Additional terms for the use of Ffowcs Williams and Hawkings surface integrals in turbulent flows
•The use of the FWH surface integrals in turbulent flows is thoroughly analysed.•Additional terms are proposed to use FWH surface integrals in turbulent flows.•The efficacy of FWH additional surface terms is assessed for a turbulent jet. The paper aims to contribute to a clearer understanding of the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Computers & fluids 2015-10, Vol.120, p.158-172 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 172 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 158 |
container_title | Computers & fluids |
container_volume | 120 |
creator | Rahier, G. Huet, M. Prieur, J. |
description | •The use of the FWH surface integrals in turbulent flows is thoroughly analysed.•Additional terms are proposed to use FWH surface integrals in turbulent flows.•The efficacy of FWH additional surface terms is assessed for a turbulent jet.
The paper aims to contribute to a clearer understanding of the spurious noise generated in aeroacoustic computations by the flow turbulence passing through a Ffowcs Williams and Hawkings (FW-H) control surface, and to propose additional surface terms that can effectively reduce this spurious noise. To this end, expressions of FW-H surface and volume integrals are recalled as well as the link between both integrals. A thorough analysis of the pressure radiated by a vortex passing through a control surface is then conducted. This analysis confirms that this spurious noise is due to the fact that some volume sources are not taken into account in the calculations limited to surface integrations. It clearly shows the mechanism involved in the spurious radiated pressure. It also confirms that the FW-H formulation is much less sensitive to the flow turbulence on the control surface than the Kirchhoff method. In the second part of the paper, a new expression of additional surface terms, that can represent an approximation of the complementary volume integral, is rigorously developed starting from the original FW-H formulation. The efficacy of these additional flux terms is first evaluated for an isolated vortex before being assessed for a turbulent jet. The comparison of different approaches finally shows the advantages of using closed control surfaces together with these additional surface terms. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.compfluid.2015.07.014 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1816072285</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0045793015002480</els_id><sourcerecordid>1816072285</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-c991be5cc14c2eccd1881926ed8ec3f41396376f071010075d05242baa7b31833</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1PGzEQhi0EEoHyG_CRy27H69317jGKmoIUiQuoR8uxx-DgrFPb26j_HkepeuU0M3o_pHkIuWdQM2D9912tw_5g_exM3QDrahA1sPaCLNggxgpEKy7JAqDtKjFyuCY3Ke2g3LxpF0QtjXHZhUl5mjHuE7Uh0vyOdE5Ig6VrG4460V_Oe6eKrCZDH9Xxw01viaY5WqWRuinjW1Q-lY3mOW5nj1Om1odj-kaubFHw7t-8Ja_rHy-rx2rz_PNptdxUmrdDrvQ4si12WrNWN6i1YcPAxqZHM6DmtmV87LnoLYjyNYDoDHRN22yVElvOBs5vycO59xDD7xlTlnuXNHqvJgxzkmxgPYimGbpiFWerjiGliFYeotur-FcykCeocif_Q5UnqBKELFBLcnlOYvnkj8Mok3Y4aTQuos7SBPdlxydqIoU-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1816072285</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Additional terms for the use of Ffowcs Williams and Hawkings surface integrals in turbulent flows</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Rahier, G. ; Huet, M. ; Prieur, J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rahier, G. ; Huet, M. ; Prieur, J.</creatorcontrib><description>•The use of the FWH surface integrals in turbulent flows is thoroughly analysed.•Additional terms are proposed to use FWH surface integrals in turbulent flows.•The efficacy of FWH additional surface terms is assessed for a turbulent jet.
