Make-up and suspicion in bargaining with cheap talk: An experiment controlling for gender and gender constellation
This paper explores gender differences in “make-up” and “suspicion” in a bargaining game in which the privately informed seller of a company sends a value message to the uninformed potential buyer who then proposes a price for the company. “Make-up” is measured by how much the true value is overstat...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Theory and decision 2016-03, Vol.80 (3), p.463-471 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 471 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 463 |
container_title | Theory and decision |
container_volume | 80 |
creator | Di Cagno, D. Galliera, A. Güth, W. Pace, N. Panaccione, L. |
description | This paper explores gender differences in “make-up” and “suspicion” in a bargaining game in which the privately informed seller of a company sends a value message to the uninformed potential buyer who then proposes a price for the company. “Make-up” is measured by how much the true value is overstated, “suspicion” by how much the price offer differs from the value message. We run different computerized treatments varying in information about the gender (constellation) and in embeddedness of gender information. The asymmetry of the game and of information allows for a robust assessment of gender (constellation) effects. We report here the results from just one shot round decision since we expect such effects to be more pronounced for inexperienced participants. We mainly find an effect of gender constellation: when female sellers are aware to confront a female buyer, they overstate more, i.e. there is more “make-up”. However, we cannot confirm gender (constellation) effects for suspicion. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11238-015-9497-9 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1816866333</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3978828391</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c516t-3a0d5f2527dc6864fd174c57548f383a93601ee87e95ef9006321f879bc5174a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkb1OwzAUhS0EEqXwAGyWWFgMdhzHDltV8ScVscBsucl1mzZ1gp0IeHsc0gEhIbxcD985uvcchM4ZvWKUyuvAWMIVoUyQPM0lyQ_QhAnJiWRKHqIJpSklQnF-jE5C2FBKlZJigvyT2QLpW2xciUMf2qqoGocrh5fGr0zlKrfC71W3xsUaTIs7U29v8Mxh-GjBVztwHS4a1_mmrgfUNh6vwJXgvx3330iEDuradNH8FB1ZUwc4288per27fZk_kMXz_eN8tiCFYFlHuKGlsIlIZFlkKkttyWRaCClSZbniJucZZQBKQi7A5pRmPGFWyXwZ9TI1fIouR9_WN289hE7vqlAMWzho-qCZYtE34_H9j8b8lMxUEtGLX-im6b2Lh2gmZUJj5lxEio1U4ZsQPFjdxrCM_9SM6qEwPRamY2F6KEznUZOMmhBZtwL_w_lP0ReM_Jfg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1772057335</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Make-up and suspicion in bargaining with cheap talk: An experiment controlling for gender and gender constellation</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Di Cagno, D. ; Galliera, A. ; Güth, W. ; Pace, N. ; Panaccione, L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Di Cagno, D. ; Galliera, A. ; Güth, W. ; Pace, N. ; Panaccione, L.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper explores gender differences in “make-up” and “suspicion” in a bargaining game in which the privately informed seller of a company sends a value message to the uninformed potential buyer who then proposes a price for the company. “Make-up” is measured by how much the true value is overstated, “suspicion” by how much the price offer differs from the value message. We run different computerized treatments varying in information about the gender (constellation) and in embeddedness of gender information. The asymmetry of the game and of information allows for a robust assessment of gender (constellation) effects. We report here the results from just one shot round decision since we expect such effects to be more pronounced for inexperienced participants. We mainly find an effect of gender constellation: when female sellers are aware to confront a female buyer, they overstate more, i.e. there is more “make-up”. However, we cannot confirm gender (constellation) effects for suspicion.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0040-5833</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7187</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11238-015-9497-9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Assessments ; Asymmetry ; Bargaining ; Behavioral/Experimental Economics ; Constellations ; Decision theory ; Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods ; Economics ; Economics and Finance ; Experiments ; Females ; Finance ; Game Theory ; Games ; Gender ; Gender differences ; Hypotheses ; Insurance ; Management ; Messages ; Operations Research/Decision Theory ; Purchasing ; Shot ; Social and Behav. Sciences ; Statistics for Business ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Theory and decision, 2016-03, Vol.80 (3), p.463-471</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c516t-3a0d5f2527dc6864fd174c57548f383a93601ee87e95ef9006321f879bc5174a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c516t-3a0d5f2527dc6864fd174c57548f383a93601ee87e95ef9006321f879bc5174a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11238-015-9497-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11238-015-9497-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Di Cagno, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galliera, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Güth, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pace, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panaccione, L.</creatorcontrib><title>Make-up and suspicion in bargaining with cheap talk: An experiment controlling for gender and gender constellation</title><title>Theory and decision</title><addtitle>Theory Decis</addtitle><description>This paper explores gender differences in “make-up” and “suspicion” in a bargaining game in which the privately informed seller of a company sends a value message to the uninformed potential buyer who then proposes a price for the company. “Make-up” is measured by how much the true value is overstated, “suspicion” by how much the price offer differs from the value message. We run different computerized treatments varying in information about the gender (constellation) and in embeddedness of gender information. The asymmetry of the game and of information allows for a robust assessment of gender (constellation) effects. We report here the results from just one shot round decision since we expect such effects to be more pronounced for inexperienced participants. We mainly find an effect of gender constellation: when female sellers are aware to confront a female buyer, they overstate more, i.e. there is more “make-up”. However, we cannot confirm gender (constellation) effects for suspicion.