Long-Lead Seasonal Forecasts—Where Do We Stand?

The National Weather Service intends to begin routinely issuing long-lead forecasts of 3-month mean U. S. temperature and precipitation by the beginning of 1995. The ability to produce useful forecasts for certain seasons and regions at projection times of up to 1 yr is attributed to advances in dat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 1994-11, Vol.75 (11), p.2097-2114
Hauptverfasser: Barnston, Anthony G., van den Dool, Huug M., Zebiak, Stephen E., Barnett, Tim P., Ji, Ming, Rodenhuis, David R., Cane, Mark A., Leetmaa, Ants, Graham, Nicholas E., Ropelewski, Chester R., Kousky, Vernon E., O'Lenic, Edward A., Livezey, Robert E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2114
container_issue 11
container_start_page 2097
container_title Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
container_volume 75
creator Barnston, Anthony G.
van den Dool, Huug M.
Zebiak, Stephen E.
Barnett, Tim P.
Ji, Ming
Rodenhuis, David R.
Cane, Mark A.
Leetmaa, Ants
Graham, Nicholas E.
Ropelewski, Chester R.
Kousky, Vernon E.
O'Lenic, Edward A.
Livezey, Robert E.
description The National Weather Service intends to begin routinely issuing long-lead forecasts of 3-month mean U. S. temperature and precipitation by the beginning of 1995. The ability to produce useful forecasts for certain seasons and regions at projection times of up to 1 yr is attributed to advances in data observing and processing, computer capability, and physical understanding—particularly, for tropical ocean–atmosphere phenomena. Because much of the skill of the forecasts comes from anomalies of tropical SST related to ENSO, we highlight here long-lead forecasts of the tropical Pacific SST itself, which have higher skill than the U.S forecasts that are made largely on their basis. The performance of five ENSO prediction systems is examined: Two are dynamical [the Cane–Zebiak simple coupled model of Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory and the nonsimple coupled model of the National Centersfor Environmental Prediction (NCEP)]; one is a hybrid coupled model (the Scripps Institution for Oceanography–Max Planck Institute for Meteorology system with a full ocean general circulation model and a statistical atmosphere); and two are statistical (canonical correlation analysis and constructed analogs, used at the Climate Prediction Center of NCEP). With increasing physical understanding, dynamically based forecasts have the potential to become more skillful than purely statistical ones. Currently, however, the two approaches deliver roughly equally skillful forecasts, and the simplest model performs about as well as the more comprehensive models. At a lead time of 6 months (defined here as the time between the end of the latest observed period and the beginning of the predictand period), the SST forecasts have an overall correlation skill in the 0.60s for 1982–93, which easily outperforms persistence and is regarded as useful. Skill for extra-tropical surface climate is this high only in limited regions for certain seasons. Both types of forecasts are not much better than local higher-order autoregressive controls. However, continual progress is being made in understanding relations among global oceanic and atmospheric climate-scale anomaly fields. It is important that more real-time forecasts be made before we rush to judgement. Performance in the real-time setting is the ultimate test of the utility of a long-lead forecast. The National Weather Service's plan to implement new operational long-lead seasonal forecast products demonstrates its effectiveness in identifying
doi_str_mv 10.1175/1520-0477(1994)075<2097:LLSFDW>2.0.CO;2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18189333</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26231686</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26231686</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-1acaa240426ae24a9086ced70533a2f33f12bb8e07ebdb8cea3a130493cdffa03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc9O4zAQhy3ESpQuj4AUIYTgkDL25I8DCITKll0pUg8F9WhNHQdahRjs9MCNh-AJ90k2VlEPe8EHW9Z8-tkzH2PnHEac5-k5TwXEkOT5KS-K5Azy9EpAkV-U5WxyN78WIxiNp5dihw225C4bAADG_ZbvsX3vV-GKkg8YL237FJeGqmhmyNuWmmhindHkO__343P-bJyJ7mw0N9Gso7a6-cl-1NR4c_B1Dtnj5NfD-HdcTu__jG_LWPfBXcxJE4kEEpGREQkVIDNtqhxSRBI1Ys3FYiEN5GZRLaQ2hMQRkgJ1VdcEOGQnm9xXZ9_WxnfqZem1aRpqjV17xSWXBfbrWzCTmGYQwKP_wJVdu75jrwSKrP9pWnwHoYQsJN1vIO2s987U6tUtX8i9Kw4qWFJh9irMXgVLqrekgiW1saSEAjWe9olDdvz1HHlNTe2o1Uu_jUNMpMgCdrjBVr6zblsOpb69DP8BlT-cng</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>232642659</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Long-Lead Seasonal Forecasts—Where Do We Stand?</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>American Meteorological Society</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Barnston, Anthony G. ; van den Dool, Huug M. ; Zebiak, Stephen E. ; Barnett, Tim P. ; Ji, Ming ; Rodenhuis, David R. ; Cane, Mark A. ; Leetmaa, Ants ; Graham, Nicholas E. ; Ropelewski, Chester R. ; Kousky, Vernon E. ; O'Lenic, Edward A. ; Livezey, Robert E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Barnston, Anthony G. ; van den Dool, Huug M. ; Zebiak, Stephen E. ; Barnett, Tim P. ; Ji, Ming ; Rodenhuis, David R. ; Cane, Mark A. ; Leetmaa, Ants ; Graham, Nicholas E. ; Ropelewski, Chester R. ; Kousky, Vernon E. ; O'Lenic, Edward A. ; Livezey, Robert E.