Microbial Inhibitors for U.S. EPA Drinking Water Methods for the Determination of Organic Compounds

Preservation of chemical analytes in drinking water samples is necessary to obtain accurate information concerning contaminant occurrence. Sample preservation to prevent biodegradation is important for most samples and analytes. With the unique demands of environmental methods, it is not always poss...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental science & technology 2001-10, Vol.35 (20), p.4103-4110
Hauptverfasser: Winslow, Stephen D, Pepich, Barry V, Bassett, Margarita V, Wendelken, Steven C, Munch, David J, Sinclair, James L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 4110
container_issue 20
container_start_page 4103
container_title Environmental science & technology
container_volume 35
creator Winslow, Stephen D
Pepich, Barry V
Bassett, Margarita V
Wendelken, Steven C
Munch, David J
Sinclair, James L
description Preservation of chemical analytes in drinking water samples is necessary to obtain accurate information concerning contaminant occurrence. Sample preservation to prevent biodegradation is important for most samples and analytes. With the unique demands of environmental methods, it is not always possible to kill all microorganisms without having undesirable effects. To find a suitable preservative, the sample, analysis, and preservation needs should be considered. During method development of U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Methods 526 (for unstable semivolatile compounds) and 532 (for phenylurea pesticides), a number of studies were conducted to identify compatible microbial inhibitors. Copper sulfate was successfully used in Method 532 and is an excellent first-choice antimicrobial agent for many applications. Copper sulfate can catalyze hydrolysis reactions for some pesticides such as those analyzed in Method 526. Under these conditions, a nonmetal compound of antimicrobial activity must be considered. During the development of Method 526, a survey of alternate organic based antimicrobial compounds found that diazolidinyl urea worked well in the method. Several other candidate microbial inhibitors were identified that could have application to other environmental methods. A general approach to selecting antimicrobial compounds in future environmental methods in water matrixes is discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1021/es010661b
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18195679</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>85395026</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a467t-a4ff5a7eb2f96e4b8508f9f600e63991c9df11ed01e91984162029b94dac97003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0UFv0zAUB3ALgVgZHPgCyEKAxKHlvThx7OPoNjap0yZ1A26Wk9irt8QudiLBtydVqg3BgYst2T89-_8eIa8RFggZfjIJEDjH6gmZYZHBvBAFPiUzAGRzyfj3A_IipTsAyBiI5-QAkQvOSjYj9YWrY6icbum537jK9SEmakOkN4v1gp5cHdHj6Py987f0m-5NpBem34RmMv3G0GMznnbO694FT4Oll_FWe1fTZei2YfBNekmeWd0m82q_H5Kb05Pr5dl8dfnlfHm0muucl_24Wlvo0lSZldzklShAWGk5gOFMSqxlYxFNA2gkSpEjzyCTlcwbXcsSgB2SD1PdbQw_BpN61blUm7bV3oQhKRQoC17K_8O8kAXjYoRv_4J3YYh-DKHGTiJjwHfPfpzQ2MiUorFqG12n4y-FoHbzUQ_zGe2bfcGh6kzzKPcDGcG7PdCp1q2N2tcu_eEykWW7BPOJudSbnw_XOt4rXrKyUNdXayXOcL06_Zqpz6N_P3ldp8cM__7vN8vysEs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>230133060</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Microbial Inhibitors for U.S. EPA Drinking Water Methods for the Determination of Organic Compounds</title><source>ACS Publications</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Winslow, Stephen D ; Pepich, Barry V ; Bassett, Margarita V ; Wendelken, Steven C ; Munch, David J ; Sinclair, James L</creator><creatorcontrib>Winslow, Stephen D ; Pepich, Barry V ; Bassett, Margarita V ; Wendelken, Steven C ; Munch, David J ; Sinclair, James L</creatorcontrib><description>Preservation of chemical analytes in drinking water samples is necessary to obtain accurate information concerning contaminant occurrence. Sample preservation to prevent biodegradation is important for most samples and analytes. With the unique demands of environmental methods, it is not always possible to kill all microorganisms without having undesirable effects. To find a suitable preservative, the sample, analysis, and preservation needs should be considered. During method development of U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Methods 526 (for unstable semivolatile compounds) and 532 (for phenylurea pesticides), a number of studies were conducted to identify compatible microbial inhibitors. Copper sulfate was successfully used in Method 532 and is an excellent first-choice antimicrobial agent for many applications. Copper sulfate can catalyze hydrolysis reactions for some pesticides such as those analyzed in Method 526. Under these conditions, a nonmetal compound of antimicrobial activity must be considered. During the development of Method 526, a survey of alternate organic based antimicrobial compounds found that diazolidinyl urea worked well in the method. Several other candidate microbial inhibitors were identified that could have application to other environmental methods. A general approach to selecting antimicrobial compounds in future environmental methods in water matrixes is discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-936X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-5851</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/es010661b</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11686373</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ESTHAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>Anti-Infective