The response of an ocean general circulation model to surface wind stress produced by an atmospheric general circulation model

Two surface wind stress datasets for 1979-91, one based on observations and the other from an integration of the COLA atmospheric general circulation model (AGCM) with prescribed SST, are used to drive the GFDL ocean general circulation model. These two runs are referred to as the control and COLA e...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Monthly weather review 1995-10, Vol.123 (10), p.3059-3085
Hauptverfasser: HUANG, B, SCHNEIDER, E. K
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3085
container_issue 10
container_start_page 3059
container_title Monthly weather review
container_volume 123
creator HUANG, B
SCHNEIDER, E. K
description Two surface wind stress datasets for 1979-91, one based on observations and the other from an integration of the COLA atmospheric general circulation model (AGCM) with prescribed SST, are used to drive the GFDL ocean general circulation model. These two runs are referred to as the control and COLA experiments, respectively. Simulated SST and upper-ocean heat contents (HC) in the tropical Pacific Ocean are compared with observations and between experiments. Both simulations reproduced the observed mean SST and HC fields as well as their annual cycles realistically. Major errors common to both runs are colder than observed SST in the eastern equatorial ocean and HC in the western Pacific south of the equator, with errors generally larger in the COLA experiment. New errors arising from the AGCM wind forcing include higher SST near the South American coast throughout the year and weaker HC gradients along the equator in boreal spring. The former is associated with suppressed coastal upwelling by weak alongshore AGCM winds, and the latter is caused by weaker equatorial easterlies in boreal spring. The low-frequency ENSO fluctuations are also realistic for both runs. Correlations between the observed and simulated SST anomalies from the COLA simulation are as high as those from the control run in the central equatorial Pacific. A major problem in the COLA simulation is the appearance of unrealistic tropical old anomalies during the boreal spring of mature of El Nino years. These anomalies propagate along the equator from the western Pacific to the eastern coast in about three months, and temporarily eliminate the warm SST and HC anomalies in the eastern Pacific. This erroneous oceanic response in the COLA simulation is caused by a reversal of the westerly wind anomalies on the equator, associated with an unrealistic southward shift of the ITCZ in boreal spring during El Nino events. In both experiments, the annual cycle of the upper equatorial ocean (upper 45 m) is dominated by the annual change of surface heat flux and advection with its vertical and horizontal components dominant in the eastern and central Pacific, respectively. The El Nino development, on the other hand, is mainly due to advection of anomalous zonal current in the west, the meridional advection in the central, and the displacement of thermocline in the east Pacific. The weakening of the warm anomalies in COLA in the middle of major warm events corresponds to changes of all these processes. Th
doi_str_mv 10.1175/1520-0493(1995)123<3059:TROAOG>2.0.CO;2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18179140</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>18179140</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c240t-890d44c0fef3184e67e7cc2b3da54179665e53303c224d995b05a1e6ed4030743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9r2zAYh0VZoVna76BDGd3Byau_jtdSCGHNBgFDSc9CkV8vHo6VSjajl332yaTkVnaRLg-PxO8hZM5gxliu5kxxyEAW4o4VhfrKuHgQoIpv2-dyWa4f-Qxmq_KeX5DJmfxEJgA8z0BLeUU-x_gbALSWfEL-bvdIA8aj7yJSX1PbUe8wnb-ww2Bb6prghtb2je_owVfY0t7TOITaOqR_mq6isU-CSI_BV4PDiu7eRovtDz4e9xga97HrmlzWto14835PycvT9-3qR7Yp1z9Xy03muIQ-WxRQSemgxlqwhUSdY-4c34nKKsnyQmuFSggQjnNZpVl2oCxDjZUEAbkUU_Ll5E2ffB0w9ubQRIdtazv0QzRskSwswf8Fc2AMCp3A9Ql0wccYsDbH0BxseDMMzBjKjPObcX4zhjIplBlDmVMoww2YVWl4Mt2-P2mjs20dbOeaeNYJnQsllfgHC5SX5g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17011096</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The response of an ocean general circulation model to surface wind stress produced by an atmospheric general circulation model</title><source>American Meteorological Society</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>HUANG, B ; SCHNEIDER, E. K</creator><creatorcontrib>HUANG, B ; SCHNEIDER, E. K</creatorcontrib><description>Two surface wind stress datasets for 1979-91, one based on observations and the other from an integration of the COLA atmospheric general circulation model (AGCM) with prescribed SST, are used to drive the GFDL ocean general circulation model. These two runs are referred to as the control and COLA experiments, respectively. Simulated SST and upper-ocean heat contents (HC) in the tropical Pacific Ocean are compared with observations and between experiments. Both simulations reproduced the observed mean SST and HC fields as well as their annual cycles realistically. Major errors common to both runs are colder than observed SST in the eastern equatorial ocean and HC in the western Pacific south of the equator, with errors generally larger in the COLA experiment. New errors arising from the AGCM wind forcing include higher SST near the South American coast throughout the year and weaker HC gradients along the equator in boreal spring. The former is associated with suppressed coastal upwelling by weak alongshore AGCM winds, and the latter is caused by weaker equatorial easterlies in boreal spring. The low-frequency ENSO fluctuations are also realistic for both runs. Correlations between the observed and simulated SST anomalies from the COLA simulation are as high as those from the control run in the central equatorial Pacific. A major problem in the COLA simulation is the appearance of unrealistic tropical old anomalies during the boreal spring of mature of El Nino years. These anomalies propagate along the equator from the western Pacific to the eastern coast in about three months, and temporarily eliminate the warm SST and HC anomalies in the eastern Pacific. This erroneous oceanic response in the COLA simulation is caused by a reversal of the westerly wind anomalies on the equator, associated with an unrealistic southward shift of the ITCZ in boreal spring during El Nino events. In both experiments, the annual cycle of the upper equatorial ocean (upper 45 m) is dominated by the annual change of surface heat flux and advection with its vertical and horizontal components dominant in the eastern and central Pacific, respectively. The El Nino development, on the other hand, is mainly due to advection of anomalous zonal current in the west, the meridional advection in the central, and the displacement of thermocline in the east Pacific. The weakening of the warm anomalies in COLA in the middle of major warm events corresponds to changes of all these processes. The implication of the results derived from this study to the coupled ocean-atmosphere general circulation models is discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0027-0644</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-0493</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1175/1520-0493(1995)123&lt;3059:TROAOG&gt;2.0.CO;2</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MWREAB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston, MA: American Meteorological Society</publisher><subject>Earth, ocean, space ; Exact sciences and technology ; External geophysics ; Marine ; Physics of the oceans ; Thermohaline structure and circulation. Turbulence and diffusion</subject><ispartof>Monthly weather review, 1995-10, Vol.123 (10), p.3059-3085</ispartof><rights>1995 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3668,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=3673545$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>HUANG, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCHNEIDER, E. K</creatorcontrib><title>The response of an ocean general circulation model to surface wind stress produced by an atmospheric general circulation model</title><title>Monthly weather review</title><description>Two surface wind stress datasets for 1979-91, one based on observations and the other from an integration of the COLA atmospheric general circulation model (AGCM) with prescribed SST, are used to drive the GFDL ocean general circulation model. These two runs are referred to as the control and COLA experiments, respectively. Simulated SST and upper-ocean heat contents (HC) in the tropical Pacific Ocean are compared with observations and between experiments. Both simulations reproduced the observed mean SST and HC fields as well as their annual cycles realistically. Major errors common to both runs are colder than observed SST in the eastern equatorial ocean and HC in the western Pacific south of the equator, with errors generally larger in the COLA experiment. New errors arising from the AGCM wind forcing include higher SST near the South American coast throughout the year and weaker HC gradients along the equator in boreal spring. The former is associated with suppressed coastal upwelling by weak alongshore AGCM winds, and the latter is caused by weaker equatorial easterlies in boreal spring. The low-frequency ENSO fluctuations are also realistic for both runs. Correlations between the observed and simulated SST anomalies from the COLA simulation are as high as those from the control run in the central equatorial Pacific. A major problem in the COLA simulation is the appearance of unrealistic tropical old anomalies during the boreal spring of mature of El Nino years. These anomalies propagate along the equator from the western Pacific to the eastern coast in about three months, and temporarily eliminate the warm SST and HC anomalies in the eastern Pacific. This erroneous oceanic response in the COLA simulation is caused by a reversal of the westerly wind anomalies on the equator, associated with an unrealistic southward shift of the ITCZ in boreal spring during El Nino events. In both experiments, the annual cycle of the upper equatorial ocean (upper 45 m) is dominated by the annual change of surface heat flux and advection with its vertical and horizontal components dominant in the eastern and central Pacific, respectively. The El Nino development, on the other hand, is mainly due to advection of anomalous zonal current in the west, the meridional advection in the central, and the displacement of thermocline in the east Pacific. The weakening of the warm anomalies in COLA in the middle of major warm events corresponds to changes of all these processes. The implication of the results derived from this study to the coupled ocean-atmosphere general circulation models is discussed.</description><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>External geophysics</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Physics of the oceans</subject><subject>Thermohaline structure and circulation. Turbulence and diffusion</subject><issn>0027-0644</issn><issn>1520-0493</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU9r2zAYh0VZoVna76BDGd3Byau_jtdSCGHNBgFDSc9CkV8vHo6VSjajl332yaTkVnaRLg-PxO8hZM5gxliu5kxxyEAW4o4VhfrKuHgQoIpv2-dyWa4f-Qxmq_KeX5DJmfxEJgA8z0BLeUU-x_gbALSWfEL-bvdIA8aj7yJSX1PbUe8wnb-ww2Bb6prghtb2je_owVfY0t7TOITaOqR_mq6isU-CSI_BV4PDiu7eRovtDz4e9xga97HrmlzWto14835PycvT9-3qR7Yp1z9Xy03muIQ-WxRQSemgxlqwhUSdY-4c34nKKsnyQmuFSggQjnNZpVl2oCxDjZUEAbkUU_Ll5E2ffB0w9ubQRIdtazv0QzRskSwswf8Fc2AMCp3A9Ql0wccYsDbH0BxseDMMzBjKjPObcX4zhjIplBlDmVMoww2YVWl4Mt2-P2mjs20dbOeaeNYJnQsllfgHC5SX5g</recordid><startdate>19951001</startdate><enddate>19951001</enddate><creator>HUANG, B</creator><creator>SCHNEIDER, E. K</creator><general>American Meteorological Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>KL.