Zooplankton grazing dynamics: top-down control of phytoplankton and its relationship to an estuarine habitat
Top‐down control of algal blooms was investigated in the Swan–Canning Estuary, to determine whether the resident zooplankton community was able to substantially reduce phytoplankton biomass through grazing, or whether high phytoplankton biomass effectively inhibited grazing. In situ grazing by zoopl...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Hydrological processes 2001-09, Vol.15 (13), p.2453-2464 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2464 |
---|---|
container_issue | 13 |
container_start_page | 2453 |
container_title | Hydrological processes |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Griffin, Sandra L. Rippingale, Robert J. |
description | Top‐down control of algal blooms was investigated in the Swan–Canning Estuary, to determine whether the resident zooplankton community was able to substantially reduce phytoplankton biomass through grazing, or whether high phytoplankton biomass effectively inhibited grazing. In situ grazing by zooplankton at two depths in the water column was measured over a diel period on six occasions and examined in relation to the biotic and abiotic habitat conditions.
Measured weight‐specific ingestion rates varied with phytoplankton and zooplankton species composition, but were significantly greater at the surface than at 5 m, close to the bottom (ranges of 1·59 to 252·41 and 0·51 to 28·99 µg phytoplankton C µg zooplankton C−1 day−1, respectively). There was no evidence of significant diel changes in ingestion rates of zooplankton. Phytoplankton biomass removed by in situ community grazing ranged between 0·9 and 45·0% of standing stock per hour. The maximum loss occurred when phytoplankton biomass ranged from 249·0 to 320·8 µg phytoplankton C l−1. Zooplankton grazing impact was negatively associated with high phytoplankton and low dissolved oxygen in bottom waters. The implications of, and mechanisms associated with, top‐down control of algal biomass in this estuary are discussed in relation to plankton succession and the physical environment. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/hyp.293 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18181333</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>18181333</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3583-659b6ccd28bfda116cac17643c12ec6fe617388e5405d96294e175a641883343</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEFP3DAQhS1UpG6Xir_gC_SAAnacOA63QmEBLbQVSKhcrFnHYV2ydmp7BeHX11VWcOrMYaTR956eHkK7lBxSQvKj5dAf5jXbQhNK6jqjRJQf0IQIUWaciOoj-hTCb0JIQQSZoO7Bub4D-xSdxY8eXo19xM1gYWVUOMbR9Vnjni1WzkbvOuxa3C-H-K4B22ATA_a6g2icDUvTJ1n6Yx3iGryxGi9hYSLEHbTdQhf0582dorvzs7vTi2z-fXZ5-nWeKVYKlvGyXnClmlws2gYo5QoUrXjBFM214q3mtGJC6LIgZVPzvC40rUrgBRWCsYJN0f5o23v3Z51SyJUJSncpsnbrIKlIy9JM0ZcRVN6F4HUre29W4AdJifxXpkxlylRmIvc2lhAUdK0Hq0x4x1OZBWM0cQcj92w6PfzPTl78-jG6ZiNtQtQvbzT4J8krVpXy_mYmv_0s-O3V_FqesL_QiJL8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18181333</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Zooplankton grazing dynamics: top-down control of phytoplankton and its relationship to an estuarine habitat</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Griffin, Sandra L. ; Rippingale, Robert J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Griffin, Sandra L. ; Rippingale, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><description>Top‐down control of algal blooms was investigated in the Swan–Canning Estuary, to determine whether the resident zooplankton community was able to substantially reduce phytoplankton biomass through grazing, or whether high phytoplankton biomass effectively inhibited grazing. In situ grazing by zooplankton at two depths in the water column was measured over a diel period on six occasions and examined in relation to the biotic and abiotic habitat conditions.
