Zooplankton grazing dynamics: top-down control of phytoplankton and its relationship to an estuarine habitat

Top‐down control of algal blooms was investigated in the Swan–Canning Estuary, to determine whether the resident zooplankton community was able to substantially reduce phytoplankton biomass through grazing, or whether high phytoplankton biomass effectively inhibited grazing. In situ grazing by zoopl...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Hydrological processes 2001-09, Vol.15 (13), p.2453-2464
Hauptverfasser: Griffin, Sandra L., Rippingale, Robert J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2464
container_issue 13
container_start_page 2453
container_title Hydrological processes
container_volume 15
creator Griffin, Sandra L.
Rippingale, Robert J.
description Top‐down control of algal blooms was investigated in the Swan–Canning Estuary, to determine whether the resident zooplankton community was able to substantially reduce phytoplankton biomass through grazing, or whether high phytoplankton biomass effectively inhibited grazing. In situ grazing by zooplankton at two depths in the water column was measured over a diel period on six occasions and examined in relation to the biotic and abiotic habitat conditions. Measured weight‐specific ingestion rates varied with phytoplankton and zooplankton species composition, but were significantly greater at the surface than at 5 m, close to the bottom (ranges of 1·59 to 252·41 and 0·51 to 28·99 µg phytoplankton C µg zooplankton C−1 day−1, respectively). There was no evidence of significant diel changes in ingestion rates of zooplankton. Phytoplankton biomass removed by in situ community grazing ranged between 0·9 and 45·0% of standing stock per hour. The maximum loss occurred when phytoplankton biomass ranged from 249·0 to 320·8 µg phytoplankton C l−1. Zooplankton grazing impact was negatively associated with high phytoplankton and low dissolved oxygen in bottom waters. The implications of, and mechanisms associated with, top‐down control of algal biomass in this estuary are discussed in relation to plankton succession and the physical environment. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/hyp.293
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18181333</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>18181333</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3583-659b6ccd28bfda116cac17643c12ec6fe617388e5405d96294e175a641883343</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEFP3DAQhS1UpG6Xir_gC_SAAnacOA63QmEBLbQVSKhcrFnHYV2ydmp7BeHX11VWcOrMYaTR956eHkK7lBxSQvKj5dAf5jXbQhNK6jqjRJQf0IQIUWaciOoj-hTCb0JIQQSZoO7Bub4D-xSdxY8eXo19xM1gYWVUOMbR9Vnjni1WzkbvOuxa3C-H-K4B22ATA_a6g2icDUvTJ1n6Yx3iGryxGi9hYSLEHbTdQhf0582dorvzs7vTi2z-fXZ5-nWeKVYKlvGyXnClmlws2gYo5QoUrXjBFM214q3mtGJC6LIgZVPzvC40rUrgBRWCsYJN0f5o23v3Z51SyJUJSncpsnbrIKlIy9JM0ZcRVN6F4HUre29W4AdJifxXpkxlylRmIvc2lhAUdK0Hq0x4x1OZBWM0cQcj92w6PfzPTl78-jG6ZiNtQtQvbzT4J8krVpXy_mYmv_0s-O3V_FqesL_QiJL8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18181333</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Zooplankton grazing dynamics: top-down control of phytoplankton and its relationship to an estuarine habitat</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Griffin, Sandra L. ; Rippingale, Robert J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Griffin, Sandra L. ; Rippingale, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><description>Top‐down control of algal blooms was investigated in the Swan–Canning Estuary, to determine whether the resident zooplankton community was able to substantially reduce phytoplankton biomass through grazing, or whether high phytoplankton biomass effectively inhibited grazing. In situ grazing by zooplankton at two depths in the water column was measured over a diel period on six occasions and examined in relation to the biotic and abiotic habitat conditions. Measured weight‐specific ingestion rates varied with phytoplankton and zooplankton species composition, but were significantly greater at the surface than at 5 m, close to the bottom (ranges of 1·59 to 252·41 and 0·51 to 28·99 µg phytoplankton C µg zooplankton C−1 day−1, respectively). There was no evidence of significant diel changes in ingestion rates of zooplankton. Phytoplankton biomass removed by in situ community grazing ranged between 0·9 and 45·0% of standing stock per hour. The maximum loss occurred when phytoplankton biomass ranged from 249·0 to 320·8 µg phytoplankton C l−1. Zooplankton grazing impact was negatively associated with high phytoplankton and low dissolved oxygen in bottom waters. The implications of, and mechanisms associated with, top‐down control of algal biomass in this estuary are discussed in relation to plankton succession and the physical environment. