Global carbon dynamics of higher latitude forests during an anticipated climate change: Ecophysiological versus biome-migration view

The response of the vegetation and soils of the higher latitude forests and tundra ecosystems to an anticipated climate change is investigated using two alternative approaches to calculate the resulting change in the total carbon content (TCC) of the vegetation and the soils: On the one hand a BGC (...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Water, air, and soil pollution air, and soil pollution, 1995-05, Vol.82 (1-2), p.455-464
Hauptverfasser: Kohlmaier, G H, Haeger, Ch, Nadler, A, Wuerth, G, Luedeke, MKB
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 464
container_issue 1-2
container_start_page 455
container_title Water, air, and soil pollution
container_volume 82
creator Kohlmaier, G H
Haeger, Ch
Nadler, A
Wuerth, G
Luedeke, MKB
description The response of the vegetation and soils of the higher latitude forests and tundra ecosystems to an anticipated climate change is investigated using two alternative approaches to calculate the resulting change in the total carbon content (TCC) of the vegetation and the soils: On the one hand a BGC (bio-geochemical-cycle) model, in this case the FBM (Frankfurt Biosphere Model), where the ecosystem response is entirely due to the ecophysiological response of the vegetation and the ecological response of the soils. On the other hand a biome or 'rule-based' model, in this case the BIOME model, which allows for the determination of the occurrence of a specific biome type from a given climatic situation assuming equilibrium conditions. Within the FBM prognosis net primary production and TCC are reduced both for needle leaved and broad leaved forests if the CO sub(2)-fertilisation effect is not taken into account. When the CO sub(2)-fertilisation effect is taken into consideration NPP, standing biomass and soil carbon are increased in a future greenhouse climate. Although there is a considerable shift of the biomes in response to the greenhouse climate within the BIOME approach, the TCC in the investigated northern biomes stayed more or less constant. This is due to a decrease in biomass in the southern regions of today's temperate forests compensating the biomass increase by the northward shift of the taiga border.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/BF01182855
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18180809</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>192416</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-6e8faf277b919c44304e7e01554d522eda70708421b989c462a25b57fef40fc43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9LxDAQxYMouP65-Aly8iBUkzRpEm8qu6sgeNFzSdNJN9I2a9Iqe_eDG1Hw6DAwc_jxHjMPoTNKLikh8up2RShVTAmxhxZUyLJgumT7aEEI10WlpT5ERym9klxayQX6XPehMT22JjZhxO1uNIO3CQeHN77bQMS9mfw0t4BdiJCmhNs5-rHDZsw9eeu3ZoIW294PecF2Y8YOrvHShu1ml3zoQ-dtdniHmOaEGx8GKAbfxaybHd89fJygA2f6BKe_8xi9rJbPd_fF49P64e7msbAlY1NRgXLGMSkbTbXlvCQcJBAqBG8FY9AaSSRRnNFGqwxUzDDRCOnAceIsL4_R-Y_uNoa3OR9TDz5Z6HszQphTTRVVRBH9P1hpRWQp_gdFpWjJv8GLH9DGkFIEV29jfljc1ZTU39HVf9GVX4wCjSU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>15681345</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Global carbon dynamics of higher latitude forests during an anticipated climate change: Ecophysiological versus biome-migration view</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Kohlmaier, G H ; Haeger, Ch ; Nadler, A ; Wuerth, G ; Luedeke, MKB</creator><contributor>Price, DT ; Apps, MJ ; Wisniewski, J</contributor><creatorcontrib>Kohlmaier, G H ; Haeger, Ch ; Nadler, A ; Wuerth, G ; Luedeke, MKB ; Price, DT ; Apps, MJ ; Wisniewski, J</creatorcontrib><description>The response of the vegetation and soils of the higher latitude forests and tundra ecosystems to an anticipated climate change is investigated using two alternative approaches to calculate the resulting change in the total carbon content (TCC) of the vegetation and the soils: On the one hand a BGC (bio-geochemical-cycle) model, in this case the FBM (Frankfurt Biosphere Model), where the ecosystem response is entirely due to the ecophysiological response of the vegetation and the ecological response of the soils. On the other hand a biome or 'rule-based' model, in this case the BIOME model, which allows for the determination of the occurrence of a specific biome type from a given climatic situation assuming equilibrium conditions. Within the FBM prognosis net primary production and TCC are reduced both for needle leaved and broad leaved forests if the CO sub(2)-fertilisation effect is not taken into account. When the CO sub(2)-fertilisation effect is taken into consideration NPP, standing biomass and soil carbon are increased in a future greenhouse climate. Although there is a considerable shift of the biomes in response to the greenhouse climate within the BIOME approach, the TCC in the investigated northern biomes stayed more or less constant. This is due to a decrease in biomass in the southern regions of today's temperate forests compensating the biomass increase by the northward shift of the taiga border.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0049-6979</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2932</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF01182855</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Agriculture ; Biomass ; Carbon ; Ecology ; Forestry ; Mathematical models ; Q1</subject><ispartof>Water, air, and soil pollution, 1995-05, Vol.82 (1-2), p.455-464</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-6e8faf277b919c44304e7e01554d522eda70708421b989c462a25b57fef40fc43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-6e8faf277b919c44304e7e01554d522eda70708421b989c462a25b57fef40fc43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,776,780,785,786,23910,23911,25119,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Price, DT</contributor><contributor>Apps, MJ</contributor><contributor>Wisniewski, J</contributor><creatorcontrib>Kohlmaier, G H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haeger, Ch</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nadler, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wuerth, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luedeke, MKB</creatorcontrib><title>Global carbon dynamics of higher latitude forests during an anticipated climate change: Ecophysiological versus biome-migration view</title><title>Water, air, and soil pollution</title><description>The