User acceptance of observation and response charts with a track and trigger system: a multisite staff survey

Aims and objectives To examine user acceptance with a new format of charts for recording observations and as a prompt for responding to episodes of clinical deterioration in adult medical–surgical patients. Background Improving recognition and response to clinical deterioration remains a challenge f...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical nursing 2016-08, Vol.25 (15-16), p.2211-2222
Hauptverfasser: Elliott, Doug, Allen, Emily, McKinley, Sharon, Perry, Lin, Duffield, Christine, Fry, Margaret, Gallagher, Robyn, Iedema, Rick, Roche, Michael
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2222
container_issue 15-16
container_start_page 2211
container_title Journal of clinical nursing
container_volume 25
creator Elliott, Doug
Allen, Emily
McKinley, Sharon
Perry, Lin
Duffield, Christine
Fry, Margaret
Gallagher, Robyn
Iedema, Rick
Roche, Michael
description Aims and objectives To examine user acceptance with a new format of charts for recording observations and as a prompt for responding to episodes of clinical deterioration in adult medical–surgical patients. Background Improving recognition and response to clinical deterioration remains a challenge for acute healthcare institutions globally. Five chart templates were developed in Australia, combining human factors design principles with a track and trigger system for escalation of care. Two chart templates were previously tested in simulations, but none had been evaluated in clinical practice. Design Prospective multisite survey of user acceptance of the charts in practice. Methods New observation and response charts were trialled in parallel with existing charts for 24 hours across 36 adult acute medical–surgical wards, covering 108 shifts, in five Australian states. Surveys were completed by 477 staff respondents, with open‐ended comments and narrative from short informal feedback groups providing elaboration and context of user experiences. Results Respondents were broadly supportive of the chart format and content for monitoring patients, and as a prompt for escalating care. Some concerns were noted for chart size and style, use of ranges to graph vital signs and with specific human factors design features. Information and training issues were identified to improve usability and adherence to chart guidelines and to support improved detection and response for patients with clinical deterioration. Conclusions This initial evaluation demonstrated that the charts were perceived as appropriate for documenting observations and as a prompt to detect clinical deterioration. Further evaluation after some minor modifications to the chart is recommended. Relevance to clinical practice Explicit training on the principles and rationale of human factors chart design, use of embedded change management strategies and addressing practical issues will improve authentic engagement, staff acceptance and adoption by all clinical users when implementing a similar observation and response chart into practice.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jocn.13303
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1818329888</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4129106601</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4643-16d0cfdcc5e82b6f8a48a3c8040a7e755d5f047c57e856d6949d37ecef2df6fb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0U1PVDEUBuDGSGREN_4A08QNMbnQr9v2ujMTRA2BBEWXTaf3FDrcj7HtBeffW2aABQtiN03a57zJyYvQO0oOaDmHy9ENB5Rzwl-gGeWyrpgi7CWakUayihKpdtHrlJaEUM4Yf4V2maJMMk1nqLtIELF1DlbZDg7w6PG4KG83NodxwHZocYS0GocE2F3ZmBO-DfkKW5yjddcbkGO4vCwxaZ0y9J_KXz91OaSQAadsvcdpijewfoN2vO0SvL2_99DFl6Of86_Vydnxt_nnk8oJKXhFZUucb52rQbOF9NoKbbnTRBCrQNV1W3silKsV6Fq2shFNyxU48Kz10i_4Htrf5q7i-GeClE0fkoOuswOMUzJUU81Zo7X-D0pUzRslWKEfntDlOMWhLLJRhLCmkUV93CoXx5QieLOKobdxbSgxd3WZu7rMpq6C399HTose2kf60E8BdAtuQwfrZ6LM97P56UNotZ0JpY2_jzM2XhupuKrN79NjQ8Q5O_8hfhnB_wG6Ia8o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1807002996</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>User acceptance of observation and response charts with a track and trigger system: a multisite staff survey</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Elliott, Doug ; Allen, Emily ; McKinley, Sharon ; Perry, Lin ; Duffield, Christine ; Fry, Margaret ; Gallagher, Robyn ; Iedema, Rick ; Roche, Michael</creator><creatorcontrib>Elliott, Doug ; Allen, Emily ; McKinley, Sharon ; Perry, Lin ; Duffield, Christine ; Fry, Margaret ; Gallagher, Robyn ; Iedema, Rick ; Roche, Michael</creatorcontrib><description>Aims and objectives To examine user acceptance with a new format of charts for recording observations and as a prompt for responding to episodes of clinical deterioration in adult medical–surgical patients. Background Improving recognition and response to clinical deterioration remains a challenge for acute healthcare institutions globally. Five chart templates were developed in Australia, combining human factors design principles with a track and trigger system for escalation of care. Two chart templates were previously tested in simulations, but none had been evaluated in clinical practice. Design Prospective multisite survey of user acceptance of the charts in practice. Methods New observation and response charts were trialled in parallel with existing charts for 24 hours across 36 adult acute medical–surgical wards, covering 108 shifts, in five Australian states. Surveys were completed by 477 staff respondents, with open‐ended comments and narrative from short informal feedback groups providing elaboration and context of user experiences. Results Respondents were broadly supportive of the chart format and content for monitoring patients, and as a prompt for escalating care. Some concerns were noted for chart size and style, use of ranges to graph vital signs and with specific human factors design features. Information and training issues were identified to improve usability and adherence to chart guidelines and to support improved detection and response for patients with clinical deterioration. Conclusions This initial evaluation demonstrated that the charts were perceived as appropriate for documenting observations and as a prompt to detect clinical deterioration. Further evaluation after some minor modifications to the chart is recommended. Relevance to clinical practice Explicit training on the principles and rationale of human factors chart design, use of embedded change management