</creatorcontrib><description>The National Weather Service intends to begin routinely issuing long-lead forecasts of 3-month mean U. S. temperature and precipitation by the beginning of 1995. The ability to produce useful forecasts for certain seasons and regions at projection times of up to 1 yr is attributed to advances in data observing and processing, computer capability, and physical understanding—particularly, for tropical ocean–atmosphere phenomena. Because much of the skill of the forecasts comes from anomalies of tropical SST related to ENSO, we highlight here long-lead forecasts of the tropical Pacific SST itself, which have higher skill than the U.S forecasts that are made largely on their basis. The performance of five ENSO prediction systems is examined: Two are dynamical [the Cane–Zebiak simple coupled model of Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory and the nonsimple coupled model of the National Centersfor Environmental Prediction (NCEP)]; one is a hybrid coupled model (the Scripps Institution for Oceanography–Max Planck Institute for Meteorology system with a full ocean general circulation model and a statistical atmosphere); and two are statistical (canonical correlation analysis and constructed analogs, used at the Climate Prediction Center of NCEP). With increasing physical understanding, dynamically based forecasts have the potential to become more skillful than purely statistical ones. Currently, however, the two approaches deliver roughly equally skillful forecasts, and the simplest model performs about as well as the more comprehensive models. At a lead time of 6 months (defined here as the time between the end of the latest observed period and the beginning of the predictand period), the SST forecasts have an overall correlation skill in the 0.60s for 1982–93, which easily outperforms persistence and is regarded as useful. Skill for extra-tropical surface climate is this high only in limited regions for certain seasons. Both types of forecasts are not much better than local higher-order autoregressive controls. However, continual progress is being made in understanding relations among global oceanic and atmospheric climate-scale anomaly fields. It is important that more real-time forecasts be made before we rush to judgement. Performance in the real-time setting is the ultimate test of the utility of a long-lead forecast. The National Weather Service's plan to implement new operational long-lead seasonal forecast products demonstrates its effectiveness in identifying and transferring "cutting edge" technologies from theory to applications. This could not have been accomplished without close ties with, and the active cooperation of, the academic and research communities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-0007</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-0477</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1175/1520-0477(1994)075&lt;2097:LLSFDW&gt;2.0.CO;2</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BAMOAD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston, MA: American Meteorological Society</publisher><subject>Analytical forecasting ; Atmospheric models ; Climate models ; Earth, ocean, space ; El Nino ; Exact sciences and technology ; External geophysics ; Forecasting models ; Marine ; Meteorology ; Modeling ; Oceans ; Predictions ; Tropical regions ; Weather ; Weather analysis and prediction ; Weather forecasting</subject><ispartof>Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 1994-11, Vol.75 (11), p.2097-2114</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1994, American Meteorological Society (AMS)</rights><rights>1995 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Meteorological Society Nov 1994</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26231686$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26231686$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,3668,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=3348262$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Barnston, Anthony G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van den Dool, Huug M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zebiak, Stephen E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barnett, Tim P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ji, Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodenhuis, David R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cane, Mark A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leetmaa, Ants</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graham, Nicholas E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ropelewski, Chester R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kousky, Vernon E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Lenic, Edward A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Livezey, Robert E.</creatorcontrib><title>Long-Lead Seasonal Forecasts—Where Do We Stand?