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Assessments</subject><subject>Asymmetry</subject><subject>Bargaining</subject><subject>Behavioral/Experimental Economics</subject><subject>Constellations</subject><subject>Decision theory</subject><subject>Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Economics and Finance</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Finance</subject><subject>Game Theory</subject><subject>Games</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Gender differences</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Insurance</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Messages</subject><subject>Operations Research/Decision Theory</subject><subject>Purchasing</subject><subject>Shot</subject><subject>Social and Behav. Sciences</subject><subject>Statistics for Business</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0040-5833</issn><issn>1573-7187</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkb1OwzAUhS0EEqXwAGyWWFgMdhzHDltV8ScVscBsucl1mzZ1gp0IeHsc0gEhIbxcD985uvcchM4ZvWKUyuvAWMIVoUyQPM0lyQ_QhAnJiWRKHqIJpSklQnF-jE5C2FBKlZJigvyT2QLpW2xciUMf2qqoGocrh5fGr0zlKrfC71W3xsUaTIs7U29v8Mxh-GjBVztwHS4a1_mmrgfUNh6vwJXgvx3330iEDuradNH8FB1ZUwc4288per27fZk_kMXz_eN8tiCFYFlHuKGlsIlIZFlkKkttyWRaCClSZbniJucZZQBKQi7A5pRmPGFWyXwZ9TI1fIouR9_WN289hE7vqlAMWzho-qCZYtE34_H9j8b8lMxUEtGLX-im6b2Lh2gmZUJj5lxEio1U4ZsQPFjdxrCM_9SM6qEwPRamY2F6KEznUZOMmhBZtwL_w_lP0ReM_Jfg</recordid><startdate>20160301</startdate><enddate>20160301</enddate><creator>Di Cagno, D.</creator><creator>Galliera, A.</creator><creator>Güth, W.</creator><creator>Pace, N.</creator><creator>Panaccione, L.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160301</creationdate><title>Make-up and suspicion in bargaining with cheap talk: An experiment controlling for gender and gender constellation</title><author>Di Cagno, D. ; Galliera, A. ; Güth, W. ; Pace, N. ; Panaccione, L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c516t-3a0d5f2527dc6864fd174c57548f383a93601ee87e95ef9006321f879bc5174a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Assessments</topic><topic>Asymmetry</topic><topic>Bargaining</topic><topic>Behavioral/Experimental Economics</topic><topic>Constellations</topic><topic>Decision theory</topic><topic>Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Economics and Finance</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Finance</topic><topic>Game Theory</topic><topic>Games</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Gender differences</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Insurance</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Messages</topic><topic>Operations Research/Decision Theory</topic><topic>Purchasing</topic><topic>Shot</topic><topic>Social and Behav. Sciences</topic><topic>Statistics for Business</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Di Cagno, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galliera, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Güth, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pace, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panaccione, L.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Art, Design & Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Theory and decision</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Di Cagno, D.</au><au>Galliera, A.</au><au>Güth, W.</au><au>Pace, N.</au><au>Panaccione, L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Make-up and suspicion in bargaining with cheap talk: An experiment controlling for gender and gender constellation</atitle><jtitle>Theory and decision</jtitle><stitle>Theory Decis</stitle><date>2016-03-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>80</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>463</spage><epage>471</epage><pages>463-471</pages><issn>0040-5833</issn><eissn>1573-7187</eissn><abstract>This paper explores gender differences in “make-up” and “suspicion” in a bargaining game in which the privately informed seller of a company sends a value message to the uninformed potential buyer who then proposes a price for the company. “Make-up” is measured by how much the true value is overstated, “suspicion” by how much the price offer differs from the value message. We run different computerized treatments varying in information about the gender (constellation) and in embeddedness of gender information. The asymmetry of the game and of information allows for a robust assessment of gender (constellation) effects. We report here the results from just one shot round decision since we expect such effects to be more pronounced for inexperienced participants. We mainly find an effect of gender constellation: when female sellers are aware to confront a female buyer, they overstate more, i.e. there is more “make-up”. However, we cannot confirm gender (constellation) effects for suspicion.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s11238-015-9497-9</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0040-5833 |
ispartof | Theory and decision, 2016-03, Vol.80 (3), p.463-471 |
issn | 0040-5833 1573-7187 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1816866333 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Analysis Assessments Asymmetry Bargaining Behavioral/Experimental Economics Constellations Decision theory Economic Theory/Quantitative Economics/Mathematical Methods Economics Economics and Finance Experiments Females Finance Game Theory Games Gender Gender differences Hypotheses Insurance Management Messages Operations Research/Decision Theory Purchasing Shot Social and Behav. Sciences Statistics for Business Studies |
title | Make-up and suspicion in bargaining with cheap talk: An experiment controlling for gender and gender constellation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T15%3A59%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Make-up%20and%20suspicion%20in%20bargaining%20with%20cheap%20talk:%20An%20experiment%20controlling%20for%20gender%20and%20gender%20constellation&rft.jtitle=Theory%20and%20decision&rft.au=Di%20Cagno,%20D.&rft.date=2016-03-01&rft.volume=80&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=463&rft.epage=471&rft.pages=463-471&rft.issn=0040-5833&rft.eissn=1573-7187&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11238-015-9497-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3978828391%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1772057335&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |