Patchy distribution fields: sampling distance unit and reconstruction adequacy
A mathematical model (Kriging) was used to examine the effects of choosing various units of sampling distance on the adequacy of reconstructing patchy distribution fields. The model simulates fish or plankton patches (or gaps) of different shapes and spatial orientations, and an acoustic survey by p...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | ICES journal of marine science 2001, Vol.58 (6), p.1184-1194 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1194 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1184 |
container_title | ICES journal of marine science |
container_volume | 58 |
creator | Kalikhman, I. |
description | A mathematical model (Kriging) was used to examine the effects of choosing various units of sampling distance on the adequacy of reconstructing patchy distribution fields. The model simulates fish or plankton patches (or gaps) of different shapes and spatial orientations, and an acoustic survey by parallel transects along which a unit of sampling distance is set. Conformity of the reconstructed fields to those originally generated was evaluated by calculating their correlations. If a priori information on patch orientation is available, the optimal ratios of the distance between transects and the sampling distance unit to the corresponding autocorrelation radius for the field have been determined, ensuring the required match between the reconstructed field and its original. The experiments with a certain unit of sampling distance confirm that a posteriori determination of patch orientation allows reconstruction of the best field attainable on the basis of the data from the survey conducted. In cases of field movement, the criterion for choosing a survey direction is based on the relationship between the dimension of moving patches in the direction of movement and that of the surveyed area; the criterion remains valid when a unit of sampling distance is set along transects. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1006/jmsc.2001.1106 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18191607</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1006/jmsc.2001.1106</oup_id><sourcerecordid>18191607</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-defd5339f9583ddf8dfa2bdeef78a1eeccec6de65ebd28c73d24b198aef87d8b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkD1PwzAQQC0EEqWwMmdCYkiw4yax2VBFKaJ8CIGEWCzHPoNLvmonEv33JA1iZbqT7r0bHkKnBEcE4_RiXXoVxRiTiBCc7qEJwTwJecz4_rAns5ASyg_RkfdrjHE2S_EEPTzJVn1uA21962zetbauAmOh0P4y8LJsClt97K6yUhB0lW0DWenAgaqrXunUzpAaNp1U22N0YGTh4eR3TtHr4vplvgxXjze386tVqCjDbajB6IRSbnjCqNaGaSPjXAOYjEkCoBSoVEOaQK5jpjKq41lOOJNgWKZZTqfobPzbuHrTgW9Fab2CopAV1J0XhBFOUpz1YDSCytXeOzCicbaUbisIFkM2MWQTQzYxZOuF81Gou-Z_NhzZPg98_9HSfYk0o1kilm_v4p4RHJPnpbijP5RVgGA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18191607</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Patchy distribution fields: sampling distance unit and reconstruction adequacy</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Kalikhman, I.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kalikhman, I.</creatorcontrib><description>A mathematical model (Kriging) was used to examine the effects of choosing various units of sampling distance on the adequacy of reconstructing patchy distribution fields. The model simulates fish or plankton patches (or gaps) of different shapes and spatial orientations, and an acoustic survey by parallel transects along which a unit of sampling distance is set. Conformity of the reconstructed fields to those originally generated was evaluated by calculating their correlations. If a priori information on patch orientation is available, the optimal ratios of the distance between transects and the sampling distance unit to the corresponding autocorrelation radius for the field have been determined, ensuring the required match between the reconstructed field and its original. The experiments with a certain unit of sampling distance confirm that a posteriori determination of patch orientation allows reconstruction of the best field attainable on the basis of the data from the survey conducted. In cases of field movement, the criterion for choosing a survey direction is based on the relationship between the dimension of moving patches in the direction of movement and that of the surveyed area; the criterion remains valid when a unit of sampling distance is set along transects.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1054-3139</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-9289</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1006/jmsc.2001.1106</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>acoustic survey design ; anisotropy ; autocorrelation radius ; coefficient of determination ; conformity ; distance between transects ; Marine ; patchy distribution field ; reconstruction ; sampling distance unit</subject><ispartof>ICES journal of marine science, 2001, Vol.58 (6), p.1184-1194</ispartof><rights>2001 International Council for the Exploration of the Sea 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-defd5339f9583ddf8dfa2bdeef78a1eeccec6de65ebd28c73d24b198aef87d8b3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kalikhman, I.