Microbial Inhibitors for U.S. EPA Drinking Water Methods for the Determination of Organic Compounds
Preservation of chemical analytes in drinking water samples is necessary to obtain accurate information concerning contaminant occurrence. Sample preservation to prevent biodegradation is important for most samples and analytes. With the unique demands of environmental methods, it is not always poss...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental science & technology 2001-10, Vol.35 (20), p.4103-4110 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 4110 |
---|---|
container_issue | 20 |
container_start_page | 4103 |
container_title | Environmental science & technology |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | Winslow, Stephen D Pepich, Barry V Bassett, Margarita V Wendelken, Steven C Munch, David J Sinclair, James L |
description | Preservation of chemical analytes in drinking water samples is necessary to obtain accurate information concerning contaminant occurrence. Sample preservation to prevent biodegradation is important for most samples and analytes. With the unique demands of environmental methods, it is not always possible to kill all microorganisms without having undesirable effects. To find a suitable preservative, the sample, analysis, and preservation needs should be considered. During method development of U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Methods 526 (for unstable semivolatile compounds) and 532 (for phenylurea pesticides), a number of studies were conducted to identify compatible microbial inhibitors. Copper sulfate was successfully used in Method 532 and is an excellent first-choice antimicrobial agent for many applications. Copper sulfate can catalyze hydrolysis reactions for some pesticides such as those analyzed in Method 526. Under these conditions, a nonmetal compound of antimicrobial activity must be considered. During the development of Method 526, a survey of alternate organic based antimicrobial compounds found that diazolidinyl urea worked well in the method. Several other candidate microbial inhibitors were identified that could have application to other environmental methods. A general approach to selecting antimicrobial compounds in future environmental methods in water matrixes is discussed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1021/es010661b |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18195679</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>85395026</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a467t-a4ff5a7eb2f96e4b8508f9f600e63991c9df11ed01e91984162029b94dac97003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0UFv0zAUB3ALgVgZHPgCyEKAxKHlvThx7OPoNjap0yZ1A26Wk9irt8QudiLBtydVqg3BgYst2T89-_8eIa8RFggZfjIJEDjH6gmZYZHBvBAFPiUzAGRzyfj3A_IipTsAyBiI5-QAkQvOSjYj9YWrY6icbum537jK9SEmakOkN4v1gp5cHdHj6Py987f0m-5NpBem34RmMv3G0GMznnbO694FT4Oll_FWe1fTZei2YfBNekmeWd0m82q_H5Kb05Pr5dl8dfnlfHm0muucl_24Wlvo0lSZldzklShAWGk5gOFMSqxlYxFNA2gkSpEjzyCTlcwbXcsSgB2SD1PdbQw_BpN61blUm7bV3oQhKRQoC17K_8O8kAXjYoRv_4J3YYh-DKHGTiJjwHfPfpzQ2MiUorFqG12n4y-FoHbzUQ_zGe2bfcGh6kzzKPcDGcG7PdCp1q2N2tcu_eEykWW7BPOJudSbnw_XOt4rXrKyUNdXayXOcL06_Zqpz6N_P3ldp8cM__7vN8vysEs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>230133060</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Microbial Inhibitors for U.S. EPA Drinking Water Methods for the Determination of Organic Compounds</title><source>ACS Publications</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Winslow, Stephen D ; Pepich, Barry V ; Bassett, Margarita V ; Wendelken, Steven C ; Munch, David J ; Sinclair, James L</creator><creatorcontrib>Winslow, Stephen D ; Pepich, Barry V ; Bassett, Margarita V ; Wendelken, Steven C ; Munch, David J ; Sinclair, James L</creatorcontrib><description>Preservation of chemical analytes in drinking water samples is necessary to obtain accurate information concerning contaminant occurrence. Sample preservation to prevent biodegradation is important for most samples and analytes. With the unique demands of environmental methods, it is not always possible to kill all microorganisms without having undesirable effects. To find a suitable preservative, the sample, analysis, and preservation needs should be considered. During method development of U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Methods 526 (for unstable semivolatile compounds) and 532 (for phenylurea pesticides), a number of studies were conducted to identify compatible microbial inhibitors. Copper sulfate was successfully used in Method 532 and is an excellent first-choice antimicrobial agent for many applications. Copper sulfate can catalyze hydrolysis reactions for some pesticides such as those analyzed in Method 526. Under these conditions, a nonmetal compound of antimicrobial activity must be considered. During the development of Method 526, a survey of alternate organic based antimicrobial compounds found that diazolidinyl urea worked well in the method. Several other candidate microbial inhibitors were identified that could have application to other environmental methods. A general approach to selecting antimicrobial compounds in future environmental methods in water matrixes is discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-936X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-5851</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/es010661b</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11686373</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ESTHAG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>Anti-Infective Agents, Local - chemistry ; Antidotes - chemistry ; Applied sciences ; Copper Sulfate - chemistry ; Drinking water ; Drinking water and swimming-pool water. Desalination ; Environmental Monitoring ; Exact sciences and technology ; Microorganisms ; Organic Chemicals - analysis ; Organic chemistry ; Pollution ; Regulatory agencies ; Specimen Handling ; United States ; United States Environmental Protection Agency ; Urea - analogs & derivatives ; Urea - chemistry ; USA ; Water Microbiology ; Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis ; Water Supply ; Water treatment ; Water treatment and pollution</subject><ispartof>Environmental science & technology, 2001-10, Vol.35 (20), p.4103-4110</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2001 American Chemical Society</rights><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Chemical Society Oct 15, 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a467t-a4ff5a7eb2f96e4b8508f9f600e63991c9df11ed01e91984162029b94dac97003</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a467t-a4ff5a7eb2f96e4b8508f9f600e63991c9df11ed01e91984162029b94dac97003</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/es010661b$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/es010661b$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,2752,27053,27901,27902,56713,56763</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1128229$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11686373$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Winslow, Stephen D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pepich, Barry V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bassett, Margarita V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wendelken, Steven C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Munch, David J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sinclair, James L</creatorcontrib><title>Microbial Inhibitors for U.S. EPA Drinking Water Methods for the Determination of Organic Compounds</title><title>Environmental science & technology</title><addtitle>Environ. Sci. Technol</addtitle><description>Preservation of chemical analytes in drinking water samples is necessary to obtain accurate information concerning contaminant occurrence. Sample preservation to prevent biodegradation is important for most samples and analytes. With the unique demands of environmental methods, it is not always possible to kill all microorganisms without having undesirable effects. To find a suitable preservative, the sample, analysis, and preservation needs should be considered. During method development of U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Methods 526 (for unstable semivolatile compounds) and 532 (for phenylurea pesticides), a number of studies were conducted to identify compatible microbial inhibitors. Copper sulfate was successfully used in Method 532 and is an excellent first-choice antimicrobial agent for many applications. Copper sulfate can catalyze hydrolysis reactions for some pesticides such as those analyzed in Method 526. Under these conditions, a nonmetal compound of antimicrobial activity must be considered. During the development of Method 526, a survey of alternate organic based antimicrobial compounds found that diazolidinyl urea worked well in the method. Several other candidate microbial inhibitors were identified that could have application to other environmental methods. A general approach to selecting antimicrobial compounds in future environmental methods in water matrixes is discussed.</description><subject>Anti-Infective Agents, Local - chemistry</subject><subject>Antidotes - chemistry</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Copper Sulfate - chemistry</subject><subject>Drinking water</subject><subject>Drinking water and swimming-pool water. Desalination</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Organic Chemicals - analysis</subject><subject>Organic chemistry</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Regulatory agencies</subject><subject>Specimen Handling</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>United States Environmental Protection Agency</subject><subject>Urea - analogs & derivatives</subject><subject>Urea - chemistry</subject><subject>USA</subject><subject>Water Microbiology</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis</subject><subject>Water Supply</subject><subject>Water treatment</subject><subject>Water treatment and pollution</subject><issn>0013-936X</issn><issn>1520-5851</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0UFv0zAUB3ALgVgZHPgCyEKAxKHlvThx7OPoNjap0yZ1A26Wk9irt8QudiLBtydVqg3BgYst2T89-_8eIa8RFggZfjIJEDjH6gmZYZHBvBAFPiUzAGRzyfj3A_IipTsAyBiI5-QAkQvOSjYj9YWrY6icbum537jK9SEmakOkN4v1gp5cHdHj6Py987f0m-5NpBem34RmMv3G0GMznnbO694FT4Oll_FWe1fTZei2YfBNekmeWd0m82q_H5Kb05Pr5dl8dfnlfHm0muucl_24Wlvo0lSZldzklShAWGk5gOFMSqxlYxFNA2gkSpEjzyCTlcwbXcsSgB2SD1PdbQw_BpN61blUm7bV3oQhKRQoC17K_8O8kAXjYoRv_4J3YYh-DKHGTiJjwHfPfpzQ2MiUorFqG12n4y-FoHbzUQ_zGe2bfcGh6kzzKPcDGcG7PdCp1q2N2tcu_eEykWW7BPOJudSbnw_XOt4rXrKyUNdXayXOcL06_Zqpz6N_P3ldp8cM__7vN8vysEs</recordid><startdate>20011015</startdate><enddate>20011015</enddate><creator>Winslow, Stephen D</creator><creator>Pepich, Barry V</creator><creator>Bassett, Margarita V</creator><creator>Wendelken, Steven C</creator><creator>Munch, David J</creator><creator>Sinclair, James L</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7UA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20011015</creationdate><title>Microbial Inhibitors for U.S. EPA Drinking Water Methods for the Determination of Organic