Whole Women’s Victory — or Not?
Facts about women's health won out over fiction in June, when the Supreme Court struck down Texas regulations aimed at closing abortion clinics. Will facts about human development be adequate to overcome fiction in the next front in the abortion wars: fetal pain? Facts about women’s health won...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The New England journal of medicine 2016-09, Vol.375 (9), p.809-811 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 811 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 9 |
| container_start_page | 809 |
| container_title | The New England journal of medicine |
| container_volume | 375 |
| creator | Charo, R. Alta |
| description | Facts about women's health won out over fiction in June, when the Supreme Court struck down Texas regulations aimed at closing abortion clinics. Will facts about human development be adequate to overcome fiction in the next front in the abortion wars: fetal pain?
Facts about women’s health won out over fiction in June, when the Supreme Court, even without examining the Texas legislature’s motives, struck down its regulations aimed at closing abortion clinics. Now the question is whether facts about human development will be adequate on their own to overcome fiction in what will probably be the next front in the abortion wars: fetal pain.
Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt
is a turning point in Supreme Court jurisprudence, not just because it turned the tide in the face of 300-plus abortion restrictions passed by state legislatures in the past 5 years alone.
1
It . . . |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1056/NEJMp1609167 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1816639141</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4168370401</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-914ce97a86afa9847ca4b0c1dbb6738462baf6a0747b0c0359651260adf439c43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpt0LtOwzAUBmALgWgpbMwoUhkYCNix48uEUFVuKmUBOkaO64hWcVzsZOjWh2Dh9fokGFIQQtiDJevTf45-AA4RPEMwpefj4d39AlEoEGVboItSjGNCIN0GXQgTHhMmcAfseT-H4SAidkEnYSkTFMMu6E9ebKmjiTW6Wq_effQ8U7V1y2i9eousi8a2vtgHO4UsvT7YvD3wdDV8HNzEo4fr28HlKFaY8DoWiCgtmORUFlJwwpQkOVRomueUYU5oksuCSsgIC98Qp4KmKKFQTguChSK4B07a3IWzr432dWZmXumylJW2jc8QR5TiMAYF2v9D57ZxVdjuS4XLUxbUaauUs947XWQLNzPSLTMEs8_yst_lBX60CW1yo6c_-LutAI5bYIzPKj03_-d8AHRJcsM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1816161857</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Whole Women’s Victory — or Not?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>New England Journal of Medicine</source><creator>Charo, R. Alta</creator><creatorcontrib>Charo, R. Alta</creatorcontrib><description>Facts about women's health won out over fiction in June, when the Supreme Court struck down Texas regulations aimed at closing abortion clinics. Will facts about human development be adequate to overcome fiction in the next front in the abortion wars: fetal pain?
Facts about women’s health won out over fiction in June, when the Supreme Court, even without examining the Texas legislature’s motives, struck down its regulations aimed at closing abortion clinics. Now the question is whether facts about human development will be adequate on their own to overcome fiction in what will probably be the next front in the abortion wars: fetal pain.
Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt
is a turning point in Supreme Court jurisprudence, not just because it turned the tide in the face of 300-plus abortion restrictions passed by state legislatures in the past 5 years alone.
1
It . . .</description><identifier>ISSN: 0028-4793</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-4406</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp1609167</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27579630</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Massachusetts Medical Society</publisher><subject>Abortion ; Abortion, Legal - legislation & jurisprudence ; Clinics ; Female ; Fetus - physiology ; Fetuses ; Ginsburg, Ruth Bader ; Health Services Accessibility - legislation & jurisprudence ; Humans ; Legislatures ; Pain ; Pain - physiopathology ; Partial Birth Abortion Ban Act 2003-US ; Reproductive Health - legislation & jurisprudence ; Supreme Court Decisions ; United States ; Women's Health - legislation & jurisprudence ; Women's Rights - legislation & jurisprudence ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>The New England journal of medicine, 2016-09, Vol.375 (9), p.809-811</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2016 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-914ce97a86afa9847ca4b0c1dbb6738462baf6a0747b0c0359651260adf439c43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-914ce97a86afa9847ca4b0c1dbb6738462baf6a0747b0c0359651260adf439c43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJMp1609167$$EPDF$$P50$$Gmms$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp1609167$$EHTML$$P50$$Gmms$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,2746,2747,26080,27901,27902,52357,54039</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27579630$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Charo, R. Alta</creatorcontrib><title>Whole Women’s Victory — or Not?</title><title>The New England journal of medicine</title><addtitle>N Engl J Med</addtitle><description>Facts about women's health won out over fiction in June, when the Supreme Court struck down Texas regulations aimed at closing abortion clinics. Will facts about human development be adequate to overcome fiction in the next front in the abortion wars: fetal pain?
Facts about women’s health won out over fiction in June, when the Supreme Court, even without examining the Texas legislature’s motives, struck down its regulations aimed at closing abortion clinics. Now the question is whether facts about human development will be adequate on their own to overcome fiction in what will probably be the next front in the abortion wars: fetal pain.
Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt
is a turning point in Supreme Court jurisprudence, not just because it turned the tide in the face of 300-plus abortion restrictions passed by state legislatures in the past 5 years alone.
1
It . . .</description><subject>Abortion</subject><subject>Abortion, Legal - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Clinics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fetus - physiology</subject><subject>Fetuses</subject><subject>Ginsburg, Ruth Bader</subject><subject>Health Services Accessibility - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Legislatures</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Pain - physiopathology</subject><subject>Partial Birth Abortion Ban Act 2003-US</subject><subject>Reproductive Health - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Supreme Court Decisions</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Women's Health - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Women's Rights - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>0028-4793</issn><issn>1533-4406</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpt0LtOwzAUBmALgWgpbMwoUhkYCNix48uEUFVuKmUBOkaO64hWcVzsZOjWh2Dh9fokGFIQQtiDJevTf45-AA4RPEMwpefj4d39AlEoEGVboItSjGNCIN0GXQgTHhMmcAfseT-H4SAidkEnYSkTFMMu6E9ebKmjiTW6Wq_effQ8U7V1y2i9eousi8a2vtgHO4UsvT7YvD3wdDV8HNzEo4fr28HlKFaY8DoWiCgtmORUFlJwwpQkOVRomueUYU5oksuCSsgIC98Qp4KmKKFQTguChSK4B07a3IWzr432dWZmXumylJW2jc8QR5TiMAYF2v9D57ZxVdjuS4XLUxbUaauUs947XWQLNzPSLTMEs8_yst_lBX60CW1yo6c_-LutAI5bYIzPKj03_-d8AHRJcsM</recordid><startdate>20160901</startdate><enddate>20160901</enddate><creator>Charo, R. Alta</creator><general>Massachusetts Medical Society</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0TZ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K0Y</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160901</creationdate><title>Whole Women’s Victory — or Not?</title><author>Charo, R. Alta</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-914ce97a86afa9847ca4b0c1dbb6738462baf6a0747b0c0359651260adf439c43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Abortion</topic><topic>Abortion, Legal - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Clinics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fetus - physiology</topic><topic>Fetuses</topic><topic>Ginsburg, Ruth Bader</topic><topic>Health Services Accessibility - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Legislatures</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Pain - physiopathology</topic><topic>Partial Birth Abortion Ban Act 2003-US</topic><topic>Reproductive Health - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Supreme Court Decisions</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Women's Health - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Women's Rights - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Charo, R. Alta</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Pharma and Biotech Premium PRO</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>New England Journal of Medicine</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The New England journal of medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Charo, R. Alta</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Whole Women’s Victory — or Not?</atitle><jtitle>The New England journal of medicine</jtitle><addtitle>N Engl J Med</addtitle><date>2016-09-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>375</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>809</spage><epage>811</epage><pages>809-811</pages><issn>0028-4793</issn><eissn>1533-4406</eissn><abstract>Facts about women's health won out over fiction in June, when the Supreme Court struck down Texas regulations aimed at closing abortion clinics. Will facts about human development be adequate to overcome fiction in the next front in the abortion wars: fetal pain?
Facts about women’s health won out over fiction in June, when the Supreme Court, even without examining the Texas legislature’s motives, struck down its regulations aimed at closing abortion clinics. Now the question is whether facts about human development will be adequate on their own to overcome fiction in what will probably be the next front in the abortion wars: fetal pain.
Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt
is a turning point in Supreme Court jurisprudence, not just because it turned the tide in the face of 300-plus abortion restrictions passed by state legislatures in the past 5 years alone.
1
It . . .</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Massachusetts Medical Society</pub><pmid>27579630</pmid><doi>10.1056/NEJMp1609167</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0028-4793 |
| ispartof | The New England journal of medicine, 2016-09, Vol.375 (9), p.809-811 |
| issn | 0028-4793 1533-4406 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1816639141 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; New England Journal of Medicine |
| subjects | Abortion Abortion, Legal - legislation & jurisprudence Clinics Female Fetus - physiology Fetuses Ginsburg, Ruth Bader Health Services Accessibility - legislation & jurisprudence Humans Legislatures Pain Pain - physiopathology Partial Birth Abortion Ban Act 2003-US Reproductive Health - legislation & jurisprudence Supreme Court Decisions United States Women's Health - legislation & jurisprudence Women's Rights - legislation & jurisprudence Womens health |
| title | Whole Women’s Victory — or Not? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T20%3A45%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Whole%20Women%E2%80%99s%20Victory%20%E2%80%94%20or%20Not?&rft.jtitle=The%20New%20England%20journal%20of%20medicine&rft.au=Charo,%20R.%20Alta&rft.date=2016-09-01&rft.volume=375&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=809&rft.epage=811&rft.pages=809-811&rft.issn=0028-4793&rft.eissn=1533-4406&rft_id=info:doi/10.1056/NEJMp1609167&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4168370401%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1816161857&rft_id=info:pmid/27579630&rfr_iscdi=true |