Estimation of explosion loading on small and medium sized equipment from CFD simulations

Explosion studies for design purposes are performed on daily basis among safety consultants all over the world. For oil and gas facilities offshore, and often onshore, the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) tool FLACS is usually applied, while others use simple blast curve formulations, like the TNO...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of loss prevention in the process industries 2016-05, Vol.41, p.382-398
Hauptverfasser: Hansen, Olav R., Kjellander, Malte T., Martini, Remi, Pappas, Jan A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 398
container_issue
container_start_page 382
container_title Journal of loss prevention in the process industries
container_volume 41
creator Hansen, Olav R.
Kjellander, Malte T.
Martini, Remi
Pappas, Jan A.
description Explosion studies for design purposes are performed on daily basis among safety consultants all over the world. For oil and gas facilities offshore, and often onshore, the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) tool FLACS is usually applied, while others use simple blast curve formulations, like the TNO-Multi Energy Method. The purpose of the explosion studies is usually to give guidance on required design strength of equipment, piping, blast walls or buildings during design, or to verify a chosen design. One key element is to translate the results from an explosion simulation into actual forces on equipment. For CFD studies loads on large objects can usually be well estimated by reporting differential pressures across the objects. For objects with key dimensions less than 2–3 grid cells (typically ∼1m-2m), and in particular less than one grid cell, this approach is not feasible. Industry guidance exists on how to estimate explosion loads on piping and smaller equipment using a drag force formulation. This study demonstrates how the current guidance may lead to too low predicted explosion loads onto equipment. More precise methods for load prediction onto piping, small and medium sized equipment are thereafter proposed and evaluated. •Evaluation of explosion load estimation methods from CFD for equipment.•Proposed method for improved load estimates based on drag and pressure gradient.•Better precision of explosion loads onto pipes and equipment in near and far field.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jlp.2015.12.004
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1816018161</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S095042301530084X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1816018161</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-9b0c3fd0d852353829bf1ed17b72e7aad1fd4d19caa5faf6483c6439e00e66993</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtu1TAQhi0EEoeWB2BniQ2bpDNxbhYrdGgLUiU2RWJn-dhj5CiJUztB0Kevw2HFopu5aP5_NPMx9g6hRMD2aiiHcSkrwKbEqgSoX7AD9p0ohGiql-wAsoGirgS8Zm9SGgCwg747sB_XafWTXn2YeXCcfi9jSHszBm39_JPnMk16HLmeLZ_I-m3iyT-S5fSw-WWieeUuhokfbz7nwbSNf5elS_bK6THR23_5gn2_ub4_finuvt1-PX66K0wN7VrIExjhLNi-qUQj-kqeHJLF7tRV1Glt0dnaojRaN067tu6FaWshCYDaVkpxwT6c9y4xPGyUVjX5ZGgc9UxhSwp7bGEPmKXv_5MOYYtzvk5hJ4XMdHBX4VllYkgpklNLzITiH4WgdtZqUJm12lkrrFRmnT0fzx7Kn_7yFFUynmaTcUUyq7LBP-N-ArMZhwk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1793923011</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Estimation of explosion loading on small and medium sized equipment from CFD simulations</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Hansen, Olav R. ; Kjellander, Malte T. ; Martini, Remi ; Pappas, Jan A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hansen, Olav R. ; Kjellander, Malte T. ; Martini, Remi ; Pappas, Jan A.</creatorcontrib><description>Explosion studies for design purposes are performed on daily basis among safety consultants all over the world. For oil and gas facilities offshore, and often onshore, the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) tool FLACS is usually applied, while others use simple blast curve formulations, like the TNO-Multi Energy Method. The purpose of the explosion studies is usually to give guidance on required design strength of equipment, piping, blast walls or buildings during design, or to verify a chosen design. One key element is to translate the results from an explosion simulation into actual forces on equipment. For CFD studies loads on large objects can usually be well estimated by reporting differential pressures across the objects. For objects with key dimensions less than 2–3 grid cells (typically ∼1m-2m), and in particular less than one grid cell, this approach is not feasible. Industry guidance exists on how to estimate explosion loads on piping and smaller equipment using a drag force formulation. This study demonstrates how the current guidance may lead to too low predicted explosion loads onto equipment. More precise methods for load prediction onto piping, small and medium sized equipment are thereafter proposed and evaluated. •Evaluation of explosion load estimation methods from CFD for equipment.