The paper aims to contribute to a clearer understanding of the spurious noise generated in aeroacoustic computations by the flow turbulence passing through a Ffowcs Williams and Hawkings (FW-H) control surface, and to propose additional surface terms that can effectively reduce this spurious noise. To this end, expressions of FW-H surface and volume integrals are recalled as well as the link between both integrals. A thorough analysis of the pressure radiated by a vortex passing through a control surface is then conducted. This analysis confirms that this spurious noise is due to the fact that some volume sources are not taken into account in the calculations limited to surface integrations. It clearly shows the mechanism involved in the spurious radiated pressure. It also confirms that the FW-H formulation is much less sensitive to the flow turbulence on the control surface than the Kirchhoff method. In the second part of the paper, a new expression of additional surface terms, that can represent an approximation of the complementary volume integral, is rigorously developed starting from the original FW-H formulation. The efficacy of these additional flux terms is first evaluated for an isolated vortex before being assessed for a turbulent jet. The comparison of different approaches finally shows the advantages of using closed control surfaces together with these additional surface terms.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0045-7930</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0747</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2015.07.014</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Acoustic integral methods ; Computational aeroacoustics ; Computational fluid dynamics ; Control surfaces ; Ffowcs Williams–Hawkings ; Fluid flow ; Integrals ; Jet noise ; Mathematical analysis ; Noise ; Turbulence ; Turbulent flow</subject><ispartof>Computers & fluids, 2015-10, Vol.120, p.158-172</ispartof><rights>2015 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-c991be5cc14c2eccd1881926ed8ec3f41396376f071010075d05242baa7b31833</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-c991be5cc14c2eccd1881926ed8ec3f41396376f071010075d05242baa7b31833</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2015.07.014$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,45974</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rahier, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huet, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prieur, J.</creatorcontrib><title>Additional terms for the use of Ffowcs Williams and Hawkings surface integrals in turbulent flows</title><title>Computers & fluids</title><description>•The use of the FWH surface integrals in turbulent flows is thoroughly analysed.•Additional terms are proposed to use FWH surface integrals in turbulent flows.•The efficacy of FWH additional surface terms is assessed for a turbulent jet.
The paper aims to contribute to a clearer understanding of the spurious noise generated in aeroacoustic computations by the flow turbulence passing through a Ffowcs Williams and Hawkings (FW-H) control surface, and to propose additional surface terms that can effectively reduce this spurious noise. To this end, expressions of FW-H surface and volume integrals are recalled as well as the link between both integrals. A thorough analysis of the pressure radiated by a vortex passing through a control surface is then conducted. This analysis confirms that this spurious noise is due to the fact that some volume sources are not taken into account in the calculations limited to surface integrations. It clearly shows the mechanism involved in the spurious radiated pressure. It also confirms that the FW-H formulation is much less sensitive to the flow turbulence on the control surface than the Kirchhoff method. In the second part of the paper, a new expression of additional surface terms, that can represent an approximation of the complementary volume integral, is rigorously developed starting from the original FW-H formulation. The efficacy of these additional flux terms is first evaluated for an isolated vortex before being assessed for a turbulent jet. The comparison of different approaches finally shows the advantages of using closed control surfaces together with these additional surface terms.</description><subject>Acoustic integral methods</subject><subject>Computational aeroacoustics</subject><subject>Computational fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Control surfaces</subject><subject>Ffowcs Williams–Hawkings</subject><subject>Fluid flow</subject><subject>Integrals</subject><subject>Jet noise</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Noise</subject><subject>Turbulence</subject><subject>Turbulent flow</subject><issn>0045-7930</issn><issn>1879-0747</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1PGzEQhi0EEoHyG_CRy27H69317jGKmoIUiQuoR8uxx-DgrFPb26j_HkepeuU0M3o_pHkIuWdQM2D9912tw_5g_exM3QDrahA1sPaCLNggxgpEKy7JAqDtKjFyuCY3Ke2g3LxpF0QtjXHZhUl5mjHuE7Uh0vyOdE5Ig6VrG4460V_Oe6eKrCZDH9Xxw01viaY5WqWRuinjW1Q-lY3mOW5nj1Om1odj-kaubFHw7t-8Ja_rHy-rx2rz_PNptdxUmrdDrvQ4si12WrNWN6i1YcPAxqZHM6DmtmV87LnoLYjyNYDoDHRN22yVElvOBs5vycO59xDD7xlTlnuXNHqvJgxzkmxgPYimGbpiFWerjiGliFYeotur-FcykCeocif_Q5UnqBKELFBLcnlOYvnkj8Mok3Y4aTQuos7SBPdlxydqIoU-</recordid><startdate>20151005</startdate><enddate>20151005</enddate><creator>Rahier, G.