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0885-6087</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1085</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/hyp.293</identifier><identifier>CODEN: HYPRE3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Algae ; Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Australia, Canning R ; Australia, Swan R ; Biological and medical sciences ; Brackish ; Brackish water ecosystems ; diel feeding ; dissolved oxygen ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Exact sciences and technology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Geochemistry ; Hydrology ; Hydrology. Hydrogeology ; Marine ; Mineralogy ; phytoplankton ; Silicates ; succession ; Synecology ; top-down control ; Water geochemistry ; zooplankton</subject><ispartof>Hydrological processes, 2001-09, Vol.15 (13), p.2453-2464</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2001 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3583-659b6ccd28bfda116cac17643c12ec6fe617388e5405d96294e175a641883343</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3583-659b6ccd28bfda116cac17643c12ec6fe617388e5405d96294e175a641883343</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fhyp.293$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fhyp.293$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=14084331$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Griffin, Sandra L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rippingale, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><title>Zooplankton grazing dynamics: top-down control of phytoplankton and its relationship to an estuarine habitat</title><title>Hydrological processes</title><addtitle>Hydrol. Process</addtitle><description>Top‐down control of algal blooms was investigated in the Swan–Canning Estuary, to determine whether the resident zooplankton community was able to substantially reduce phytoplankton biomass through grazing, or whether high phytoplankton biomass effectively inhibited grazing. In situ grazing by zooplankton at two depths in the water column was measured over a diel period on six occasions and examined in relation to the biotic and abiotic habitat conditions. Measured weight‐specific ingestion rates varied with phytoplankton and zooplankton species composition, but were significantly greater at the surface than at 5 m, close to the bottom (ranges of 1·59 to 252·41 and 0·51 to 28·99 µg phytoplankton C µg zooplankton C−1 day−1, respectively). There was no evidence of significant diel changes in ingestion rates of zooplankton. Phytoplankton biomass removed by in situ community grazing ranged between 0·9 and 45·0% of standing stock per hour. The maximum loss occurred when phytoplankton biomass ranged from 249·0 to 320·8 µg phytoplankton C l−1. Zooplankton grazing impact was negatively associated with high phytoplankton and low dissolved oxygen in bottom waters. The implications of, and mechanisms associated with, top‐down control of algal biomass in this estuary are discussed in relation to plankton succession and the physical environment. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>Algae</subject><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Australia, Canning R</subject><subject>Australia, Swan R</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Brackish</subject><subject>Brackish water ecosystems</subject><subject>diel feeding</subject><subject>dissolved oxygen</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Geochemistry</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Hydrology. Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Mineralogy</subject><subject>phytoplankton</subject><subject>Silicates</subject><subject>succession</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><subject>top-down control</subject><subject>Water geochemistry</subject><subject>zooplankton</subject><issn>0885-6087</issn><issn>1099-1085</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEFP3DAQhS1UpG6Xir_gC_SAAnacOA63QmEBLbQVSKhcrFnHYV2ydmp7BeHX11VWcOrMYaTR956eHkK7lBxSQvKj5dAf5jXbQhNK6jqjRJQf0IQIUWaciOoj-hTCb0JIQQSZoO7Bub4D-xSdxY8eXo19xM1gYWVUOMbR9Vnjni1WzkbvOuxa3C-H-K4B22ATA_a6g2icDUvTJ1n6Yx3iGryxGi9hYSLEHbTdQhf0582dorvzs7vTi2z-fXZ5-nWeKVYKlvGyXnClmlws2gYo5QoUrXjBFM214q3mtGJC6LIgZVPzvC40rUrgBRWCsYJN0f5o23v3Z51SyJUJSncpsnbrIKlIy9JM0ZcRVN6F4HUre29W4AdJifxXpkxlylRmIvc2lhAUdK0Hq0x4x1OZBWM0cQcj92w6PfzPTl78-jG6ZiNtQtQvbzT4J8krVpXy_mYmv_0s-O3V_FqesL_QiJL8</recordid><startdate>200109</startdate><enddate>200109</enddate><creator>Griffin, Sandra L.</creator><creator>Rippingale, Robert J.