Defining High-Quality Palliative Care in Oncology Practice: An American Society of Clinical Oncology/American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine Guidance Statement

Integrated into routine oncology care, palliative care can improve symptom burden, quality of life, and patient and caregiver satisfaction. However, not all oncology practices have access to specialist palliative medicine. This project endeavored to define what constitutes high-quality primary palli...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of oncology practice 2016-09, Vol.12 (9), p.e828-e838
Hauptverfasser: Bickel, Kathleen E, McNiff, Kristen, Buss, Mary K, Kamal, Arif, Lupu, Dale, Abernethy, Amy P, Broder, Michael S, Shapiro, Charles L, Acheson, Anupama Kurup, Malin, Jennifer, Evans, Tracey, Krzyzanowska, Monika K
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e838
container_issue 9
container_start_page e828
container_title Journal of oncology practice
container_volume 12
creator Bickel, Kathleen E
McNiff, Kristen
Buss, Mary K
Kamal, Arif
Lupu, Dale
Abernethy, Amy P
Broder, Michael S
Shapiro, Charles L
Acheson, Anupama Kurup
Malin, Jennifer
Evans, Tracey
Krzyzanowska, Monika K
description Integrated into routine oncology care, palliative care can improve symptom burden, quality of life, and patient and caregiver satisfaction. However, not all oncology practices have access to specialist palliative medicine. This project endeavored to define what constitutes high-quality primary palliative care as delivered by medical oncology practices. An expert steering committee outlined 966 palliative care service items, in nine domains, each describing a candidate element of primary palliative care delivery for patients with advanced cancer or high symptom burden. Using modified Delphi methodology, 31 multidisciplinary panelists rated each service item on three constructs: importance, feasibility, and scope within medical oncology practice. Panelists endorsed the highest proportion of palliative care service items in the domains of End-of-Life Care (81%); Communication and Shared Decision Making (79%); and Advance Care Planning (78%). The lowest proportions were in Spiritual and Cultural Assessment and Management (35%) and Psychosocial Assessment and Management (39%). In the largest domain, Symptom Assessment and Management, there was consensus that all symptoms should be assessed and managed at a basic level, with more comprehensive management for common symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, dyspnea, and pain. Within the Appropriate Palliative Care and Hospice Referral domain, there was consensus that oncology practices should be able to describe the difference between palliative care and hospice to patients and refer patients appropriately. This statement describes the elements comprising high-quality primary palliative care for patients with advanced cancer or high symptom burden, as delivered by oncology practices. Oncology providers wishing to enhance palliative care delivery may find this information useful to inform operational changes and quality improvement efforts.
doi_str_mv 10.1200/JOP.2016.010686
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1819433498</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1819433498</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2891-b16d028877a0b7a51919daf1628d4385be90526e6bc98219913cd2d7e774572d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkUtv1DAURi0Eog9Ys0NessmMH_GL3WgoHVCraVWQ2EWOfTMYOc4QJ5X6m_iTdZkyYnWvdM_33cVB6B0lC8oIWX7d3iwYoXJBKJFavkCn1HBR1dL8eFl2IepK1UqdoLOcfxFSC2Pka3TClOCUK3mK_nyCLqSQdngTdj-r29nGMD3gGxtjsFO4B7y2I-CQ8Da5IQ67chutm4KDj3iV8KqHMTib8N3gApTk0OF1LI3OxmNkeaRWznro_1KbIe9LC7bJ___uGnxwIQG-nIO3qQB3k52ghzS9Qa86GzO8fZ7n6Pvni2_rTXW1vfyyXl1VjmlDq5ZKT5jWSlnSKiuoocbbjkqmfc21aMEQwSTI1hnNqDGUO8-8AqVqoZjn5-jDoXc_Dr9nyFPTh-wgRptgmHNDNTU157XRBV0eUDcOOY_QNfsx9HZ8aChpngw1xVDzZKg5GCqJ98_lc9uDP_L_lPBHpH-M5g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1819433498</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Defining High-Quality Palliative Care in Oncology Practice: An American Society of Clinical Oncology/American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine Guidance Statement</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Society of Clinical Oncology Online Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Bickel, Kathleen E ; McNiff, Kristen ; Buss, Mary K ; Kamal, Arif ; Lupu, Dale ; Abernethy, Amy P ; Broder, Michael S ; Shapiro, Charles L ; Acheson, Anupama Kurup ; Malin, Jennifer ; Evans, Tracey ; Krzyzanowska, Monika K</creator><creatorcontrib>Bickel, Kathleen E ; McNiff, Kristen ; Buss, Mary K ; Kamal, Arif ; Lupu, Dale ; Abernethy, Amy P ; Broder, Michael S ; Shapiro, Charles L ; Acheson, Anupama Kurup ; Malin, Jennifer ; Evans, Tracey ; Krzyzanowska, Monika K</creatorcontrib><description>Integrated into routine oncology care, palliative care can improve symptom burden, quality of life, and patient and caregiver satisfaction. However, not all oncology practices have access to specialist palliative medicine. This project endeavored to define what constitutes high-quality primary palliative care as delivered by medical oncology practices. An expert steering committee outlined 966 palliative care service items, in nine domains, each describing a candidate element of primary palliative care delivery for patients with advanced cancer or high symptom burden. Using modified Delphi methodology, 31 multidisciplinary panelists rated each service item on three constructs: importance, feasibility, and scope within medical oncology practice. Panelists endorsed the highest proportion of palliative care service items in the domains of End-of-Life Care (81%); Communication and Shared Decision Making (79%); and Advance Care Planning (78%). The lowest proportions were in Spiritual and Cultural Assessment and Management (35%) and Psychosocial Assessment and Management (39%). In the largest domain, Symptom Assessment and Management, there was consensus that all symptoms should be assessed and managed at a basic level, with more comprehensive management for common symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, dyspnea, and pain. Within the Appropriate Palliative Care and Hospice Referral domain, there was consensus that oncology practices should be able to describe the difference between palliative care and hospice to patients and refer patients appropriately. This statement describes the elements comprising high-quality primary palliative care for patients with advanced cancer or high symptom burden, as delivered by oncology practices. Oncology providers wishing to enhance palliative care delivery may find this information useful to inform operational changes and quality improvement efforts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1554-7477</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1935-469X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1200/JOP.2016.010686</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27531376</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Advance Care Planning ; Caregivers ; Continuity of Patient Care ; Culture ; Decision Making ; Humans ; Neoplasms - therapy ; Palliative Care ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Psychology ; Quality of Health Care ; Societies, Medical ; Terminal Care</subject><ispartof>Journal of oncology practice, 2016-09, Vol.12 (9), p.e828-e838</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2016 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2891-b16d028877a0b7a51919daf1628d4385be90526e6bc98219913cd2d7e774572d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2891-b16d028877a0b7a51919daf1628d4385be90526e6bc98219913cd2d7e774572d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3727,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27531376$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bickel, Kathleen E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNiff, Kristen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buss, Mary K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamal, Arif</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lupu, Dale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abernethy, Amy P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Broder, Michael S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shapiro, Charles L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Acheson, Anupama Kurup</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malin, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evans, Tracey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krzyzanowska, Monika K</creatorcontrib><title>Defining High-Quality Palliative Care in Oncology Practice: An American Society of Clinical Oncology/American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine Guidance Statement</title><title>Journal of oncology practice</title><addtitle>J Oncol Pract</addtitle><description>Integrated into routine oncology care, palliative care can improve symptom burden, quality of life, and patient and caregiver satisfaction. However, not all oncology practices have access to specialist palliative medicine. This project endeavored to define what constitutes high-quality primary palliative care as delivered by medical oncology practices. An expert steering committee outlined 966 palliative care service items, in nine domains, each describing a candidate element of primary palliative care delivery for patients with advanced cancer or high symptom burden. Using modified Delphi methodology, 31 multidisciplinary panelists rated each service item on three constructs: importance, feasibility, and scope within medical oncology practice. Panelists endorsed the highest proportion of palliative care service items in the domains of End-of-Life Care (81%); Communication and Shared Decision Making (79%); and Advance Care Planning (78%). The lowest proportions were in Spiritual and Cultural Assessment and Management (35%) and Psychosocial Assessment and Management (39%). In the largest domain, Symptom Assessment and Management, there was consensus that all symptoms should be assessed and managed at a basic level, with more comprehensive management for common symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, dyspnea, and pain. Within the Appropriate Palliative Care and Hospice Referral domain, there was consensus that oncology practices should be able to describe the difference between palliative care and hospice to patients and refer patients appropriately. This statement describes the elements comprising high-quality primary palliative care for patients with advanced cancer or high symptom burden, as delivered by oncology practices. Oncology providers wishing to enhance palliative care delivery may find this information useful to inform operational changes and quality improvement efforts.</description><subject>Advance Care Planning</subject><subject>Caregivers</subject><subject>Continuity of Patient Care</subject><subject>Culture</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Palliative Care</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Quality of Health Care</subject><subject>Societies, Medical</subject><subject>Terminal Care</subject><issn>1554-7477</issn><issn>1935-469X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkUtv1DAURi0Eog9Ys0NessmMH_GL3WgoHVCraVWQ2EWOfTMYOc4QJ5X6m_iTdZkyYnWvdM_33cVB6B0lC8oIWX7d3iwYoXJBKJFavkCn1HBR1dL8eFl2IepK1UqdoLOcfxFSC2Pka3TClOCUK3mK_nyCLqSQdngTdj-r29nGMD3gGxtjsFO4B7y2I-CQ8Da5IQ67chutm4KDj3iV8KqHMTib8N3gApTk0OF1LI3OxmNkeaRWznro_1KbIe9LC7bJ___uGnxwIQG-nIO3qQB3k52ghzS9Qa86GzO8fZ7n6Pvni2_rTXW1vfyyXl1VjmlDq5ZKT5jWSlnSKiuoocbbjkqmfc21aMEQwSTI1hnNqDGUO8-8AqVqoZjn5-jDoXc_Dr9nyFPTh-wgRptgmHNDNTU157XRBV0eUDcOOY_QNfsx9HZ8aChpngw1xVDzZKg5GCqJ98_lc9uDP_L_lPBHpH-M5g</recordid><startdate>201609</startdate><enddate>201609</enddate><creator>Bickel, Kathleen E</creator><creator>McNiff, Kristen</creator><creator>Buss, Mary K</creator><creator>Kamal, Arif</creator><creator>Lupu, Dale</creator><creator>Abernethy, Amy P</creator><creator>Broder, Michael S</creator><creator>Shapiro, Charles L</creator><creator>Acheson, Anupama Kurup</creator><creator>Malin, Jennifer</creator><creator>Evans, Tracey</creator><creator>Krzyzanowska, Monika K</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201609</creationdate><title>Defining High-Quality Palliative Care in Oncology Practice: An American Society of Clinical Oncology/American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine Guidance Statement</title><author>Bickel, Kathleen E ; McNiff, Kristen ; Buss, Mary K ; Kamal, Arif ; Lupu, Dale ; Abernethy, Amy P ; Broder, Michael S ; Shapiro, Charles L ; Acheson, Anupama Kurup ; Malin, Jennifer ; Evans, Tracey ; Krzyzanowska, Monika K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2891-b16d028877a0b7a51919daf1628d4385be90526e6bc98219913cd2d7e774572d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Advance Care Planning</topic><topic>Caregivers</topic><topic>Continuity of Patient Care</topic><topic>Culture</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Palliative Care</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Quality of Health Care</topic><topic>Societies, Medical</topic><topic>Terminal Care</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bickel, Kathleen E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNiff, Kristen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buss, Mary K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kamal, Arif</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lupu, Dale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abernethy, Amy P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Broder, Michael S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shapiro, Charles L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Acheson, Anupama