Economic Analysis of Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson Disease: Systematic Review of the Literature
Parkinson disease (PD) is a chronic multifaceted neurodegenerative disorder of adult onset that affects quality of life and places a burden on patients, caregivers, and society. In early disease, dopaminergic therapy improves motor symptoms, but as the disease progresses, symptoms tend to increase i...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | World neurosurgery 2016-09, Vol.93, p.44-49 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 49 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 44 |
container_title | World neurosurgery |
container_volume | 93 |
creator | Becerra, Jaime Eduardo Zorro, Oscar Ruiz-Gaviria, Rafael Castañeda-Cardona, Camilo Otálora-Esteban, Margarita Henao, Sara Navarrete, Sergio Acevedo, Juan Carlos Rosselli, Diego |
description | Parkinson disease (PD) is a chronic multifaceted neurodegenerative disorder of adult onset that affects quality of life and places a burden on patients, caregivers, and society. In early disease, dopaminergic therapy improves motor symptoms, but as the disease progresses, symptoms tend to increase in frequency and severity, even with best medical treatment (BMT). Deep brain stimulation (DBS) becomes an option for certain patients, but cost becomes an important issue.
We performed a systematic review of the literature of economic studies of the use of DBS in patients with PD, including costs studies or economic evaluations expressed as cost per improvement in quality life, decrease in dose of pharmacological treatments, and the decrease of caregiver burden.
We reviewed the following databases: Medline/PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, LILACS, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform ICTRP portal and ClinicalTrials.gov from 1980 to 2015. Costs have been converted or adjusted to 2016 US dollars (US$).
Nine studies were identified. The average cost of DBS for a patient with PD in 5 years is US$186,244. The quality-adjusted life year was higher in DBS compared with BMT after at least 2 years of treatment, with an average incremental cost utility ratio of US$41,932 per additional quality-adjusted life year gained. Costs in the first year are higher with DBS because of direct costs related to the surgical procedure, the device, and the more frequent controls. Studies show better results with a longer time horizon (up to 5 years).
DBS is a cost-effective intervention for patients with advanced PD, but it has a high initial cost compared with BMT. However, DBS reduces pharmacologic treatment costs and should also reduce direct, indirect, and social costs of PD on the long term. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.05.028 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1820603192</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1878875016303023</els_id><sourcerecordid>1820603192</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-1d0e281f4e00cf421719ec5b431f29e80da301c017dde15518b753404ea0adf33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1v2zAMhoWhwxJk_QM7DDr2EpeULVsedkm_tgEBVrTbWVBkGlXqj1SSW-TfV0G6HscLSeDhC_Bh7AtChoDl-TZ7GWjKRJozkBkI9YHNUVVqqaqyPnmfJczYaQhbSJVjoar8E5uJSmBZCzlndG3HYeyd5avBdPvgAh9bfkW04xfeuIHfR9dPnYluHHhab41_dENIy5ULZAJ94_f7EKlPhOV39Ozo5ZAQH4ivXSRv4uTpM_vYmi7Q6VtfsL83138ufy7Xv3_8ulytlzaXZVxiAyQUtgUB2LYQWGFNVm6KHFtRk4LG5IAWsGoaQilRbSqZF1CQAdO0eb5gZ8fcnR-fJgpR9y5Y6joz0DgFjUpAmTTUIqHiiFo_huCp1TvveuP3GkEfDOutPhjWB8MapE6G09HXt_xp01PzfvLPZwK-HwFKXyYXXgfraLDUOE826mZ0_8t_BR56jK0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1820603192</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Economic Analysis of Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson Disease: Systematic Review of the Literature</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Becerra, Jaime Eduardo ; Zorro, Oscar ; Ruiz-Gaviria, Rafael ; Castañeda-Cardona, Camilo ; Otálora-Esteban, Margarita ; Henao, Sara ; Navarrete, Sergio ; Acevedo, Juan Carlos ; Rosselli, Diego</creator><creatorcontrib>Becerra, Jaime Eduardo ; Zorro, Oscar ; Ruiz-Gaviria, Rafael ; Castañeda-Cardona, Camilo ; Otálora-Esteban, Margarita ; Henao, Sara ; Navarrete, Sergio ; Acevedo, Juan Carlos ; Rosselli, Diego</creatorcontrib><description>Parkinson disease (PD) is a chronic multifaceted neurodegenerative disorder of adult onset that affects quality of life and places a burden on patients, caregivers, and society. In early disease, dopaminergic therapy improves motor symptoms, but as the disease progresses, symptoms tend to increase in frequency and severity, even with best medical treatment (BMT). Deep brain stimulation (DBS) becomes an option for certain patients, but cost becomes an important issue.