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19951001</creationdate><title>The response of an ocean general circulation model to surface wind stress produced by an atmospheric general circulation model</title><author>HUANG, B ; SCHNEIDER, E. K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c240t-890d44c0fef3184e67e7cc2b3da54179665e53303c224d995b05a1e6ed4030743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>External geophysics</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Physics of the oceans</topic><topic>Thermohaline structure and circulation. Turbulence and diffusion</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>HUANG, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SCHNEIDER, E. K</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><jtitle>Monthly weather review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>HUANG, B</au><au>SCHNEIDER, E. K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The response of an ocean general circulation model to surface wind stress produced by an atmospheric general circulation model</atitle><jtitle>Monthly weather review</jtitle><date>1995-10-01</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>123</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>3059</spage><epage>3085</epage><pages>3059-3085</pages><issn>0027-0644</issn><eissn>1520-0493</eissn><coden>MWREAB</coden><abstract>Two surface wind stress datasets for 1979-91, one based on observations and the other from an integration of the COLA atmospheric general circulation model (AGCM) with prescribed SST, are used to drive the GFDL ocean general circulation model. These two runs are referred to as the control and COLA experiments, respectively. Simulated SST and upper-ocean heat contents (HC) in the tropical Pacific Ocean are compared with observations and between experiments. Both simulations reproduced the observed mean SST and HC fields as well as their annual cycles realistically. Major errors common to both runs are colder than observed SST in the eastern equatorial ocean and HC in the western Pacific south of the equator, with errors generally larger in the COLA experiment. New errors arising from the AGCM wind forcing include higher SST near the South American coast throughout the year and weaker HC gradients along the equator in boreal spring. The former is associated with suppressed coastal upwelling by weak alongshore AGCM winds, and the latter is caused by weaker equatorial easterlies in boreal spring. The low-frequency ENSO fluctuations are also realistic for both runs. Correlations between the observed and simulated SST anomalies from the COLA simulation are as high as those from the control run in the central equatorial Pacific. A major problem in the COLA simulation is the appearance of unrealistic tropical old anomalies during the boreal spring of mature of El Nino years. These anomalies propagate along the equator from the western Pacific to the eastern coast in about three months, and temporarily eliminate the warm SST and HC anomalies in the eastern Pacific. This erroneous oceanic response in the COLA simulation is caused by a reversal of the westerly wind anomalies on the equator, associated with an unrealistic southward shift of the ITCZ in boreal spring during El Nino events. In both experiments, the annual cycle of the upper equatorial ocean (upper 45 m) is dominated by the annual change of surface heat flux and advection with its vertical and horizontal components dominant in the eastern and central Pacific, respectively. The El Nino development, on the other hand, is mainly due to advection of anomalous zonal current in the west, the meridional advection in the central, and the displacement of thermocline in the east Pacific. The weakening of the warm anomalies in COLA in the middle of major warm events corresponds to changes of all these processes. The implication of the results derived from this study to the coupled ocean-atmosphere general circulation models is discussed.</abstract><cop>Boston, MA</cop><pub>American Meteorological Society</pub><doi>10.1175/1520-0493(1995)123&lt;3059:TROAOG&gt;2.0.CO;2</doi><tpages>27</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0027-0644
ispartof Monthly weather review, 1995-10, Vol.123 (10), p.3059-3085
issn 0027-0644
1520-0493
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18179140
source American Meteorological Society; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Earth, ocean, space
Exact sciences and technology
External geophysics
Marine
Physics of the oceans
Thermohaline structure and circulation. Turbulence and diffusion
title The response of an ocean general circulation model to surface wind stress produced by an atmospheric general circulation model
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T16%3A13%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20response%20of%20an%20ocean%20general%20circulation%20model%20to%20surface%20wind%20stress%20produced%20by%20an%20atmospheric%20general%20circulation%20model&rft.jtitle=Monthly%20weather%20review&rft.au=HUANG,%20B&rft.date=1995-10-01&rft.volume=123&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=3059&rft.epage=3085&rft.pages=3059-3085&rft.issn=0027-0644&rft.eissn=1520-0493&rft.coden=MWREAB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1175/1520-0493(1995)123%3C3059:TROAOG%3E2.0.CO;2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E18179140%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17011096&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true