Thermodynamic and exergoeconomic analysis of biogas fed solid oxide fuel cell power plants emphasizing on anode and cathode recycling: A comparative study

•Four biogas-fed solid oxide fuel cell power plants are proposed.•Performance of systems is compared with each other economically.•Efficiency of biogas fed fuel cell with anode–cathode recycling is the highest.•For current density of 6000A/m2 the optimum anode recycle ratio is around 0.25.•Unit prod...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Energy conversion and management 2015-11, Vol.105, p.596-606
Hauptverfasser: Mehr, A.S., Mahmoudi, S.M.S., Yari, M., Chitsaz, A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 606
container_issue
container_start_page 596
container_title Energy conversion and management
container_volume 105
creator Mehr, A.S.
Mahmoudi, S.M.S.
Yari, M.
Chitsaz, A.
description •Four biogas-fed solid oxide fuel cell power plants are proposed.•Performance of systems is compared with each other economically.•Efficiency of biogas fed fuel cell with anode–cathode recycling is the highest.•For current density of 6000A/m2 the optimum anode recycle ratio is around 0.25.•Unit product cost of biogas fed fuel cell with anode–cathode recycling is 19.07$/GJ. Four different configurations of natural gas and biogas fed solid oxide fuel cell are proposed and analyzed thermoeconomically, focusing on the influence of anode and/or cathode gas recycling. It is observed that the net output power is maximized at an optimum current density the value of which is lowered as the methane concentration in the biogas is decreased. Results indicate that when the current density is low, there is an optimum anode recycling ratio at which the thermal efficiency is maximized. In addition, an increase in the anode recycling ratio increases the unit product cost of the system while an increase in the cathode recycling ratio has a revers effect. For the same working conditions, the solid oxide fuel cell with anode and cathode recycling is superior to the other configurations and its thermal efficiency is calculated as 46.09% being 6.81% higher than that of the simple solid oxide fuel cell fed by natural gas. The unit product cost of the solid oxide fuel cell-anode and cathode recycling system is calculated as 19.07$/GJ which is about 35% lower than the corresponding value for the simple natural gas fed solid oxide fuel cell system.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.enconman.2015.07.085
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1816051747</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S019689041500744X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1816051747</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-dd1376d359e47e3bb3e8fd48a3a109e0228cba3afad1fc1a8f8ad1711f1ff8ed3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc9u3CAQxlGVSt2kfYWKYy92B_8D95QoStJKkXJJz4iFYZeVDQ54k7iP0qct1jbnnPgYfvONho-QrwxKBqz7fijR6-BH5csKWFsCL0G0H8iGCd4XVVXxM7IB1neF6KH5RM5TOgBA3UK3IX8f9xjHYBavRqep8obiK8ZdwGwZTiU1LMklGizdurBTiVo0NIXBGRpenUFqjzhQjcNAp_CCkU6D8nOiOE57ldwf53c0-GwUMrtO0GrerzqiXvSQn3_QK6rDOKmoZveMNM1Hs3wmH60aEn75f16Q37c3j9c_i_uHu1_XV_eFbkQ7F8awmnembntsONbbbY3CmkaoWjHoEapK6G2-WGWY1UwJK7LijFlmrUBTX5BvJ98phqcjplmOLq3bKI_hmCQTrIOW8Ya_j_Ieel63bZfR7oTqGFKKaOUU3ajiIhnINTd5kG-5yTU3CVzm3HLj5akR887PDqNM2mUSjcv_NUsT3HsW_wBYX6lZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1790973556</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Thermodynamic and exergoeconomic analysis of biogas fed solid oxide fuel cell power plants emphasizing on anode and cathode recycling: A comparative study</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Mehr, A.S. ; Mahmoudi, S.M.S. ; Yari, M. ; Chitsaz, A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mehr, A.S. ; Mahmoudi, S.M.S. ; Yari, M. ; Chitsaz, A.</creatorcontrib><description>•Four biogas-fed solid oxide fuel cell power plants are proposed.•Performance of systems is compared with each other economically.•Efficiency of biogas fed fuel cell with anode–cathode recycling is the highest.•For current density of 6000A/m2 the optimum anode recycle ratio is around 0.25.