</creator><creator>Huet, M.</creator><creator>Prieur, J.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151005</creationdate><title>Additional terms for the use of Ffowcs Williams and Hawkings surface integrals in turbulent flows</title><author>Rahier, G. ; Huet, M. ; Prieur, J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-c991be5cc14c2eccd1881926ed8ec3f41396376f071010075d05242baa7b31833</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Acoustic integral methods</topic><topic>Computational aeroacoustics</topic><topic>Computational fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Control surfaces</topic><topic>Ffowcs Williams–Hawkings</topic><topic>Fluid flow</topic><topic>Integrals</topic><topic>Jet noise</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Noise</topic><topic>Turbulence</topic><topic>Turbulent flow</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rahier, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huet, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prieur, J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Computers & fluids</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rahier, G.</au><au>Huet, M.</au><au>Prieur, J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Additional terms for the use of Ffowcs Williams and Hawkings surface integrals in turbulent flows</atitle><jtitle>Computers & fluids</jtitle><date>2015-10-05</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>120</volume><spage>158</spage><epage>172</epage><pages>158-172</pages><issn>0045-7930</issn><eissn>1879-0747</eissn><abstract>•The use of the FWH surface integrals in turbulent flows is thoroughly analysed.•Additional terms are proposed to use FWH surface integrals in turbulent flows.•The efficacy of FWH additional surface terms is assessed for a turbulent jet.
The paper aims to contribute to a clearer understanding of the spurious noise generated in aeroacoustic computations by the flow turbulence passing through a Ffowcs Williams and Hawkings (FW-H) control surface, and to propose additional surface terms that can effectively reduce this spurious noise. To this end, expressions of FW-H surface and volume integrals are recalled as well as the link between both integrals. A thorough analysis of the pressure radiated by a vortex passing through a control surface is then conducted. This analysis confirms that this spurious noise is due to the fact that some volume sources are not taken into account in the calculations limited to surface integrations. It clearly shows the mechanism involved in the spurious radiated pressure. It also confirms that the FW-H formulation is much less sensitive to the flow turbulence on the control surface than the Kirchhoff method. In the second part of the paper, a new expression of additional surface terms, that can represent an approximation of the complementary volume integral, is rigorously developed starting from the original FW-H formulation. The efficacy of these additional flux terms is first evaluated for an isolated vortex before being assessed for a turbulent jet. The comparison of different approaches finally shows the advantages of using closed control surfaces together with these additional surface terms.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.compfluid.2015.07.014</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0045-7930 |
ispartof | Computers & fluids, 2015-10, Vol.120, p.158-172 |
issn | 0045-7930 1879-0747 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1816072285 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Acoustic integral methods Computational aeroacoustics Computational fluid dynamics Control surfaces Ffowcs Williams–Hawkings Fluid flow Integrals Jet noise Mathematical analysis Noise Turbulence Turbulent flow |
title | Additional terms for the use of Ffowcs Williams and Hawkings surface integrals in turbulent flows |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T04%3A18%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Additional%20terms%20for%20the%20use%20of%20Ffowcs%20Williams%20and%20Hawkings%20surface%20integrals%20in%20turbulent%20flows&rft.jtitle=Computers%20&%20fluids&rft.au=Rahier,%20G.&rft.date=2015-10-05&rft.volume=120&rft.spage=158&rft.epage=172&rft.pages=158-172&rft.issn=0045-7930&rft.eissn=1879-0747&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.compfluid.2015.07.014&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1816072285%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1816072285&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0045793015002480&rfr_iscdi=true |