM among years for chemical composition, including N solubility; some of these differences may have been related to changes in our analytical methods over time. However, adjustment of degradation activity of individual in vitro incubations based on the mean degradation activity over all incubations yielded kd and RUP that did not differ by year using either assay. Simultaneously incubating CM samples from 2yr in the same in vitro runs confirmed that no year effects existed for kd or RUP. Differences existed in chemical composition of CM among the 12 processing plants over the 4yr of sample collection. Moreover, consistent differences in kd and RUP were observed among plants: kd ranged from 0.069 to 0.113/h (OPAA assay) and 0.075 to 0.120/h (OPAF assay), and RUP estimates ranged from 51 to 43% (OPAA assay) and 49 to 41% (OPAF assay). Regression of kd on insoluble N content of CM yielded correlation coefficients (R(2))=0.40 (OPAA assay) and 0.42 (OPAF assay), and regressions of kd on NDIN and N-fraction B3 yielded R(2)
doi_str_mv 10.3168/jds.2016-11000
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1821098590</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1821098590</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-eb52bb816700f6dbbd28ca7a85b41ed3eaf953e401d5892da0f828489fd7314b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE1PwzAMhiMEYmNw5Yhy5NLhJE2bHlHFlzSJC4hj5DSpyNSmI1kn7d_TMeBkW378ynoIuWawFKxQd2ublhxYkTEGACdkziSXmWCVOiVzAM4zEMBn5CKl9TQyDvKczHhZiIoBn5OP-tP1vsGOYrA0jr0PU-8D3fltHKjbYTfi1g-BDi2tMaD1GGiDYeiQ9g67RDdxsGPjLB12LtKc7h3GdEnO2mnprn7rgrw_PrzVz9nq9emlvl9ljRBymzkjuTGKFSVAW1hjLFcNlqikyZmzwmFbSeFyYFaqiluEVnGVq6q1pWC5EQtye8ydvvgaXdrq3qfGdR0GN4xJM8UZVEpWMKHLI9rEIaXoWr2Jvse41wz0QaaeZOqDTP0jczq4-c0eTe_sP_5nT3wDs1Zvyg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1821098590</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Chemical and ruminal in vitro evaluation of Canadian canola meals produced over 4 years</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Broderick, Glen A ; Colombini, Stefania ; Costa, Sara ; Karsli, Mehmet A ; Faciola, Antonio P</creator><creatorcontrib>Broderick, Glen A ; Colombini, Stefania ; Costa, Sara ; Karsli, Mehmet A ; Faciola, Antonio P</creatorcontrib><description>To test the effects of year and processing plant on the nutritional value of canola meal (CM), 3 CM samples/yr were collected from each of 12 Canadian production plants over 4yr (total=144). Samples of CM were analyzed for differences in chemical composition and for in vitro ruminal protein degradability using the Michaelis-Menten inhibitor in vitro (MMIIV) method. In the MMIIV method, protein degradation rate (kd) was estimated by 2 methods: from net release (i.e., blank corrected) of (1) ammonia plus AA determined by o-phthaldialdehyde fluorescence (OPAF) assay or (2) ammonia, AA, plus oligopeptides determined by o-phthaldialdehyde absorbance (OPAA) assay; rumen-undegradable protein (RUP) was computed assuming passage rates of 0.16 and 0.06/h for, respectively, soluble and insoluble protein. Casein, solvent soybean meal (SSBM), and expeller soybean meal (ESBM) were included in all incubations as standard proteins. Differences among years and plants were assessed using the mixed procedures of SAS. Small but significant differences were found in CM among years for chemical composition, including N solubility; some of these differences may have been related to changes in our analytical methods over time. However, adjustment of degradation activity of individual in vitro incubations based on the mean degradation activity over all incubations yielded kd and RUP that did not differ by year using either assay. Simultaneously incubating CM samples from 2yr in the same in vitro runs confirmed that no year effects existed for kd or RUP. Differences existed in chemical composition of CM among the 12 processing plants over the 4yr of sample collection. Moreover, consistent differences in kd and RUP were observed among plants: kd ranged from 0.069 to 0.113/h (OPAA assay) and 0.075 to 0.120/h (OPAF assay), and RUP estimates ranged from 51 to 43% (OPAA assay) and 49 to 41% (OPAF assay). Regression of kd on insoluble N content of CM yielded correlation coefficients (R(2))=0.40 (OPAA assay) and 0.42 (OPAF assay), and regressions of kd on NDIN and N-fraction B3 yielded R(2)&lt;0.02. Mean estimates from both OPAA and OPAF assays for casein, SSBM, ESBM, and CM were, respectively, kd=0.764, 0.161, 0.050, and 0.093/h and RUP=18, 33, 56, and 45%. A range of 8 percentage units from lowest to highest RUP suggests that substantial differences exist in metabolizable protein content of CM produced by different processing plants.