Kurup</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malin, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evans, Tracey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krzyzanowska, Monika K</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of oncology practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bickel, Kathleen E</au><au>McNiff, Kristen</au><au>Buss, Mary K</au><au>Kamal, Arif</au><au>Lupu, Dale</au><au>Abernethy, Amy P</au><au>Broder, Michael S</au><au>Shapiro, Charles L</au><au>Acheson, Anupama Kurup</au><au>Malin, Jennifer</au><au>Evans, Tracey</au><au>Krzyzanowska, Monika K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Defining High-Quality Palliative Care in Oncology Practice: An American Society of Clinical Oncology/American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine Guidance Statement</atitle><jtitle>Journal of oncology practice</jtitle><addtitle>J Oncol Pract</addtitle><date>2016-09</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>e828</spage><epage>e838</epage><pages>e828-e838</pages><issn>1554-7477</issn><eissn>1935-469X</eissn><abstract>Integrated into routine oncology care, palliative care can improve symptom burden, quality of life, and patient and caregiver satisfaction. However, not all oncology practices have access to specialist palliative medicine. This project endeavored to define what constitutes high-quality primary palliative care as delivered by medical oncology practices. An expert steering committee outlined 966 palliative care service items, in nine domains, each describing a candidate element of primary palliative care delivery for patients with advanced cancer or high symptom burden. Using modified Delphi methodology, 31 multidisciplinary panelists rated each service item on three constructs: importance, feasibility, and scope within medical oncology practice. Panelists endorsed the highest proportion of palliative care service items in the domains of End-of-Life Care (81%); Communication and Shared Decision Making (79%); and Advance Care Planning (78%). The lowest proportions were in Spiritual and Cultural Assessment and Management (35%) and Psychosocial Assessment and Management (39%). In the largest domain, Symptom Assessment and Management, there was consensus that all symptoms should be assessed and managed at a basic level, with more comprehensive management for common symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, dyspnea, and pain. Within the Appropriate Palliative Care and Hospice Referral domain, there was consensus that oncology practices should be able to describe the difference between palliative care and hospice to patients and refer patients appropriately. This statement describes the elements comprising high-quality primary palliative care for patients with advanced cancer or high symptom burden, as delivered by oncology practices. Oncology providers wishing to enhance palliative care delivery may find this information useful to inform operational changes and quality improvement efforts.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>27531376</pmid><doi>10.1200/JOP.2016.010686</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1554-7477
ispartof Journal of oncology practice, 2016-09, Vol.12 (9), p.e828-e838
issn 1554-7477
1935-469X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1819433498
source MEDLINE; American Society of Clinical Oncology Online Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Advance Care Planning
Caregivers
Continuity of Patient Care
Culture
Decision Making
Humans
Neoplasms - therapy
Palliative Care
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Psychology
Quality of Health Care
Societies, Medical
Terminal Care
title Defining High-Quality Palliative Care in Oncology Practice: An American Society of Clinical Oncology/American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine Guidance Statement
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T06%3A49%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Defining%20High-Quality%20Palliative%20Care%20in%20Oncology%20Practice:%20An%20American%20Society%20of%20Clinical%20Oncology/American%20Academy%20of%20Hospice%20and%20Palliative%20Medicine%20Guidance%20Statement&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20oncology%20practice&rft.au=Bickel,%20Kathleen%20E&rft.date=2016-09&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=e828&rft.epage=e838&rft.pages=e828-e838&rft.issn=1554-7477&rft.eissn=1935-469X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1200/JOP.2016.010686&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1819433498%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1819433498&rft_id=info:pmid/27531376&rfr_iscdi=true