Compounds</title><author>Winslow, Stephen D ; Pepich, Barry V ; Bassett, Margarita V ; Wendelken, Steven C ; Munch, David J ; Sinclair, James L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a467t-a4ff5a7eb2f96e4b8508f9f600e63991c9df11ed01e91984162029b94dac97003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Anti-Infective Agents, Local - chemistry</topic><topic>Antidotes - chemistry</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Copper Sulfate - chemistry</topic><topic>Drinking water</topic><topic>Drinking water and swimming-pool water. Desalination</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Organic Chemicals - analysis</topic><topic>Organic chemistry</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Regulatory agencies</topic><topic>Specimen Handling</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>United States Environmental Protection Agency</topic><topic>Urea - analogs & derivatives</topic><topic>Urea - chemistry</topic><topic>USA</topic><topic>Water Microbiology</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis</topic><topic>Water Supply</topic><topic>Water treatment</topic><topic>Water treatment and pollution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Winslow, Stephen D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pepich, Barry V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bassett, Margarita V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wendelken, Steven C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Munch, David J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sinclair, James L</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environmental science & technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Winslow, Stephen D</au><au>Pepich, Barry V</au><au>Bassett, Margarita V</au><au>Wendelken, Steven C</au><au>Munch, David J</au><au>Sinclair, James L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Microbial Inhibitors for U.S. EPA Drinking Water Methods for the Determination of Organic Compounds</atitle><jtitle>Environmental science & technology</jtitle><addtitle>Environ. Sci. Technol</addtitle><date>2001-10-15</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>20</issue><spage>4103</spage><epage>4110</epage><pages>4103-4110</pages><issn>0013-936X</issn><eissn>1520-5851</eissn><coden>ESTHAG</coden><abstract>Preservation of chemical analytes in drinking water samples is necessary to obtain accurate information concerning contaminant occurrence. Sample preservation to prevent biodegradation is important for most samples and analytes. With the unique demands of environmental methods, it is not always possible to kill all microorganisms without having undesirable effects. To find a suitable preservative, the sample, analysis, and preservation needs should be considered. During method development of U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Methods 526 (for unstable semivolatile compounds) and 532 (for phenylurea pesticides), a number of studies were conducted to identify compatible microbial inhibitors. Copper sulfate was successfully used in Method 532 and is an excellent first-choice antimicrobial agent for many applications. Copper sulfate can catalyze hydrolysis reactions for some pesticides such as those analyzed in Method 526. Under these conditions, a nonmetal compound of antimicrobial activity must be considered. During the development of Method 526, a survey of alternate organic based antimicrobial compounds found that diazolidinyl urea worked well in the method. Several other candidate microbial inhibitors were identified that could have application to other environmental methods. A general approach to selecting antimicrobial compounds in future environmental methods in water matrixes is discussed.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><pmid>11686373</pmid><doi>10.1021/es010661b</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0013-936X |
ispartof | Environmental science & technology, 2001-10, Vol.35 (20), p.4103-4110 |
issn | 0013-936X 1520-5851 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18195679 |
source | ACS Publications; MEDLINE |
subjects | Anti-Infective Agents, Local - chemistry Antidotes - chemistry Applied sciences Copper Sulfate - chemistry Drinking water Drinking water and swimming-pool water. Desalination Environmental Monitoring Exact sciences and technology Microorganisms Organic Chemicals - analysis Organic chemistry Pollution Regulatory agencies Specimen Handling United States United States Environmental Protection Agency Urea - analogs & derivatives Urea - chemistry USA Water Microbiology Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis Water Supply Water treatment Water treatment and pollution |
title | Microbial Inhibitors for U.S. EPA Drinking Water Methods for the Determination of Organic Compounds |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T02%3A06%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Microbial%20Inhibitors%20for%20U.S.%20EPA%20Drinking%20Water%20Methods%20for%20the%20Determination%20of%20Organic%20Compounds&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20science%20&%20technology&rft.au=Winslow,%20Stephen%20D&rft.date=2001-10-15&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=20&rft.spage=4103&rft.epage=4110&rft.pages=4103-4110&rft.issn=0013-936X&rft.eissn=1520-5851&rft.coden=ESTHAG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/es010661b&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E85395026%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=230133060&rft_id=info:pmid/11686373&rfr_iscdi=true |