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0302</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3198</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3168/jds.2016-11000</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27639102</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Animal Feed ; Animals ; Brassica napus - metabolism ; Canada ; Dietary Proteins - metabolism ; Digestion ; Glycine max - metabolism ; Nitrogen - metabolism ; Rumen - metabolism</subject><ispartof>Journal of dairy science, 2016-10, Vol.99 (10), p.7956-7970</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2016 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-eb52bb816700f6dbbd28ca7a85b41ed3eaf953e401d5892da0f828489fd7314b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-eb52bb816700f6dbbd28ca7a85b41ed3eaf953e401d5892da0f828489fd7314b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27639102$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Broderick, Glen A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colombini, Stefania</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costa, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karsli, Mehmet A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faciola, Antonio P</creatorcontrib><title>Chemical and ruminal in vitro evaluation of Canadian canola meals produced over 4 years</title><title>Journal of dairy science</title><addtitle>J Dairy Sci</addtitle><description>To test the effects of year and processing plant on the nutritional value of canola meal (CM), 3 CM samples/yr were collected from each of 12 Canadian production plants over 4yr (total=144). Samples of CM were analyzed for differences in chemical composition and for in vitro ruminal protein degradability using the Michaelis-Menten inhibitor in vitro (MMIIV) method. In the MMIIV method, protein degradation rate (kd) was estimated by 2 methods: from net release (i.e., blank corrected) of (1) ammonia plus AA determined by o-phthaldialdehyde fluorescence (OPAF) assay or (2) ammonia, AA, plus oligopeptides determined by o-phthaldialdehyde absorbance (OPAA) assay; rumen-undegradable protein (RUP) was computed assuming passage rates of 0.16 and 0.06/h for, respectively, soluble and insoluble protein. Casein, solvent soybean meal (SSBM), and expeller soybean meal (ESBM) were included in all incubations as standard proteins. Differences among years and plants were assessed using the mixed procedures of SAS. Small but significant differences were found in CM among years for chemical composition, including N solubility; some of these differences may have been related to changes in our analytical methods over time. However, adjustment of degradation activity of individual in vitro incubations based on the mean degradation activity over all incubations yielded kd and RUP that did not differ by year using either assay. Simultaneously incubating CM samples from 2yr in the same in vitro runs confirmed that no year effects existed for kd or RUP. Differences existed in chemical composition of CM among the 12 processing plants over the 4yr of sample collection. Moreover, consistent differences in kd and RUP were observed among plants: kd ranged from 0.069 to 0.113/h (OPAA assay) and 0.075 to 0.120/h (OPAF assay), and RUP estimates ranged from 51 to 43% (OPAA assay) and 49 to 41% (OPAF assay). Regression of kd on insoluble N content of CM yielded correlation coefficients (R(2))=0.40 (OPAA assay) and 0.42 (OPAF assay), and regressions of kd on NDIN and N-fraction B3 yielded R(2)&lt;0.02. Mean estimates from both OPAA and OPAF assays for casein, SSBM, ESBM, and CM were, respectively, kd=0.764, 0.161, 0.050, and 0.093/h and RUP=18, 33, 56, and 45%. A range of 8 percentage units from lowest to highest RUP suggests that substantial differences exist in metabolizable protein content of CM produced by different processing plants.</description><subject>Animal Feed</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Brassica napus - metabolism</subject><subject>Canada</subject><subject>Dietary Proteins - metabolism</subject><subject>Digestion</subject><subject>Glycine max - metabolism</subject><subject>Nitrogen - metabolism</subject><subject>Rumen - metabolism</subject><issn>0022-0302</issn><issn>1525-3198</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kE1PwzAMhiMEYmNw5Yhy5NLhJE2bHlHFlzSJC4hj5DSpyNSmI1kn7d_TMeBkW378ynoIuWawFKxQd2ublhxYkTEGACdkziSXmWCVOiVzAM4zEMBn5CKl9TQyDvKczHhZiIoBn5OP-tP1vsGOYrA0jr0PU-8D3fltHKjbYTfi1g-BDi2tMaD1GGiDYeiQ9g67RDdxsGPjLB12LtKc7h3GdEnO2mnprn7rgrw_PrzVz9nq9emlvl9ljRBymzkjuTGKFSVAW1hjLFcNlqikyZmzwmFbSeFyYFaqiluEVnGVq6q1pWC5EQtye8ydvvgaXdrq3qfGdR0GN4xJM8UZVEpWMKHLI9rEIaXoWr2Jvse41wz0QaaeZOqDTP0jczq4-c0eTe_sP_5nT3wDs1Zvyg</recordid><startdate>201610</startdate><enddate>201610</enddate><creator>Broderick, Glen A</creator><creator>Colombini, Stefania</creator><creator>Costa, Sara</creator><creator>Karsli, Mehmet A</creator><creator>Faciola, Antonio P</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201610</creationdate><title>Chemical and ruminal in vitro evaluation of Canadian canola meals produced over 4 years</title><author>Broderick, Glen A ; Colombini, Stefania ; Costa, Sara ; Karsli, Mehmet A ; Faciola, Antonio P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-eb52bb816700f6dbbd28ca7a85b41ed3eaf953e401d5892da0f828489fd7314b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Animal Feed</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Brassica napus - metabolism</topic><topic>Canada</topic><topic>Dietary Proteins - metabolism</topic><topic>Digestion</topic><topic>Glycine max - metabolism</topic><topic>Nitrogen - metabolism</topic><topic>Rumen - metabolism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Broderick, Glen A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colombini, Stefania</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costa, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karsli, Mehmet A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faciola, Antonio P</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of dairy science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Broderick, Glen A</au><au>Colombini, Stefania</au><au>Costa, Sara</au><au>Karsli, Mehmet A</au><au>Faciola, Antonio P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Chemical and ruminal in vitro evaluation of Canadian canola meals produced over 4 years</atitle><jtitle>Journal of dairy science</jtitle><addtitle>J Dairy Sci</addtitle><date>2016-10</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>99</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>7956</spage><epage>7970</epage><pages>7956-7970</pages><issn>0022-0302</issn><eissn>1525-3198</eissn><abstract>To test the effects of year and processing plant on the nutritional value of canola meal (CM), 3 CM samples/yr were collected from each of 12 Canadian production plants over 4yr (total=144). Samples of CM were analyzed for differences in chemical composition and for in vitro ruminal protein degradability using the Michaelis-Menten inhibitor in vitro (MMIIV) method. In the MMIIV method, protein degradation rate (kd) was estimated by 2 methods: from net release (i.e., blank corrected) of (1) ammonia plus AA determined by o-phthaldialdehyde fluorescence (OPAF) assay or (2) ammonia, AA, plus oligopeptides determined by o-phthaldialdehyde absorbance (OPAA) assay; rumen-undegradable protein (RUP) was computed assuming passage rates of 0.16 and 0.06/h for, respectively, soluble and insoluble protein. Casein, solvent soybean meal (SSBM), and expeller soybean meal (ESBM) were included in all incubations as standard proteins. Differences among years and plants were assessed using the mixed procedures of SAS. Small but significant differences were found in CM among years for chemical composition, including N solubility; some of these differences may have been related to changes in our analytical methods over time. However, adjustment of degradation activity of individual in vitro incubations based on the mean degradation activity over all incubations yielded kd and RUP that did not differ by year using either assay. Simultaneously incubating CM samples from 2yr in the same in vitro runs confirmed that no year effects existed for kd or RUP. Differences existed in chemical composition of CM among the 12 processing plants over the 4yr of sample collection. Moreover, consistent differences in kd and RUP were observed among plants: kd ranged from 0.069 to 0.113/h (OPAA assay) and 0.075 to 0.120/h (OPAF assay), and RUP estimates ranged from 51 to 43% (OPAA assay) and 49 to 41% (OPAF assay). Regression of kd on insoluble N content of CM yielded correlation coefficients (R(2))=0.40 (OPAA assay) and 0.42 (OPAF assay), and regressions of kd on NDIN and N-fraction B3 yielded R(2)&lt;0.02. Mean estimates from both OPAA and OPAF assays for casein, SSBM, ESBM, and CM were, respectively, kd=0.764, 0.161, 0.050, and 0.093/h and RUP=18, 33, 56, and 45%. A range of 8 percentage units from lowest to highest RUP suggests that substantial differences exist in metabolizable protein content of CM produced by different processing plants.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>27639102</pmid><doi>10.3168/jds.2016-11000</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-0302
ispartof Journal of dairy science, 2016-10, Vol.99 (10), p.7956-7970
issn 0022-0302
1525-3198
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1821098590
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Animal Feed
Animals
Brassica napus - metabolism
Canada
Dietary Proteins - metabolism
Digestion
Glycine max - metabolism
Nitrogen - metabolism
Rumen - metabolism
title Chemical and ruminal in vitro evaluation of Canadian canola meals produced over 4 years
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T10%3A04%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Chemical%20and%20ruminal%20in%20vitro%20evaluation%20of%20Canadian%20canola%20meals%20produced%20over%204%20years&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20dairy%20science&rft.au=Broderick,%20Glen%20A&rft.date=2016-10&rft.volume=99&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=7956&rft.epage=7970&rft.pages=7956-7970&rft.issn=0022-0302&rft.eissn=1525-3198&rft_id=info:doi/10.3168/jds.2016-11000&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1821098590%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1821098590&rft_id=info:pmid/27639102&rfr_iscdi=true