•Unit product cost of biogas fed fuel cell with anode–cathode recycling is 19.07$/GJ. Four different configurations of natural gas and biogas fed solid oxide fuel cell are proposed and analyzed thermoeconomically, focusing on the influence of anode and/or cathode gas recycling. It is observed that the net output power is maximized at an optimum current density the value of which is lowered as the methane concentration in the biogas is decreased. Results indicate that when the current density is low, there is an optimum anode recycling ratio at which the thermal efficiency is maximized. In addition, an increase in the anode recycling ratio increases the unit product cost of the system while an increase in the cathode recycling ratio has a revers effect. For the same working conditions, the solid oxide fuel cell with anode and cathode recycling is superior to the other configurations and its thermal efficiency is calculated as 46.09% being 6.81% higher than that of the simple solid oxide fuel cell fed by natural gas. The unit product cost of the solid oxide fuel cell-anode and cathode recycling system is calculated as 19.07$/GJ which is about 35% lower than the corresponding value for the simple natural gas fed solid oxide fuel cell system.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0196-8904</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2227</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2015.07.085</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Anodes ; Biogas ; Cathodes ; Comparative study ; Current density ; Exergoeconomic ; Mathematical analysis ; Natural gas ; Recycling ; SOFC ; Solid oxide fuel cells ; Unit product cost</subject><ispartof>Energy conversion and management, 2015-11, Vol.105, p.596-606</ispartof><rights>2015 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-dd1376d359e47e3bb3e8fd48a3a109e0228cba3afad1fc1a8f8ad1711f1ff8ed3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-dd1376d359e47e3bb3e8fd48a3a109e0228cba3afad1fc1a8f8ad1711f1ff8ed3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S019689041500744X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mehr, A.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahmoudi, S.M.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yari, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chitsaz, A.</creatorcontrib><title>Thermodynamic and exergoeconomic analysis of biogas fed solid oxide fuel cell power plants emphasizing on anode and cathode recycling: A comparative study</title><title>Energy conversion and management</title><description>•Four biogas-fed solid oxide fuel cell power plants are proposed.•Performance of systems is compared with each other economically.•Efficiency of biogas fed fuel cell with anode–cathode recycling is the highest.•For current density of 6000A/m2 the optimum anode recycle ratio is around 0.25.•Unit product cost of biogas fed fuel cell with anode–cathode recycling is 19.07$/GJ. Four different configurations of natural gas and biogas fed solid oxide fuel cell are proposed and analyzed thermoeconomically, focusing on the influence of anode and/or cathode gas recycling. It is observed that the net output power is maximized at an optimum current density the value of which is lowered as the methane concentration in the biogas is decreased. Results indicate that when the current density is low, there is an optimum anode recycling ratio at which the thermal efficiency is maximized. In addition, an increase in the anode recycling ratio increases the unit product cost of the system while an increase in the cathode recycling ratio has a revers effect. For the same working conditions, the solid oxide fuel cell with anode and cathode recycling is superior to the other configurations and its thermal efficiency is calculated as 46.09% being 6.81% higher than that of the simple solid oxide fuel cell fed by natural gas. The unit product cost of the solid oxide fuel cell-anode and cathode recycling system is calculated as 19.07$/GJ which is about 35% lower than the corresponding value for the simple natural gas fed solid oxide fuel cell system.</description><subject>Anodes</subject><subject>Biogas</subject><subject>Cathodes</subject><subject>Comparative study</subject><subject>Current density</subject><subject>Exergoeconomic</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Natural gas</subject><subject>Recycling</subject><subject>SOFC</subject><subject>Solid oxide fuel cells</subject><subject>Unit product cost</subject><issn>0196-8904</issn><issn>1879-2227</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkc9u3CAQxlGVSt2kfYWKYy92B_8D95QoStJKkXJJz4iFYZeVDQ54k7iP0qct1jbnnPgYfvONho-QrwxKBqz7fijR6-BH5csKWFsCL0G0H8iGCd4XVVXxM7IB1neF6KH5RM5TOgBA3UK3IX8f9xjHYBavRqep8obiK8ZdwGwZTiU1LMklGizdurBTiVo0NIXBGRpenUFqjzhQjcNAp_CCkU6D8nOiOE57ldwf53c0-GwUMrtO0GrerzqiXvSQn3_QK6rDOKmoZveMNM1Hs3wmH60aEn75f16Q37c3j9c_i_uHu1_XV_eFbkQ7F8awmnembntsONbbbY3CmkaoWjHoEapK6G2-WGWY1UwJK7LijFlmrUBTX5BvJ98phqcjplmOLq3bKI_hmCQTrIOW8Ya_j_Ieel63bZfR7oTqGFKKaOUU3ajiIhnINTd5kG-5yTU3CVzm3HLj5akR887PDqNM2mUSjcv_NUsT3HsW_wBYX6lZ</recordid><startdate>20151101</startdate><enddate>20151101</enddate><creator>Mehr, A.S.</creator><creator>Mahmoudi, S.M.S.</creator><creator>Yari, M.</creator><creator>Chitsaz, A.