We performed a systematic review of the literature of economic studies of the use of DBS in patients with PD, including costs studies or economic evaluations expressed as cost per improvement in quality life, decrease in dose of pharmacological treatments, and the decrease of caregiver burden.
We reviewed the following databases: Medline/PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, LILACS, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform ICTRP portal and ClinicalTrials.gov from 1980 to 2015. Costs have been converted or adjusted to 2016 US dollars (US$).
Nine studies were identified. The average cost of DBS for a patient with PD in 5 years is US$186,244. The quality-adjusted life year was higher in DBS compared with BMT after at least 2 years of treatment, with an average incremental cost utility ratio of US$41,932 per additional quality-adjusted life year gained. Costs in the first year are higher with DBS because of direct costs related to the surgical procedure, the device, and the more frequent controls. Studies show better results with a longer time horizon (up to 5 years).
DBS is a cost-effective intervention for patients with advanced PD, but it has a high initial cost compared with BMT. However, DBS reduces pharmacologic treatment costs and should also reduce direct, indirect, and social costs of PD on the long term.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1878-8750</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-8769</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.05.028</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27216925</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Antiparkinson Agents - economics ; Antiparkinson Agents - therapeutic use ; Caregivers - economics ; Caregivers - utilization ; Combined Modality Therapy - economics ; Combined Modality Therapy - utilization ; Cost of Illness ; Cost-Benefit Analysis - economics ; Cost-Benefit Analysis - statistics & numerical data ; Cost-effectiveness analysis ; Deep brain stimulation ; Deep Brain Stimulation - economics ; Deep Brain Stimulation - utilization ; Economic analysis ; Health Care Costs - statistics & numerical data ; Humans ; Internationality ; Parkinson disease ; Parkinson Disease - economics ; Parkinson Disease - mortality ; Parkinson Disease - therapy ; Prevalence ; Quality of Life ; Survival Rate ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>World neurosurgery, 2016-09, Vol.93, p.44-49</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-1d0e281f4e00cf421719ec5b431f29e80da301c017dde15518b753404ea0adf33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-1d0e281f4e00cf421719ec5b431f29e80da301c017dde15518b753404ea0adf33</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0960-9480</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2016.05.028$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27929,27930,46000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27216925$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Becerra, Jaime Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zorro, Oscar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruiz-Gaviria, Rafael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castañeda-Cardona, Camilo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Otálora-Esteban, Margarita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henao, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Navarrete, Sergio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Acevedo, Juan Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosselli, Diego</creatorcontrib><title>Economic Analysis of Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson Disease: Systematic Review of the Literature</title><title>World neurosurgery</title><addtitle>World Neurosurg</addtitle><description>Parkinson disease (PD) is a chronic multifaceted neurodegenerative disorder of adult onset that affects quality of life and places a burden on patients, caregivers, and society. In early disease, dopaminergic therapy improves motor symptoms, but as the disease progresses, symptoms tend to increase in frequency and severity, even with best medical treatment (BMT). Deep brain stimulation (DBS) becomes an option for certain patients, but cost becomes an important issue.
We performed a systematic review of the literature of economic studies of the use of DBS in patients with PD, including costs studies or economic evaluations expressed as cost per improvement in quality life, decrease in dose of pharmacological treatments, and the decrease of caregiver burden.
We reviewed the following databases: Medline/PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, LILACS, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform ICTRP portal and ClinicalTrials.gov from 1980 to 2015. Costs have been converted or adjusted to 2016 US dollars (US$).