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200109</creationdate><title>Zooplankton grazing dynamics: top-down control of phytoplankton and its relationship to an estuarine habitat</title><author>Griffin, Sandra L. ; Rippingale, Robert J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3583-659b6ccd28bfda116cac17643c12ec6fe617388e5405d96294e175a641883343</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Algae</topic><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Australia, Canning R</topic><topic>Australia, Swan R</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Brackish</topic><topic>Brackish water ecosystems</topic><topic>diel feeding</topic><topic>dissolved oxygen</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Geochemistry</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Hydrology. Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Mineralogy</topic><topic>phytoplankton</topic><topic>Silicates</topic><topic>succession</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><topic>top-down control</topic><topic>Water geochemistry</topic><topic>zooplankton</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Griffin, Sandra L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rippingale, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Hydrological processes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Griffin, Sandra L.</au><au>Rippingale, Robert J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Zooplankton grazing dynamics: top-down control of phytoplankton and its relationship to an estuarine habitat</atitle><jtitle>Hydrological processes</jtitle><addtitle>Hydrol. Process</addtitle><date>2001-09</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>13</issue><spage>2453</spage><epage>2464</epage><pages>2453-2464</pages><issn>0885-6087</issn><eissn>1099-1085</eissn><coden>HYPRE3</coden><abstract>Top‐down control of algal blooms was investigated in the Swan–Canning Estuary, to determine whether the resident zooplankton community was able to substantially reduce phytoplankton biomass through grazing, or whether high phytoplankton biomass effectively inhibited grazing. In situ grazing by zooplankton at two depths in the water column was measured over a diel period on six occasions and examined in relation to the biotic and abiotic habitat conditions. Measured weight‐specific ingestion rates varied with phytoplankton and zooplankton species composition, but were significantly greater at the surface than at 5 m, close to the bottom (ranges of 1·59 to 252·41 and 0·51 to 28·99 µg phytoplankton C µg zooplankton C−1 day−1, respectively). There was no evidence of significant diel changes in ingestion rates of zooplankton. Phytoplankton biomass removed by in situ community grazing ranged between 0·9 and 45·0% of standing stock per hour. The maximum loss occurred when phytoplankton biomass ranged from 249·0 to 320·8 µg phytoplankton C l−1. Zooplankton grazing impact was negatively associated with high phytoplankton and low dissolved oxygen in bottom waters. The implications of, and mechanisms associated with, top‐down control of algal biomass in this estuary are discussed in relation to plankton succession and the physical environment. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/hyp.293</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0885-6087
ispartof Hydrological processes, 2001-09, Vol.15 (13), p.2453-2464
issn 0885-6087
1099-1085
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18181333
source Wiley Journals
subjects Algae
Animal and plant ecology
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Australia, Canning R
Australia, Swan R
Biological and medical sciences
Brackish
Brackish water ecosystems
diel feeding
dissolved oxygen
Earth sciences
Earth, ocean, space
Exact sciences and technology
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Geochemistry
Hydrology
Hydrology. Hydrogeology
Marine
Mineralogy
phytoplankton
Silicates
succession
Synecology
top-down control
Water geochemistry
zooplankton
title Zooplankton grazing dynamics: top-down control of phytoplankton and its relationship to an estuarine habitat
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T05%3A03%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Zooplankton%20grazing%20dynamics:%20top-down%20control%20of%20phytoplankton%20and%20its%20relationship%20to%20an%20estuarine%20habitat&rft.jtitle=Hydrological%20processes&rft.au=Griffin,%20Sandra%20L.&rft.date=2001-09&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=13&rft.spage=2453&rft.epage=2464&rft.pages=2453-2464&rft.issn=0885-6087&rft.eissn=1099-1085&rft.coden=HYPRE3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/hyp.293&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E18181333%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18181333&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true