strategies and addressing practical issues will improve authentic engagement, staff acceptance and adoption by all clinical users when implementing a similar observation and response chart into practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0962-1067</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2702</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13303</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27126281</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Attitude of Health Personnel ; Australia ; clinical deterioration ; Clinical medicine ; deteriorating patient ; experiences ; Female ; human factors design ; Humans ; Male ; Medical Records ; Medical Staff, Hospital ; Middle Aged ; Monitoring, Physiologic ; Nursing ; observation charts ; perceptions ; Prospective Studies ; rapid response system ; survey ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; track and trigger ; Vital Signs</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical nursing, 2016-08, Vol.25 (15-16), p.2211-2222</ispartof><rights>2016 The Authors. published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2016 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4643-16d0cfdcc5e82b6f8a48a3c8040a7e755d5f047c57e856d6949d37ecef2df6fb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4643-16d0cfdcc5e82b6f8a48a3c8040a7e755d5f047c57e856d6949d37ecef2df6fb3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0381-5160 ; 0000-0002-3831-537X ; 0000-0002-6081-5442</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjocn.13303$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjocn.13303$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27126281$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Elliott, Doug</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, Emily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKinley, Sharon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perry, Lin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duffield, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fry, Margaret</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallagher, Robyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iedema, Rick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roche, Michael</creatorcontrib><title>User acceptance of observation and response charts with a track and trigger system: a multisite staff survey</title><title>Journal of clinical nursing</title><addtitle>J Clin Nurs</addtitle><description>Aims and objectives To examine user acceptance with a new format of charts for recording observations and as a prompt for responding to episodes of clinical deterioration in adult medical–surgical patients. Background Improving recognition and response to clinical deterioration remains a challenge for acute healthcare institutions globally. Five chart templates were developed in Australia, combining human factors design principles with a track and trigger system for escalation of care. Two chart templates were previously tested in simulations, but none had been evaluated in clinical practice. Design Prospective multisite survey of user acceptance of the charts in practice. Methods New observation and response charts were trialled in parallel with existing charts for 24 hours across 36 adult acute medical–surgical wards, covering 108 shifts, in five Australian states. Surveys were completed by 477 staff respondents, with open‐ended comments and narrative from short informal feedback groups providing elaboration and context of user experiences. Results Respondents were broadly supportive of the chart format and content for monitoring patients, and as a prompt for escalating care. Some concerns were noted for chart size and style, use of ranges to graph vital signs and with specific human factors design features. Information and training issues were identified to improve usability and adherence to chart guidelines and to support improved detection and response for patients with clinical deterioration. Conclusions This initial evaluation demonstrated that the charts were perceived as appropriate for documenting observations and as a prompt to detect clinical deterioration. Further evaluation after some minor modifications to the chart is recommended. Relevance to clinical practice Explicit training on the principles and rationale of human factors chart design, use of embedded change management strategies and addressing practical issues will improve authentic engagement, staff acceptance and adoption by all clinical users when implementing a similar observation and response chart into practice.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Australia</subject><subject>clinical deterioration</subject><subject>Clinical medicine</subject><subject>deteriorating patient</subject><subject>experiences</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>human factors design</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical Records</subject><subject>Medical Staff, Hospital</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Monitoring, Physiologic</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>observation charts</subject><subject>perceptions</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>rapid response system</subject><subject>survey</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>track and trigger</subject><subject>Vital Signs</subject><issn>0962-1067</issn><issn>1365-2702</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0U1PVDEUBuDGSGREN_4A08QNMbnQr9v2ujMTRA2BBEWXTaf3FDrcj7HtBeffW2aABQtiN03a57zJyYvQO0oOaDmHy9ENB5Rzwl-gGeWyrpgi7CWakUayihKpdtHrlJaEUM4Yf4V2maJMMk1nqLtIELF1DlbZDg7w6PG4KG83NodxwHZocYS0GocE2F3ZmBO-DfkKW5yjddcbkGO4vCwxaZ0y9J_KXz91OaSQAadsvcdpijewfoN2vO0SvL2_99DFl6Of86_Vydnxt_nnk8oJKXhFZUucb52rQbOF9NoKbbnTRBCrQNV1W3silKsV6Fq2shFNyxU48Kz10i_4Htrf5q7i-GeClE0fkoOuswOMUzJUU81Zo7X-D0pUzRslWKEfntDlOMWhLLJRhLCmkUV93CoXx5QieLOKobdxbSgxd3WZu7rMpq6C399HTose2kf60E8BdAtuQwfrZ6LM97P56UNotZ0JpY2_jzM2XhupuKrN79NjQ8Q5O_8hfhnB_wG6Ia8o</recordid><startdate>201608</startdate><enddate>201608</enddate><creator>Elliott, Doug</creator><creator>Allen, Emily</creator><creator>McKinley, Sharon</creator><creator>Perry, Lin</creator><creator>Duffield, Christine</creator><creator>Fry, Margaret</creator><creator>Gallagher, Robyn</creator><creator>Iedema, Rick</creator><creator>Roche, Michael</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0381-5160</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3831-537X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6081-5442</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201608</creationdate><title>User acceptance of observation and response charts with a track and trigger system: a multisite staff survey</title><author>Elliott, Doug ; Allen, Emily ; McKinley, Sharon ; Perry, Lin ; Duffield, Christine ; Fry, Margaret ; Gallagher, Robyn ; Iedema, Rick ; Roche, Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4643-16d0cfdcc5e82b6f8a48a3c8040a7e755d5f047c57e856d6949d37ecef2df6fb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Australia</topic><topic>clinical deterioration</topic><topic>Clinical medicine</topic><topic>deteriorating patient</topic><topic>experiences</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>human factors design</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical Records</topic><topic>Medical Staff, Hospital</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Monitoring, Physiologic</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>observation charts</topic><topic>perceptions</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>rapid response system</topic><topic>survey</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>track and trigger</topic><topic>Vital Signs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Elliott, Doug</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, Emily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKinley, Sharon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perry, Lin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duffield, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fry, Margaret</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallagher, Robyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iedema, Rick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roche, Michael</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical nursing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Elliott, Doug</au><au>Allen, Emily</au><au>McKinley, Sharon</au><au>Perry, Lin</au><au>Duffield, Christine</au><au>Fry, Margaret</au><au>Gallagher, Robyn</au><au>Iedema, Rick</au><au>Roche, Michael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>User acceptance of observation and response charts with a track and trigger system: a multisite staff survey</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical nursing</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Nurs</addtitle><date>2016-08</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>15-16</issue><spage>2211</spage><epage>2222</epage><pages>2211-2222</pages><issn>0962-1067</issn><eissn>1365-2702</eissn><abstract>Aims and objectives To examine user acceptance with a new format of charts for recording observations and as a prompt for responding to episodes of clinical deterioration in adult medical–surgical patients. Background Improving recognition and response to clinical deterioration remains a challenge for acute healthcare institutions globally. Five chart templates were developed in Australia, combining human factors design principles with a track and trigger system for escalation of care. Two chart templates were previously tested in simulations, but none had been evaluated in clinical practice. Design Prospective multisite survey of user acceptance of the charts in practice. Methods New observation and response charts were trialled in parallel with existing charts for 24 hours across 36 adult acute medical–surgical wards, covering 108 shifts, in five Australian states. Surveys were completed by 477 staff respondents, with open‐ended comments and narrative from short informal feedback groups providing elaboration and context of user experiences. Results Respondents were broadly supportive of the chart format and content for monitoring patients, and as a prompt for escalating care. Some concerns were noted for chart size and style, use of ranges to graph vital signs and with specific human factors design features. Information and training issues were identified to improve usability and adherence to chart guidelines and to support improved detection and response for patients with clinical deterioration. Conclusions This initial evaluation demonstrated that the charts were perceived as appropriate for documenting observations and as a prompt to detect clinical deterioration. Further evaluation after some minor modifications to the chart is recommended. Relevance to clinical practice Explicit training on the principles and rationale of human factors chart design, use of embedded change management strategies and addressing practical issues will improve authentic engagement, staff acceptance and adoption by all clinical users when implementing a similar observation and response chart into practice.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>27126281</pmid><doi>10.1111/jocn.13303</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0381-5160</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3831-537X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6081-5442</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0962-1067
ispartof Journal of clinical nursing, 2016-08, Vol.25 (15-16), p.2211-2222
issn 0962-1067
1365-2702
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1818329888
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Adult
Attitude of Health Personnel
Australia
clinical deterioration
Clinical medicine
deteriorating patient
experiences
Female
human factors design
Humans
Male
Medical Records
Medical Staff, Hospital
Middle Aged
Monitoring, Physiologic
Nursing
observation charts
perceptions
Prospective Studies
rapid response system
survey
Surveys and Questionnaires
track and trigger
Vital Signs
title User acceptance of observation and response charts with a track and trigger system: a multisite staff survey
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T07%3A13%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=User%20acceptance%20of%20observation%20and%20response%20charts%20with%20a%20track%20and%20trigger%20system:%20a%20multisite%20staff%20survey&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20nursing&rft.au=Elliott,%20Doug&rft.date=2016-08&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=15-16&rft.spage=2211&rft.epage=2222&rft.pages=2211-2222&rft.issn=0962-1067&rft.eissn=1365-2702&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jocn.13303&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4129106601%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1807002996&rft_id=info:pmid/27126281&rfr_iscdi=true