Measured weight‐specific ingestion rates varied with phytoplankton and zooplankton species composition, but were significantly greater at the surface than at 5 m, close to the bottom (ranges of 1·59 to 252·41 and 0·51 to 28·99 µg phytoplankton C µg zooplankton C−1 day−1, respectively). There was no evidence of significant diel changes in ingestion rates of zooplankton. Phytoplankton biomass removed by in situ community grazing ranged between 0·9 and 45·0% of standing stock per hour. The maximum loss occurred when phytoplankton biomass ranged from 249·0 to 320·8 µg phytoplankton C l−1. Zooplankton grazing impact was negatively associated with high phytoplankton and low dissolved oxygen in bottom waters. The implications of, and mechanisms associated with, top‐down control of algal biomass in this estuary are discussed in relation to plankton succession and the physical environment. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0885-6087</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1085</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/hyp.293</identifier><identifier>CODEN: HYPRE3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Algae ; Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Australia, Canning R ; Australia, Swan R ; Biological and medical sciences ; Brackish ; Brackish water ecosystems ; diel feeding ; dissolved oxygen ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Exact sciences and technology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Geochemistry ; Hydrology ; Hydrology. Hydrogeology ; Marine ; Mineralogy ; phytoplankton ; Silicates ; succession ; Synecology ; top-down control ; Water geochemistry ; zooplankton</subject><ispartof>Hydrological processes, 2001-09, Vol.15 (13), p.2453-2464</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3583-659b6ccd28bfda116cac17643c12ec6fe617388e5405d96294e175a641883343</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3583-659b6ccd28bfda116cac17643c12ec6fe617388e5405d96294e175a641883343</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fhyp.293$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fhyp.293$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=14084331$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Griffin, Sandra L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rippingale, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><title>Zooplankton grazing dynamics: top-down control of phytoplankton and its relationship to an estuarine habitat</title><title>Hydrological processes</title><addtitle>Hydrol. Process</addtitle><description>Top‐down control of algal blooms was investigated in the Swan–Canning Estuary, to determine whether the resident zooplankton community was able to substantially reduce phytoplankton biomass through grazing, or whether high phytoplankton biomass effectively inhibited grazing. In situ grazing by zooplankton at two depths in the water column was measured over a diel period on six occasions and examined in relation to the biotic and abiotic habitat conditions.
Measured weight‐specific ingestion rates varied with phytoplankton and zooplankton species composition, but were significantly greater at the surface than at 5 m, close to the bottom (ranges of 1·59 to 252·41 and 0·51 to 28·99 µg phytoplankton C µg zooplankton C−1 day−1, respectively). There was no evidence of significant diel changes in ingestion rates of zooplankton. Phytoplankton biomass removed by in situ community grazing ranged between 0·9 and 45·0% of standing stock per hour. The maximum loss occurred when phytoplankton biomass ranged from 249·0 to 320·8 µg phytoplankton C l−1. Zooplankton grazing impact was negatively associated with high phytoplankton and low dissolved oxygen in bottom waters. The implications of, and mechanisms associated with, top‐down control of algal biomass in this estuary are discussed in relation to plankton succession and the physical environment. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>Algae</subject><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Australia, Canning R</subject><subject>Australia, Swan R</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Brackish</subject><subject>Brackish water ecosystems</subject><subject>diel feeding</subject><subject>dissolved oxygen</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Geochemistry</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Hydrology. Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Mineralogy</subject><subject>phytoplankton</subject><subject>Silicates</subject><subject>succession</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><subject>top-down control</subject><subject>Water geochemistry</subject><subject>zooplankton</subject><issn>0885-6087</issn><issn>1099-1085</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEFP3DAQhS1UpG6Xir_gC_SAAnacOA63QmEBLbQVSKhcrFnHYV2ydmp7BeHX11VWcOrMYaTR956eHkK7lBxSQvKj5dAf5jXbQhNK6jqjRJQf0IQIUWaciOoj-hTCb0JIQQSZoO7Bub4D-xSdxY8eXo19xM1gYWVUOMbR9Vnjni1WzkbvOuxa3C-H-K4B22ATA_a6g2icDUvTJ1n6Yx3iGryxGi9hYSLEHbTdQhf0582dorvzs7vTi2z-fXZ5-nWeKVYKlvGyXnClmlws2gYo5QoUrXjBFM214q3mtGJC6LIgZVPzvC40rUrgBRWCsYJN0f5o23v3Z51SyJUJSncpsnbrIKlIy9JM0ZcRVN6F4HUre29W4AdJifxXpkxlylRmIvc2lhAUdK0Hq0x4x1OZBWM0cQcj92w6PfzPTl78-jG6ZiNtQtQvbzT4J8krVpXy_mYmv_0s-O3V_FqesL_QiJL8</recordid><startdate>200109</startdate><enddate>200109</enddate><creator>Griffin, Sandra L.