</title><title>Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society</title><description>The National Weather Service intends to begin routinely issuing long-lead forecasts of 3-month mean U. S. temperature and precipitation by the beginning of 1995. The ability to produce useful forecasts for certain seasons and regions at projection times of up to 1 yr is attributed to advances in data observing and processing, computer capability, and physical understanding—particularly, for tropical ocean–atmosphere phenomena. Because much of the skill of the forecasts comes from anomalies of tropical SST related to ENSO, we highlight here long-lead forecasts of the tropical Pacific SST itself, which have higher skill than the U.S forecasts that are made largely on their basis. The performance of five ENSO prediction systems is examined: Two are dynamical [the Cane–Zebiak simple coupled model of Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory and the nonsimple coupled model of the National Centersfor Environmental Prediction (NCEP)]; one is a hybrid coupled model (the Scripps Institution for Oceanography–Max Planck Institute for Meteorology system with a full ocean general circulation model and a statistical atmosphere); and two are statistical (canonical correlation analysis and constructed analogs, used at the Climate Prediction Center of NCEP). With increasing physical understanding, dynamically based forecasts have the potential to become more skillful than purely statistical ones. Currently, however, the two approaches deliver roughly equally skillful forecasts, and the simplest model performs about as well as the more comprehensive models. At a lead time of 6 months (defined here as the time between the end of the latest observed period and the beginning of the predictand period), the SST forecasts have an overall correlation skill in the 0.60s for 1982–93, which easily outperforms persistence and is regarded as useful. Skill for extra-tropical surface climate is this high only in limited regions for certain seasons. Both types of forecasts are not much better than local higher-order autoregressive controls. However, continual progress is being made in understanding relations among global oceanic and atmospheric climate-scale anomaly fields. It is important that more real-time forecasts be made before we rush to judgement. Performance in the real-time setting is the ultimate test of the utility of a long-lead forecast. The National Weather Service's plan to implement new operational long-lead seasonal forecast products demonstrates its effectiveness in identifying and transferring "cutting edge" technologies from theory to applications. This could not have been accomplished without close ties with, and the active cooperation of, the academic and research communities.</description><subject>Analytical forecasting</subject><subject>Atmospheric models</subject><subject>Climate models</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>El Nino</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>External geophysics</subject><subject>Forecasting models</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Meteorology</subject><subject>Modeling</subject><subject>Oceans</subject><subject>Predictions</subject><subject>Tropical regions</subject><subject>Weather</subject><subject>Weather analysis and prediction</subject><subject>Weather forecasting</subject><issn>0003-0007</issn><issn>1520-0477</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc9O4zAQhy3ESpQuj4AUIYTgkDL25I8DCITKll0pUg8F9WhNHQdahRjs9MCNh-AJ90k2VlEPe8EHW9Z8-tkzH2PnHEac5-k5TwXEkOT5KS-K5Azy9EpAkV-U5WxyN78WIxiNp5dihw225C4bAADG_ZbvsX3vV-GKkg8YL237FJeGqmhmyNuWmmhindHkO__343P-bJyJ7mw0N9Gso7a6-cl-1NR4c_B1Dtnj5NfD-HdcTu__jG_LWPfBXcxJE4kEEpGREQkVIDNtqhxSRBI1Ys3FYiEN5GZRLaQ2hMQRkgJ1VdcEOGQnm9xXZ9_WxnfqZem1aRpqjV17xSWXBfbrWzCTmGYQwKP_wJVdu75jrwSKrP9pWnwHoYQsJN1vIO2s987U6tUtX8i9Kw4qWFJh9irMXgVLqrekgiW1saSEAjWe9olDdvz1HHlNTe2o1Uu_jUNMpMgCdrjBVr6zblsOpb69DP8BlT-cng</recordid><startdate>19941101</startdate><enddate>19941101</enddate><creator>Barnston, Anthony G.</creator><creator>van den Dool, Huug M.</creator><creator>Zebiak, Stephen E.</creator><creator>Barnett, Tim P.</creator><creator>Ji, Ming</creator><creator>Rodenhuis, David R.</creator><creator>Cane, Mark A.</creator><creator>Leetmaa, Ants</creator><creator>Graham, Nicholas E.</creator><creator>Ropelewski, Chester R.</creator><creator>Kousky, Vernon E.</creator><creator>O'Lenic, Edward A.</creator><creator>Livezey, Robert E.</creator><general>American Meteorological Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19941101</creationdate><title>Long-Lead Seasonal Forecasts—Where Do We Stand?</title><author>Barnston, Anthony G. ; van den Dool, Huug M. ; Zebiak, Stephen E. ; Barnett, Tim P. ; Ji, Ming ; Rodenhuis, David R. ; Cane, Mark A. ; Leetmaa, Ants ; Graham, Nicholas E. ; Ropelewski, Chester R. ; Kousky, Vernon E. ; O'Lenic, Edward A. ; Livezey, Robert E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-1acaa240426ae24a9086ced70533a2f33f12bb8e07ebdb8cea3a130493cdffa03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Analytical forecasting</topic><topic>Atmospheric models</topic><topic>Climate models</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>El Nino</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>External geophysics</topic><topic>Forecasting models</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Meteorology</topic><topic>Modeling</topic><topic>Oceans</topic><topic>Predictions</topic><topic>Tropical regions</topic><topic>Weather</topic><topic>Weather analysis and prediction</topic><topic>Weather forecasting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Barnston, Anthony G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van den Dool, Huug M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zebiak, Stephen E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barnett, Tim P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ji, Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodenhuis, David R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cane, Mark A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leetmaa, Ants</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graham, Nicholas E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ropelewski, Chester R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kousky, Vernon E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Lenic, Edward A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Livezey, Robert E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Barnston, Anthony G.