</creatorcontrib><title>Patchy distribution fields: sampling distance unit and reconstruction adequacy</title><title>ICES journal of marine science</title><description>A mathematical model (Kriging) was used to examine the effects of choosing various units of sampling distance on the adequacy of reconstructing patchy distribution fields. The model simulates fish or plankton patches (or gaps) of different shapes and spatial orientations, and an acoustic survey by parallel transects along which a unit of sampling distance is set. Conformity of the reconstructed fields to those originally generated was evaluated by calculating their correlations. If a priori information on patch orientation is available, the optimal ratios of the distance between transects and the sampling distance unit to the corresponding autocorrelation radius for the field have been determined, ensuring the required match between the reconstructed field and its original. The experiments with a certain unit of sampling distance confirm that a posteriori determination of patch orientation allows reconstruction of the best field attainable on the basis of the data from the survey conducted. In cases of field movement, the criterion for choosing a survey direction is based on the relationship between the dimension of moving patches in the direction of movement and that of the surveyed area; the criterion remains valid when a unit of sampling distance is set along transects.</description><subject>acoustic survey design</subject><subject>anisotropy</subject><subject>autocorrelation radius</subject><subject>coefficient of determination</subject><subject>conformity</subject><subject>distance between transects</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>patchy distribution field</subject><subject>reconstruction</subject><subject>sampling distance unit</subject><issn>1054-3139</issn><issn>1095-9289</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkD1PwzAQQC0EEqWwMmdCYkiw4yax2VBFKaJ8CIGEWCzHPoNLvmonEv33JA1iZbqT7r0bHkKnBEcE4_RiXXoVxRiTiBCc7qEJwTwJecz4_rAns5ASyg_RkfdrjHE2S_EEPTzJVn1uA21962zetbauAmOh0P4y8LJsClt97K6yUhB0lW0DWenAgaqrXunUzpAaNp1U22N0YGTh4eR3TtHr4vplvgxXjze386tVqCjDbajB6IRSbnjCqNaGaSPjXAOYjEkCoBSoVEOaQK5jpjKq41lOOJNgWKZZTqfobPzbuHrTgW9Fab2CopAV1J0XhBFOUpz1YDSCytXeOzCicbaUbisIFkM2MWQTQzYxZOuF81Gou-Z_NhzZPg98_9HSfYk0o1kilm_v4p4RHJPnpbijP5RVgGA</recordid><startdate>2001</startdate><enddate>2001</enddate><creator>Kalikhman, I.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2001</creationdate><title>Patchy distribution fields: sampling distance unit and reconstruction adequacy</title><author>Kalikhman, I.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-defd5339f9583ddf8dfa2bdeef78a1eeccec6de65ebd28c73d24b198aef87d8b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>acoustic survey design</topic><topic>anisotropy</topic><topic>autocorrelation radius</topic><topic>coefficient of determination</topic><topic>conformity</topic><topic>distance between transects</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>patchy distribution field</topic><topic>reconstruction</topic><topic>sampling distance unit</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kalikhman, I.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>ICES journal of marine science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kalikhman, I.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Patchy distribution fields: sampling distance unit and reconstruction adequacy</atitle><jtitle>ICES journal of marine science</jtitle><date>2001</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1184</spage><epage>1194</epage><pages>1184-1194</pages><issn>1054-3139</issn><eissn>1095-9289</eissn><abstract>A mathematical model (Kriging) was used to examine the effects of choosing various units of sampling distance on the adequacy of reconstructing patchy distribution fields. The model simulates fish or plankton patches (or gaps) of different shapes and spatial orientations, and an acoustic survey by parallel transects along which a unit of sampling distance is set. Conformity of the reconstructed fields to those originally generated was evaluated by calculating their correlations. If a priori information on patch orientation is available, the optimal ratios of the distance between transects and the sampling distance unit to the corresponding autocorrelation radius for the field have been determined, ensuring the required match between the reconstructed field and its original. The experiments with a certain unit of sampling distance confirm that a posteriori determination of patch orientation allows reconstruction of the best field attainable on the basis of the data from the survey conducted. In cases of field movement, the criterion for choosing a survey direction is based on the relationship between the dimension of moving patches in the direction of movement and that of the surveyed area; the criterion remains valid when a unit of sampling distance is set along transects.</abstract><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1006/jmsc.2001.1106</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1054-3139 |
ispartof | ICES journal of marine science, 2001, Vol.58 (6), p.1184-1194 |
issn | 1054-3139 1095-9289 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18191607 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Oxford Journals Open Access Collection; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | acoustic survey design anisotropy autocorrelation radius coefficient of determination conformity distance between transects Marine patchy distribution field reconstruction sampling distance unit |
title | Patchy distribution fields: sampling distance unit and reconstruction adequacy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T18%3A59%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Patchy%20distribution%20fields:%20sampling%20distance%20unit%20and%20reconstruction%20adequacy&rft.jtitle=ICES%20journal%20of%20marine%20science&rft.au=Kalikhman,%20I.&rft.date=2001&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1184&rft.epage=1194&rft.pages=1184-1194&rft.issn=1054-3139&rft.eissn=1095-9289&rft_id=info:doi/10.1006/jmsc.2001.1106&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E18191607%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18191607&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1006/jmsc.2001.1106&rfr_iscdi=true |