</creator><creator>Rippingale, Robert J.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200109</creationdate><title>Zooplankton grazing dynamics: top-down control of phytoplankton and its relationship to an estuarine habitat</title><author>Griffin, Sandra L. ; Rippingale, Robert J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3583-659b6ccd28bfda116cac17643c12ec6fe617388e5405d96294e175a641883343</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Algae</topic><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Australia, Canning R</topic><topic>Australia, Swan R</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Brackish</topic><topic>Brackish water ecosystems</topic><topic>diel feeding</topic><topic>dissolved oxygen</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Geochemistry</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Hydrology. Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Mineralogy</topic><topic>phytoplankton</topic><topic>Silicates</topic><topic>succession</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><topic>top-down control</topic><topic>Water geochemistry</topic><topic>zooplankton</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Griffin, Sandra L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rippingale, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Hydrological processes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Griffin, Sandra L.</au><au>Rippingale, Robert J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Zooplankton grazing dynamics: top-down control of phytoplankton and its relationship to an estuarine habitat</atitle><jtitle>Hydrological processes</jtitle><addtitle>Hydrol. Process</addtitle><date>2001-09</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>13</issue><spage>2453</spage><epage>2464</epage><pages>2453-2464</pages><issn>0885-6087</issn><eissn>1099-1085</eissn><coden>HYPRE3</coden><abstract>Top‐down control of algal blooms was investigated in the Swan–Canning Estuary, to determine whether the resident zooplankton community was able to substantially reduce phytoplankton biomass through grazing, or whether high phytoplankton biomass effectively inhibited grazing. In situ grazing by zooplankton at two depths in the water column was measured over a diel period on six occasions and examined in relation to the biotic and abiotic habitat conditions.
Measured weight‐specific ingestion rates varied with phytoplankton and zooplankton species composition, but were significantly greater at the surface than at 5 m, close to the bottom (ranges of 1·59 to 252·41 and 0·51 to 28·99 µg phytoplankton C µg zooplankton C−1 day−1, respectively). There was no evidence of significant diel changes in ingestion rates of zooplankton. Phytoplankton biomass removed by in situ community grazing ranged between 0·9 and 45·0% of standing stock per hour. The maximum loss occurred when phytoplankton biomass ranged from 249·0 to 320·8 µg phytoplankton C l−1. Zooplankton grazing impact was negatively associated with high phytoplankton and low dissolved oxygen in bottom waters. The implications of, and mechanisms associated with, top‐down control of algal biomass in this estuary are discussed in relation to plankton succession and the physical environment. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/hyp.293</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0885-6087 |
ispartof | Hydrological processes, 2001-09, Vol.15 (13), p.2453-2464 |
issn | 0885-6087 1099-1085 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18181333 |
source | Wiley Journals |
subjects | Algae Animal and plant ecology Animal, plant and microbial ecology Australia, Canning R Australia, Swan R Biological and medical sciences Brackish Brackish water ecosystems diel feeding dissolved oxygen Earth sciences Earth, ocean, space Exact sciences and technology Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Geochemistry Hydrology Hydrology. Hydrogeology Marine Mineralogy phytoplankton Silicates succession Synecology top-down control Water geochemistry zooplankton |
title | Zooplankton grazing dynamics: top-down control of phytoplankton and its relationship to an estuarine habitat |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T05%3A03%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Zooplankton%20grazing%20dynamics:%20top-down%20control%20of%20phytoplankton%20and%20its%20relationship%20to%20an%20estuarine%20habitat&rft.jtitle=Hydrological%20processes&rft.au=Griffin,%20Sandra%20L.&rft.date=2001-09&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=13&rft.spage=2453&rft.epage=2464&rft.pages=2453-2464&rft.issn=0885-6087&rft.eissn=1099-1085&rft.coden=HYPRE3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/hyp.293&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E18181333%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18181333&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |