Lithium-sulfur batteries-the solution is in the electrolyte, but is the electrolyte a solution?

At first glance, the combination of the lightest, most electropositive metal (lithium) with a safe, abundant (and reasonably light) non-metal (sulfur) makes good sense as a prospective battery. However, while the lithium-sulfur battery offers a very high theoretical specific energy (∼2600 W h kg −1...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Energy & environmental science 2014-01, Vol.7 (12), p.392-392
Hauptverfasser: Barghamadi, Marzieh, Best, Adam S, Bhatt, Anand I, Hollenkamp, Anthony F, Musameh, Mustafa, Rees, Robert J, Rüther, Thomas
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 392
container_issue 12
container_start_page 392
container_title Energy & environmental science
container_volume 7
creator Barghamadi, Marzieh
Best, Adam S
Bhatt, Anand I
Hollenkamp, Anthony F
Musameh, Mustafa
Rees, Robert J
Rüther, Thomas
description At first glance, the combination of the lightest, most electropositive metal (lithium) with a safe, abundant (and reasonably light) non-metal (sulfur) makes good sense as a prospective battery. However, while the lithium-sulfur battery offers a very high theoretical specific energy (∼2600 W h kg −1 ) the actual performance delivered is proving to be severely limited-in many cases, this is directly related to the role of the electrolyte. The fundamental issue is that the reduction of sulfur proceeds through a series of polysulfide species, which are for the most part soluble in common organic solvents, including those employed in battery electrolyte solutions. So, despite the fact that the ultimate product (Li 2 S) is essentially insoluble, the intermediate stages of discharge see a migration of redox-active species out of the cathode, from where they can react with the lithium anode, which sets in train a series of equilibria that cause both a loss of charging efficiency and a gradual loss of discharge capacity. In the last decade, a major stream of the research to overcome this complex situation has focused on minimizing the solubility of polysulfides. From this we now have a range of media in which the lithium-sulfur system can operate with much improved charge-discharge characteristics: ionic liquids (and blends with organic media); super-saturated salt-solvent mixtures; polymer-gelled organic media; solid polymers; solid inorganic glasses. Underlining the multi-faceted nature of interactions within the lithium-sulfur cell, though, none of these improved electrolytes has been able to bring the performance of this system up to the levels of reliability and capacity maintenance (without sacrificing high specific energy) that are benchmarks in energy storage applications. Our survey indicates that only by combining particular electrolytes with cathode materials that are designed to actively retain sulfur and its reduction products, have a relatively few studies been able to obtain the desired levels of performance. Ultimately the successful development of the lithium-sulfur battery requires careful coordination of the choice of modified electrolyte with the specific nature of the cathode material, underpinned by the assumption that the resulting electrolyte composition will meet established criteria for compatibility with the lithium anode. Whether lithium-sulfur batteries succeed hinges largely on taming sulfur's complex electrochemistry, over which, choi
doi_str_mv 10.1039/c4ee02192d
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1816076182</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1816076182</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-64cf9366b745ffe84932ae48a4e08f1e502920e95e38b81adcce4e22057a8c463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkb1PwzAQxS0EEqWwsCOFDSECZ8dx7AlVpXxIlVhgthz3rBqlTbGdof89KYUiMcB0p_d-d8N7hJxSuKZQqBvLEYFRxWZ7ZECrkudlBWL_exeKHZKjGN8ABINKDYie-jT33SKPXeO6kNUmJQweY57mmMW26ZJvl5mPmV9mGwkbtCm0zTrhVVZ3aWP90jOzO7w9JgfONBFPvuaQvN5PXsaP-fT54Wk8muaWc5lywa1ThRB1xUvnUHJVMINcGo4gHcUSmGKAqsRC1pKambXIkTEoKyMtF8WQXGz_rkL73mFMeuGjxaYxS2y7qKmkAipBJfsfrRSook8TevRyi9rQxhjQ6VXwCxPWmoLeBK7HfDL5DPyuh8-2cIh2x_0U0vvnf_l6NXPFB3lAiKE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1790930390</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Lithium-sulfur batteries-the solution is in the electrolyte, but is the electrolyte a solution?</title><source>Royal Society Of Chemistry Journals 2008-</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Barghamadi, Marzieh ; Best, Adam S ; Bhatt, Anand I ; Hollenkamp, Anthony F ; Musameh, Mustafa ; Rees, Robert J ; Rüther, Thomas</creator><creatorcontrib>Barghamadi, Marzieh ; Best, Adam S ; Bhatt, Anand I ; Hollenkamp, Anthony F ; Musameh, Mustafa ; Rees, Robert J ; Rüther, Thomas</creatorcontrib><description>At first glance, the combination of the lightest, most electropositive metal (lithium) with a safe, abundant (and reasonably light) non-metal (sulfur) makes good sense as a prospective battery. However, while the lithium-sulfur battery offers a very high theoretical specific energy (∼2600 W h kg −1 ) the actual performance delivered is proving to be severely limited-in many cases, this is directly related to the role of the electrolyte. The fundamental issue is that the reduction of sulfur proceeds through a series of polysulfide species, which are for the most part soluble in common organic solvents, including those employed in battery electrolyte solutions. So, despite the fact that the ultimate product (Li 2 S) is essentially insoluble, the intermediate stages of discharge see a migration of redox-active species out of the cathode, from where they can react with the lithium anode, which sets in train a series of equilibria that cause both a loss of charging efficiency and a gradual loss of discharge capacity. In the last decade, a major stream of the research to overcome this complex situation has focused on minimizing the solubility of polysulfides. From this we now have a range of media in which the lithium-sulfur system can operate with much improved charge-discharge characteristics: ionic liquids (and blends with organic media); super-saturated salt-solvent mixtures; polymer-gelled organic media; solid polymers; solid inorganic glasses. Underlining the multi-faceted nature of interactions within the lithium-sulfur cell, though, none of these improved electrolytes has been able to bring the performance of this system up to the levels of reliability and capacity maintenance (without sacrificing high specific energy) that are benchmarks in energy storage applications. Our survey indicates that only by combining particular electrolytes with cathode materials that are designed to actively retain sulfur and its reduction products, have a relatively few studies been able to obtain the desired levels of performance. Ultimately the successful development of the lithium-sulfur battery requires careful coordination of the choice of modified electrolyte with the specific nature of the cathode material, underpinned by the assumption that the resulting electrolyte composition will meet established criteria for compatibility with the lithium anode. Whether lithium-sulfur batteries succeed hinges largely on taming sulfur's complex electrochemistry, over which, choice of electrolyte exerts an equally complex influence.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1754-5692</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1754-5706</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1039/c4ee02192d</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Cathodes ; Discharge ; Electrolytes ; Lithium ; Materials selection ; Media ; Reduction (electrolytic) ; Sulfur</subject><ispartof>Energy &amp; environmental science, 2014-01, Vol.7 (12), p.392-392</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-64cf9366b745ffe84932ae48a4e08f1e502920e95e38b81adcce4e22057a8c463</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-64cf9366b745ffe84932ae48a4e08f1e502920e95e38b81adcce4e22057a8c463</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Barghamadi, Marzieh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Best, Adam S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhatt, Anand I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hollenkamp, Anthony F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Musameh, Mustafa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rees, Robert J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rüther, Thomas</creatorcontrib><title>Lithium-sulfur batteries-the solution is in the electrolyte, but is the electrolyte a solution?