response of the vegetation and soils of the higher latitude forests and tundra ecosystems to an anticipated climate change is investigated using two alternative approaches to calculate the resulting change in the total carbon content (TCC) of the vegetation and the soils: On the one hand a BGC (bio-geochemical-cycle) model, in this case the FBM (Frankfurt Biosphere Model), where the ecosystem response is entirely due to the ecophysiological response of the vegetation and the ecological response of the soils. On the other hand a biome or 'rule-based' model, in this case the BIOME model, which allows for the determination of the occurrence of a specific biome type from a given climatic situation assuming equilibrium conditions. Within the FBM prognosis net primary production and TCC are reduced both for needle leaved and broad leaved forests if the CO sub(2)-fertilisation effect is not taken into account. When the CO sub(2)-fertilisation effect is taken into consideration NPP, standing biomass and soil carbon are increased in a future greenhouse climate. Although there is a considerable shift of the biomes in response to the greenhouse climate within the BIOME approach, the TCC in the investigated northern biomes stayed more or less constant. This is due to a decrease in biomass in the southern regions of today's temperate forests compensating the biomass increase by the northward shift of the taiga border.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Q1</subject><issn>0049-6979</issn><issn>1573-2932</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU9LxDAQxYMouP65-Aly8iBUkzRpEm8qu6sgeNFzSdNJN9I2a9Iqe_eDG1Hw6DAwc_jxHjMPoTNKLikh8up2RShVTAmxhxZUyLJgumT7aEEI10WlpT5ERym9klxayQX6XPehMT22JjZhxO1uNIO3CQeHN77bQMS9mfw0t4BdiJCmhNs5-rHDZsw9eeu3ZoIW294PecF2Y8YOrvHShu1ml3zoQ-dtdniHmOaEGx8GKAbfxaybHd89fJygA2f6BKe_8xi9rJbPd_fF49P64e7msbAlY1NRgXLGMSkbTbXlvCQcJBAqBG8FY9AaSSRRnNFGqwxUzDDRCOnAceIsL4_R-Y_uNoa3OR9TDz5Z6HszQphTTRVVRBH9P1hpRWQp_gdFpWjJv8GLH9DGkFIEV29jfljc1ZTU39HVf9GVX4wCjSU</recordid><startdate>19950501</startdate><enddate>19950501</enddate><creator>Kohlmaier, G H</creator><creator>Haeger, Ch</creator><creator>Nadler, A</creator><creator>Wuerth, G</creator><creator>Luedeke, MKB</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>KL.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19950501</creationdate><title>Global carbon dynamics of higher latitude forests during an anticipated climate change: Ecophysiological versus biome-migration view</title><author>Kohlmaier, G H ; Haeger, Ch ; Nadler, A ; Wuerth, G ; Luedeke, MKB</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c322t-6e8faf277b919c44304e7e01554d522eda70708421b989c462a25b57fef40fc43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Q1</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kohlmaier, G H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haeger, Ch</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nadler, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wuerth, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luedeke, MKB</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><jtitle>Water, air, and soil pollution</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kohlmaier, G H</au><au>Haeger, Ch</au><au>Nadler, A</au><au>Wuerth, G</au><au>Luedeke, MKB</au><au>Price, DT</au><au>Apps, MJ</au><au>Wisniewski, J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Global carbon dynamics of higher latitude forests during an anticipated climate change: Ecophysiological versus biome-migration view</atitle><jtitle>Water, air, and soil pollution</jtitle><date>1995-05-01</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>82</volume><issue>1-2</issue><spage>455</spage><epage>464</epage><pages>455-464</pages><issn>0049-6979</issn><eissn>1573-2932</eissn><abstract>The response of the vegetation and soils of the higher latitude forests and tundra ecosystems to an anticipated climate change is investigated using two alternative approaches to calculate the resulting change in the total carbon content (TCC) of the vegetation and the soils: On the one hand a BGC (bio-geochemical-cycle) model, in this case the FBM (Frankfurt Biosphere Model), where the ecosystem response is entirely due to the ecophysiological response of the vegetation and the ecological response of the soils. On the other hand a biome or 'rule-based' model, in this case the BIOME model, which allows for the determination of the occurrence of a specific biome type from a given climatic situation assuming equilibrium conditions. Within the FBM prognosis net primary production and TCC are reduced both for needle leaved and broad leaved forests if the CO sub(2)-fertilisation effect is not taken into account. When the CO sub(2)-fertilisation effect is taken into consideration NPP, standing biomass and soil carbon are increased in a future greenhouse climate. Although there is a considerable shift of the biomes in response to the greenhouse climate within the BIOME approach, the TCC in the investigated northern biomes stayed more or less constant. This is due to a decrease in biomass in the southern regions of today's temperate forests compensating the biomass increase by the northward shift of the taiga border.</abstract><doi>10.1007/BF01182855</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0049-6979
ispartof Water, air, and soil pollution, 1995-05, Vol.82 (1-2), p.455-464
issn 0049-6979
1573-2932
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18180809
source Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Agriculture
Biomass
Carbon
Ecology
Forestry
Mathematical models
Q1
title Global carbon dynamics of higher latitude forests during an anticipated climate change: Ecophysiological versus biome-migration view
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T23%3A31%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Global%20carbon%20dynamics%20of%20higher%20latitude%20forests%20during%20an%20anticipated%20climate%20change:%20Ecophysiological%20versus%20biome-migration%20view&rft.jtitle=Water,%20air,%20and%20soil%20pollution&rft.au=Kohlmaier,%20G%20H&rft.date=1995-05-01&rft.volume=82&rft.issue=1-2&rft.spage=455&rft.epage=464&rft.pages=455-464&rft.issn=0049-6979&rft.eissn=1573-2932&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF01182855&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E192416%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=15681345&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true