</au><au>van den Dool, Huug M.</au><au>Zebiak, Stephen E.</au><au>Barnett, Tim P.</au><au>Ji, Ming</au><au>Rodenhuis, David R.</au><au>Cane, Mark A.</au><au>Leetmaa, Ants</au><au>Graham, Nicholas E.</au><au>Ropelewski, Chester R.</au><au>Kousky, Vernon E.</au><au>O'Lenic, Edward A.</au><au>Livezey, Robert E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Long-Lead Seasonal Forecasts—Where Do We Stand?</atitle><jtitle>Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society</jtitle><date>1994-11-01</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>75</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>2097</spage><epage>2114</epage><pages>2097-2114</pages><issn>0003-0007</issn><eissn>1520-0477</eissn><coden>BAMOAD</coden><abstract>The National Weather Service intends to begin routinely issuing long-lead forecasts of 3-month mean U. S. temperature and precipitation by the beginning of 1995. The ability to produce useful forecasts for certain seasons and regions at projection times of up to 1 yr is attributed to advances in data observing and processing, computer capability, and physical understanding—particularly, for tropical ocean–atmosphere phenomena. Because much of the skill of the forecasts comes from anomalies of tropical SST related to ENSO, we highlight here long-lead forecasts of the tropical Pacific SST itself, which have higher skill than the U.S forecasts that are made largely on their basis. The performance of five ENSO prediction systems is examined: Two are dynamical [the Cane–Zebiak simple coupled model of Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory and the nonsimple coupled model of the National Centersfor Environmental Prediction (NCEP)]; one is a hybrid coupled model (the Scripps Institution for Oceanography–Max Planck Institute for Meteorology system with a full ocean general circulation model and a statistical atmosphere); and two are statistical (canonical correlation analysis and constructed analogs, used at the Climate Prediction Center of NCEP). With increasing physical understanding, dynamically based forecasts have the potential to become more skillful than purely statistical ones. Currently, however, the two approaches deliver roughly equally skillful forecasts, and the simplest model performs about as well as the more comprehensive models. At a lead time of 6 months (defined here as the time between the end of the latest observed period and the beginning of the predictand period), the SST forecasts have an overall correlation skill in the 0.60s for 1982–93, which easily outperforms persistence and is regarded as useful. Skill for extra-tropical surface climate is this high only in limited regions for certain seasons. Both types of forecasts are not much better than local higher-order autoregressive controls. However, continual progress is being made in understanding relations among global oceanic and atmospheric climate-scale anomaly fields. It is important that more real-time forecasts be made before we rush to judgement. Performance in the real-time setting is the ultimate test of the utility of a long-lead forecast. The National Weather Service's plan to implement new operational long-lead seasonal forecast products demonstrates its effectiveness in identifying and transferring "cutting edge" technologies from theory to applications. This could not have been accomplished without close ties with, and the active cooperation of, the academic and research communities.</abstract><cop>Boston, MA</cop><pub>American Meteorological Society</pub><doi>10.1175/1520-0477(1994)075&lt;2097:LLSFDW&gt;2.0.CO;2</doi><tpages>18</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-0007
ispartof Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 1994-11, Vol.75 (11), p.2097-2114
issn 0003-0007
1520-0477
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18189333
source Jstor Complete Legacy; American Meteorological Society; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Analytical forecasting
Atmospheric models
Climate models
Earth, ocean, space
El Nino
Exact sciences and technology
External geophysics
Forecasting models
Marine
Meteorology
Modeling
Oceans
Predictions
Tropical regions
Weather
Weather analysis and prediction
Weather forecasting
title Long-Lead Seasonal Forecasts—Where Do We Stand?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T21%3A48%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Long-Lead%20Seasonal%20Forecasts%E2%80%94Where%20Do%20We%20Stand?&rft.jtitle=Bulletin%20of%20the%20American%20Meteorological%20Society&rft.au=Barnston,%20Anthony%20G.&rft.date=1994-11-01&rft.volume=75&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2097&rft.epage=2114&rft.pages=2097-2114&rft.issn=0003-0007&rft.eissn=1520-0477&rft.coden=BAMOAD&rft_id=info:doi/10.1175/1520-0477(1994)075%3C2097:LLSFDW%3E2.0.CO;2&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26231686%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=232642659&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26231686&rfr_iscdi=true