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151101</creationdate><title>Thermodynamic and exergoeconomic analysis of biogas fed solid oxide fuel cell power plants emphasizing on anode and cathode recycling: A comparative study</title><author>Mehr, A.S. ; Mahmoudi, S.M.S. ; Yari, M. ; Chitsaz, A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-dd1376d359e47e3bb3e8fd48a3a109e0228cba3afad1fc1a8f8ad1711f1ff8ed3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Anodes</topic><topic>Biogas</topic><topic>Cathodes</topic><topic>Comparative study</topic><topic>Current density</topic><topic>Exergoeconomic</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Natural gas</topic><topic>Recycling</topic><topic>SOFC</topic><topic>Solid oxide fuel cells</topic><topic>Unit product cost</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mehr, A.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahmoudi, S.M.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yari, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chitsaz, A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Energy conversion and management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mehr, A.S.</au><au>Mahmoudi, S.M.S.</au><au>Yari, M.</au><au>Chitsaz, A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Thermodynamic and exergoeconomic analysis of biogas fed solid oxide fuel cell power plants emphasizing on anode and cathode recycling: A comparative study</atitle><jtitle>Energy conversion and management</jtitle><date>2015-11-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>105</volume><spage>596</spage><epage>606</epage><pages>596-606</pages><issn>0196-8904</issn><eissn>1879-2227</eissn><abstract>•Four biogas-fed solid oxide fuel cell power plants are proposed.•Performance of systems is compared with each other economically.•Efficiency of biogas fed fuel cell with anode–cathode recycling is the highest.•For current density of 6000A/m2 the optimum anode recycle ratio is around 0.25.•Unit product cost of biogas fed fuel cell with anode–cathode recycling is 19.07$/GJ. Four different configurations of natural gas and biogas fed solid oxide fuel cell are proposed and analyzed thermoeconomically, focusing on the influence of anode and/or cathode gas recycling. It is observed that the net output power is maximized at an optimum current density the value of which is lowered as the methane concentration in the biogas is decreased. Results indicate that when the current density is low, there is an optimum anode recycling ratio at which the thermal efficiency is maximized. In addition, an increase in the anode recycling ratio increases the unit product cost of the system while an increase in the cathode recycling ratio has a revers effect. For the same working conditions, the solid oxide fuel cell with anode and cathode recycling is superior to the other configurations and its thermal efficiency is calculated as 46.09% being 6.81% higher than that of the simple solid oxide fuel cell fed by natural gas. The unit product cost of the solid oxide fuel cell-anode and cathode recycling system is calculated as 19.07$/GJ which is about 35% lower than the corresponding value for the simple natural gas fed solid oxide fuel cell system.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.enconman.2015.07.085</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0196-8904
ispartof Energy conversion and management, 2015-11, Vol.105, p.596-606
issn 0196-8904
1879-2227
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1816051747
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Anodes
Biogas
Cathodes
Comparative study
Current density
Exergoeconomic
Mathematical analysis
Natural gas
Recycling
SOFC
Solid oxide fuel cells
Unit product cost
title Thermodynamic and exergoeconomic analysis of biogas fed solid oxide fuel cell power plants emphasizing on anode and cathode recycling: A comparative study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T23%3A06%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Thermodynamic%20and%20exergoeconomic%20analysis%20of%20biogas%20fed%20solid%20oxide%20fuel%20cell%20power%20plants%20emphasizing%20on%20anode%20and%20cathode%20recycling:%20A%20comparative%20study&rft.jtitle=Energy%20conversion%20and%20management&rft.au=Mehr,%20A.S.&rft.date=2015-11-01&rft.volume=105&rft.spage=596&rft.epage=606&rft.pages=596-606&rft.issn=0196-8904&rft.eissn=1879-2227&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.enconman.2015.07.085&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1816051747%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1790973556&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S019689041500744X&rfr_iscdi=true