•Proposed method for improved load estimates based on drag and pressure gradient.•Better precision of explosion loads onto pipes and equipment in near and far field.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0950-4230</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-3352</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2015.12.004</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>CFD explosion modeling ; Computational fluid dynamics ; Computer simulation ; Design engineering ; Drag ; Estimating techniques ; Explosion loading ; Explosions ; FLACS ; Fluid dynamics ; Formulations ; Loads (forces) ; Mathematical models ; Piping ; Pressure ; Simulation</subject><ispartof>Journal of loss prevention in the process industries, 2016-05, Vol.41, p.382-398</ispartof><rights>2015 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. May 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-9b0c3fd0d852353829bf1ed17b72e7aad1fd4d19caa5faf6483c6439e00e66993</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-9b0c3fd0d852353829bf1ed17b72e7aad1fd4d19caa5faf6483c6439e00e66993</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2997-1519</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2015.12.004$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27929,27930,46000</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hansen, Olav R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kjellander, Malte T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martini, Remi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pappas, Jan A.</creatorcontrib><title>Estimation of explosion loading on small and medium sized equipment from CFD simulations</title><title>Journal of loss prevention in the process industries</title><description>Explosion studies for design purposes are performed on daily basis among safety consultants all over the world. For oil and gas facilities offshore, and often onshore, the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) tool FLACS is usually applied, while others use simple blast curve formulations, like the TNO-Multi Energy Method. The purpose of the explosion studies is usually to give guidance on required design strength of equipment, piping, blast walls or buildings during design, or to verify a chosen design. One key element is to translate the results from an explosion simulation into actual forces on equipment. For CFD studies loads on large objects can usually be well estimated by reporting differential pressures across the objects. For objects with key dimensions less than 2–3 grid cells (typically ∼1m-2m), and in particular less than one grid cell, this approach is not feasible. Industry guidance exists on how to estimate explosion loads on piping and smaller equipment using a drag force formulation. This study demonstrates how the current guidance may lead to too low predicted explosion loads onto equipment. More precise methods for load prediction onto piping, small and medium sized equipment are thereafter proposed and evaluated. •Evaluation of explosion load estimation methods from CFD for equipment.•Proposed method for improved load estimates based on drag and pressure gradient.•Better precision of explosion loads onto pipes and equipment in near and far field.</description><subject>CFD explosion modeling</subject><subject>Computational fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Design engineering</subject><subject>Drag</subject><subject>Estimating techniques</subject><subject>Explosion loading</subject><subject>Explosions</subject><subject>FLACS</subject><subject>Fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Formulations</subject><subject>Loads (forces)</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Piping</subject><subject>Pressure</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><issn>0950-4230</issn><issn>1873-3352</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtu1TAQhi0EEoeWB2BniQ2bpDNxbhYrdGgLUiU2RWJn-dhj5CiJUztB0Kevw2HFopu5aP5_NPMx9g6hRMD2aiiHcSkrwKbEqgSoX7AD9p0ohGiql-wAsoGirgS8Zm9SGgCwg747sB_XafWTXn2YeXCcfi9jSHszBm39_JPnMk16HLmeLZ_I-m3iyT-S5fSw-WWieeUuhokfbz7nwbSNf5elS_bK6THR23_5gn2_ub4_finuvt1-PX66K0wN7VrIExjhLNi-qUQj-kqeHJLF7tRV1Glt0dnaojRaN067tu6FaWshCYDaVkpxwT6c9y4xPGyUVjX5ZGgc9UxhSwp7bGEPmKXv_5MOYYtzvk5hJ4XMdHBX4VllYkgpklNLzITiH4WgdtZqUJm12lkrrFRmnT0fzx7Kn_7yFFUynmaTcUUyq7LBP-N-ArMZhwk</recordid><startdate>20160501</startdate><enddate>20160501</enddate><creator>Hansen, Olav R.</creator><creator>Kjellander, Malte T.</creator><creator>Martini, Remi</creator><creator>Pappas, Jan A.