Nine studies were identified. The average cost of DBS for a patient with PD in 5 years is US$186,244. The quality-adjusted life year was higher in DBS compared with BMT after at least 2 years of treatment, with an average incremental cost utility ratio of US$41,932 per additional quality-adjusted life year gained. Costs in the first year are higher with DBS because of direct costs related to the surgical procedure, the device, and the more frequent controls. Studies show better results with a longer time horizon (up to 5 years).
DBS is a cost-effective intervention for patients with advanced PD, but it has a high initial cost compared with BMT. However, DBS reduces pharmacologic treatment costs and should also reduce direct, indirect, and social costs of PD on the long term.</description><subject>Antiparkinson Agents - economics</subject><subject>Antiparkinson Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Caregivers - economics</subject><subject>Caregivers - utilization</subject><subject>Combined Modality Therapy - economics</subject><subject>Combined Modality Therapy - utilization</subject><subject>Cost of Illness</subject><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis - economics</subject><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Cost-effectiveness analysis</subject><subject>Deep brain stimulation</subject><subject>Deep Brain Stimulation - economics</subject><subject>Deep Brain Stimulation - utilization</subject><subject>Economic analysis</subject><subject>Health Care Costs - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internationality</subject><subject>Parkinson disease</subject><subject>Parkinson Disease - economics</subject><subject>Parkinson Disease - mortality</subject><subject>Parkinson Disease - therapy</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1878-8750</issn><issn>1878-8769</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1v2zAMhoWhwxJk_QM7DDr2EpeULVsedkm_tgEBVrTbWVBkGlXqj1SSW-TfV0G6HscLSeDhC_Bh7AtChoDl-TZ7GWjKRJozkBkI9YHNUVVqqaqyPnmfJczYaQhbSJVjoar8E5uJSmBZCzlndG3HYeyd5avBdPvgAh9bfkW04xfeuIHfR9dPnYluHHhab41_dENIy5ULZAJ94_f7EKlPhOV39Ozo5ZAQH4ivXSRv4uTpM_vYmi7Q6VtfsL83138ufy7Xv3_8ulytlzaXZVxiAyQUtgUB2LYQWGFNVm6KHFtRk4LG5IAWsGoaQilRbSqZF1CQAdO0eb5gZ8fcnR-fJgpR9y5Y6joz0DgFjUpAmTTUIqHiiFo_huCp1TvveuP3GkEfDOutPhjWB8MapE6G09HXt_xp01PzfvLPZwK-HwFKXyYXXgfraLDUOE826mZ0_8t_BR56jK0</recordid><startdate>201609</startdate><enddate>201609</enddate><creator>Becerra, Jaime Eduardo</creator><creator>Zorro, Oscar</creator><creator>Ruiz-Gaviria, Rafael</creator><creator>Castañeda-Cardona, Camilo</creator><creator>Otálora-Esteban, Margarita</creator><creator>Henao, Sara</creator><creator>Navarrete, Sergio</creator><creator>Acevedo, Juan Carlos</creator><creator>Rosselli, Diego</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0960-9480</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201609</creationdate><title>Economic Analysis of Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson Disease: Systematic Review of the Literature</title><author>Becerra, Jaime Eduardo ; Zorro, Oscar ; Ruiz-Gaviria, Rafael ; Castañeda-Cardona, Camilo ; Otálora-Esteban, Margarita ; Henao, Sara ; Navarrete, Sergio ; Acevedo, Juan Carlos ; Rosselli, Diego</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-1d0e281f4e00cf421719ec5b431f29e80da301c017dde15518b753404ea0adf33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Antiparkinson Agents - economics</topic><topic>Antiparkinson Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Caregivers - economics</topic><topic>Caregivers - utilization</topic><topic>Combined Modality Therapy - economics</topic><topic>Combined Modality Therapy - utilization</topic><topic>Cost of Illness</topic><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis - economics</topic><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Cost-effectiveness analysis</topic><topic>Deep brain stimulation</topic><topic>Deep Brain Stimulation - economics</topic><topic>Deep Brain Stimulation - utilization</topic><topic>Economic analysis</topic><topic>Health Care Costs - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internationality</topic><topic>Parkinson disease</topic><topic>Parkinson Disease - economics</topic><topic>Parkinson Disease - mortality</topic><topic>Parkinson Disease - therapy</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Becerra, Jaime Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zorro, Oscar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruiz-Gaviria, Rafael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castañeda-Cardona, Camilo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Otálora-Esteban, Margarita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henao, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Navarrete, Sergio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Acevedo, Juan Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosselli, Diego</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>World neurosurgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Becerra, Jaime Eduardo</au><au>Zorro, Oscar</au><au>Ruiz-Gaviria, Rafael</au><au>Castañeda-Cardona, Camilo</au><au>Otálora-Esteban, Margarita</au><au>Henao, Sara</au><au>Navarrete, Sergio</au><au>Acevedo, Juan Carlos</au><au>Rosselli, Diego</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Economic Analysis of Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson Disease: Systematic Review of the Literature</atitle><jtitle>World neurosurgery</jtitle><addtitle>World Neurosurg</addtitle><date>2016-09</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>93</volume><spage>44</spage><epage>49</epage><pages>44-49</pages><issn>1878-8750</issn><eissn>1878-8769</eissn><abstract>Parkinson disease (PD) is a chronic multifaceted neurodegenerative disorder of adult onset that affects quality of life and places a burden on patients, caregivers, and society. In early disease, dopaminergic therapy improves motor symptoms, but as the disease progresses, symptoms tend to increase in frequency and severity, even with best medical treatment (BMT). Deep brain stimulation (DBS) becomes an option for certain patients, but cost becomes an important issue.
We performed a systematic review of the literature of economic studies of the use of DBS in patients with PD, including costs studies or economic evaluations expressed as cost per improvement in quality life, decrease in dose of pharmacological treatments, and the decrease of caregiver burden.
We reviewed the following databases: Medline/PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, LILACS, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform ICTRP portal and ClinicalTrials.gov from 1980 to 2015. Costs have been converted or adjusted to 2016 US dollars (US$).
Nine studies were identified. The average cost of DBS for a patient with PD in 5 years is US$186,244. The quality-adjusted life year was higher in DBS compared with BMT after at least 2 years of treatment, with an average incremental cost utility ratio of US$41,932 per additional quality-adjusted life year gained. Costs in the first year are higher with DBS because of direct costs related to the surgical procedure, the device, and the more frequent controls. Studies show better results with a longer time horizon (up to 5 years).
DBS is a cost-effective intervention for patients with advanced PD, but it has a high initial cost compared with BMT. However, DBS reduces pharmacologic treatment costs and should also reduce direct, indirect, and social costs of PD on the long term.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>27216925</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.wneu.2016.05.028</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0960-9480</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1878-8750 |
ispartof | World neurosurgery, 2016-09, Vol.93, p.44-49 |
issn | 1878-8750 1878-8769 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1820603192 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Antiparkinson Agents - economics Antiparkinson Agents - therapeutic use Caregivers - economics Caregivers - utilization Combined Modality Therapy - economics Combined Modality Therapy - utilization Cost of Illness Cost-Benefit Analysis - economics Cost-Benefit Analysis - statistics & numerical data Cost-effectiveness analysis Deep brain stimulation Deep Brain Stimulation - economics Deep Brain Stimulation - utilization Economic analysis Health Care Costs - statistics & numerical data Humans Internationality Parkinson disease Parkinson Disease - economics Parkinson Disease - mortality Parkinson Disease - therapy Prevalence Quality of Life Survival Rate Treatment Outcome |
title | Economic Analysis of Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson Disease: Systematic Review of the Literature |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T00%3A07%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Economic%20Analysis%20of%20Deep%20Brain%20Stimulation%20in%20Parkinson%20Disease:%20Systematic%20Review%20of%20the%20Literature&rft.jtitle=World%20neurosurgery&rft.au=Becerra,%20Jaime%20Eduardo&rft.date=2016-09&rft.volume=93&rft.spage=44&rft.epage=49&rft.pages=44-49&rft.issn=1878-8750&rft.eissn=1878-8769&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.wneu.2016.05.028&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1820603192%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1820603192&rft_id=info:pmid/27216925&rft_els_id=S1878875016303023&rfr_iscdi=true |