</title><title>Energy &amp; environmental science</title><description>At first glance, the combination of the lightest, most electropositive metal (lithium) with a safe, abundant (and reasonably light) non-metal (sulfur) makes good sense as a prospective battery. However, while the lithium-sulfur battery offers a very high theoretical specific energy (∼2600 W h kg −1 ) the actual performance delivered is proving to be severely limited-in many cases, this is directly related to the role of the electrolyte. The fundamental issue is that the reduction of sulfur proceeds through a series of polysulfide species, which are for the most part soluble in common organic solvents, including those employed in battery electrolyte solutions. So, despite the fact that the ultimate product (Li 2 S) is essentially insoluble, the intermediate stages of discharge see a migration of redox-active species out of the cathode, from where they can react with the lithium anode, which sets in train a series of equilibria that cause both a loss of charging efficiency and a gradual loss of discharge capacity. In the last decade, a major stream of the research to overcome this complex situation has focused on minimizing the solubility of polysulfides. From this we now have a range of media in which the lithium-sulfur system can operate with much improved charge-discharge characteristics: ionic liquids (and blends with organic media); super-saturated salt-solvent mixtures; polymer-gelled organic media; solid polymers; solid inorganic glasses. Underlining the multi-faceted nature of interactions within the lithium-sulfur cell, though, none of these improved electrolytes has been able to bring the performance of this system up to the levels of reliability and capacity maintenance (without sacrificing high specific energy) that are benchmarks in energy storage applications. Our survey indicates that only by combining particular electrolytes with cathode materials that are designed to actively retain sulfur and its reduction products, have a relatively few studies been able to obtain the desired levels of performance. Ultimately the successful development of the lithium-sulfur battery requires careful coordination of the choice of modified electrolyte with the specific nature of the cathode material, underpinned by the assumption that the resulting electrolyte composition will meet established criteria for compatibility with the lithium anode. Whether lithium-sulfur batteries succeed hinges largely on taming sulfur's complex electrochemistry, over which, choice of electrolyte exerts an equally complex influence.</description><subject>Cathodes</subject><subject>Discharge</subject><subject>Electrolytes</subject><subject>Lithium</subject><subject>Materials selection</subject><subject>Media</subject><subject>Reduction (electrolytic)</subject><subject>Sulfur</subject><issn>1754-5692</issn><issn>1754-5706</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkb1PwzAQxS0EEqWwsCOFDSECZ8dx7AlVpXxIlVhgthz3rBqlTbGdof89KYUiMcB0p_d-d8N7hJxSuKZQqBvLEYFRxWZ7ZECrkudlBWL_exeKHZKjGN8ABINKDYie-jT33SKPXeO6kNUmJQweY57mmMW26ZJvl5mPmV9mGwkbtCm0zTrhVVZ3aWP90jOzO7w9JgfONBFPvuaQvN5PXsaP-fT54Wk8muaWc5lywa1ThRB1xUvnUHJVMINcGo4gHcUSmGKAqsRC1pKambXIkTEoKyMtF8WQXGz_rkL73mFMeuGjxaYxS2y7qKmkAipBJfsfrRSook8TevRyi9rQxhjQ6VXwCxPWmoLeBK7HfDL5DPyuh8-2cIh2x_0U0vvnf_l6NXPFB3lAiKE</recordid><startdate>20140101</startdate><enddate>20140101</enddate><creator>Barghamadi, Marzieh</creator><creator>Best, Adam S</creator><creator>Bhatt, Anand I</creator><creator>Hollenkamp, Anthony F</creator><creator>Musameh, Mustafa</creator><creator>Rees, Robert J</creator><creator>Rüther, Thomas</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140101</creationdate><title>Lithium-sulfur batteries-the solution is in the electrolyte, but is the electrolyte a solution?</title><author>Barghamadi, Marzieh ; Best, Adam S ; Bhatt, Anand I ; Hollenkamp, Anthony F ; Musameh, Mustafa ; Rees, Robert J ; Rüther, Thomas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-64cf9366b745ffe84932ae48a4e08f1e502920e95e38b81adcce4e22057a8c463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Cathodes</topic><topic>Discharge</topic><topic>Electrolytes</topic><topic>Lithium</topic><topic>Materials selection</topic><topic>Media</topic><topic>Reduction (electrolytic)</topic><topic>Sulfur</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Barghamadi, Marzieh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Best, Adam S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhatt, Anand I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hollenkamp, Anthony F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Musameh, Mustafa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rees, Robert J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rüther, Thomas</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Energy &amp; environmental science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Barghamadi, Marzieh</au><au>Best, Adam S</au><au>Bhatt, Anand I</au><au>Hollenkamp, Anthony F</au><au>Musameh, Mustafa</au><au>Rees, Robert J</au><au>Rüther, Thomas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Lithium-sulfur batteries-the solution is in the electrolyte, but is the electrolyte a solution?