Agents, Local - chemistry ; Antidotes - chemistry ; Applied sciences ; Copper Sulfate - chemistry ; Drinking water ; Drinking water and swimming-pool water. Desalination ; Environmental Monitoring ; Exact sciences and technology ; Microorganisms ; Organic Chemicals - analysis ; Organic chemistry ; Pollution ; Regulatory agencies ; Specimen Handling ; United States ; United States Environmental Protection Agency ; Urea - analogs &amp; derivatives ; Urea - chemistry ; USA ; Water Microbiology ; Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis ; Water Supply ; Water treatment ; Water treatment and pollution</subject><ispartof>Environmental science &amp; technology, 2001-10, Vol.35 (20), p.4103-4110</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2001 American Chemical Society</rights><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Chemical Society Oct 15, 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a467t-a4ff5a7eb2f96e4b8508f9f600e63991c9df11ed01e91984162029b94dac97003</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a467t-a4ff5a7eb2f96e4b8508f9f600e63991c9df11ed01e91984162029b94dac97003</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/es010661b$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/es010661b$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,2752,27053,27901,27902,56713,56763</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1128229$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11686373$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Winslow, Stephen D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pepich, Barry V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bassett, Margarita V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wendelken, Steven C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Munch, David J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sinclair, James L</creatorcontrib><title>Microbial Inhibitors for U.S. EPA Drinking Water Methods for the Determination of Organic Compounds</title><title>Environmental science &amp; technology</title><addtitle>Environ. Sci. Technol</addtitle><description>Preservation of chemical analytes in drinking water samples is necessary to obtain accurate information concerning contaminant occurrence. Sample preservation to prevent biodegradation is important for most samples and analytes. With the unique demands of environmental methods, it is not always possible to kill all microorganisms without having undesirable effects. To find a suitable preservative, the sample, analysis, and preservation needs should be considered. During method development of U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Methods 526 (for unstable semivolatile compounds) and 532 (for phenylurea pesticides), a number of studies were conducted to identify compatible microbial inhibitors. Copper sulfate was successfully used in Method 532 and is an excellent first-choice antimicrobial agent for many applications. Copper sulfate can catalyze hydrolysis reactions for some pesticides such as those analyzed in Method 526. Under these conditions, a nonmetal compound of antimicrobial activity must be considered. During the development of Method 526, a survey of alternate organic based antimicrobial compounds found that diazolidinyl urea worked well in the method. Several other candidate microbial inhibitors were identified that could have application to other environmental methods. A general approach to selecting antimicrobial compounds in future environmental methods in water matrixes is discussed.</description><subject>Anti-Infective Agents, Local - chemistry</subject><subject>Antidotes - chemistry</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Copper Sulfate - chemistry</subject><subject>Drinking water</subject><subject>Drinking water and swimming-pool water. Desalination</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Organic Chemicals - analysis</subject><subject>Organic chemistry</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Regulatory agencies</subject><subject>Specimen Handling</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>United States Environmental Protection Agency</subject><subject>Urea - analogs &amp; derivatives</subject><subject>Urea - chemistry</subject><subject>USA</subject><subject>Water Microbiology</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis</subject><subject>Water Supply</subject><subject>Water treatment</subject><subject>Water treatment and pollution</subject><issn>0013-936X</issn><issn>1520-5851</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0UFv0zAUB3ALgVgZHPgCyEKAxKHlvThx7OPoNjap0yZ1A26Wk9irt8QudiLBtydVqg3BgYst2T89-_8eIa8RFggZfjIJEDjH6gmZYZHBvBAFPiUzAGRzyfj3A_IipTsAyBiI5-QAkQvOSjYj9YWrY6icbum537jK9SEmakOkN4v1gp5cHdHj6Py987f0m-5NpBem34RmMv3G0GMznnbO694FT4Oll_FWe1fTZei2YfBNekmeWd0m82q_H5Kb05Pr5dl8dfnlfHm0muucl_24Wlvo0lSZldzklShAWGk5gOFMSqxlYxFNA2gkSpEjzyCTlcwbXcsSgB2SD1PdbQw_BpN61blUm7bV3oQhKRQoC17K_8O8kAXjYoRv_4J3YYh-DKHGTiJjwHfPfpzQ2MiUorFqG12n4y-FoHbzUQ_zGe2bfcGh6kzzKPcDGcG7PdCp1q2N2tcu_eEykWW7BPOJudSbnw_XOt4rXrKyUNdXayXOcL06_Zqpz6N_P3ldp8cM__7vN8vysEs</recordid><startdate>20011015</startdate><enddate>20011015</enddate><creator>Winslow, Stephen D</creator><creator>Pepich, Barry V</creator><creator>Bassett, Margarita V</creator><creator>Wendelken, Steven C</creator><creator>Munch, David J</creator><creator>Sinclair, James L</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7UA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20011015</creationdate><title>Microbial Inhibitors for U.S. EPA Drinking Water Methods for the Determination of Organic Compounds</title><author>Winslow, Stephen D ; Pepich, Barry V ; Bassett, Margarita V ; Wendelken, Steven C ; Munch, David J ; Sinclair, James L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a467t-a4ff5a7eb2f96e4b8508f9f600e63991c9df11ed01e91984162029b94dac97003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Anti-Infective Agents, Local - chemistry</topic><topic>Antidotes - chemistry</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Copper Sulfate - chemistry</topic><topic>Drinking water</topic><topic>Drinking water and swimming-pool water. Desalination</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Organic Chemicals - analysis</topic><topic>Organic chemistry</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Regulatory agencies</topic><topic>Specimen Handling</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>United States Environmental Protection Agency</topic><topic>Urea - analogs &amp; derivatives</topic><topic>Urea - chemistry</topic><topic>USA</topic><topic>Water Microbiology</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis</topic><topic>Water Supply</topic><topic>Water treatment</topic><topic>Water treatment and pollution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Winslow, Stephen D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pepich, Barry V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bassett, Margarita V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wendelken, Steven C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Munch, David J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sinclair, James L</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environmental science &amp; technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Winslow, Stephen D</au><au>Pepich, Barry V</au><au>Bassett, Margarita V</au><au>Wendelken, Steven C</au><au>Munch, David J</au><au>Sinclair, James L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Microbial Inhibitors for U.S. EPA Drinking Water Methods for the Determination of Organic Compounds</atitle><jtitle>Environmental science &amp; technology</jtitle><addtitle>Environ. Sci. Technol</addtitle><date>2001-10-15</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>20</issue><spage>4103</spage><epage>4110</epage><pages>4103-4110</pages><issn>0013-936X</issn><eissn>1520-5851</eissn><coden>ESTHAG</coden><abstract>Preservation of chemical analytes in drinking water samples is necessary to obtain accurate information concerning contaminant occurrence. Sample preservation to prevent biodegradation is important for most samples and analytes. With the unique demands of environmental methods, it is not always possible to kill all microorganisms without having undesirable effects. To find a suitable preservative, the sample, analysis, and preservation needs should be considered. During method development of U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Methods 526 (for unstable semivolatile compounds) and 532 (for phenylurea pesticides), a number of studies were conducted to identify compatible microbial inhibitors. Copper sulfate was successfully used in Method 532 and is an excellent first-choice antimicrobial agent for many applications. Copper sulfate can catalyze hydrolysis reactions for some pesticides such as those analyzed in Method 526. Under these conditions, a nonmetal compound of antimicrobial activity must be considered. During the development of Method 526, a survey of alternate organic based antimicrobial compounds found that diazolidinyl urea worked well in the method. Several other candidate microbial inhibitors were identified that could have application to other environmental methods. A general approach to selecting antimicrobial compounds in future environmental methods in water matrixes is discussed.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><pmid>11686373</pmid><doi>10.1021/es010661b</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0013-936X
ispartof Environmental science & technology, 2001-10, Vol.35 (20), p.4103-4110
issn 0013-936X
1520-5851
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18195679
source ACS Publications; MEDLINE
subjects Anti-Infective Agents, Local - chemistry
Antidotes - chemistry
Applied sciences
Copper Sulfate - chemistry
Drinking water
Drinking water and swimming-pool water. Desalination
Environmental Monitoring
Exact sciences and technology
Microorganisms
Organic Chemicals - analysis
Organic chemistry
Pollution
Regulatory agencies
Specimen Handling
United States
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Urea - analogs & derivatives
Urea - chemistry
USA
Water Microbiology
Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis
Water Supply
Water treatment
Water treatment and pollution
title Microbial Inhibitors for U.S. EPA Drinking Water Methods for the Determination of Organic Compounds
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T02%3A06%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Microbial%20Inhibitors%20for%20U.S.%20EPA%20Drinking%20Water%20Methods%20for%20the%20Determination%20of%20Organic%20Compounds&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20science%20&%20technology&rft.au=Winslow,%20Stephen%20D&rft.date=2001-10-15&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=20&rft.spage=4103&rft.epage=4110&rft.pages=4103-4110&rft.issn=0013-936X&rft.eissn=1520-5851&rft.coden=ESTHAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/es010661b&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E85395026%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=230133060&rft_id=info:pmid/11686373&rfr_iscdi=true