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2997-1519</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20160501</creationdate><title>Estimation of explosion loading on small and medium sized equipment from CFD simulations</title><author>Hansen, Olav R. ; Kjellander, Malte T. ; Martini, Remi ; Pappas, Jan A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c406t-9b0c3fd0d852353829bf1ed17b72e7aad1fd4d19caa5faf6483c6439e00e66993</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>CFD explosion modeling</topic><topic>Computational fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Design engineering</topic><topic>Drag</topic><topic>Estimating techniques</topic><topic>Explosion loading</topic><topic>Explosions</topic><topic>FLACS</topic><topic>Fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Formulations</topic><topic>Loads (forces)</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Piping</topic><topic>Pressure</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hansen, Olav R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kjellander, Malte T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martini, Remi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pappas, Jan A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>Journal of loss prevention in the process industries</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hansen, Olav R.</au><au>Kjellander, Malte T.</au><au>Martini, Remi</au><au>Pappas, Jan A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Estimation of explosion loading on small and medium sized equipment from CFD simulations</atitle><jtitle>Journal of loss prevention in the process industries</jtitle><date>2016-05-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>41</volume><spage>382</spage><epage>398</epage><pages>382-398</pages><issn>0950-4230</issn><eissn>1873-3352</eissn><abstract>Explosion studies for design purposes are performed on daily basis among safety consultants all over the world. For oil and gas facilities offshore, and often onshore, the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) tool FLACS is usually applied, while others use simple blast curve formulations, like the TNO-Multi Energy Method. The purpose of the explosion studies is usually to give guidance on required design strength of equipment, piping, blast walls or buildings during design, or to verify a chosen design. One key element is to translate the results from an explosion simulation into actual forces on equipment. For CFD studies loads on large objects can usually be well estimated by reporting differential pressures across the objects. For objects with key dimensions less than 2–3 grid cells (typically ∼1m-2m), and in particular less than one grid cell, this approach is not feasible. Industry guidance exists on how to estimate explosion loads on piping and smaller equipment using a drag force formulation. This study demonstrates how the current guidance may lead to too low predicted explosion loads onto equipment. More precise methods for load prediction onto piping, small and medium sized equipment are thereafter proposed and evaluated. •Evaluation of explosion load estimation methods from CFD for equipment.•Proposed method for improved load estimates based on drag and pressure gradient.•Better precision of explosion loads onto pipes and equipment in near and far field.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jlp.2015.12.004</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2997-1519</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0950-4230
ispartof Journal of loss prevention in the process industries, 2016-05, Vol.41, p.382-398
issn 0950-4230
1873-3352
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1816018161
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects CFD explosion modeling
Computational fluid dynamics
Computer simulation
Design engineering
Drag
Estimating techniques
Explosion loading
Explosions
FLACS
Fluid dynamics
Formulations
Loads (forces)
Mathematical models
Piping
Pressure
Simulation
title Estimation of explosion loading on small and medium sized equipment from CFD simulations
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T22%3A06%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Estimation%20of%20explosion%20loading%20on%20small%20and%20medium%20sized%20equipment%20from%20CFD%20simulations&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20loss%20prevention%20in%20the%20process%20industries&rft.au=Hansen,%20Olav%20R.&rft.date=2016-05-01&rft.volume=41&rft.spage=382&rft.epage=398&rft.pages=382-398&rft.issn=0950-4230&rft.eissn=1873-3352&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jlp.2015.12.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1816018161%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1793923011&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S095042301530084X&rfr_iscdi=true