</atitle><jtitle>Energy &amp; environmental science</jtitle><date>2014-01-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>392</spage><epage>392</epage><pages>392-392</pages><issn>1754-5692</issn><eissn>1754-5706</eissn><abstract>At first glance, the combination of the lightest, most electropositive metal (lithium) with a safe, abundant (and reasonably light) non-metal (sulfur) makes good sense as a prospective battery. However, while the lithium-sulfur battery offers a very high theoretical specific energy (∼2600 W h kg −1 ) the actual performance delivered is proving to be severely limited-in many cases, this is directly related to the role of the electrolyte. The fundamental issue is that the reduction of sulfur proceeds through a series of polysulfide species, which are for the most part soluble in common organic solvents, including those employed in battery electrolyte solutions. So, despite the fact that the ultimate product (Li 2 S) is essentially insoluble, the intermediate stages of discharge see a migration of redox-active species out of the cathode, from where they can react with the lithium anode, which sets in train a series of equilibria that cause both a loss of charging efficiency and a gradual loss of discharge capacity. In the last decade, a major stream of the research to overcome this complex situation has focused on minimizing the solubility of polysulfides. From this we now have a range of media in which the lithium-sulfur system can operate with much improved charge-discharge characteristics: ionic liquids (and blends with organic media); super-saturated salt-solvent mixtures; polymer-gelled organic media; solid polymers; solid inorganic glasses. Underlining the multi-faceted nature of interactions within the lithium-sulfur cell, though, none of these improved electrolytes has been able to bring the performance of this system up to the levels of reliability and capacity maintenance (without sacrificing high specific energy) that are benchmarks in energy storage applications. Our survey indicates that only by combining particular electrolytes with cathode materials that are designed to actively retain sulfur and its reduction products, have a relatively few studies been able to obtain the desired levels of performance. Ultimately the successful development of the lithium-sulfur battery requires careful coordination of the choice of modified electrolyte with the specific nature of the cathode material, underpinned by the assumption that the resulting electrolyte composition will meet established criteria for compatibility with the lithium anode. Whether lithium-sulfur batteries succeed hinges largely on taming sulfur's complex electrochemistry, over which, choice of electrolyte exerts an equally complex influence.</abstract><doi>10.1039/c4ee02192d</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1754-5692
ispartof Energy & environmental science, 2014-01, Vol.7 (12), p.392-392
issn 1754-5692
1754-5706
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1816076182
source Royal Society Of Chemistry Journals 2008-; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Cathodes
Discharge
Electrolytes
Lithium
Materials selection
Media
Reduction (electrolytic)
Sulfur
title Lithium-sulfur batteries-the solution is in the electrolyte, but is the electrolyte a solution?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T02%3A51%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Lithium-sulfur%20batteries-the%20solution%20is%20in%20the%20electrolyte,%20but%20is%20the%20electrolyte%20a%20solution?&rft.jtitle=Energy%20&%20environmental%20science&rft.au=Barghamadi,%20Marzieh&rft.date=2014-01-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=392&rft.epage=392&rft.pages=392-392&rft.issn=1754-5692&rft.eissn=1754-5706&rft_id=info:doi/10.1039/c4ee02192d&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1816076182%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1790930390&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true